From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/display: Refactor enable_joiner_pipes
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 21:52:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvG47MoTIBJOO4EV@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240923181336.3303940-11-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:43:30PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Pass the current pipe into enabled_joiner_pipes(), and let it figure out
> the proper bitmasks for us.
>
> v2:
> -Simplify helper get_joiner_primary_pipes. (Ville)
> -Nuke get_joiner_secondary_pipes. (Ville)
> -Add more drm_WARNs and checks for final primary/secondary pipes.
> (Ville)
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 85 +++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index c42ba377d247..f35d1e1fdb8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -3706,7 +3706,14 @@ static void enabled_ultrajoiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> }
> }
>
> -static void enabled_joiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +static u8 get_joiner_primary_pipe(enum pipe pipe, u8 primary_pipes)
> +{
> + primary_pipes &= GENMASK(pipe, 0);
> +
> + return primary_pipes ? BIT(fls(primary_pipes) - 1) : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void enabled_joiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe,
> u8 *primary_pipes, u8 *secondary_pipes)
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(&dev_priv->drm);
> @@ -3774,41 +3781,47 @@ static void enabled_joiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> expected_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(primary_ultrajoiner_pipes),
> secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes);
>
> - *primary_pipes = primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes | primary_bigjoiner_pipes |
> - primary_ultrajoiner_pipes;
> - *secondary_pipes = secondary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes | secondary_bigjoiner_pipes |
> - secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes;
> -}
> -
> -static enum pipe get_joiner_primary_pipe(enum pipe pipe, u8 primary_pipes, u8 secondary_pipes)
> -{
> - if ((secondary_pipes & BIT(pipe)) == 0)
> - return pipe;
> -
> - /* ignore everything above our pipe */
> - primary_pipes &= ~GENMASK(7, pipe);
> -
> - /* highest remaining bit should be our primary pipe */
> - return fls(primary_pipes) - 1;
> -}
> + *primary_pipes = 0;
> + *secondary_pipes = 0;
>
> -static u8 get_joiner_secondary_pipes(enum pipe pipe, u8 primary_pipes, u8 secondary_pipes)
> -{
> - enum pipe primary_pipe, next_primary_pipe;
> + if (ultrajoiner_pipes & BIT(pipe)) {
> + *primary_pipes = get_joiner_primary_pipe(pipe, primary_ultrajoiner_pipes);
> + *secondary_pipes = secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes &
> + expected_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(primary_ultrajoiner_pipes);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That should be '*primary_pipes'.
This branch is missing the final WARN_ON you have in the
bigjoiner uncompressed joiner branches below.
> + return;
> + }
>
> - primary_pipe = get_joiner_primary_pipe(pipe, primary_pipes, secondary_pipes);
> + if (uncompressed_joiner_pipes & BIT(pipe)) {
> + *primary_pipes = get_joiner_primary_pipe(pipe, primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes);
> + *secondary_pipes =
> + secondary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes &
> + expected_uncompressed_joiner_secondary_pipes(primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes);
> + } else if (bigjoiner_pipes & BIT(pipe)) {
> + *primary_pipes = get_joiner_primary_pipe(pipe, primary_bigjoiner_pipes);
> + *secondary_pipes = secondary_bigjoiner_pipes &
> + expected_bigjoiner_secondary_pipes(primary_bigjoiner_pipes);
Same '*primary_pipes' thing in these two.
> + }
I would probably get rid of the if-else construct here, and just
handle each joiner type completely independently, just like ultrajoiner
above. Makes the code more regular and thus easier to reason about.
>
> - if ((primary_pipes & BIT(primary_pipe)) == 0)
> - return 0;
> + drm_WARN(display->drm,
> + expected_bigjoiner_secondary_pipes(*primary_pipes) != *secondary_pipes,
> + "Wrong bigjoiner secondary pipes for primary_pipes %#x (expected %#x, current %#x for)\n",
> + *primary_pipes,
> + expected_bigjoiner_secondary_pipes(*primary_pipes),
> + *secondary_pipes);
>
> - /* ignore our primary pipe and everything below it */
> - primary_pipes &= ~GENMASK(primary_pipe, 0);
> - /* make sure a high bit is set for the ffs() */
> - primary_pipes |= BIT(7);
> - /* lowest remaining bit should be the next primary pipe */
> - next_primary_pipe = ffs(primary_pipes) - 1;
> + drm_WARN(display->drm,
> + expected_uncompressed_joiner_secondary_pipes(*primary_pipes) != *secondary_pipes,
> + "Wrong uncompressed joiner secondary pipes for primary_pipes %#x (expected %#x, current %#x for)\n",
> + *primary_pipes,
> + expected_uncompressed_joiner_secondary_pipes(*primary_pipes),
> + *secondary_pipes);
>
> - return secondary_pipes & GENMASK(next_primary_pipe - 1, primary_pipe);
> + drm_WARN(display->drm,
> + expected_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(*primary_pipes) != *secondary_pipes,
> + "Wrong ultrajoiner secondary pipes for primary_pipes %#x (expected %#x, current %#x for)\n",
> + *primary_pipes,
> + expected_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(*primary_pipes),
> + *secondary_pipes);
I'm not quite sure what's happening here. We already bailed out for
ultrajoiner earlier.
The patch is pretty hard to read. Did you try --patience vs. not when
generating it in case one or the other makes for a more readalbe end
result?
> }
>
> static u8 hsw_panel_transcoders(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> @@ -3880,10 +3893,10 @@ static u8 hsw_enabled_transcoders(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> enabled_transcoders |= BIT(cpu_transcoder);
>
> /* joiner secondary -> consider the primary pipe's transcoder as well */
> - enabled_joiner_pipes(dev_priv, &primary_pipes, &secondary_pipes);
> + enabled_joiner_pipes(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, &primary_pipes, &secondary_pipes);
> if (secondary_pipes & BIT(crtc->pipe)) {
> cpu_transcoder = (enum transcoder)
> - get_joiner_primary_pipe(crtc->pipe, primary_pipes, secondary_pipes);
> + ffs(get_joiner_primary_pipe(crtc->pipe, primary_pipes)) - 1;
> if (transcoder_ddi_func_is_enabled(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder))
> enabled_transcoders |= BIT(cpu_transcoder);
> }
> @@ -4017,14 +4030,12 @@ static void intel_joiner_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> u8 primary_pipes, secondary_pipes;
> enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>
> - enabled_joiner_pipes(i915, &primary_pipes, &secondary_pipes);
> + enabled_joiner_pipes(i915, pipe, &primary_pipes, &secondary_pipes);
>
> if (((primary_pipes | secondary_pipes) & BIT(pipe)) == 0)
> return;
>
> - crtc_state->joiner_pipes =
> - BIT(get_joiner_primary_pipe(pipe, primary_pipes, secondary_pipes)) |
> - get_joiner_secondary_pipes(pipe, primary_pipes, secondary_pipes);
> + crtc_state->joiner_pipes = primary_pipes | secondary_pipes;
> }
>
> static bool hsw_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> --
> 2.45.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-23 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-23 18:13 [PATCH 00/16] Ultrajoiner basic functionality series Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/display_device: Add Check HAS_DSC for bigjoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/display_debugfs: Allow force joiner only if supported Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/display: Modify debugfs for joiner to force n pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:36 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/dp: Add helper to compute num pipes required Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/display: Add debugfs support to avoid joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:38 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915: Split current joiner hw state readout Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915: Add bigjoiner and uncompressed joiner hw readout sanity checks Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/display: Add macro HAS_ULTRAJOINER() Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915: Implement hw state readout and checks for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:44 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/display: Refactor enable_joiner_pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:52 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/display/vdsc: Add ultrajoiner support with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/dp: Modify compressed bpp limitations for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:32 ` Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/dp: Modify helper to get slice count " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 19:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915: Compute config and mode valid changes " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 19:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/display: Consider ultrajoiner for computing maxdotclock Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 19:08 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/intel_dp: Add support for forcing ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 19:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-25 22:13 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Ultrajoiner basic functionality series (rev3) Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:13 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:15 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:26 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:29 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:30 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:59 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-26 2:40 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZvG47MoTIBJOO4EV@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox