From: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
To: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"Nirmoy Das" <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/25] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get()
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 21:40:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd421437-87da-4b9e-b6e4-523723898965@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <232163cc-1978-45b7-a920-2890a014cb95@intel.com>
On 03-10-2024 17:53, Nilawar, Badal wrote:
>
>
> On 30-09-2024 11:01, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
>> If an acknowledgment timeout occurs for a forcewake domain awake
>> request, do not increment the reference count for the domain. This
>> ensures that subsequent _get calls do not incorrectly assume the domain
>> is awake. The return value is a mask of domains that got refcounted,
>> and these domains need to be provided for subsequent xe_force_wake_put
>> call.
>>
>> While at it, add simple kernel-doc for xe_force_wake_get()
>>
>> v3
>> - Use explicit type for mask (Michal/Badal)
>> - Improve kernel-doc (Michal)
>> - Use unsigned int instead of abusing enum (Michal)
>>
>> v5
>> - Use unsigned int for return (MattB/Badal/Rodrigo)
>> - use xe_gt_WARN for domain awake ack failure (Badal/Rodrigo)
>>
>> v6
>> - Change XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL to single bit, this helps accommodate
>> actually refcounted domains in return. (Michal)
>> - Modify commit message and warn message (Badal)
>> - Remove unnecessary information in kernel-doc (Michal)
>>
>> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h | 4 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/
>> xe_force_wake.c
>> index 5ce9e912818a..7f358e42c5d4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
>> @@ -160,29 +160,54 @@ static int domain_sleep_wait(struct xe_gt *gt,
>> (ffs(tmp__) - 1))) && \
>> domain__->reg_ctl.addr)
>> -int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>> - enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
>> +/**
>> + * xe_force_wake_get() : Increase the domain refcount
>> + * @fw: struct xe_force_wake
>> + * @domains: forcewake domains to get refcount on
>> + *
>> + * This function takes references for the input @domains and wakes
>> them if
>> + * they are asleep.If requested domain is ALL then only
>> + * applicable/initialized domains will be considered for refcount and
>> it is
>> + * a caller responsibilty to check returned ref if it includes any
>> specific
>> + * domain by using xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain() function. caller
>> must call
>> + * xe_force_wake_put() function to decrease incremented refcounts.
>> + *
>> + * Return: opaque reference to woken domains or zero if none of
>> requested
>> + * domains were awake.
>> + */
>> +unsigned int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>> + enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
>> {
>> struct xe_gt *gt = fw->gt;
>> struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
>> - enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, woken = 0;
>> + unsigned int ref_incr = 0, awake_rqst = 0, awake_failed = 0;
>> + unsigned int tmp, ref_rqst;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> - int ret = 0;
>
> As we have fw->initialized_domains lets add check if valid domain is
> being passed and assert otherwise.
Sounds good check to have. Will add it.
>
> Regards,
> Badal
>
>> + ref_rqst = (domains == XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL) ? fw-
>> >initialized_domains : domains;
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&fw->lock, flags);
>> - for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, domains, fw, tmp) {
>> + for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, ref_rqst, fw, tmp) {
>> if (!domain->ref++) {
>> - woken |= BIT(domain->id);
>> + awake_rqst |= BIT(domain->id);
>> domain_wake(gt, domain);
>> }
>> + ref_incr |= BIT(domain->id);
>> }
>> - for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, woken, fw, tmp) {
>> - ret |= domain_wake_wait(gt, domain);
>> + for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, awake_rqst, fw, tmp) {
>> + if (domain_wake_wait(gt, domain) == 0) {
>> + fw->awake_domains |= BIT(domain->id);
>> + } else {
>> + awake_failed |= BIT(domain->id);
>> + --domain->ref;
>> + }
>> }
>> - fw->awake_domains |= woken;
>> + ref_incr &= ~awake_failed;
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
>> - return ret;
>> + xe_gt_WARN(gt, awake_failed, "Forcewake domain%s %#x failed to
>> acknowledge awake request\n",
>> + str_plural(hweight_long(awake_failed)), awake_failed);
>> +
>> + return (ref_incr == fw->initialized_domains) ? ref_incr |
>> XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL : ref_incr;
>> }
>> int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/
>> xe_force_wake.h
>> index de720881a300..eb638128952d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
>> @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_gt(struct xe_gt *gt,
>> struct xe_force_wake *fw);
>> void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt,
>> struct xe_force_wake *fw);
>> -int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>> - enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
>> +unsigned int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>> + enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
>> int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>> enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h b/drivers/gpu/
>> drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h
>> index fde17dc3d01e..899fbbcb3ea9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h
>> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ enum xe_force_wake_domains {
>> XE_FW_MEDIA_VEBOX2 = BIT(XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX2),
>> XE_FW_MEDIA_VEBOX3 = BIT(XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX3),
>> XE_FW_GSC = BIT(XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GSC),
>> - XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL = BIT(XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_COUNT) - 1
>> + XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL = BIT(XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_COUNT)
>> };
>> /**
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-30 5:31 [PATCH v6 00/25] Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 01/25] drm/xe: Add member initialized_domains to xe_force_wake() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 19:51 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-01 5:03 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 02/25] drm/xe/forcewake: Add a helper xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 20:04 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-01 5:06 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 03/25] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-03 12:23 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-03 16:10 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad [this message]
2024-10-04 7:40 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-07 3:14 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 04/25] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 20:13 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-09-30 20:15 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-01 5:11 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-10-04 3:21 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-09-30 22:13 ` Matt Roper
2024-10-01 5:31 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 05/25] drm/xe/device: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-04 7:18 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-07 3:40 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 06/25] drm/xe/hdcp: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 07/25] drm/xe/gsc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 08/25] drm/xe/gt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 09/25] drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 10/25] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 11/25] drm/xe/tests/mocs: Update xe_force_wake_get() return handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 12/25] drm/xe/mocs: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 13/25] drm/xe/xe_drm_client: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 14/25] drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 15/25] drm/xe/guc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 16/25] drm/xe/huc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 17/25] drm/xe/oa: Handle force_wake_get failure in xe_oa_stream_init() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 18/25] drm/xe/pat: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 19/25] drm/xe/gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 20/25] drm/xe/xe_reg_sr: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 21/25] drm/xe/query: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 22/25] drm/xe/vram: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 23/25] drm/xe: forcewake debugfs open fails on xe_forcewake_get failure Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 24/25] drm/xe: Ensure __must_check for xe_force_wake_get() return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 25/25] drm/xe: Change return type to void for xe_force_wake_put Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 6:02 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev6) Patchwork
2024-09-30 6:03 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 6:03 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-30 7:35 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 20:55 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev7) Patchwork
2024-09-30 20:55 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 20:57 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:08 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:10 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:12 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:39 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-01 6:20 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fd421437-87da-4b9e-b6e4-523723898965@intel.com \
--to=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox