From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, anshuman.gupta@intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com,
riana.tauro@intel.com, mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com,
aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com, himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com,
arvind.yadav@intel.com, syed.abdul.muqthyar.ahmed@intel.com,
nitin.r.gote@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/13] drm/xe/cper: Initialize Intel-specific section header
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 06:57:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <at7r5F9TrkHza2xf@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023043422.681260-18-badal.nilawar@intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2026 at 10:04:25AM +0530, Badal Nilawar wrote:
> Define the Intel-specific CPER header and initialize it
Please also use the same terminology in subject.
> from the error counter record for Intel GPU hardware errors.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> ---
> v5:
> - Move xe_cper_emit_counter() from patch 7 of rev4 to this patch to
> avoid code churn (Raag)
> - Use __packed for individual structures instead of #pragma pack (Raag)
> - Drop redundent 'err'/'error' references, shorten structure name (Raag)
> v4:
> - Split from "drm/xe/cper: Prepare CPER record" (Raag)
> - Add dedicated struct xe_cper_error_class (Michal)
> - Drop empty fill_fw_id() stub, leave a TODO instead
> v2:
> - Guard against NULL THIS_MODULE->srcversion (sashiko)
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_cper.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_cper_types.h | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_cper_types.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_cper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_cper.c
> index a9044e708cac..3d7657517223 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_cper.c
> @@ -6,18 +6,68 @@
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/minmax.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>
> #include "xe_cper.h"
> +#include "xe_cper_types.h"
> #include "xe_device.h"
> #include "xe_printk.h"
> #include "xe_ras.h"
> #include "xe_ras_types.h"
>
> +static bool is_valid_sigid(u32 sigid)
Can simply be is_sigid().
> +{
> + return sigid != U32_MAX;
> +}
> +
> static bool is_hw_sigid(enum xe_sigid sigid)
> {
> return in_range(sigid, INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_HARDWARE_START, INTEL_SIGID_BATCH);
> }
>
> +static void cper_init_intel_hdr(struct xe_device *xe,
> + const struct xe_ras_error_class *counter,
This looks like can be less lines.
> + u64 first_timestamp, u32 sig_id, u32 error_count,
> + struct xe_cper_intel_hdr *ihdr)
> +{
> + ihdr->counter = *counter;
> + ihdr->validation_bits |= XE_CPER_VALID_LOCATION;
> +
> + if (first_timestamp) {
> + ihdr->first_timestamp = first_timestamp;
> + ihdr->validation_bits |= XE_CPER_VALID_FIRST_TIMESTAMP;
> + }
> +
> + if (is_valid_sigid(sig_id)) {
> + ihdr->sig_id = sig_id;
> + ihdr->validation_bits |= XE_CPER_VALID_SIG_ID;
> + }
> +
> + ihdr->error_count = error_count;
> +
> + strscpy(ihdr->pci_bdf, pci_name(to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev)), sizeof(ihdr->pci_bdf));
> + ihdr->validation_bits |= XE_CPER_VALID_PCI_BDF;
> +
> +#ifdef MODULE
> + if (THIS_MODULE->srcversion) {
> + strscpy(ihdr->drv_version, THIS_MODULE->srcversion, sizeof(ihdr->drv_version));
> + ihdr->validation_bits |= XE_CPER_VALID_DRV_VERSION;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> + /* TODO: fill fw_id and set XE_CPER_VALID_FW_ID */
Hm, see below.
> +}
> +
> +static void cper_emit_counter(struct xe_device *xe, int cper_sev, enum xe_sigid sigid,
> + const struct xe_ras_error_class *counter,
> + const struct xe_ras_get_counter_response *response)
> +{
> + struct xe_cper_intel_hdr ihdr = {};
> +
> + cper_init_intel_hdr(xe, counter, response->timestamp,
> + sigid, response->value, &ihdr);
> +}
> +
> static void cper_emit_hw_err(struct xe_device *xe, int cper_sev, enum xe_sigid sigid,
> const struct xe_ras_error_class *counter)
> {
> @@ -31,6 +81,8 @@ static void cper_emit_hw_err(struct xe_device *xe, int cper_sev, enum xe_sigid s
> xe_err(xe, "CPER: failed to get counter, skipping record\n");
> return;
> }
> +
> + cper_emit_counter(xe, cper_sev, sigid, counter, &response);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_cper_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_cper_types.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a8730ff62b69
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_cper_types.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _XE_CPER_TYPES_H_
> +#define _XE_CPER_TYPES_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#include "xe_ras_types.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * Validation bits definition for validation_bits in struct
> + * xe_cper_intel_hdr. When set, corresponding fields in header
> + * contains valid data
> + */
> +#define XE_CPER_VALID_LOCATION 0x0001
> +#define XE_CPER_VALID_FIRST_TIMESTAMP 0x0002
> +#define XE_CPER_VALID_SIG_ID 0x0004
> +#define XE_CPER_VALID_PCI_BDF 0x0008
> +#define XE_CPER_VALID_DRV_VERSION 0x0010
> +
> +/**
> + * struct xe_cper_intel_hdr - Intel-specific CPER header
> + *
> + * Fixed-size header for the Intel GPU error section of a CPER record.
> + * All multi-byte fields are little-endian.
> + */
> +struct xe_cper_intel_hdr {
> + /** @counter: Error class (severity, component, location, cause) */
> + struct xe_ras_error_class counter;
> + /** @first_timestamp: First occurrence of this error class, in ticks */
> + u64 first_timestamp;
> + /** @sig_id: Aggregated error class SIG ID; set to U32_MAX if unknown */
> + u32 sig_id;
> + /** @error_count: Number of times this error has been observed */
> + u32 error_count;
> + /** @validation_bits: Raw u16 view of all valid bits */
> + u16 validation_bits;
> + /** @pci_bdf: PCI location string, format "DDDD:bb:dd.f" */
> + char pci_bdf[16];
> + /** @drv_version: Driver source version string (THIS_MODULE->srcversion) */
> + char drv_version[25];
> + /** @fw_id: Firmware version string (GFSP+PCODE+CSC+GUC or MNG+NUC+RAS+GUC) */
> + char fw_id[256];
Please introduce this member in the patch you actually use it.
Raag
> + /** @reserved: Reserved for future use, must be zero */
> + u8 reserved[5];
> +} __packed;
> +
> +#endif
> --
> 2.54.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 4:34 [PATCH v5 00/13] Add CPER logging support for CRI Badal Nilawar
2026-10-23 4:24 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add CPER logging support for CRI (rev5) Patchwork
2026-10-23 4:26 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-10-23 4:34 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] drm/xe/cper: Add CPER reporting entry point for xe_log Badal Nilawar
2026-10-24 11:38 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-23 4:34 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] drm/xe/cper: Retrieve the error counter record for CPER reporting Badal Nilawar
2026-10-24 11:50 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-23 4:34 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] drm/xe/cper: Initialize Intel-specific section header Badal Nilawar
2026-10-23 4:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 5:57 ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2026-10-23 4:34 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] drm/xe/cper: Construct CPER record for hardware errors Badal Nilawar
2026-10-26 9:54 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-27 3:34 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-10-23 4:34 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] drm/xe/cper: Log CPER records for aggregate counter retrieval Badal Nilawar
2026-10-26 11:31 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-23 4:34 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] drm/xe/cper: Emit cper record to trace buf Badal Nilawar
2026-10-26 12:29 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-27 4:21 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-10-23 4:34 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] drm/xe/xe_ras: Report device memory errors using SIGID Badal Nilawar
2026-10-26 12:47 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-26 18:31 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-10-27 1:29 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-27 6:03 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-10-23 4:34 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] drm/xe/xe_ras: Report core compute " Badal Nilawar
2026-10-23 6:24 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-27 12:43 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-23 4:34 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] drm/xe/xe_ras: Report soc internal " Badal Nilawar
2026-10-23 6:16 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-26 12:57 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-23 4:34 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] drm/xe/xe_ras: Report correctable " Badal Nilawar
2026-10-26 15:17 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-27 4:13 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-23 4:34 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] drm/xe/xe_ras: Report unknown " Badal Nilawar
2026-10-23 4:34 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] drm/xe/xe_ras: Add support to retrieve info queue data Badal Nilawar
2026-10-23 4:34 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] drm/xe/cper: Prepare Intel CPER info records Badal Nilawar
2026-10-23 6:34 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: success for Add CPER logging support for CRI (rev5) Patchwork
2026-10-23 6:35 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=at7r5F9TrkHza2xf@black.igk.intel.com \
--to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com \
--cc=arvind.yadav@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
--cc=nitin.r.gote@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=syed.abdul.muqthyar.ahmed@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox