Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Brost,  Matthew" <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: "Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
	"Wajdeczko, Michal" <Michal.Wajdeczko@intel.com>,
	"Dugast, Francois" <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/xe: Avoid unconditional VRAM reads in H2G path
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 23:20:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <804b1ee3dda5fdf6a3579f9a6e515f8ab1277c39.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260218043319.809548-3-matthew.brost@intel.com>

On Tue, 2026-02-17 at 20:33 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> desc_read() issues an VRAM read which serializes the CPU and drains

Few spelling nits in the commit message

/s/an/a/

> posted writes on dGPU platforms. The H2G tracepoint evaluated its
> arguments unconditionally, so even with tracing disabled the
> submission
> path paid the full VRAM readf latency. Guard the tracepoint with
> trace_xe_guc_ctb_h2g_enabled().
> 
> Adso move the descriptor status verification under

/s/Adso/Also/

> CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG.
> This removes another unnecessary VRAM read in non-debug builfds.

/s/builfds/builds/

> 
> This results in ~10× faster H2G submission and significantly reduces
> lock contention across the driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> index ea07a27757d5..37842c93e0ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> @@ -939,22 +939,22 @@ static int h2g_write(struct xe_guc_ct *ct,
> const u32 *action, u32 len,
>         u32 full_len;
>         struct iosys_map map = IOSYS_MAP_INIT_OFFSET(&h2g->cmds,
>                                                          tail *
> sizeof(u32));
> -       u32 desc_status;
>  
>         full_len = len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN;
>  
>         lockdep_assert_held(&ct->lock);
>         xe_gt_assert(gt, full_len <= GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN);
>  
> -       desc_status = desc_read(xe, h2g, status);
> -       if (desc_status) {
> -               xe_gt_err(gt, "CT write: non-zero status: %u\n",
> desc_status);
> -               goto corrupted;
> -       }
> -
>         if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG)) {

Somehow in the previous rev I had read this as
CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG_GUC... yeah no issue here. Mainly I want to be able
to see this in CI runs which should mostly have XE_DEBUG set.

So apart from the spelling fixes in the commit:
Reviewed-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>

Thanks,
Stuart

>                 u32 desc_tail = desc_read(xe, h2g, tail);
>                 u32 desc_head = desc_read(xe, h2g, head);
> +               u32 desc_status;
> +
> +               desc_status = desc_read(xe, h2g, status);
> +               if (desc_status) {
> +                       xe_gt_err(gt, "CT write: non-zero status:
> %u\n", desc_status);
> +                       goto corrupted;
> +               }
>  
>                 if (tail != desc_tail) {
>                         desc_write(xe, h2g, status, desc_status |
> GUC_CTB_STATUS_MISMATCH);
> @@ -1023,8 +1023,15 @@ static int h2g_write(struct xe_guc_ct *ct,
> const u32 *action, u32 len,
>         /* Update descriptor */
>         desc_write(xe, h2g, tail, h2g->info.tail);
>  
> -       trace_xe_guc_ctb_h2g(xe, gt->info.id, *(action - 1),
> full_len,
> -                            desc_read(xe, h2g, head), h2g-
> >info.tail);
> +       /*
> +        * desc_read() performs an VRAM read which serializes the CPU
> and drains
> +        * posted writes on dGPU platforms. Tracepoints evaluate
> arguments even
> +        * when disabled, so guard the event to avoid adding µs-scale
> latency to
> +        * the fast H2G submission path when tracing is not active.
> +        */
> +       if (trace_xe_guc_ctb_h2g_enabled())
> +               trace_xe_guc_ctb_h2g(xe, gt->info.id, *(action - 1),
> full_len,
> +                                    desc_read(xe, h2g, head), h2g-
> >info.tail);
>  
>         return 0;
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-18 23:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-18  4:33 [PATCH v3 0/3] dGPU memory optimizations Matthew Brost
2026-02-18  4:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/xe: Split H2G and G2H into separate buffer objects Matthew Brost
2026-02-18 23:12   ` Summers, Stuart
2026-02-19  3:46     ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-24 15:58   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-24 16:12     ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-25 10:55       ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-25 18:08         ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-26 12:08       ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-18  4:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/xe: Avoid unconditional VRAM reads in H2G path Matthew Brost
2026-02-18 23:20   ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
2026-02-26 12:47   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-18  4:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/xe: Move LRC seqno to system memory to avoid slow dGPU reads Matthew Brost
2026-02-24  2:40   ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-26 12:25   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-26 17:11     ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-26 17:26       ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-26 17:56         ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-26 12:43   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-26 16:55     ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-18  4:40 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for dGPU memory optimizations Patchwork
2026-02-18  5:23 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-02-18  6:15 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-02-18  7:07 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for dGPU memory optimizations (rev2) Patchwork
2026-02-18  7:36 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-02-18  7:53 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-02-18 12:29 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for dGPU memory optimizations (rev3) Patchwork
2026-02-18 13:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-02-18 14:08 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=804b1ee3dda5fdf6a3579f9a6e515f8ab1277c39.camel@intel.com \
    --to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    --cc=Michal.Wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox