From: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
To: iwd@lists.linux.dev
Cc: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 09/13] ft: add ft_handshake_setup
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 12:17:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231206201802.2139649-9-prestwoj@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231206201802.2139649-1-prestwoj@gmail.com>
This will be called from station after FT-authentication has
finished. It sets up the handshake object to perform reassociation.
This is essentially a copy-paste of ft_associate without sending
the actual frame.
---
src/ft.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/ft.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/ft.c b/src/ft.c
index d3b9234a..c612a433 100644
--- a/src/ft.c
+++ b/src/ft.c
@@ -1276,6 +1276,46 @@ int ft_associate(uint32_t ifindex, const uint8_t *addr)
return ret;
}
+int ft_handshake_setup(uint32_t ifindex, const uint8_t *target)
+{
+ struct netdev *netdev = netdev_find(ifindex);
+ struct handshake_state *hs = netdev_get_handshake(netdev);
+ struct ft_info *info;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ info = ft_info_find(ifindex, target);
+ if (!info)
+ return -ENOENT;
+
+ /*
+ * Either failed or no response. This may have been an FT-over-DS
+ * attempt so clear out the entry so FT-over-Air can try again.
+ */
+ if (info->status != 0) {
+ int status = info->status;
+
+ l_queue_remove(info_list, info);
+ ft_info_destroy(info);
+
+ return status;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * This shouldn't ever fail:
+ * - supplicant_ie has already been validated long ago
+ * - l_checksum_* shouldn't fail since we presumable have kernel
+ * support, how else could we have made it this far.
+ * But just in case...
+ */
+ if (L_WARN_ON(!ft_prepare_handshake(info, hs)))
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+
+ /* After this no previous auths will be valid */
+ ft_clear_authentications(ifindex);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static bool remove_ifindex(void *data, void *user_data)
{
struct ft_info *info = data;
diff --git a/src/ft.h b/src/ft.h
index 51bbe3bc..23d0136e 100644
--- a/src/ft.h
+++ b/src/ft.h
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ void __ft_rx_action(uint32_t ifindex, const uint8_t *frame, size_t frame_len);
void __ft_rx_authenticate(uint32_t ifindex, const uint8_t *frame,
size_t frame_len);
+int ft_handshake_setup(uint32_t ifindex, const uint8_t *target);
+
void ft_clear_authentications(uint32_t ifindex);
int ft_action(uint32_t ifindex, uint32_t freq, const struct scan_bss *target);
int ft_associate(uint32_t ifindex, const uint8_t *addr);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-06 20:17 [PATCH v3 01/13] auto-t: add explicit stop() to IWD class James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] auto-t: add association timeout test James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] auto-t: only call set_value for changed values in default() James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] handshake: add setters for authenticator/supplicant_fte James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] handshake: use authenticator_fte instead of 'fte' James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] unit: use authenticator_fte James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] handshake: remove handshake_state_set_fte James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] ft: add FTE/RSNE building to ft_prepare_handshake James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` James Prestwood [this message]
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] netdev: add netdev_ft_reassociate James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] station: use netdev_ft_reassociate James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] ft: remove ft_associate and helpers James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:18 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] netdev: station: remove NETDEV_EVENT_FT_ROAMED James Prestwood
2023-12-13 16:14 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] auto-t: add explicit stop() to IWD class Denis Kenzior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231206201802.2139649-9-prestwoj@gmail.com \
--to=prestwoj@gmail.com \
--cc=iwd@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox