From: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
To: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"Nirmoy Das" <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/25] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get()
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 13:10:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6094193-0059-44eb-bab7-73d139a0b4a7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd421437-87da-4b9e-b6e4-523723898965@intel.com>
On 03-10-2024 21:40, Ghimiray, Himal Prasad wrote:
>
>
> On 03-10-2024 17:53, Nilawar, Badal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30-09-2024 11:01, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
>>> If an acknowledgment timeout occurs for a forcewake domain awake
>>> request, do not increment the reference count for the domain. This
>>> ensures that subsequent _get calls do not incorrectly assume the domain
>>> is awake. The return value is a mask of domains that got refcounted,
>>> and these domains need to be provided for subsequent xe_force_wake_put
>>> call.
>>>
>>> While at it, add simple kernel-doc for xe_force_wake_get()
>>>
>>> v3
>>> - Use explicit type for mask (Michal/Badal)
>>> - Improve kernel-doc (Michal)
>>> - Use unsigned int instead of abusing enum (Michal)
>>>
>>> v5
>>> - Use unsigned int for return (MattB/Badal/Rodrigo)
>>> - use xe_gt_WARN for domain awake ack failure (Badal/Rodrigo)
>>>
>>> v6
>>> - Change XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL to single bit, this helps accommodate
>>> actually refcounted domains in return. (Michal)
>>> - Modify commit message and warn message (Badal)
>>> - Remove unnecessary information in kernel-doc (Michal)
>>>
>>> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++------
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h | 4 +--
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h | 2 +-
>>> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/
>>> xe_force_wake.c
>>> index 5ce9e912818a..7f358e42c5d4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
>>> @@ -160,29 +160,54 @@ static int domain_sleep_wait(struct xe_gt *gt,
>>> (ffs(tmp__) - 1))) && \
>>> domain__->reg_ctl.addr)
>>> -int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>>> - enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
>>> +/**
>>> + * xe_force_wake_get() : Increase the domain refcount
>>> + * @fw: struct xe_force_wake
>>> + * @domains: forcewake domains to get refcount on
>>> + *
>>> + * This function takes references for the input @domains and wakes
>>> them if
>>> + * they are asleep.If requested domain is ALL then only
>>> + * applicable/initialized domains will be considered for refcount
>>> and it is
>>> + * a caller responsibilty to check returned ref if it includes any
>>> specific
>>> + * domain by using xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain() function. caller
>>> must call
>>> + * xe_force_wake_put() function to decrease incremented refcounts.
>>> + *
>>> + * Return: opaque reference to woken domains or zero if none of
>>> requested
>>> + * domains were awake.
>>> + */
>>> +unsigned int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>>> + enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
>>> {
>>> struct xe_gt *gt = fw->gt;
>>> struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
>>> - enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, woken = 0;
>>> + unsigned int ref_incr = 0, awake_rqst = 0, awake_failed = 0;
>>> + unsigned int tmp, ref_rqst;
>>> unsigned long flags;
>>> - int ret = 0;
>>
>> As we have fw->initialized_domains lets add check if valid domain is
>> being passed and assert otherwise.
>
> Sounds good check to have. Will add it.
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Badal
>>
>>> + ref_rqst = (domains == XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL) ? fw-
>>> >initialized_domains : domains;
>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&fw->lock, flags);
>>> - for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, domains, fw, tmp) {
>>> + for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, ref_rqst, fw, tmp) {
>>> if (!domain->ref++) {
>>> - woken |= BIT(domain->id);
>>> + awake_rqst |= BIT(domain->id);
>>> domain_wake(gt, domain);
>>> }
>>> + ref_incr |= BIT(domain->id);
>>> }
>>> - for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, woken, fw, tmp) {
>>> - ret |= domain_wake_wait(gt, domain);
>>> + for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, awake_rqst, fw, tmp) {
>>> + if (domain_wake_wait(gt, domain) == 0) {
>>> + fw->awake_domains |= BIT(domain->id);
>>> + } else {
>>> + awake_failed |= BIT(domain->id);
>>> + --domain->ref;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> - fw->awake_domains |= woken;
>>> + ref_incr &= ~awake_failed;
>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
>>> - return ret;
>>> + xe_gt_WARN(gt, awake_failed, "Forcewake domain%s %#x failed to
>>> acknowledge awake request\n",
>>> + str_plural(hweight_long(awake_failed)), awake_failed);
>>> +
>>> + return (ref_incr == fw->initialized_domains) ? ref_incr |
>>> XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL : ref_incr;
How about we simply return ref_incr at this point? Then, in patch 2,
given that we have a helper function available, we can validate ref_incr
against fw->initialized_domains, particularly for XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL,
within that helper function.
Regards,
Badal
>>> }
>>> int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/
>>> xe_force_wake.h
>>> index de720881a300..eb638128952d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
>>> @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_gt(struct xe_gt *gt,
>>> struct xe_force_wake *fw);
>>> void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt,
>>> struct xe_force_wake *fw);
>>> -int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>>> - enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
>>> +unsigned int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>>> + enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
>>> int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>>> enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h b/drivers/gpu/
>>> drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h
>>> index fde17dc3d01e..899fbbcb3ea9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h
>>> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ enum xe_force_wake_domains {
>>> XE_FW_MEDIA_VEBOX2 = BIT(XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX2),
>>> XE_FW_MEDIA_VEBOX3 = BIT(XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX3),
>>> XE_FW_GSC = BIT(XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GSC),
>>> - XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL = BIT(XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_COUNT) - 1
>>> + XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL = BIT(XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_COUNT)
>>> };
>>> /**
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-30 5:31 [PATCH v6 00/25] Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 01/25] drm/xe: Add member initialized_domains to xe_force_wake() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 19:51 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-01 5:03 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 02/25] drm/xe/forcewake: Add a helper xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 20:04 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-01 5:06 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 03/25] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-03 12:23 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-03 16:10 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-10-04 7:40 ` Nilawar, Badal [this message]
2024-10-07 3:14 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 04/25] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 20:13 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-09-30 20:15 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-01 5:11 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-10-04 3:21 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-09-30 22:13 ` Matt Roper
2024-10-01 5:31 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 05/25] drm/xe/device: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-04 7:18 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-07 3:40 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 06/25] drm/xe/hdcp: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 07/25] drm/xe/gsc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 08/25] drm/xe/gt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 09/25] drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 10/25] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 11/25] drm/xe/tests/mocs: Update xe_force_wake_get() return handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 12/25] drm/xe/mocs: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 13/25] drm/xe/xe_drm_client: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 14/25] drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 15/25] drm/xe/guc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 16/25] drm/xe/huc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 17/25] drm/xe/oa: Handle force_wake_get failure in xe_oa_stream_init() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 18/25] drm/xe/pat: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 19/25] drm/xe/gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 20/25] drm/xe/xe_reg_sr: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 21/25] drm/xe/query: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 22/25] drm/xe/vram: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 23/25] drm/xe: forcewake debugfs open fails on xe_forcewake_get failure Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 24/25] drm/xe: Ensure __must_check for xe_force_wake_get() return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 5:31 ` [PATCH v6 25/25] drm/xe: Change return type to void for xe_force_wake_put Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-30 6:02 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev6) Patchwork
2024-09-30 6:03 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 6:03 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-30 7:35 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-30 20:55 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev7) Patchwork
2024-09-30 20:55 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 20:57 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:08 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:10 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:12 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-09-30 21:39 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-01 6:20 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c6094193-0059-44eb-bab7-73d139a0b4a7@intel.com \
--to=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox