From: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
To: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
"Michal Wajdeczko" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/25] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 08:51:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a80c24b8-018c-48ea-8df3-9827d3f65b45@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6dbbfd13-e579-46ff-8975-6d88516aa1c1@intel.com>
On 01-10-2024 10:41, Ghimiray, Himal Prasad wrote:
>
>
> On 01-10-2024 01:45, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30.09.2024 22:13, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30.09.2024 07:31, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
>>>> Instead of calling xe_force_wake_put on all domains that were input to
>>>> xe_force_wake_get, call _put only on the domains whose reference counts
>>>> were successfully incremented by the _get call. Since the return value
>>>> of _get can be a mask that does not match any specific value in the
>>>> enum
>>>> xe_force_wake_domains, change the input parameter of _put to
>>>> unsigned int.
>>>
>>> at this point in the series xe_force_wake_get() still returns errno
>>
>> oops, scratch that, somehow missed patch 03/25
>>
>>>
>>> maybe rephrase this to something like:
>>>
>>> "Prepare xe_force_wake_put() to accept force_wake reference with
>>> refcounted domains"
>>>
>>> and also maybe it is a good time to change this function to void (or
>>> maybe even do it before this path?
>
> Changing this to void here or before this patch will break the
> compilation, since the cleanup is in subsequent patches. Therefore,
> patch 25/25 addresses changing it to void after all the cleanups.
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> v3
>>>> - Move WARN to this patch (Badal)
>>>> - use xe_gt_WARN instead of XE_WARN (Michal)
>>>> - Stop using xe_force_wake_domains for non enum values.
>>>> - Remove kernel-doc from this patch (Badal)
>>>>
>>>> -v5
>>>> - Fix global awake_domain
>>>>
>>>> -v6
>>>> - put all initialized domains in case of FORCEWAKE_ALL.
>>>> - Modify ret variable name (Michal)
>>>> - Modify input var name (Michal)
>>>> - Modify commit message and warn (Badal)
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
>>>
>>> probably this applies to some earlier #rev, so please mark it as such
>
> Sure. Miss at my end. Will do in this patch and others.
Changes in this patch looks good to me. Please maintain my RB.
Regards,
Badal
>
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h | 2 +-
>>>> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/
>>>> xe/xe_force_wake.c
>>>> index 7f358e42c5d4..372ea43b0d06 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
>>>> @@ -211,26 +211,40 @@ unsigned int xe_force_wake_get(struct
>>>> xe_force_wake *fw,
>>>> }
>>>> int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>>>> - enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
>>>> + unsigned int fw_ref)
>>>> {
>>>> struct xe_gt *gt = fw->gt;
>>>> struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
>>>> - enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, sleep = 0;
>>>> + unsigned int tmp, sleep = 0;
>>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>> - int ret = 0;
>>>> + int ack_fail = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Avoid unnecessary lock and unlock when the function is called
>>>> + * in error path of individual domains.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (!fw_ref)
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (fw_ref == XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL)
>>>> + fw_ref = fw->initialized_domains;
>>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&fw->lock, flags);
>>>> - for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, domains, fw, tmp) {
>>>> + for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, fw_ref, fw, tmp) {
>>>> if (!--domain->ref) {
>>>> sleep |= BIT(domain->id);
>>>> domain_sleep(gt, domain);
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, sleep, fw, tmp) {
>>>> - ret |= domain_sleep_wait(gt, domain);
>>>> + if (domain_sleep_wait(gt, domain) == 0)
>>>> + fw->awake_domains &= ~BIT(domain->id);
>>>> + else
>>>> + ack_fail |= BIT(domain->id);
>>>> }
>>>> - fw->awake_domains &= ~sleep;
>>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
>>>> - return ret;
>>>> + xe_gt_WARN(gt, ack_fail, "Forcewake domain%s %#x failed to
>>>> acknowledge sleep request\n",
>>>> + str_plural(hweight_long(ack_fail)), ack_fail);
>>>> + return ack_fail;
>>>> }
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/
>>>> xe/xe_force_wake.h
>>>> index eb638128952d..b5a75544d86a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
>>>> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt,
>>>> unsigned int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>>>> enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
>>>> int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>>>> - enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
>>>> + unsigned int fw_ref);
>>>> static inline int
>>>> xe_force_wake_ref(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-30 5:31 [PATCH v6 00/25] Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 01/25] drm/xe: Add member initialized_domains to xe_force_wake() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 19:51 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-01 5:03 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 02/25] drm/xe/forcewake: Add a helper xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 20:04 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-01 5:06 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 03/25] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-03 12:23 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-03 16:10 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-10-04 7:40 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-07 3:14 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 04/25] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 20:13 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-09-30 20:15 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-01 5:11 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-10-04 3:21 ` Nilawar, Badal [this message]
2024-09-30 22:13 ` Matt Roper
2024-10-01 5:31 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 05/25] drm/xe/device: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-04 7:18 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-07 3:40 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 06/25] drm/xe/hdcp: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 07/25] drm/xe/gsc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 08/25] drm/xe/gt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 09/25] drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 10/25] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 11/25] drm/xe/tests/mocs: Update xe_force_wake_get() return handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 12/25] drm/xe/mocs: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 13/25] drm/xe/xe_drm_client: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 14/25] drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 15/25] drm/xe/guc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 16/25] drm/xe/huc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 17/25] drm/xe/oa: Handle force_wake_get failure in xe_oa_stream_init() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 18/25] drm/xe/pat: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 19/25] drm/xe/gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 20/25] drm/xe/xe_reg_sr: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 21/25] drm/xe/query: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 22/25] drm/xe/vram: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 23/25] drm/xe: forcewake debugfs open fails on xe_forcewake_get failure Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 24/25] drm/xe: Ensure __must_check for xe_force_wake_get() return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 25/25] drm/xe: Change return type to void for xe_force_wake_put Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 6:02 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev6) Patchwork
2024-09-30 6:03 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 6:03 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-30 7:35 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 20:55 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev7) Patchwork
2024-09-30 20:55 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 20:57 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:08 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:10 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:12 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:39 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-01 6:20 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a80c24b8-018c-48ea-8df3-9827d3f65b45@intel.com \
--to=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox