Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: robdclark@chromium.org, sarah.walker@imgtec.com,
	ketil.johnsen@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, mcanal@igalia.com,
	frank.binns@imgtec.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	christian.koenig@amd.com, luben.tuikov@amd.com,
	donald.robson@imgtec.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, lina@asahilina.net,
	airlied@gmail.com, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	faith.ekstrand@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 06/13] drm/sched: Add generic scheduler message interface
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:50:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQB6vm8f7XkqaBUH@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230912102302.71d798a8@collabora.com>

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:23:02AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:16:08 -0700
> Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Add generic schedule message interface which sends messages to backend
> > from the drm_gpu_scheduler main submission thread. The idea is some of
> > these messages modify some state in drm_sched_entity which is also
> > modified during submission. By scheduling these messages and submission
> > in the same thread their is not race changing states in
> > drm_sched_entity.
> > 
> > This interface will be used in Xe, new Intel GPU driver, to cleanup,
> > suspend, resume, and change scheduling properties of a drm_sched_entity.
> > 
> > The interface is designed to be generic and extendable with only the
> > backend understanding the messages.
> 
> I didn't follow the previous discussions closely enough, but it seemed
> to me that the whole point of this 'ordered-wq for scheduler' approach
> was so you could interleave your driver-specific work items in the
> processing without changing the core. This messaging system looks like
> something that could/should be entirely driver-specific to me, and I'm
> not convinced this thin 'work -> generic_message_callback' layer is
> worth it. You can simply have your own xe_msg_process work, and a
> xe_msg_send helper that schedules this work. Assuming other drivers
> need this messaging API, they'll probably have their own message ids
> and payloads, and the automation done here is simple enough that it can
> be duplicated. That's just my personal opinion, of course, and if
> others see this message interface as valuable, I fine with it.

Good point. I am fine deleting this from the scheduler and making this
driver specific.

Matt

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-12 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-12  2:16 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 00/13] DRM scheduler changes for Xe Matthew Brost
2023-09-12  2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 01/13] drm/sched: Add drm_sched_submit_* helpers Matthew Brost
2023-09-12  2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 02/13] drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread Matthew Brost
2023-09-12  7:29   ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 15:02     ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-14  3:41       ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14  3:35   ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-16 17:07   ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12  2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 03/13] drm/sched: Move schedule policy to scheduler / entity Matthew Brost
2023-09-12  7:37   ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 15:14     ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 14:11   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-12 15:17     ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-14  4:18   ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14  4:23     ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 15:48       ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 15:49     ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12  2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 04/13] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy Matthew Brost
2023-09-13 12:30   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-12  2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 05/13] drm/sched: Split free_job into own work item Matthew Brost
2023-09-12  8:08   ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:37     ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 14:53       ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:55         ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12  2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 06/13] drm/sched: Add generic scheduler message interface Matthew Brost
2023-09-12  8:23   ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:50     ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2023-09-12  2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 07/13] drm/sched: Add drm_sched_start_timeout_unlocked helper Matthew Brost
2023-09-12  2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 08/13] drm/sched: Start run wq before TDR in drm_sched_start Matthew Brost
2023-09-12  2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 09/13] drm/sched: Submit job before starting TDR Matthew Brost
2023-09-14  2:56   ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 17:48     ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-21  3:35       ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-12  2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 10/13] drm/sched: Add helper to set TDR timeout Matthew Brost
2023-09-14  2:38   ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 17:36     ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12  2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 11/13] drm/sched: Waiting for pending jobs to complete in scheduler kill Matthew Brost
2023-09-12  8:44   ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12  9:57   ` Christian König
2023-09-12 14:47     ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-16 17:52       ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-18 11:03         ` Christian König
2023-09-18 14:57           ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-19  5:55             ` Christian König
2023-09-12 10:28   ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:54     ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12  2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 12/13] drm/sched/doc: Add Entity teardown documentaion Matthew Brost
2023-09-13 15:04   ` Christian König
2023-09-14  2:06   ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-16 18:06   ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12  2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 13/13] drm/sched: Update maintainers of GPU scheduler Matthew Brost
2023-09-12  2:20 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for DRM scheduler changes for Xe (rev5) Patchwork
2023-09-14  1:45 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 00/13] DRM scheduler changes for Xe Luben Tuikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZQB6vm8f7XkqaBUH@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=donald.robson@imgtec.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=faith.ekstrand@collabora.com \
    --cc=frank.binns@imgtec.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ketil.johnsen@arm.com \
    --cc=lina@asahilina.net \
    --cc=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
    --cc=mcanal@igalia.com \
    --cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
    --cc=sarah.walker@imgtec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox