From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915: Implement hw state readout and checks for ultrajoiner
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 21:44:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvG3KSKtMp-ckptU@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240923181336.3303940-10-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:43:29PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> From: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
>
> Ultrajoiner mode has some new bits and states to be
> read out from the hw. Lets make changes accordingly.
>
> v2: Fix checkpatch warnings. (Ankit)
> v3: Add separate functions for computing expected secondary_big/ultrajoiner
> pipes. (Ankit)
> v4:
> -Streamline the helpers for ultrajoiner. (Ville)
> -Add fixup to accommodate PIPED check for ultrajoiner. (Ville)
> -Add more Ultrajoiner drm_WARNs. (Ville)
> v5: Remove spurious newline. (Ville)
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index ee57e1e544af..c42ba377d247 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -3663,13 +3663,58 @@ static u8 expected_bigjoiner_secondary_pipes(u8 bigjoiner_primary_pipes)
> return expected_secondary_pipes(bigjoiner_primary_pipes, 2);
> }
>
> +static u8 expected_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(u8 ultrajoiner_primary_pipes)
> +{
> + return expected_secondary_pipes(ultrajoiner_primary_pipes, 4);
> +}
> +
> +static u8 fixup_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(u8 ultrajoiner_primary_pipes,
> + u8 ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes)
> +{
> + return ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes | ultrajoiner_primary_pipes << 3;
> +}
> +
> +static void enabled_ultrajoiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + u8 *primary_pipes, u8 *secondary_pipes)
> +{
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> +
> + *primary_pipes = 0;
> + *secondary_pipes = 0;
> +
> + if (!HAS_ULTRAJOINER(i915))
> + return;
> +
> + for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&i915->drm, crtc,
> + joiner_pipes(i915)) {
> + enum intel_display_power_domain power_domain;
> + enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> +
> + power_domain = intel_dsc_power_domain(crtc, (enum transcoder)pipe);
> + with_intel_display_power_if_enabled(i915, power_domain, wakeref) {
> + u32 tmp = intel_de_read(i915, ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(pipe));
> +
> + if (!(tmp & ULTRA_JOINER_ENABLE))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (tmp & PRIMARY_ULTRA_JOINER_ENABLE)
> + *primary_pipes |= BIT(pipe);
> + else
> + *secondary_pipes |= BIT(pipe);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void enabled_joiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> u8 *primary_pipes, u8 *secondary_pipes)
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(&dev_priv->drm);
> u8 primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes, primary_bigjoiner_pipes;
> + u8 primary_ultrajoiner_pipes;
> u8 secondary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes, secondary_bigjoiner_pipes;
> - u8 uncompressed_joiner_pipes, bigjoiner_pipes;
> + u8 secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes;
> + u8 uncompressed_joiner_pipes, bigjoiner_pipes, ultrajoiner_pipes;
>
> enabled_uncompressed_joiner_pipes(display, &primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes,
> &secondary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes);
> @@ -3683,14 +3728,35 @@ static void enabled_joiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> drm_WARN_ON(display->drm,
> (primary_bigjoiner_pipes & secondary_bigjoiner_pipes) != 0);
>
> + enabled_ultrajoiner_pipes(dev_priv, &primary_ultrajoiner_pipes,
> + &secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes);
> + /*
> + * For some strange reason the last pipe in the set of four
> + * shouldn't have ultrajoiner enable bit set in hardware.
> + * Set the bit anyway to make life easier.
> + */
> + drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
> + expected_secondary_pipes(primary_ultrajoiner_pipes, 3) !=
> + secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes);
> + secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes =
> + fixup_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(primary_ultrajoiner_pipes,
> + secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes);
> +
> + drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, (primary_ultrajoiner_pipes & secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes) != 0);
> +
> uncompressed_joiner_pipes = primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes |
> secondary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes;
> bigjoiner_pipes = primary_bigjoiner_pipes | secondary_bigjoiner_pipes;
> + ultrajoiner_pipes = primary_ultrajoiner_pipes | secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes;
>
> drm_WARN(display->drm, (uncompressed_joiner_pipes & bigjoiner_pipes) != 0,
> "Uncomressed joiner pipes(%#x) and bigjoiner pipes(%#x) can't intersect\n",
> uncompressed_joiner_pipes, bigjoiner_pipes);
>
> + drm_WARN(display->drm, (ultrajoiner_pipes & bigjoiner_pipes) != ultrajoiner_pipes,
> + "Ultrajoiner pipes(%#x) should be bigjoiner pipes(%#x)\n",
> + ultrajoiner_pipes, bigjoiner_pipes);
> +
> drm_WARN(display->drm, secondary_bigjoiner_pipes !=
> expected_bigjoiner_secondary_pipes(primary_bigjoiner_pipes),
> "Wrong secondary bigjoiner pipes(expected %#x, current %#x)\n",
> @@ -3702,15 +3768,16 @@ static void enabled_joiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> "Wrong secondary uncompressed joiner pipes(expected %#x, current %#x)\n",
> expected_uncompressed_joiner_secondary_pipes(primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes),
> secondary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes);
> -
> - *primary_pipes = primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes | primary_bigjoiner_pipes;
> -
> - *secondary_pipes = secondary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes | secondary_bigjoiner_pipes;
> -
> - /* Joiner pipes should always be consecutive primary and secondary */
> - drm_WARN(display->drm, *secondary_pipes != *primary_pipes << 1,
> - "Joiner misconfigured (primary pipes %#x, secondary pipes %#x)\n",
> - *primary_pipes, *secondary_pipes);
> + drm_WARN(display->drm, secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes !=
> + expected_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(primary_ultrajoiner_pipes),
> + "Wrong secondary ultrajoiner pipes(expected %x, current %x)\n",
> + expected_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(primary_ultrajoiner_pipes),
> + secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes);
> +
> + *primary_pipes = primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes | primary_bigjoiner_pipes |
> + primary_ultrajoiner_pipes;
> + *secondary_pipes = secondary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes | secondary_bigjoiner_pipes |
> + secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes;
I think these masks will turn to utter nonsense if ultrajoiner
is enabled. So we really need to adjust how we derive the
final primary/secondary pipes *before* we add ultrajoiner into
the mix. Looks like you have that stuff in the next patch, so
you should reverse these two patches.
> }
>
> static enum pipe get_joiner_primary_pipe(enum pipe pipe, u8 primary_pipes, u8 secondary_pipes)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h
> index f921ad67b587..bf32a3b46fb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
> #define SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_MASK REG_GENMASK(26, 25)
> #define SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_2_SEGMENT REG_FIELD_PREP(SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_MASK, 0)
> #define SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_4_SEGMENT REG_FIELD_PREP(SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_MASK, 1)
> +#define ULTRA_JOINER_ENABLE REG_BIT(23)
> +#define PRIMARY_ULTRA_JOINER_ENABLE REG_BIT(22)
> #define UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_PRIMARY (1 << 21)
> #define UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_SECONDARY (1 << 20)
>
> --
> 2.45.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-23 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-23 18:13 [PATCH 00/16] Ultrajoiner basic functionality series Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/display_device: Add Check HAS_DSC for bigjoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/display_debugfs: Allow force joiner only if supported Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/display: Modify debugfs for joiner to force n pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:36 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/dp: Add helper to compute num pipes required Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/display: Add debugfs support to avoid joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:38 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915: Split current joiner hw state readout Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915: Add bigjoiner and uncompressed joiner hw readout sanity checks Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/display: Add macro HAS_ULTRAJOINER() Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915: Implement hw state readout and checks for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:44 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/display: Refactor enable_joiner_pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/display/vdsc: Add ultrajoiner support with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/dp: Modify compressed bpp limitations for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:32 ` Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/dp: Modify helper to get slice count " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 19:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915: Compute config and mode valid changes " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 19:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/display: Consider ultrajoiner for computing maxdotclock Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 19:08 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/intel_dp: Add support for forcing ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 19:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-25 22:13 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Ultrajoiner basic functionality series (rev3) Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:13 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:15 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:26 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:29 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:30 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:59 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-26 2:40 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZvG3KSKtMp-ckptU@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox