From: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: robdclark@chromium.org, sarah.walker@imgtec.com,
ketil.johnsen@arm.com, frank.binns@imgtec.com, mcanal@igalia.com,
Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, boris.brezillon@collabora.com,
donald.robson@imgtec.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, lina@asahilina.net,
airlied@gmail.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
faith.ekstrand@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 09/13] drm/sched: Submit job before starting TDR
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 22:56:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed3aca10-8a9f-4698-92f4-21558fa6cfe3@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230912021615.2086698-10-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On 2023-09-11 22:16, Matthew Brost wrote:
> If the TDR is set to a value, it can fire before a job is submitted in
> drm_sched_main. The job should be always be submitted before the TDR
> fires, fix this ordering.
>
> v2:
> - Add to pending list before run_job, start TDR after (Luben, Boris)
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> index c627d3e6494a..9dbfab7be2c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> @@ -498,7 +498,6 @@ static void drm_sched_job_begin(struct drm_sched_job *s_job)
>
> spin_lock(&sched->job_list_lock);
> list_add_tail(&s_job->list, &sched->pending_list);
> - drm_sched_start_timeout(sched);
> spin_unlock(&sched->job_list_lock);
> }
>
> @@ -1234,6 +1233,7 @@ static void drm_sched_run_job_work(struct work_struct *w)
> fence = sched->ops->run_job(sched_job);
> complete_all(&entity->entity_idle);
> drm_sched_fence_scheduled(s_fence, fence);
> + drm_sched_start_timeout_unlocked(sched);
>
> if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fence)) {
> /* Drop for original kref_init of the fence */
So, sched->ops->run_job(), is a "job inflection point" from the point of view of
the DRM scheduler. After that call, DRM has relinquished control of the job to the
firmware/hardware.
Putting the job in the pending list, before submitting it to down to the firmware/hardware,
goes along with starting a timeout timer for the job. The timeout always includes
time for the firmware/hardware to get it prepped, as well as time for the actual
execution of the job (task). Thus, we want to do this:
1. Put the job in pending list. "Pending list" means "pends in hardware".
2. Start a timeout timer for the job.
3. Start executing the job/task. This usually involves giving it to firmware/hardware,
i.e. ownership of the job/task changes to another domain. In our case this is accomplished
by calling sched->ops->run_job().
Perhaps move drm_sched_start_timeout() closer to sched->ops->run_job() from above and/or increase
the timeout value?
--
Regards,
Luben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-14 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-12 2:16 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 00/13] DRM scheduler changes for Xe Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 01/13] drm/sched: Add drm_sched_submit_* helpers Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 02/13] drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 7:29 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 15:02 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 3:41 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 3:35 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-16 17:07 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 03/13] drm/sched: Move schedule policy to scheduler / entity Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 7:37 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 15:14 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 14:11 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-12 15:17 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 4:18 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 4:23 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 15:48 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 15:49 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 04/13] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy Matthew Brost
2023-09-13 12:30 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 05/13] drm/sched: Split free_job into own work item Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 8:08 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:37 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 14:53 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:55 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 06/13] drm/sched: Add generic scheduler message interface Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 8:23 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:50 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 07/13] drm/sched: Add drm_sched_start_timeout_unlocked helper Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 08/13] drm/sched: Start run wq before TDR in drm_sched_start Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 09/13] drm/sched: Submit job before starting TDR Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 2:56 ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
2023-09-14 17:48 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-21 3:35 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 10/13] drm/sched: Add helper to set TDR timeout Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 2:38 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 17:36 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 11/13] drm/sched: Waiting for pending jobs to complete in scheduler kill Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 8:44 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 9:57 ` Christian König
2023-09-12 14:47 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-16 17:52 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-18 11:03 ` Christian König
2023-09-18 14:57 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-19 5:55 ` Christian König
2023-09-12 10:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:54 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 12/13] drm/sched/doc: Add Entity teardown documentaion Matthew Brost
2023-09-13 15:04 ` Christian König
2023-09-14 2:06 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-16 18:06 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 13/13] drm/sched: Update maintainers of GPU scheduler Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:20 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for DRM scheduler changes for Xe (rev5) Patchwork
2023-09-14 1:45 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 00/13] DRM scheduler changes for Xe Luben Tuikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed3aca10-8a9f-4698-92f4-21558fa6cfe3@amd.com \
--to=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=donald.robson@imgtec.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=faith.ekstrand@collabora.com \
--cc=frank.binns@imgtec.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ketil.johnsen@arm.com \
--cc=lina@asahilina.net \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mcanal@igalia.com \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=sarah.walker@imgtec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox