From: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
To: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/25] drm/xe/device: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 12:48:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed935723-8128-42ff-a01e-52f22fa2cbbe@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240930053149.1246339-6-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
On 30-09-2024 11:01, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> With xe_force_wake_get() now returning the refcount-incremented domain
> mask, the return value will be 0 for single domains (excluding
> XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL) in the event of a failure. Modify the return handling
> of xe_force_wake_get() accordingly and pass the return value as input to
> xe_force_wake_put().
Now with changes in patch 3, return value 0 indicates failure for
XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL, i.e. no domains awake, as well. Please rephrase the
commit message accordingly.
Regards,
Badal
>
> v3
> - return xe_wakeref_t instead of int in xe_force_wake_get()
> - xe_force_wake_put() error doesn't need to be escalated/considered as
> probing error. It internally WARNS on domain ack failure.
>
> v5
> - return unsigned int xe_force_wake_get()
>
> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 8e9b551c7033..e885edacf39f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -600,8 +600,8 @@ int xe_device_probe_early(struct xe_device *xe)
> static int probe_has_flat_ccs(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> struct xe_gt *gt;
> + unsigned int fw_ref;
> u32 reg;
> - int err;
>
> /* Always enabled/disabled, no runtime check to do */
> if (GRAPHICS_VER(xe) < 20 || !xe->info.has_flat_ccs)
> @@ -609,9 +609,9 @@ static int probe_has_flat_ccs(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> gt = xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);
>
> - err = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> + fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> + if (!fw_ref)
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> reg = xe_gt_mcr_unicast_read_any(gt, XE2_FLAT_CCS_BASE_RANGE_LOWER);
> xe->info.has_flat_ccs = (reg & XE2_FLAT_CCS_ENABLE);
> @@ -620,7 +620,8 @@ static int probe_has_flat_ccs(struct xe_device *xe)
> drm_dbg(&xe->drm,
> "Flat CCS has been disabled in bios, May lead to performance impact");
>
> - return xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> + xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> @@ -871,6 +872,7 @@ void xe_device_wmb(struct xe_device *xe)
> void xe_device_td_flush(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> struct xe_gt *gt;
> + unsigned int fw_ref;
> u8 id;
>
> if (!IS_DGFX(xe) || GRAPHICS_VER(xe) < 20)
> @@ -885,7 +887,8 @@ void xe_device_td_flush(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (xe_gt_is_media_type(gt))
> continue;
>
> - if (xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT))
> + fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> + if (!fw_ref)
> return;
>
> xe_mmio_write32(>->mmio, XE2_TDF_CTRL, TRANSIENT_FLUSH_REQUEST);
> @@ -900,22 +903,22 @@ void xe_device_td_flush(struct xe_device *xe)
> 150, NULL, false))
> xe_gt_err_once(gt, "TD flush timeout\n");
>
> - xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> + xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
> }
> }
>
> void xe_device_l2_flush(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> struct xe_gt *gt;
> - int err;
> + uint fw_ref;
>
> gt = xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);
>
> if (!XE_WA(gt, 16023588340))
> return;
>
> - err = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> - if (err)
> + fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> + if (!fw_ref)
> return;
>
> spin_lock(>->global_invl_lock);
> @@ -925,7 +928,7 @@ void xe_device_l2_flush(struct xe_device *xe)
> xe_gt_err_once(gt, "Global invalidation timeout\n");
> spin_unlock(>->global_invl_lock);
>
> - xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> + xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
> }
>
> u32 xe_device_ccs_bytes(struct xe_device *xe, u64 size)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-30 5:31 [PATCH v6 00/25] Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 01/25] drm/xe: Add member initialized_domains to xe_force_wake() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 19:51 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-01 5:03 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 02/25] drm/xe/forcewake: Add a helper xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 20:04 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-01 5:06 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 03/25] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-03 12:23 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-03 16:10 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-10-04 7:40 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-07 3:14 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 04/25] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 20:13 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-09-30 20:15 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-01 5:11 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-10-04 3:21 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-09-30 22:13 ` Matt Roper
2024-10-01 5:31 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 05/25] drm/xe/device: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-04 7:18 ` Nilawar, Badal [this message]
2024-10-07 3:40 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 06/25] drm/xe/hdcp: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 07/25] drm/xe/gsc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 08/25] drm/xe/gt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 09/25] drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 10/25] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 11/25] drm/xe/tests/mocs: Update xe_force_wake_get() return handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 12/25] drm/xe/mocs: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 13/25] drm/xe/xe_drm_client: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 14/25] drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 15/25] drm/xe/guc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 16/25] drm/xe/huc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 17/25] drm/xe/oa: Handle force_wake_get failure in xe_oa_stream_init() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 18/25] drm/xe/pat: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 19/25] drm/xe/gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 20/25] drm/xe/xe_reg_sr: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 21/25] drm/xe/query: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 22/25] drm/xe/vram: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 23/25] drm/xe: forcewake debugfs open fails on xe_forcewake_get failure Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 24/25] drm/xe: Ensure __must_check for xe_force_wake_get() return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 25/25] drm/xe: Change return type to void for xe_force_wake_put Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 6:02 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev6) Patchwork
2024-09-30 6:03 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 6:03 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-30 7:35 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 20:55 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev7) Patchwork
2024-09-30 20:55 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 20:57 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:08 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:10 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:12 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:39 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-01 6:20 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed935723-8128-42ff-a01e-52f22fa2cbbe@intel.com \
--to=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox