From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Handle CGP context error
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 09:18:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQjj1HQMSkMF87sO@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aQjb4PmAC9VBZ3FP@nvishwa1-desk>
On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 08:44:16AM -0800, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2025 at 10:29:32AM -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 11:29:31AM -0700, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
> > > Trigger multi-queue context cleanup upon CGP context error
> > > notification from GuC.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 4 +++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.h | 2 ++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h | 5 ++++
> > > 5 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> > > index 3e9fbed9cda6..8af3691626bf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> > > @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ enum xe_guc_action {
> > > XE_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_QUEUE = 0x4602,
> > > XE_GUC_ACTION_MULTI_QUEUE_CONTEXT_CGP_SYNC = 0x4603,
> > > XE_GUC_ACTION_NOTIFY_MULTI_QUEUE_CONTEXT_CGP_SYNC_DONE = 0x4604,
> > > + XE_GUC_ACTION_NOTIFY_MULTI_QUEUE_CGP_CONTEXT_ERROR = 0x4605,
> > > XE_GUC_ACTION_CLIENT_SOFT_RESET = 0x5507,
> > > XE_GUC_ACTION_SET_ENG_UTIL_BUFF = 0x550A,
> > > XE_GUC_ACTION_SET_DEVICE_ENGINE_ACTIVITY_BUFFER = 0x550C,
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> > > index 48b5006eb080..d0e19af0b4d2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> > > @@ -1574,6 +1574,10 @@ static int process_g2h_msg(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, u32 *msg, u32 len)
> > > case XE_GUC_ACTION_NOTIFY_MULTI_QUEUE_CONTEXT_CGP_SYNC_DONE:
> > > ret = xe_guc_exec_queue_cgp_sync_done_handler(guc, payload, adj_len);
> > > break;
> > > + case XE_GUC_ACTION_NOTIFY_MULTI_QUEUE_CGP_CONTEXT_ERROR:
> > > + ret = xe_guc_exec_queue_cgp_context_error_handler(guc, payload,
> > > + adj_len);
> > > + break;
> > > default:
> > > xe_gt_err(gt, "unexpected G2H action 0x%04x\n", action);
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > > index 87c13feb2cef..605352145d76 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > > @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
> > > #include "xe_vm.h"
> > > #include "xe_bo.h"
> > >
> > > +#define XE_GUC_EXEC_QUEUE_CGP_CONTEXT_ERROR_LEN 6
> > > +
> > > static struct xe_guc *
> > > exec_queue_to_guc(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > > {
> > > @@ -3001,6 +3003,37 @@ int xe_guc_exec_queue_reset_failure_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 le
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +int xe_guc_exec_queue_cgp_context_error_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg,
> > > + u32 len)
> > > +{
> > > + struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> > > + struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> > > + struct xe_exec_queue *q;
> > > + u32 guc_id = msg[2];
> > > +
> > > + if (unlikely(len != XE_GUC_EXEC_QUEUE_CGP_CONTEXT_ERROR_LEN)) {
> > > + drm_err(&xe->drm, "Invalid length %u", len);
> > > + return -EPROTO;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + q = g2h_exec_queue_lookup(guc, guc_id);
> > > + if (unlikely(!q))
> > > + return -EPROTO;
> > > +
> > > + xe_gt_dbg(gt,
> > > + "CGP context error: region=%s err=0x%x, context=0x%x LRCA=0x%x:0x%x SgId=0x%x",
> > > + msg[0] & 1 ? "uc" : "kmd", msg[1], msg[2], msg[4], msg[3], msg[5]);
> > > +
> > > + trace_xe_exec_queue_cgp_context_error(q);
> > > +
> > > + /* Treat the same as engine reset */
> > > + set_exec_queue_reset(q);
> > > + if (!exec_queue_banned(q) && !exec_queue_check_timeout(q))
> >
> > I don't think you need the exec_queue_check_timeout check.
> >
>
> The check here is same as in other guc error handlers like
> xe_guc_exec_queue_reset_handler() and xe_guc_exec_queue_memory_cat_error_handler().
Ah, it is but it doesn't seem right in those cases either. Maybe I'm
forgeting something, will try page this information back in.
> Hence the reason to keep it here also. Doesn't exec_queue_check_timeout()
> mean TDR is already underway?
Yes, it does.
So with the current state of the code, this is correct, so:
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
If I reason this can be dropped, let's drop it everywhere in a single
shot.
Matt
>
> Niranjana
>
> > Otherwise LGTM.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > > + xe_guc_exec_queue_trigger_cleanup(q);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * xe_guc_exec_queue_cgp_sync_done_handler - CGP synchronization done handler
> > > * @guc: guc
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.h
> > > index abfa94bce391..01b013a90b1b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.h
> > > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ int xe_guc_exec_queue_memory_cat_error_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg,
> > > int xe_guc_exec_queue_reset_failure_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len);
> > > int xe_guc_error_capture_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len);
> > > int xe_guc_exec_queue_cgp_sync_done_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len);
> > > +int xe_guc_exec_queue_cgp_context_error_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg,
> > > + u32 len);
> > >
> > > struct xe_guc_submit_exec_queue_snapshot *
> > > xe_guc_exec_queue_snapshot_capture(struct xe_exec_queue *q);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
> > > index 79a97b086cb2..c9d0748dae9d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
> > > @@ -172,6 +172,11 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(xe_exec_queue, xe_exec_queue_memory_cat_error,
> > > TP_ARGS(q)
> > > );
> > >
> > > +DEFINE_EVENT(xe_exec_queue, xe_exec_queue_cgp_context_error,
> > > + TP_PROTO(struct xe_exec_queue *q),
> > > + TP_ARGS(q)
> > > +);
> > > +
> > > DEFINE_EVENT(xe_exec_queue, xe_exec_queue_stop,
> > > TP_PROTO(struct xe_exec_queue *q),
> > > TP_ARGS(q)
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-03 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-31 18:29 [PATCH 00/16] drm/xe: Multi Queue feature support Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add multi_queue_enable_mask to gt information Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 0:01 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 1:25 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add user interface for multi queue support Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 19:31 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 22:58 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 0:23 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 22:59 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 17:37 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 23:06 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add GuC " Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-01 18:07 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-04 4:56 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-04 17:41 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-04 18:55 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-04 19:26 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-02 18:02 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-04 5:02 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add multi queue priority property Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-01 23:59 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 4:45 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Handle invalid exec queue property setting Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-03 22:41 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add exec_queue set_property ioctl support Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 16:53 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 1:49 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add support for multi queue dynamic priority change Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-01 23:23 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 18:06 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-01 23:41 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 18:14 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-03 19:05 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add multi queue information to guc_info dump Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-01 18:31 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 1:15 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Handle tearing down of a multi queue Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 0:39 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-04 3:35 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Set QUEUE_DRAIN_MODE for Multi Queue batches Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 18:22 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 17:09 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Handle CGP context error Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 18:29 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-03 16:44 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-03 17:18 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Tracepoint support Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-01 18:32 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Support active group after primary is destroyed Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-03 22:05 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-04 17:24 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-04 17:30 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/xe/doc: Add documentation for Multi Queue Group Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/xe/doc: Add documentation for Multi Queue Group GuC interface Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 18:29 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/xe/multi_queue: Enable multi_queue on xe3p_xpc Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-02 0:05 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-31 18:47 ` [PATCH 00/16] drm/xe: Multi Queue feature support Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-31 21:15 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2025-10-31 21:16 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-31 22:19 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-01 11:25 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQjj1HQMSkMF87sO@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox