From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <francois.dugast@intel.com>,
<daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: Split H2G and G2H into separate buffer objects
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 08:44:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZSa4slBRwb6Hvmb@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aY/H1RKHSPJBlw/w@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 04:54:45PM -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 11:55:14PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2/13/2026 10:16 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > H2G and G2H buffers have different access patterns (H2G is CPU-write,
> > > GuC-read, while G2H is GPU-write, CPU-read). On dGPU, these patterns
> > > benefit from different memory placements: H2G in VRAM and G2H in system
> > > memory. Split the CT buffer into two separate buffers—one for H2G and
> > > one for G2H—and select the optimal placement for each.
> > >
> > > This provides a significant performance improvement on the G2H read
> > > path, reducing a single read from ~20 µs to under 1 µs on BMG.
> > >
> > > Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++----------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct_types.h | 6 ++-
> > > 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> > > index 8a45573f8812..6a96bea40720 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> > > @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ static bool g2h_fence_needs_alloc(struct g2h_fence *g2h_fence)
> > >
> > > #define CTB_DESC_SIZE ALIGN(sizeof(struct guc_ct_buffer_desc), SZ_2K)
> > > #define CTB_H2G_BUFFER_OFFSET (CTB_DESC_SIZE * 2)
> > > +#define CTB_G2H_BUFFER_OFFSET (CTB_DESC_SIZE * 2)
> > > #define CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE (SZ_4K)
> > > #define CTB_H2G_BUFFER_DWORDS (CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE / sizeof(u32))
> > > #define CTB_G2H_BUFFER_SIZE (SZ_128K)
> > > @@ -279,10 +280,14 @@ long xe_guc_ct_queue_proc_time_jiffies(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
> > > return (CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE / SZ_4K) * HZ;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static size_t guc_ct_size(void)
> > > +static size_t guc_h2g_size(void)
> > > {
> > > - return CTB_H2G_BUFFER_OFFSET + CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE +
> > > - CTB_G2H_BUFFER_SIZE;
> > > + return CTB_H2G_BUFFER_OFFSET + CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static size_t guc_g2h_size(void)
> > > +{
> > > + return CTB_G2H_BUFFER_OFFSET + CTB_G2H_BUFFER_SIZE;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void guc_ct_fini(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
> > > @@ -311,7 +316,8 @@ int xe_guc_ct_init_noalloc(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
> > > struct xe_gt *gt = ct_to_gt(ct);
> > > int err;
> > >
> > > - xe_gt_assert(gt, !(guc_ct_size() % PAGE_SIZE));
> > > + xe_gt_assert(gt, !(guc_h2g_size() % PAGE_SIZE));
> > > + xe_gt_assert(gt, !(guc_g2h_size() % PAGE_SIZE));
> >
> > nit: maybe it's time to use SZ_4K here instead of PAGE_SIZE?
> >
>
> Not a nit actually, this is a correctness thing and SZ_4K is correct or
> XE_PAGE_SIZE.
>
On second thought - PAGE_SIZE is right here as these are CPU mapped.
There is an existing bug here for non-x86 CPUs with non-4k PAGE_SIZE
(currently unsupported). This a seperate issue and as this is a fixes,
I'd like to fix this up in follow up.
Matt
> > >
> > > err = drmm_mutex_init(&xe->drm, &ct->lock);
> > > if (err)
> > > @@ -356,7 +362,17 @@ int xe_guc_ct_init(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
> > > struct xe_tile *tile = gt_to_tile(gt);
> > > struct xe_bo *bo;
> >
> > nit: can we drop this local var and assign bo to ct struct members directly ?
> >
>
> Yes.
>
> > >
> > > - bo = xe_managed_bo_create_pin_map(xe, tile, guc_ct_size(),
> > > + bo = xe_managed_bo_create_pin_map(xe, tile, guc_h2g_size(),
> > > + XE_BO_FLAG_SYSTEM |
> > > + XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT |
> > > + XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT_INVALIDATE |
> > > + XE_BO_FLAG_PINNED_NORESTORE);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(bo))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(bo);
> > > +
> > > + ct->bo_h2g = bo;
> > > +
> > > + bo = xe_managed_bo_create_pin_map(xe, tile, guc_g2h_size(),
> > > XE_BO_FLAG_SYSTEM |
> > > XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT |
> > > XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT_INVALIDATE |
> > > @@ -364,7 +380,7 @@ int xe_guc_ct_init(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
> > > if (IS_ERR(bo))
> > > return PTR_ERR(bo);
> > >
> > > - ct->bo = bo;
> > > + ct->bo_g2h = bo;
> > >
> > > return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, guc_action_disable_ct, ct);
> > > }
> > > @@ -389,7 +405,7 @@ int xe_guc_ct_init_post_hwconfig(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
> > > xe_assert(xe, !xe_guc_ct_enabled(ct));
> > >
> > > if (IS_DGFX(xe)) {
> > > - ret = xe_managed_bo_reinit_in_vram(xe, tile, &ct->bo);
> > > + ret = xe_managed_bo_reinit_in_vram(xe, tile, &ct->bo_h2g);
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > @@ -439,8 +455,7 @@ static void guc_ct_ctb_g2h_init(struct xe_device *xe, struct guc_ctb *g2h,
> > > g2h->desc = IOSYS_MAP_INIT_OFFSET(map, CTB_DESC_SIZE);
> > > xe_map_memset(xe, &g2h->desc, 0, 0, sizeof(struct guc_ct_buffer_desc));
> > >
> > > - g2h->cmds = IOSYS_MAP_INIT_OFFSET(map, CTB_H2G_BUFFER_OFFSET +
> > > - CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE);
> > > + g2h->cmds = IOSYS_MAP_INIT_OFFSET(map, CTB_G2H_BUFFER_OFFSET);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int guc_ct_ctb_h2g_register(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
> > > @@ -449,8 +464,8 @@ static int guc_ct_ctb_h2g_register(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
> > > u32 desc_addr, ctb_addr, size;
> > > int err;
> > >
> > > - desc_addr = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(ct->bo);
> > > - ctb_addr = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(ct->bo) + CTB_H2G_BUFFER_OFFSET;
> > > + desc_addr = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(ct->bo_h2g);
> > > + ctb_addr = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(ct->bo_h2g) + CTB_H2G_BUFFER_OFFSET;
> > > size = ct->ctbs.h2g.info.size * sizeof(u32);
> > >
> > > err = xe_guc_self_cfg64(guc,
> > > @@ -476,9 +491,8 @@ static int guc_ct_ctb_g2h_register(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
> > > u32 desc_addr, ctb_addr, size;
> > > int err;
> > >
> > > - desc_addr = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(ct->bo) + CTB_DESC_SIZE;
> > > - ctb_addr = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(ct->bo) + CTB_H2G_BUFFER_OFFSET +
> > > - CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE;
> > > + desc_addr = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(ct->bo_g2h) + CTB_DESC_SIZE;
> > > + ctb_addr = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(ct->bo_g2h) + CTB_G2H_BUFFER_OFFSET;
> > > size = ct->ctbs.g2h.info.size * sizeof(u32);
> > >
> > > err = xe_guc_self_cfg64(guc,
> > > @@ -605,9 +619,12 @@ static int __xe_guc_ct_start(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, bool needs_register)
> > > xe_gt_assert(gt, !xe_guc_ct_enabled(ct));
> > >
> > > if (needs_register) {
> > > - xe_map_memset(xe, &ct->bo->vmap, 0, 0, xe_bo_size(ct->bo));
> > > - guc_ct_ctb_h2g_init(xe, &ct->ctbs.h2g, &ct->bo->vmap);
> > > - guc_ct_ctb_g2h_init(xe, &ct->ctbs.g2h, &ct->bo->vmap);
> > > + xe_map_memset(xe, &ct->bo_h2g->vmap, 0, 0,
> > > + xe_bo_size(ct->bo_h2g));
> > > + xe_map_memset(xe, &ct->bo_g2h->vmap, 0, 0,
> > > + xe_bo_size(ct->bo_g2h));
> > > + guc_ct_ctb_h2g_init(xe, &ct->ctbs.h2g, &ct->bo_h2g->vmap);
> > > + guc_ct_ctb_g2h_init(xe, &ct->ctbs.g2h, &ct->bo_g2h->vmap);
> > >
> > > err = guc_ct_ctb_h2g_register(ct);
> > > if (err)
> > > @@ -624,7 +641,7 @@ static int __xe_guc_ct_start(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, bool needs_register)
> > > ct->ctbs.h2g.info.broken = false;
> > > ct->ctbs.g2h.info.broken = false;
> > > /* Skip everything in H2G buffer */
> > > - xe_map_memset(xe, &ct->bo->vmap, CTB_H2G_BUFFER_OFFSET, 0,
> > > + xe_map_memset(xe, &ct->bo_h2g->vmap, CTB_H2G_BUFFER_OFFSET, 0,
> > > CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -1963,8 +1980,9 @@ static struct xe_guc_ct_snapshot *guc_ct_snapshot_alloc(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, bo
> > > if (!snapshot)
> > > return NULL;
> > >
> > > - if (ct->bo && want_ctb) {
> > > - snapshot->ctb_size = xe_bo_size(ct->bo);
> > > + if (ct->bo_h2g && ct->bo_g2h && want_ctb) {
> > > + snapshot->ctb_size = xe_bo_size(ct->bo_h2g) +
> > > + xe_bo_size(ct->bo_g2h);
> > > snapshot->ctb = kmalloc(snapshot->ctb_size, atomic ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -2012,8 +2030,12 @@ static struct xe_guc_ct_snapshot *guc_ct_snapshot_capture(struct xe_guc_ct *ct,
> > > guc_ctb_snapshot_capture(xe, &ct->ctbs.g2h, &snapshot->g2h);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (ct->bo && snapshot->ctb)
> > > - xe_map_memcpy_from(xe, snapshot->ctb, &ct->bo->vmap, 0, snapshot->ctb_size);
> > > + if (ct->bo_h2g && ct->bo_g2h && snapshot->ctb) {
> > > + xe_map_memcpy_from(xe, snapshot->ctb, &ct->bo_h2g->vmap, 0,
> > > + xe_bo_size(ct->bo_h2g));
> > > + xe_map_memcpy_from(xe, snapshot->ctb + xe_bo_size(ct->bo_h2g),
> > > + &ct->bo_g2h->vmap, 0, xe_bo_size(ct->bo_g2h));
> > > + }
> > >
> > > return snapshot;
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct_types.h
> > > index 09d7ff1ef42a..385a607e4777 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct_types.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct_types.h
> > > @@ -126,8 +126,10 @@ struct xe_fast_req_fence {
> > > * for the H2G and G2H requests sent and received through the buffers.
> > > */
> > > struct xe_guc_ct {
> > > - /** @bo: Xe BO for CT */
> > > - struct xe_bo *bo;
> > > + /** @bo_h2g: Xe BO for H2G */
> > > + struct xe_bo *bo_h2g;
> > > + /** @bo_g2h: Xe BO for G2H */
> > > + struct xe_bo *bo_g2h;
> >
> > since we already have h2g and g2h:
> >
> > struct {
> > /** @ctbs.send: Host to GuC (H2G, send) channel */
> > struct guc_ctb h2g;
> > /** @ctbs.recv: GuC to Host (G2H, receive) channel */
> > struct guc_ctb g2h;
> > } ctbs;
> >
> > maybe just add .bo member to struct guc_ctb?
> >
>
> I thought about this, was trying to keep the diff to minimum for fixes
> but moving it there is likely fine.
>
> Matt
>
> >
> > > /** @lock: protects everything in CT layer */
> > > struct mutex lock;
> > > /** @fast_lock: protects G2H channel and credits */
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-17 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-13 21:16 [PATCH v2 0/2] GuC CT memory optimizations Matthew Brost
2026-02-13 21:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: Split H2G and G2H into separate buffer objects Matthew Brost
2026-02-13 22:55 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-02-14 0:54 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-17 16:44 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-02-13 21:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Remove H2G reads in CT send path in non-debug builds Matthew Brost
2026-02-16 12:51 ` Francois Dugast
2026-02-16 17:40 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-17 11:19 ` Francois Dugast
2026-02-18 0:24 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-02-18 2:35 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-13 21:59 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for GuC CT memory optimizations Patchwork
2026-02-13 22:39 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-02-14 21:35 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZSa4slBRwb6Hvmb@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox