From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add support for multi queue dynamic priority change
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2025 16:23:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQaWcP/ykkycsx51@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251031182936.1882062-8-niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 11:29:27AM -0700, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
> Support dynamic priority change for multi queue group queues via
> exec queue set_property ioctl. Issue CGP_SYNC command to GuC through
> the drm scheduler message interface for priority to take effect.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pallavi Mishra <pallavi.mishra@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c | 12 ++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 3 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> index 0264cab00fd4..98f8f1c7f13b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> @@ -729,9 +729,13 @@ static int exec_queue_set_multi_queue_priority(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_e
> if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, value > XE_MULTI_QUEUE_PRIORITY_HIGH))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - q->multi_queue.priority = value;
> + /* For queue creation time (!q->xef) setting, just store the priority value */
> + if (!q->xef) {
> + q->multi_queue.priority = value;
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> - return 0;
> + return q->ops->set_multi_queue_priority(q, value);
> }
>
> typedef int (*xe_exec_queue_set_property_fn)(struct xe_device *xe,
> @@ -760,6 +764,10 @@ int xe_exec_queue_set_property_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, args->reserved[0] || args->reserved[1]))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, args->property !=
> + DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_MULTI_QUEUE_PRIORITY))
> + return -EINVAL;
This check looks to be in the wrong place. There are other valid
properties, e.g., DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_TIMESLICE, etc...
I think CI is complaining about this too.
> +
> q = xe_exec_queue_lookup(xef, args->exec_queue_id);
> if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, !q))
> return -ENOENT;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> index 964a0e6654c7..dcb55b069ed8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> @@ -241,6 +241,9 @@ struct xe_exec_queue_ops {
> int (*set_timeslice)(struct xe_exec_queue *q, u32 timeslice_us);
> /** @set_preempt_timeout: Set preemption timeout for exec queue */
> int (*set_preempt_timeout)(struct xe_exec_queue *q, u32 preempt_timeout_us);
> + /** @set_multi_queue_priority: Set multi queue priority */
> + int (*set_multi_queue_priority)(struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> + enum xe_multi_queue_priority priority);
> /**
> * @suspend: Suspend exec queue from executing, allowed to be called
> * multiple times in a row before resume with the caveat that
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 5ec144c1c2dc..426b64ef8d99 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -1761,10 +1761,32 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_resume(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
> }
> }
>
> -#define CLEANUP 1 /* Non-zero values to catch uninitialized msg */
> -#define SET_SCHED_PROPS 2
> -#define SUSPEND 3
> -#define RESUME 4
> +static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_multi_queue_priority(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
> +{
> + struct xe_exec_queue *q = msg->private_data;
> +
> + if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q)) {
> +#define MAX_MULTI_QUEUE_REG_SIZE (2)
> + struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
> + struct xe_exec_queue_group *group = q->multi_queue.group;
> + u32 action[MAX_MULTI_QUEUE_REG_SIZE];
> + int len = 0;
> +
> + action[len++] = XE_GUC_ACTION_MULTI_QUEUE_CONTEXT_CGP_SYNC;
> + action[len++] = group->primary->guc->id;
> +#undef MAX_MULTI_QUEUE_REG_SIZE
> +
> + xe_guc_exec_queue_group_cgp_sync(guc, q, action, len);
Just to confirm - even though multi-group priority isn't part of CGP
rathe the LRC, a CGP_SYNC is needed?
> + }
> +
> + kfree(msg);
> +}
> +
> +#define CLEANUP 1 /* Non-zero values to catch uninitialized msg */
> +#define SET_SCHED_PROPS 2
> +#define SUSPEND 3
> +#define RESUME 4
> +#define SET_MULTI_QUEUE_PRIORITY 5
> #define OPCODE_MASK 0xf
> #define MSG_LOCKED BIT(8)
> #define MSG_HEAD BIT(9)
> @@ -1788,6 +1810,9 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_process_msg(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
> case RESUME:
> __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_resume(msg);
> break;
> + case SET_MULTI_QUEUE_PRIORITY:
> + __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_multi_queue_priority(msg);
> + break;
> default:
> XE_WARN_ON("Unknown message type");
> }
> @@ -2004,6 +2029,28 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_set_preempt_timeout(struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int guc_exec_queue_set_multi_queue_priority(struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> + enum xe_multi_queue_priority priority)
> +{
> + struct xe_sched_msg *msg;
> +
> + if (!xe_exec_queue_is_multi_queue(q))
> + return -EINVAL;
Minor nit, I'd move this check to the caller as
xe_exec_queue_is_multi_queue is available there, then assert it is a
xe_exec_queue_is_multi_queue here.
Matt
> +
> + if (q->multi_queue.priority == priority ||
> + exec_queue_killed_or_banned_or_wedged(q))
> + return 0;
> +
> + msg = kmalloc(sizeof(*msg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!msg)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + q->multi_queue.priority = priority;
> + guc_exec_queue_add_msg(q, msg, SET_MULTI_QUEUE_PRIORITY);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int guc_exec_queue_suspend(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> {
> struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &q->guc->sched;
> @@ -2095,6 +2142,7 @@ static const struct xe_exec_queue_ops guc_exec_queue_ops = {
> .set_priority = guc_exec_queue_set_priority,
> .set_timeslice = guc_exec_queue_set_timeslice,
> .set_preempt_timeout = guc_exec_queue_set_preempt_timeout,
> + .set_multi_queue_priority = guc_exec_queue_set_multi_queue_priority,
> .suspend = guc_exec_queue_suspend,
> .suspend_wait = guc_exec_queue_suspend_wait,
> .resume = guc_exec_queue_resume,
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-01 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-31 18:29 [PATCH 00/16] drm/xe: Multi Queue feature support Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add multi_queue_enable_mask to gt information Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 0:01 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 1:25 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add user interface for multi queue support Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 19:31 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 22:58 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 0:23 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 22:59 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 17:37 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 23:06 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add GuC " Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-01 18:07 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-04 4:56 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-04 17:41 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-04 18:55 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-04 19:26 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-02 18:02 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-04 5:02 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add multi queue priority property Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-01 23:59 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 4:45 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Handle invalid exec queue property setting Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-03 22:41 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add exec_queue set_property ioctl support Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 16:53 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 1:49 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add support for multi queue dynamic priority change Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-01 23:23 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-11-03 18:06 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-01 23:41 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 18:14 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-03 19:05 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add multi queue information to guc_info dump Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-01 18:31 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 1:15 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Handle tearing down of a multi queue Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 0:39 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-04 3:35 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Set QUEUE_DRAIN_MODE for Multi Queue batches Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 18:22 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 17:09 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Handle CGP context error Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 18:29 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 16:44 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-03 17:18 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Tracepoint support Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-01 18:32 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Support active group after primary is destroyed Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-03 22:05 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-04 17:24 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-04 17:30 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/xe/doc: Add documentation for Multi Queue Group Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/xe/doc: Add documentation for Multi Queue Group GuC interface Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Enable multi_queue on xe3p_xpc Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 0:05 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-31 18:47 ` [PATCH 00/16] drm/xe: Multi Queue feature support Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 21:15 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2025-10-31 21:16 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-31 22:19 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-01 11:25 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQaWcP/ykkycsx51@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox