From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com, anshuman.gupta@intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
lukas@wunner.de, simona.vetter@ffwll.ch, airlied@gmail.com,
pratik.bari@intel.com, joshua.santosh.ranjan@intel.com,
ashwin.kumar.kulkarni@intel.com, shubham.kumar@intel.com,
Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Add support for PVC SOC errors
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 11:52:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aT_oXo97R3GyWgNk@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251205083934.3602030-10-riana.tauro@intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 02:09:36PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
> Report the SOC nonfatal/fatal hardware error and update the counters.
...
> +#define SOC_PVC_BASE 0x282000
Curious, should we use 'master' naming for consistency with the code?
> +#define SOC_PVC_SLAVE_BASE 0x283000
> +
> +#define SOC_GCOERRSTS 0x200
> +#define SOC_GNFERRSTS 0x210
> +#define SOC_GLOBAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, x) XE_REG(_PICK_EVEN((x), \
> + (base) + SOC_GCOERRSTS, \
> + (base) + SOC_GNFERRSTS))
> +#define SOC_SLAVE_IEH BIT(1)
> +#define SOC_IEH0_LOCAL_ERR_STATUS BIT(0)
> +#define SOC_IEH1_LOCAL_ERR_STATUS BIT(0)
What's the secret spacing convention in this file? Really, I couldn't
figure out ;)
> +#define SOC_GSYSEVTCTL 0x264
> +#define SOC_GSYSEVTCTL_REG(base, slave_base, x) XE_REG(_PICK_EVEN((x), \
> + (base) + SOC_GSYSEVTCTL, \
> + slave_base + SOC_GSYSEVTCTL))
Brace around slave_base for consistency.
> +#define SOC_LERRUNCSTS 0x280
> +#define SOC_LERRCORSTS 0x294
> +#define SOC_LOCAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, x) XE_REG(x == DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_CORRECTABLE ? \
In previous patch this was 'hw_err', so whichever one you use please make
it consistent.
> + (base) + SOC_LERRCORSTS : \
> + (base) + SOC_LERRUNCSTS)
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c
> index 77c90f1b06fd..1b7c782dbd98 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>
> #define HEC_UNCORR_FW_ERR_BITS 4
> #define XE_RAS_REG_SIZE 32
> +#define XE_SOC_NUM_IEH 2
Alignment please! (including the values)
> extern struct fault_attr inject_csc_hw_error;
> static const char * const error_severity[] = DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_SEVERITY_NAMES;
> @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ static const char * const hec_uncorrected_fw_errors[] = {
>
> static const unsigned long xe_hw_error_map[] = {
> ERR_INDEX(XE_GT_ERROR, DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_CORE_COMPUTE),
> + ERR_INDEX(XE_SOC_ERROR, DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_SOC_INTERNAL),
> };
>
> enum gt_vector_regs {
> @@ -48,6 +50,92 @@ enum gt_vector_regs {
> ERR_STAT_GT_VECTOR_MAX,
> };
>
> +static const char * const pvc_slave_local_fatal_err_reg[] = {
> + [0] = "Local IEH internal: Malformed PCIe AER",
> + [1] = "Local IEH internal: Malformed PCIe ERR",
> + [2] = "Local IEH internal: UR conditions in IEH",
> + [3] = "Local IEH internal: From SERR Sources",
Unless there's anything like 'IEH external', let's try to simplify a bit.
> + [4 ... 19] = "Undefined",
> + [20] = "Malformed MCA error packet (HBM/Punit)",
> + [21 ... 31] = "Undefined",
Nit: I'd align '=' in all the arrays here but ofcourse it's a personal
preference.
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const pvc_slave_global_err_reg[] = {
> + [0] = "Undefined",
> + [1] = "HBM SS2: Channel0",
> + [2] = "HBM SS2: Channel1",
> + [3] = "HBM SS2: Channel2",
> + [4] = "HBM SS2: Channel3",
> + [5] = "HBM SS2: Channel4",
> + [6] = "HBM SS2: Channel5",
> + [7] = "HBM SS2: Channel6",
> + [8] = "HBM SS2: Channel7",
> + [9] = "HBM SS3: Channel0",
> + [10] = "HBM SS3: Channel1",
> + [11] = "HBM SS3: Channel2",
> + [12] = "HBM SS3: Channel3",
> + [13] = "HBM SS3: Channel4",
> + [14] = "HBM SS3: Channel5",
> + [15] = "HBM SS3: Channel6",
> + [16] = "HBM SS3: Channel7",
> + [17] = "Undefined",
> + [18] = "ANR MDFI",
> + [19 ... 31] = "Undefined",
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const pvc_master_global_err_reg[] = {
> + [0 ... 1] = "Undefined",
> + [2] = "HBM SS0: Channel0",
> + [3] = "HBM SS0: Channel1",
> + [4] = "HBM SS0: Channel2",
> + [5] = "HBM SS0: Channel3",
> + [6] = "HBM SS0: Channel4",
> + [7] = "HBM SS0: Channel5",
> + [8] = "HBM SS0: Channel6",
> + [9] = "HBM SS0: Channel7",
> + [10] = "HBM SS1: Channel0",
> + [11] = "HBM SS1: Channel1",
> + [12] = "HBM SS1: Channel2",
> + [13] = "HBM SS1: Channel3",
> + [14] = "HBM SS1: Channel4",
> + [15] = "HBM SS1: Channel5",
> + [16] = "HBM SS1: Channel6",
> + [17] = "HBM SS1: Channel7",
> + [18 ... 31] = "Undefined",
> +};
I'd move this array above as per SS<N> ordering. Also, group together
global and local ones.
> +static const char * const pvc_master_local_fatal_err_reg[] = {
> + [0] = "Local IEH internal: Malformed IOSF PCIe AER",
> + [1] = "Local IEH internal: Malformed IOSF PCIe ERR",
> + [2] = "Local IEH internal: IEH UR RESPONSE",
> + [3] = "Local IEH internal: From SERR SPI controller",
> + [4] = "Base Die MDFI T2T",
> + [5] = "Undefined",
> + [6] = "Base Die MDFI T2C",
> + [7] = "Undefined",
> + [8] = "Invalid CSC PSF Command Parity",
> + [9] = "Invalid CSC PSF Unexpected Completion",
> + [10] = "Invalid CSC PSF Unsupported Request",
> + [11] = "Invalid PCIe PSF Command Parity",
> + [12] = "PCIe PSF Unexpected Completion",
> + [13] = "PCIe PSF Unsupported Request",
> + [14 ... 19] = "Undefined",
> + [20] = "Malformed MCA error packet (HBM/Punit)",
> + [21 ... 31] = "Undefined",
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const pvc_master_local_nonfatal_err_reg[] = {
> + [0 ... 3] = "Undefined",
> + [4] = "Base Die MDFI T2T",
> + [5] = "Undefined",
> + [6] = "Base Die MDFI T2C",
> + [7] = "Undefined",
> + [8] = "Invalid CSC PSF Command Parity",
> + [9] = "Invalid CSC PSF Unexpected Completion",
> + [10] = "Invalid PCIe PSF Command Parity",
> + [11 ... 31] = "Undefined",
> +};
> +
> static bool fault_inject_csc_hw_error(void)
> {
> return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) && should_fail(&inject_csc_hw_error, 1);
> @@ -197,6 +285,117 @@ static void gt_handle_errors(struct xe_tile *tile,
> }
> }
>
> +static void log_soc_error(struct xe_tile *tile, const char * const *reg_info,
> + const enum drm_xe_ras_error_severity severity, u32 err_bit, u32 index)
> +{
> + const char *severity_str = error_severity[severity];
> + struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(tile);
> + struct xe_drm_ras *ras = &xe->ras;
> + struct xe_drm_ras_counter *info = ras->info[severity];
> + const char *name;
> +
> + name = reg_info[err_bit];
> +
> + if (strcmp(name, "Undefined") != 0) {
Do we need '!= 0'?
> + if (severity == DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_FATAL)
> + drm_err_ratelimited(&xe->drm, "%s SOC %s error detected",
Again, duplicate 'error'.
> + name, severity_str);
> + else
> + drm_warn(&xe->drm, "%s SOC %s error detected", name, severity_str);
Ditto.
> + atomic64_inc(&info[index].counter);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void soc_hw_error_handler(struct xe_tile *tile,
> + const enum drm_xe_ras_error_severity severity, u32 error_id)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(tile);
> + struct xe_mmio *mmio = &tile->mmio;
> + unsigned long master_global_errstat, slave_global_errstat;
> + unsigned long master_local_errstat, slave_local_errstat;
> + u32 base, slave_base, regbit;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (xe->info.platform != XE_PVC)
> + return;
> +
> + base = SOC_PVC_BASE;
> + slave_base = SOC_PVC_SLAVE_BASE;
> +
> + /*
> + * Mask error type in GSYSEVTCTL so that no new errors of the type will be reported
> + */
Can be one line.
> + for (i = 0; i < XE_SOC_NUM_IEH; i++)
> + xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_GSYSEVTCTL_REG(base, slave_base, i), ~REG_BIT(severity));
> +
> + if (severity == DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_CORRECTABLE) {
> + xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_GLOBAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, severity), REG_GENMASK(31, 0));
> + xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_LOCAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, severity), REG_GENMASK(31, 0));
> + xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_GLOBAL_ERR_STAT_REG(slave_base, severity),
> + REG_GENMASK(31, 0));
> + xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_LOCAL_ERR_STAT_REG(slave_base, severity),
> + REG_GENMASK(31, 0));
> + goto unmask_gsysevtctl;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Read the master global IEH error register if
> + * BIT 1 is set then process the slave IEH first. If BIT 0 in
> + * global error register is set then process the corresponding
> + * Local error registers
> + */
This can definitely be less lines.
> + master_global_errstat = xe_mmio_read32(mmio, SOC_GLOBAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, severity));
> + if (master_global_errstat & SOC_SLAVE_IEH) {
> + slave_global_errstat = xe_mmio_read32(mmio,
> + SOC_GLOBAL_ERR_STAT_REG(slave_base, severity));
> + if (slave_global_errstat & SOC_IEH1_LOCAL_ERR_STATUS) {
> + slave_local_errstat = xe_mmio_read32(mmio,
> + SOC_LOCAL_ERR_STAT_REG(slave_base,
> + severity));
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(regbit, &slave_local_errstat, XE_RAS_REG_SIZE) {
> + if (severity == DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_FATAL)
Shouldn't this condition be outside the loop? Also, should we not log it
after we clear the bits?
> + log_soc_error(tile, pvc_slave_local_fatal_err_reg, severity,
> + regbit, error_id);
> + }
> +
> + xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_LOCAL_ERR_STAT_REG(slave_base, severity),
> + slave_local_errstat);
> + }
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(regbit, &slave_global_errstat, XE_RAS_REG_SIZE)
> + log_soc_error(tile, pvc_slave_global_err_reg, severity, regbit, error_id);
Ditto.
> +
> + xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_GLOBAL_ERR_STAT_REG(slave_base, severity),
> + slave_global_errstat);
> + }
> +
> + if (master_global_errstat & SOC_IEH0_LOCAL_ERR_STATUS) {
> + master_local_errstat = xe_mmio_read32(mmio, SOC_LOCAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, severity));
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(regbit, &master_local_errstat, XE_RAS_REG_SIZE) {
> + if (severity == DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_FATAL)
> + log_soc_error(tile, pvc_master_local_fatal_err_reg, severity,
> + regbit, error_id);
> + if (severity == DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_NONFATAL)
> + log_soc_error(tile, pvc_master_local_nonfatal_err_reg, severity,
> + regbit, error_id);
These can be consolidated using temp variable. Also, log after clear.
> + }
> +
> + xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_LOCAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, severity), master_local_errstat);
> + }
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(regbit, &master_global_errstat, XE_RAS_REG_SIZE)
> + log_soc_error(tile, pvc_master_global_err_reg, severity, regbit, error_id);
Ditto.
> +
> + xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_GLOBAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, severity), master_global_errstat);
> +
> +unmask_gsysevtctl:
> + for (i = 0; i < XE_SOC_NUM_IEH; i++)
> + xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_GSYSEVTCTL_REG(base, slave_base, i),
> + (DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_SEVERITY_MAX << 1) + 1);
> +}
> +
> static void gt_hw_error_handler(struct xe_tile *tile,
> const enum drm_xe_ras_error_severity severity, u32 error_id)
> {
> @@ -269,6 +468,9 @@ static void hw_error_source_handler(struct xe_tile *tile, enum drm_xe_ras_error_
> }
> if (BIT(err_bit) & XE_GT_ERROR)
> gt_hw_error_handler(tile, severity, error_id);
> +
> + if (BIT(err_bit) == XE_SOC_ERROR)
Make this consistent with above.
Raag
> + soc_hw_error_handler(tile, severity, error_id);
> }
>
> clear_reg:
> --
> 2.47.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-15 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-05 8:39 [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce DRM_RAS using generic netlink for RAS Riana Tauro
2025-12-05 8:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/ras: Introduce the DRM RAS infrastructure over generic netlink Riana Tauro
2025-12-09 21:35 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-01-08 22:36 ` Zack McKevitt
2026-01-09 20:57 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-01-13 8:20 ` Riana Tauro
2026-01-15 23:39 ` Zack McKevitt
2026-01-16 5:56 ` Riana Tauro
2026-01-16 20:26 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-12-05 8:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/xe/xe_drm_ras: Add support for drm ras Riana Tauro
2025-12-09 8:22 ` Raag Jadav
2026-01-09 8:08 ` Riana Tauro
2026-01-09 14:13 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-01-09 15:58 ` Raag Jadav
2026-01-12 6:13 ` Riana Tauro
2026-01-12 10:27 ` Raag Jadav
2025-12-09 21:57 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-01-07 9:48 ` Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-12-05 8:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Add support for GT hardware errors Riana Tauro
2025-12-10 18:18 ` Raag Jadav
2026-01-12 3:41 ` Riana Tauro
2026-01-12 10:02 ` Raag Jadav
2025-12-05 8:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Add support for PVC SOC errors Riana Tauro
2025-12-15 10:52 ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2026-01-12 4:45 ` Riana Tauro
2026-01-12 10:06 ` Raag Jadav
2025-12-05 9:40 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce DRM_RAS using generic netlink for RAS (rev3) Patchwork
2025-12-05 9:41 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-12-05 9:56 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-12-05 11:27 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-12-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce DRM_RAS using generic netlink for RAS Alex Deucher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aT_oXo97R3GyWgNk@black.igk.intel.com \
--to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashwin.kumar.kulkarni@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joshua.santosh.ranjan@intel.com \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=pratik.bari@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=shubham.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox