From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Brost, Matthew" <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: "Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
"De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/xe: Do not forward invalid TLB invalidation seqnos to upper layers
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 22:05:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f24c5e38256edad7efd007d45620b72e5e1c1ab.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251104195616.3339137-7-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On Tue, 2025-11-04 at 11:56 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Context-based TLB invalidations send multiple H2G messages per seqno,
> with only the final H2G containing a valid seqno — the others carry
> an
> invalid seqno. The G2H handler drops these invalid seqnos to avoid
> prematurely signaling a TLB invalidation fence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> index 61bfa0d485f6..995789f0d31f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> @@ -235,7 +235,8 @@ int xe_guc_tlb_inval_done_handler(struct xe_guc
> *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len)
> if (unlikely(len != 1))
> return -EPROTO;
>
> - xe_tlb_inval_done_handler(>->tlb_inval, msg[0]);
> + if (msg[0] != TLB_INVALIDATION_SEQNO_INVALID)
> + xe_tlb_inval_done_handler(>->tlb_inval, msg[0]);
Honestly I feel like this should be included as part of the patch that
actually uses it. No problem with the actual contents though.
Thanks,
Stuart
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h
> index 8f8b060e9005..7a6967ce3b76 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct xe_tlb_inval {
> const struct xe_tlb_inval_ops *ops;
> /** @tlb_inval.seqno: TLB invalidation seqno, protected by CT
> lock */
> #define TLB_INVALIDATION_SEQNO_MAX 0x100000
> +#define TLB_INVALIDATION_SEQNO_INVALID TLB_INVALIDATION_SEQNO_MAX
> int seqno;
> /** @tlb_invalidation.seqno_lock: protects
> @tlb_invalidation.seqno */
> struct mutex seqno_lock;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-06 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-04 19:56 [PATCH v2 00/12] Context based TLB invalidations Matthew Brost
2025-11-04 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] drm/xe: Add normalize_invalidation_range Matthew Brost
2025-11-06 20:03 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-04 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/xe: Make usm.asid_to_vm allocation use GFP_NOWAIT Matthew Brost
2025-11-06 22:08 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-06 22:13 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-04 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/xe: Add xe_device_asid_to_vm helper Matthew Brost
2025-12-11 22:07 ` Matt Atwood
2025-11-04 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] drm/xe: Add vm to exec queues association Matthew Brost
2025-11-06 22:15 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-12-12 21:03 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-12-12 21:24 ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-12 21:37 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-04 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/xe: Taint TLB invalidation seqno lock with GFP_KERNEL Matthew Brost
2025-12-11 22:35 ` Matt Atwood
2025-11-04 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/xe: Do not forward invalid TLB invalidation seqnos to upper layers Matthew Brost
2025-11-06 22:05 ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
2025-11-04 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] drm/xe: Rename send_tlb_inval_ppgtt to send_tlb_inval_asid_ppgtt Matthew Brost
2025-11-06 20:22 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-04 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] drm/xe: Add send_tlb_inval_ppgtt helper Matthew Brost
2025-11-06 20:25 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-04 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] drm/xe: Add xe_tlb_inval_idle helper Matthew Brost
2025-11-10 18:48 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-12-12 22:00 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-04 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] drm/xe: Add exec queue active vfunc Matthew Brost
2025-11-04 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/xe: Add context-based invalidation to GuC TLB invalidation backend Matthew Brost
2025-11-06 21:50 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-07 7:01 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-10 19:29 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-11 1:01 ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-12 22:30 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-04 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] drm/xe: Enable context TLB invalidations for CI Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f24c5e38256edad7efd007d45620b72e5e1c1ab.camel@intel.com \
--to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox