From: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
To: iwd@lists.linux.dev
Cc: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/13] station: use netdev_ft_reassociate
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 12:18:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231206201802.2139649-11-prestwoj@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231206201802.2139649-1-prestwoj@gmail.com>
Using this will provide netdev with a connect callback and unify the
roaming result notification between FT and reassociation. Both paths
will now end up in station_reassociate_cb.
This also adds another return case for ft_handshake_setup which was
previously ignored by ft_associate. Its likely impossible to actually
happen but should be handled nevertheless.
Fixes: 30c6a10f28 ("netdev: Separate connect_failed and disconnected paths")
---
src/station.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/station.c b/src/station.c
index 48a595dc..52d87c84 100644
--- a/src/station.c
+++ b/src/station.c
@@ -2181,7 +2181,8 @@ static void station_reassociate_cb(struct netdev *netdev,
l_debug("%u, result: %d", netdev_get_ifindex(station->netdev), result);
- if (station->state != STATION_STATE_ROAMING)
+ if (station->state != STATION_STATE_ROAMING &&
+ station->state != STATION_STATE_FT_ROAMING)
return;
if (result == NETDEV_RESULT_OK)
@@ -2314,7 +2315,8 @@ static bool station_ft_work_ready(struct wiphy_radio_work_item *item)
if (!bss)
goto try_next;
- ret = ft_associate(netdev_get_ifindex(station->netdev), bss->addr);
+ ret = ft_handshake_setup(netdev_get_ifindex(station->netdev),
+ bss->addr);
switch (ret) {
case MMPDU_STATUS_CODE_INVALID_PMKID:
/*
@@ -2343,12 +2345,28 @@ try_next:
station_transition_start(station);
break;
case 0:
+ ret = netdev_ft_reassociate(station->netdev, bss,
+ station->connected_bss,
+ station_netdev_event,
+ station_reassociate_cb, station);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto disassociate;
+
station->connected_bss = bss;
station->preparing_roam = false;
station_enter_state(station, STATION_STATE_FT_ROAMING);
station_debug_event(station, "ft-roam");
+ break;
+ case -EINVAL:
+ /*
+ * Likely an impossible situation, but since ft_handshake_setup
+ * rederived the handshake keys we can't do anything but
+ * disconnect.
+ */
+disassociate:
+ station_disassociated(station);
break;
default:
if (ret > 0)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-06 20:17 [PATCH v3 01/13] auto-t: add explicit stop() to IWD class James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] auto-t: add association timeout test James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] auto-t: only call set_value for changed values in default() James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] handshake: add setters for authenticator/supplicant_fte James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] handshake: use authenticator_fte instead of 'fte' James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] unit: use authenticator_fte James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] handshake: remove handshake_state_set_fte James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] ft: add FTE/RSNE building to ft_prepare_handshake James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] ft: add ft_handshake_setup James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] netdev: add netdev_ft_reassociate James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:18 ` James Prestwood [this message]
2023-12-06 20:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] ft: remove ft_associate and helpers James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:18 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] netdev: station: remove NETDEV_EVENT_FT_ROAMED James Prestwood
2023-12-13 16:14 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] auto-t: add explicit stop() to IWD class Denis Kenzior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231206201802.2139649-11-prestwoj@gmail.com \
--to=prestwoj@gmail.com \
--cc=iwd@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox