* 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26
@ 2008-09-06 21:24 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:25 ` [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (41 more replies)
0 siblings, 42 replies; 78+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.26, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.26, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2008-09-07 150 43 33
2008-08-30 135 48 36
2008-08-23 122 48 40
2008-08-16 103 47 37
2008-08-10 80 52 31
2008-08-02 47 31 20
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512
Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig"
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11507
Subject : usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-26 21:03 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121977815018224&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11506
Subject : oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5)
Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-04 19:14 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055573123449&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505
Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine
Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins-Et1tbQHTxzrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504
Subject : reiserfs  BUG in 2.6.27-rc5
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-03 16:35 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11501
Subject : Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw
Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-04 18:34 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055342419068&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500
Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux
Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11485
Subject : 2.6.27-rc xen pvops regression?
Submitter : Bernhard Schmidt <berni-wpePDvIxQxvMZTq/7ZfH4Q@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-31 17:18 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122020367015025&w=4
Handled-By : Alex Nixon <alex.nixon-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476
Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4
Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Dan Williams <dcbw-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11471
Subject : GPE storm detected, kernel freezes
Submitter : George Gibbs <Vash63-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-31 22:00 (7 days old)
Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465
Subject : Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett-H+0wwilmMs3R7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-30 18:52 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122012238925775&w=4
Handled-By : Dave Airlie <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11463
Subject : sshd hangs on close
Submitter : Matthias Urlichs <matthias-+qxcz+fHsVSELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-30 9:18 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122008800512864&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11459
Subject : kernel crash after wifi connection established
Submitter : Alexey Kuznetsov <ak-b7SOpcJQXxU@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-30 03:08 (8 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407
Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (17 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org>
Pavel Machek <pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404
Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (17 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4
Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11403
Subject : 2.6.27-rc2 USB suspend regression
Submitter : Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-20 20:48 (18 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121926536103630&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11398
Subject : hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj.
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-21 17:17 (17 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380
Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (18 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11357
Subject : Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick
Submitter : uwe <kender-KuiJ5kEpwI6ELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-16 14:17 (22 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11343
Subject : SATA Cold Boot Problems with 2.6.27-rc[23] on nVidia 680i
Submitter : Manny Maxwell <mannymax-7UBucS1kxs3k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-14 4:16 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121868782917600&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340
Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (25 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11335
Subject : 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-12 4:18 (26 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121851477201960&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/16/274
Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308
Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272
Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835
Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (33 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271
Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (33 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98
Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu-W8zweXLXuWQS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264
Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue
Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (31 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11230
Subject : Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs
Submitter : Josh Boyer <jwboyer-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-02 16:03 (36 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121769306319391&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224
Subject : Only three cores found on quad-core machine.
Submitter : Dave Jones <davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-01 18:15 (37 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220
Subject : Screen stays black after resume
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (38 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215
Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (38 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210
Subject : libata badness
Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (38 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4
Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209
Subject : 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman-8qz54MUs51PtwjQa/ONI9g@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 10:43 (38 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (38 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Dhaval Giani <dhaval-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Miao Xie <miaox-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11511
Subject : HPT374 detection crash with 74811f355f4f69a187fa74892dcf2a684b84ce99
Submitter : Masoud Sharbiani <masouds-VSK0CvVmMoVQFI55V6+gNQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-04 23:11 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122056994113818&w=4
Handled-By : Masoud Sharbiani <masouds-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122072163527041&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442
Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git
Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4
Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver-GvhC2dPhHPQdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11439
Subject : [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings
Submitter : Rufus & Azrael <rufus-azrael-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-26 9:37 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121974353815440&w=4
Handled-By : Greg KH <gregkh-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121976424221858&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11418
Subject : Many soft lockups
Submitter : Gu Rui <chaos.proton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-24 13:06 (14 days old)
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17622&action=view
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382
Subject : e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM
Submitter : David Vrabel <david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-08 10:47 (30 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121819267211679&w=4
Handled-By : Christopher Li <chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=122038324200305&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11358
Subject : net: forcedeth call restore mac addr in nv_shutdown path
Submitter : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-17 3:30 (21 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11336
Subject : 2.6.27-rc2:stall while mounting root fs
Submitter : Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-12 12:37 (26 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121854484015909&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17622
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11334
Subject : myri10ge: use ioremap_wc: compilation failure on ARM
Submitter : Martin Michlmayr <tbm-R+vWnYXSFMfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-10 11:25 (28 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121836771727632&w=2
Handled-By : Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh-OLH4Qvv75CYX/NnBR394Jw@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11334#c13
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11276
Subject : build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-06 17:18 (32 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121804329014332&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/353
Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/364
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237
Subject : corrupt PMD after resume
Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins-cCz0Lq7MMjm9FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-02 9:51 (36 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121767073424952&w=4
Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122001615314700&w=2
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.26,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread* [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11210] libata badness Rafael J. Wysocki ` (40 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dhaval Giani, Miao Xie, Peter Zijlstra, Zhang, Yanmin This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207 Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (38 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Dhaval Giani <dhaval-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> Miao Xie <miaox-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11210] libata badness 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:25 ` [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11209] 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting Rafael J. Wysocki ` (39 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Kumar Gala This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210 Subject : libata badness Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (38 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4 Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11209] 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:25 ` [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11210] libata badness Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-07 9:04 ` Peter Zijlstra 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11237] corrupt PMD after resume Rafael J. Wysocki ` (38 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Lukas Hejtmanek, Peter Zijlstra This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209 Subject : 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman-8qz54MUs51PtwjQa/ONI9g@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-07-31 10:43 (38 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11209] 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11209] 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-07 9:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [not found] ` <1220778273.8687.20.camel-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2008-09-07 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Lukas Hejtmanek On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 23:30 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209 > Subject : 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting > Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman-8qz54MUs51PtwjQa/ONI9g@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2008-07-31 10:43 (38 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4 > Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Should be fixed in the latest -git ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1220778273.8687.20.camel-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11209] 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting [not found] ` <1220778273.8687.20.camel-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-07 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [not found] ` <200809080002.09381.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-07 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Lukas Hejtmanek On Sunday, 7 of September 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 23:30 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209 > > Subject : 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting > > Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman-8qz54MUs51PtwjQa/ONI9g@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2008-07-31 10:43 (38 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4 > > Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> > > Should be fixed in the latest -git Thanks for the update. Does any specific commit fix it or just a series of recent commits? Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200809080002.09381.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11209] 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting [not found] ` <200809080002.09381.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-08 6:40 ` Peter Zijlstra 0 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2008-09-08 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Lukas Hejtmanek On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 00:02 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, 7 of September 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 23:30 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > > of recent regressions. > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > > (either way). > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209 > > > Subject : 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting > > > Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman-8qz54MUs51PtwjQa/ONI9g@public.gmane.org> > > > Date : 2008-07-31 10:43 (38 days old) > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4 > > > Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> > > > > Should be fixed in the latest -git > > Thanks for the update. > > Does any specific commit fix it or just a series of recent commits? commit 49048622eae698e5c4ae61f7e71200f265ccc529 Author: Balbir Singh <balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> Date: Fri Sep 5 18:12:23 2008 +0200 sched: fix process time monotonicity Spencer reported a problem where utime and stime were going negative despite the fixes in commit b27f03d4bdc145a09fb7b0c0e004b29f1ee555fa. The suspected reason for the problem is that signal_struct maintains it's own utime and stime (of exited tasks), these are not updated using the new task_utime() routine, hence sig->utime can go backwards and cause the same problem to occur (sig->utime, adds tsk->utime and not task_utime()). This patch fixes the problem commit 56c7426b3951e4f35a71d695f1c982989399d6fd Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Date: Mon Sep 1 16:44:23 2008 +0200 sched_clock: fix NOHZ interaction If HLT stops the TSC, we'll fail to account idle time, thereby inflating the actual process times. Fix this by re-calibrating the clock against GTOD when leaving nohz mode. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11237] corrupt PMD after resume 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11209] 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Rafael J. Wysocki ` (37 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins, Hugh Dickins, Ingo Molnar, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, Jeremy Fitzhardinge This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 Subject : corrupt PMD after resume Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins-cCz0Lq7MMjm9FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-02 9:51 (36 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121767073424952&w=4 Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122001615314700&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11237] corrupt PMD after resume Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11230] Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Rafael J. Wysocki ` (36 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Peter Zijlstra, Zdenek Kabelac This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215 Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (38 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11230] Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume Rafael J. Wysocki ` (35 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Josh Boyer This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 Subject : Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Submitter : Josh Boyer <jwboyer-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-02 16:03 (36 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121769306319391&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11230] Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine Rafael J. Wysocki ` (34 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Nico Schottelius This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 Subject : Screen stays black after resume Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (38 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine. 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (6 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Rafael J. Wysocki ` (33 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Jones This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224 Subject : Only three cores found on quad-core machine. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-01 18:15 (37 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (7 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (32 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jean-Luc Coulon This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264 Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (31 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (8 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (31 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jaswinder Singh This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272 Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (9 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11276] build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things Rafael J. Wysocki ` (30 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Francois Romieu, Jaswinder Singh This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271 Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98 Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu-W8zweXLXuWQS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11276] build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (10 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11334] myri10ge: use ioremap_wc: compilation failure on ARM Rafael J. Wysocki ` (29 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Ingo Molnar, Randy Dunlap This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11276 Subject : build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-06 17:18 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121804329014332&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/353 Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/364 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11334] myri10ge: use ioremap_wc: compilation failure on ARM 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (11 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11276] build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-07 15:59 ` Lennert Buytenhek 2008-09-10 12:09 ` Lennert Buytenhek 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11335] 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki ` (28 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 2 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Brice Goglin, Lennert Buytenhek, Lennert Buytenhek, Martin Michlmayr This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11334 Subject : myri10ge: use ioremap_wc: compilation failure on ARM Submitter : Martin Michlmayr <tbm-R+vWnYXSFMfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-10 11:25 (28 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121836771727632&w=2 Handled-By : Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh-OLH4Qvv75CYX/NnBR394Jw@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11334#c13 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11334] myri10ge: use ioremap_wc: compilation failure on ARM 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11334] myri10ge: use ioremap_wc: compilation failure on ARM Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-07 15:59 ` Lennert Buytenhek [not found] ` <20080907155952.GA24110-mfnYTeDhw6uOVk/H6u/4e9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-10 12:09 ` Lennert Buytenhek 1 sibling, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Lennert Buytenhek @ 2008-09-07 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Brice Goglin, Lennert Buytenhek, Martin Michlmayr On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:30:38PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11334 > Subject : myri10ge: use ioremap_wc: compilation failure on ARM > Submitter : Martin Michlmayr <tbm-R+vWnYXSFMfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2008-08-10 11:25 (28 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121836771727632&w=2 > Handled-By : Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh-OLH4Qvv75CYX/NnBR394Jw@public.gmane.org> > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11334#c13 Still relevant. A patch to fix this has been submitted and should be in the ARM tree, but it has not made its way upstream yet, and the original submitter has not confirmed that it fixes the problem yet. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080907155952.GA24110-mfnYTeDhw6uOVk/H6u/4e9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11334] myri10ge: use ioremap_wc: compilation failure on ARM [not found] ` <20080907155952.GA24110-mfnYTeDhw6uOVk/H6u/4e9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-08 8:52 ` Martin Michlmayr 0 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Martin Michlmayr @ 2008-09-08 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lennert Buytenhek Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Brice Goglin, Lennert Buytenhek * Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh-OLH4Qvv75CYX/NnBR394Jw@public.gmane.org> [2008-09-07 17:59]: > Still relevant. A patch to fix this has been submitted and should be in > the ARM tree, but it has not made its way upstream yet, and the original > submitter has not confirmed that it fixes the problem yet. Your patch fixes the compilation error I reported, thanks. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11334] myri10ge: use ioremap_wc: compilation failure on ARM 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11334] myri10ge: use ioremap_wc: compilation failure on ARM Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-07 15:59 ` Lennert Buytenhek @ 2008-09-10 12:09 ` Lennert Buytenhek 1 sibling, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Lennert Buytenhek @ 2008-09-10 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Brice Goglin, Martin Michlmayr On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:30:38PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11334 > Subject : myri10ge: use ioremap_wc: compilation failure on ARM > Submitter : Martin Michlmayr <tbm-R+vWnYXSFMfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2008-08-10 11:25 (28 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121836771727632&w=2 > Handled-By : Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh-OLH4Qvv75CYX/NnBR394Jw@public.gmane.org> > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11334#c13 The patch to fix this is upstream now (in -rc6), as commit 1ad77a876da48331451698cc4172c90ab9b6372f. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11335] 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (12 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11334] myri10ge: use ioremap_wc: compilation failure on ARM Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11336] 2.6.27-rc2:stall while mounting root fs Rafael J. Wysocki ` (27 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Hugh Dickins, Randy Dunlap This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11335 Subject : 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-12 4:18 (26 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121851477201960&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/16/274 Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11336] 2.6.27-rc2:stall while mounting root fs 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (13 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11335] 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (26 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Thomas Gleixner, Torsten Kaiser This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11336 Subject : 2.6.27-rc2:stall while mounting root fs Submitter : Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-12 12:37 (26 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121854484015909&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17622 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (14 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11336] 2.6.27-rc2:stall while mounting root fs Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Rafael J. Wysocki ` (25 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christoph Lameter This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (27 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (15 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11343] SATA Cold Boot Problems with 2.6.27-rc[23] on nVidia 680i Rafael J. Wysocki ` (24 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340 Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (25 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11343] SATA Cold Boot Problems with 2.6.27-rc[23] on nVidia 680i 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (16 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11357] Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick Rafael J. Wysocki ` (23 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Manny Maxwell, Tejun Heo This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11343 Subject : SATA Cold Boot Problems with 2.6.27-rc[23] on nVidia 680i Submitter : Manny Maxwell <mannymax-7UBucS1kxs3k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-14 4:16 (24 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121868782917600&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11357] Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (17 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11343] SATA Cold Boot Problems with 2.6.27-rc[23] on nVidia 680i Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Rafael J. Wysocki ` (22 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, uwe This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11357 Subject : Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick Submitter : uwe <kender-KuiJ5kEpwI6ELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-16 14:17 (22 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (18 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11357] Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11358] net: forcedeth call restore mac addr in nv_shutdown path Rafael J. Wysocki ` (21 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christopher Li, David Vrabel This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382 Subject : e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Submitter : David Vrabel <david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-08 10:47 (30 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121819267211679&w=4 Handled-By : Christopher Li <chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=122038324200305&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11358] net: forcedeth call restore mac addr in nv_shutdown path 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (19 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (20 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jeff Garzik, Tobias Diedrich, Yinghai Lu This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11358 Subject : net: forcedeth call restore mac addr in nv_shutdown path Submitter : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-17 3:30 (21 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4 Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (20 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11358] net: forcedeth call restore mac addr in nv_shutdown path Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11403] 2.6.27-rc2 USB suspend regression Rafael J. Wysocki ` (19 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380 Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11403] 2.6.27-rc2 USB suspend regression 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (21 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Rafael J. Wysocki ` (18 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Jeremy Fitzhardinge This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11403 Subject : 2.6.27-rc2 USB suspend regression Submitter : Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-20 20:48 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121926536103630&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (22 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11403] 2.6.27-rc2 USB suspend regression Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj Rafael J. Wysocki ` (17 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, James Bottomley, Miller, Mike (OS Dev), rdunlap This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404 Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (17 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4 Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (23 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11418] Many soft lockups Rafael J. Wysocki ` (16 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frans Pop This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11398 Subject : hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-21 17:17 (17 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11418] Many soft lockups 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (24 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Rafael J. Wysocki ` (15 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gu Rui, Thomas Gleixner This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11418 Subject : Many soft lockups Submitter : Gu Rui <chaos.proton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-24 13:06 (14 days old) Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17622&action=view ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (25 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11418] Many soft lockups Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-08 4:44 ` Greg KH 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki ` (14 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Greg KH, Rufus & Azrael This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11439 Subject : [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Submitter : Rufus & Azrael <rufus-azrael-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-26 9:37 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121974353815440&w=4 Handled-By : Greg KH <gregkh-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121976424221858&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-08 4:44 ` Greg KH 2008-09-09 5:01 ` Jesse Barnes 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2008-09-08 4:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki, jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Rufus & Azrael On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:30:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11439 > Subject : [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings > Submitter : Rufus & Azrael <rufus-azrael-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2008-08-26 9:37 (12 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121974353815440&w=4 > Handled-By : Greg KH <gregkh-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121976424221858&w=4 Jesse, have you queued up this patch to send to Linus for 2.6.27? thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings 2008-09-08 4:44 ` Greg KH @ 2008-09-09 5:01 ` Jesse Barnes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2008-09-09 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Rufus & Azrael On Sunday, September 07, 2008 9:44 pm Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:30:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11439 > > Subject : [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings > > Submitter : Rufus & Azrael <rufus-azrael@numericable.fr> > > Date : 2008-08-26 9:37 (12 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121974353815440&w=4 > > Handled-By : Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121976424221858&w=4 > > Jesse, have you queued up this patch to send to Linus for 2.6.27? Not yet; I'll include it in my next pull request though. Thanks, Jesse ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (26 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11459] kernel crash after wifi connection established Rafael J. Wysocki ` (13 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek, Pekka Enberg, Rafael J. Wysocki, Vegard Nossum This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407 Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (17 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Pekka Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org> Pavel Machek <pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11459] kernel crash after wifi connection established 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (27 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11465] Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log Rafael J. Wysocki ` (12 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Kuznetsov This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11459 Subject : kernel crash after wifi connection established Submitter : Alexey Kuznetsov <ak-b7SOpcJQXxU@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-30 03:08 (8 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11465] Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (28 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11459] kernel crash after wifi connection established Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Rafael J. Wysocki ` (11 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Gene Heskett This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465 Subject : Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett-H+0wwilmMs3R7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-30 18:52 (8 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122012238925775&w=4 Handled-By : Dave Airlie <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (29 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11465] Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11463] sshd hangs on close Rafael J. Wysocki ` (10 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Oliver Neukum, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4 Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver-GvhC2dPhHPQdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11463] sshd hangs on close 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (30 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11485] 2.6.27-rc xen pvops regression? Rafael J. Wysocki ` (9 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Matthias Urlichs This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11463 Subject : sshd hangs on close Submitter : Matthias Urlichs <matthias-+qxcz+fHsVSELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-30 9:18 (8 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122008800512864&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11485] 2.6.27-rc xen pvops regression? 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (31 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11463] sshd hangs on close Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux Rafael J. Wysocki ` (8 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alex Nixon, Bernhard Schmidt, Jeremy Fitzhardinge This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11485 Subject : 2.6.27-rc xen pvops regression? Submitter : Bernhard Schmidt <berni-wpePDvIxQxvMZTq/7ZfH4Q@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-31 17:18 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122020367015025&w=4 Handled-By : Alex Nixon <alex.nixon-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (32 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11485] 2.6.27-rc xen pvops regression? Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki ` (7 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (33 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11471] GPE storm detected, kernel freezes Rafael J. Wysocki ` (6 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dan Williams, Jouni Malinen, Michael S. Tsirkin, Zhu Yi This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476 Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4 Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Dan Williams <dcbw-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11471] GPE storm detected, kernel freezes 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (34 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Rafael J. Wysocki ` (5 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, George Gibbs, Zhang Rui This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11471 Subject : GPE storm detected, kernel freezes Submitter : George Gibbs <Vash63-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-31 22:00 (7 days old) Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (35 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11471] GPE storm detected, kernel freezes Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11501] Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw Rafael J. Wysocki ` (4 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gregory Haskins, Ingo Molnar, Lin Ming, Peter Zijlstra This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505 Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Gregory Haskins <ghaskins-Et1tbQHTxzrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11501] Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (36 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11506] oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Rafael J. Wysocki ` (3 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11501 Subject : Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-04 18:34 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055342419068&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11506] oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (37 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11501] Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Rafael J. Wysocki ` (2 subsequent siblings) 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Marcin Slusarz This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11506 Subject : oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-04 19:14 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055573123449&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (38 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11506] oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11507] usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11511] HPT374 detection crash with 74811f355f4f69a187fa74892dcf2a684b84ce99 Rafael J. Wysocki 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512 Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11507] usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (39 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 10:09 ` Frans Pop 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11511] HPT374 detection crash with 74811f355f4f69a187fa74892dcf2a684b84ce99 Rafael J. Wysocki 41 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frans Pop This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11507 Subject : usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-26 21:03 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121977815018224&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11507] usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11507] usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 10:09 ` Frans Pop 0 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Frans Pop @ 2008-09-12 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Saturday 06 September 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me > know (either way). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11507 > Subject : usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot > Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2008-08-26 21:03 (12 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121977815018224&w=2 Still there. Alan Stern has provided a patch for the issue: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg09735.html I've just reported back the test results: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg09926.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11511] HPT374 detection crash with 74811f355f4f69a187fa74892dcf2a684b84ce99 2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (40 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11507] usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 41 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Masoud Sharbiani, Masoud Sharbiani This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11511 Subject : HPT374 detection crash with 74811f355f4f69a187fa74892dcf2a684b84ce99 Submitter : Masoud Sharbiani <masouds-VSK0CvVmMoVQFI55V6+gNQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-04 23:11 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122056994113818&w=4 Handled-By : Masoud Sharbiani <masouds-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122072163527041&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 @ 2008-09-12 18:59 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.26, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.26, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2008-09-12 163 51 38 2008-09-07 150 43 33 2008-08-30 135 48 36 2008-08-23 122 48 40 2008-08-16 103 47 37 2008-08-10 80 52 31 2008-08-02 47 31 20 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11559 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6: nohz + s2ram = need to press keys to get progress Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-12 8:31 (1 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122121384705262&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11557 Subject : Controlling backlight on thinkpad x60 Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-08 15:10 (5 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122088987319698&w=4 Handled-By : Matthew Garrett <mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11554 Subject : Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27 Submitter : Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton-4qZELD6Fgxg39yzSjRtAkw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-12 16:56 (1 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122123862519434&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 Subject : Strange looking line from "ps aux" Submitter : Rogério Brito <rbrito-qczF+2RCDl1fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-11 17:43 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122115506018275&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11552 Subject : Disabling IRQ #23 Submitter : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-09 19:08 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098735230906&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107367715361&w=4 Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11551 Subject : Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 Submitter : Steven Noonan <steven-Cunn4gMjHvbm+q05EWxUEA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-10 18:07 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107007407994&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11548 Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! Submitter : Chris Mason <chris.mason-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-08 14:26 (5 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122088566310440&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11516 Subject : severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 Submitter : Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-07 13:59 (6 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512 Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (8 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11506 Subject : oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-04 19:14 (9 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055573123449&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505 Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (9 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4 http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Gregory Haskins <ghaskins-Et1tbQHTxzrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504 Subject : reiserfs BUG in 2.6.27-rc5 Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-03 16:35 (10 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11501 Subject : Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-04 18:34 (9 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055342419068&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11485 Subject : 2.6.27-rc xen pvops regression? Submitter : Bernhard Schmidt <berni-wpePDvIxQxvMZTq/7ZfH4Q@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-31 17:18 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122020367015025&w=4 Handled-By : Alex Nixon <alex.nixon-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476 Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4 Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Dan Williams <dcbw-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11471 Subject : GPE storm detected, kernel freezes Submitter : George Gibbs <Vash63-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-31 22:00 (13 days old) Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465 Subject : Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett-H+0wwilmMs3R7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-30 18:52 (14 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122012238925775&w=4 Handled-By : Dave Airlie <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11463 Subject : sshd hangs on close Submitter : Matthias Urlichs <matthias-+qxcz+fHsVSELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-30 9:18 (14 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122008800512864&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11459 Subject : kernel crash after wifi connection established Submitter : Alexey Kuznetsov <ak-b7SOpcJQXxU@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-30 03:08 (14 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407 Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (23 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Pekka Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org> Pavel Machek <pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404 Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (23 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4 Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11398 Subject : hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-21 17:17 (23 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380 Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (24 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11357 Subject : Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick Submitter : uwe <kender-KuiJ5kEpwI6ELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-16 14:17 (28 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11343 Subject : SATA Cold Boot Problems with 2.6.27-rc[23] on nVidia 680i Submitter : Manny Maxwell <mannymax-7UBucS1kxs3k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-14 4:16 (30 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121868782917600&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340 Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (31 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11335 Subject : 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-12 4:18 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121851477201960&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/16/274 Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272 Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (39 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271 Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (39 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98 Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu-W8zweXLXuWQS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264 Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (37 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 Subject : Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Submitter : Josh Boyer <jwboyer-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-02 16:03 (42 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121769306319391&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224 Subject : Only three cores found on quad-core machine. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-01 18:15 (43 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 Subject : Screen stays black after resume Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (44 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215 Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (44 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210 Subject : libata badness Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (44 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4 Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207 Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (44 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Dhaval Giani <dhaval-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> Miao Xie <miaox-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11556 Subject : e100: PCI wake-up handling rework causes "Error clearing wake event" Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-09 6:12 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=122094080712131&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122096638020191&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11555 Subject : rmmod ide-cd_mod: tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong. Submitter : Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski-NWF1p15JEu3VItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-07-16 2:22 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=122061839713526&w=4 Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095622602315&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman-cENuUygGYd//D1n+0JDH9g@public.gmane.org> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098498125536&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549 Subject : 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Submitter : <jmerkey-6KXTs3wnGaZTqo3+vT/QGPegYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-02 21:27 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122039255517586&w=4 Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098180019264&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11547 Subject : build issue #565 for v2.6.27-rc5 : undefined reference to `ei_interrupt' in hp-plus.c Submitter : Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-07 13:19 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122079361508022&w=4 Handled-By : Randy.Dunlap <rdunlap-/UHa2rfvQTnk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122038632306156&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11507 Subject : usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-26 21:03 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121977815018224&w=2 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg09735.html Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (19 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4 Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver-GvhC2dPhHPQdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11439 Subject : [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Submitter : Rufus & Azrael <rufus-azrael-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-26 9:37 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121974353815440&w=4 Handled-By : Greg KH <gregkh-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121976424221858&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382 Subject : e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Submitter : David Vrabel <david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-08 10:47 (36 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121819267211679&w=4 Handled-By : Christopher Li <chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=122038324200305&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11358 Subject : net: forcedeth call restore mac addr in nv_shutdown path Submitter : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-17 3:30 (27 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4 Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11336 Subject : 2.6.27-rc2:stall while mounting root fs Submitter : Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-12 12:37 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121854484015909&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17622 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11276 Subject : build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-06 17:18 (38 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121804329014332&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/353 Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/364 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 Subject : corrupt PMD after resume Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins-cCz0Lq7MMjm9FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-02 9:51 (42 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121767073424952&w=4 Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122001615314700&w=2 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.26, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 22:14 ` James Morris 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 22:14 ` James Morris [not found] ` <alpine.LRH.1.10.0809130812460.12313-CK9fWmtY32x9JUWOpEiw7w@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: James Morris @ 2008-09-12 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Stephen Smalley On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is this seen with? - James -- James Morris <jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0809130812460.12313-CK9fWmtY32x9JUWOpEiw7w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux [not found] ` <alpine.LRH.1.10.0809130812460.12313-CK9fWmtY32x9JUWOpEiw7w@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-12 22:24 ` Andrew Morton [not found] ` <20080912152443.c4e59f42.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-12 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: James Morris Cc: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 08:14:10 +1000 (EST) James Morris <jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > this seen with? > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080912152443.c4e59f42.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux [not found] ` <20080912152443.c4e59f42.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-13 0:15 ` James Morris [not found] ` <alpine.LRH.1.10.0809131012310.13073-CK9fWmtY32x9JUWOpEiw7w@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: James Morris @ 2008-09-13 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> > > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we By which I mean, this was caused by a non-SELinux change to the upstream kernel many, many eons ago. > > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > > this seen with? > > > > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. As mentioned in the bugzilla, any related avc messages would be useful. -- James Morris <jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0809131012310.13073-CK9fWmtY32x9JUWOpEiw7w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux [not found] ` <alpine.LRH.1.10.0809131012310.13073-CK9fWmtY32x9JUWOpEiw7w@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-13 19:37 ` Andrew Morton [not found] ` <20080913123722.e238ae2a.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-13 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: James Morris Cc: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:15:43 +1000 (EST) James Morris <jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > > > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> > > > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > > > > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we > > By which I mean, this was caused by a non-SELinux change to the upstream > kernel many, many eons ago. hm, seems that 2.6.24 is OK but 2.6.25 is not. I must have missed the bug when testing 2.6.25-based kernels. I started a git bisection search but after half an hour I hit bad bisection breakage: a complete machine hang in fib_rules_init(). > > > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > > > this seen with? > > > > > > > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. > > As mentioned in the bugzilla, any related avc messages would be useful. 2.6.25 dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-sony.txt /var/log/messages: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/messages-sony.txt The latter includes this: Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class key not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class dccp_socket not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class memprotect not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class peer not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class capability2 not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class dir not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class file not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class chr_file not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class blk_file not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class fifo_file not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class node not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class node not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class netif not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class netif not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setkeycreate in class process not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setsockcreate in class process not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setfcap in class capability not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission polmatch in class association not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_in in class packet not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_out in class packet not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_in in class packet not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_out in class packet not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be denied Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1403 audit(1221309118.644:3): policy loaded auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1400 audit(1221334321.726:4): avc: denied { audit_write } for pid=400 comm="hwclock" capability=29 scontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tclass=capability Why am I seeing this on two machines and two vanilla-installed distros but nobody else is reporting it? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080913123722.e238ae2a.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux [not found] ` <20080913123722.e238ae2a.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-15 0:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-15 13:05 ` Stephen Smalley 1 sibling, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-15 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: James Morris, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA On Saturday, 13 of September 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:15:43 +1000 (EST) James Morris <jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > > > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > > > > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> > > > > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > > > > > > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we > > > > By which I mean, this was caused by a non-SELinux change to the upstream > > kernel many, many eons ago. > > hm, seems that 2.6.24 is OK but 2.6.25 is not. I must have missed the > bug when testing 2.6.25-based kernels. > > I started a git bisection search but after half an hour I hit bad > bisection breakage: a complete machine hang in fib_rules_init(). > > > > > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > > > > this seen with? > > > > > > > > > > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. > > > > As mentioned in the bugzilla, any related avc messages would be useful. > > 2.6.25 dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-sony.txt > /var/log/messages: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/messages-sony.txt > > The latter includes this: > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class key not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class dccp_socket not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class memprotect not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class peer not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class capability2 not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class dir not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class chr_file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class blk_file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class fifo_file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setkeycreate in class process not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setsockcreate in class process not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setfcap in class capability not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission polmatch in class association not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_in in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_out in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_in in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_out in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be denied > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1403 audit(1221309118.644:3): policy loaded auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1400 audit(1221334321.726:4): avc: denied { audit_write } for pid=400 comm="hwclock" capability=29 scontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tclass=capability > > > Why am I seeing this on two machines and two vanilla-installed distros > but nobody else is reporting it? Well, it seems no one else is testing selinux ... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux [not found] ` <20080913123722.e238ae2a.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-15 0:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-15 13:05 ` Stephen Smalley [not found] ` <1221483926.30816.18.camel-/ugcdrsPCSfIm9DtXLC9OUVfdvkotuLY+aIohriVLy8@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-15 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: James Morris, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 12:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:15:43 +1000 (EST) James Morris <jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > > > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > > > > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> > > > > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > > > > > > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we > > > > By which I mean, this was caused by a non-SELinux change to the upstream > > kernel many, many eons ago. > > hm, seems that 2.6.24 is OK but 2.6.25 is not. I must have missed the > bug when testing 2.6.25-based kernels. > > I started a git bisection search but after half an hour I hit bad > bisection breakage: a complete machine hang in fib_rules_init(). > > > > > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > > > > this seen with? > > > > > > > > > > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. > > > > As mentioned in the bugzilla, any related avc messages would be useful. > > 2.6.25 dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-sony.txt > /var/log/messages: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/messages-sony.txt > > The latter includes this: > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class key not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class dccp_socket not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class memprotect not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class peer not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class capability2 not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class dir not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class chr_file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class blk_file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class fifo_file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setkeycreate in class process not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setsockcreate in class process not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setfcap in class capability not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission polmatch in class association not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_in in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_out in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_in in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_out in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be denied > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1403 audit(1221309118.644:3): policy loaded auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1400 audit(1221334321.726:4): avc: denied { audit_write } for pid=400 comm="hwclock" capability=29 scontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tclass=capability > > > Why am I seeing this on two machines and two vanilla-installed distros > but nobody else is reporting it? What we actually need to see is the output of: /sbin/ausearch -i -m AVC -sv no However, the most likely explanation is simply that when /proc/net was changed from being a directory to being a symlink to /proc/self/net, that introduced an additional permission check on accesses of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read check on the symlink itself. And since that check wasn't happening on /proc/net accesses with older kernels, older policies didn't allow it. As to why others haven't reported it, I expect that they have updated their policies to newer ones that allow the necessary access. The fact that legacy distros wouldn't have such updated policies isn't surprising - they don't push updates to those distros for new kernels. FC5 and FC6 are both EOL'd, right? In any event, we didn't change anything in SELinux - the change was elsewhere (in the proc/net implementation). Don't blame the messenger please. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1221483926.30816.18.camel-/ugcdrsPCSfIm9DtXLC9OUVfdvkotuLY+aIohriVLy8@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux [not found] ` <1221483926.30816.18.camel-/ugcdrsPCSfIm9DtXLC9OUVfdvkotuLY+aIohriVLy8@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-15 13:42 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-17 19:50 ` Andrew Morton 1 sibling, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-15 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: James Morris, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 09:05 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 12:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:15:43 +1000 (EST) James Morris <jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > > > > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > > > > > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> > > > > > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > > > > > > > > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we > > > > > > By which I mean, this was caused by a non-SELinux change to the upstream > > > kernel many, many eons ago. > > > > hm, seems that 2.6.24 is OK but 2.6.25 is not. I must have missed the > > bug when testing 2.6.25-based kernels. > > > > I started a git bisection search but after half an hour I hit bad > > bisection breakage: a complete machine hang in fib_rules_init(). > > > > > > > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > > > > > this seen with? > > > > > > > > > > > > > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. > > > > > > As mentioned in the bugzilla, any related avc messages would be useful. > > > > 2.6.25 dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-sony.txt > > /var/log/messages: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/messages-sony.txt > > > > The latter includes this: > > > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class key not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class dccp_socket not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class memprotect not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class peer not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class capability2 not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class dir not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class chr_file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class blk_file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class fifo_file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setkeycreate in class process not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setsockcreate in class process not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setfcap in class capability not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission polmatch in class association not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_in in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_out in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_in in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_out in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be denied > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1403 audit(1221309118.644:3): policy loaded auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1400 audit(1221334321.726:4): avc: denied { audit_write } for pid=400 comm="hwclock" capability=29 scontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tclass=capability > > > > > > Why am I seeing this on two machines and two vanilla-installed distros > > but nobody else is reporting it? > > What we actually need to see is the output of: > /sbin/ausearch -i -m AVC -sv no > > However, the most likely explanation is simply that when /proc/net was > changed from being a directory to being a symlink to /proc/self/net, > that introduced an additional permission check on accesses > of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read check on the symlink itself. > And since that check wasn't happening on /proc/net accesses with older > kernels, older policies didn't allow it. > > As to why others haven't reported it, I expect that they have updated > their policies to newer ones that allow the necessary access. The fact > that legacy distros wouldn't have such updated policies isn't surprising > - they don't push updates to those distros for new kernels. FC5 and FC6 > are both EOL'd, right? > > In any event, we didn't change anything in SELinux - the change was > elsewhere (in the proc/net implementation). Don't blame the messenger > please. BTW, if the explanation above is correct, then a user can allow this permission in their own policy by creating a local policy module and inserting it, ala: $ cat fixprocnet.te policy_module(fixprocnet, 1.0) require { attribute domain; type proc_net_t; } # Allow all domains to read the /proc/net symlink. allow domain proc_net_t:lnk_file read; $ make -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile fixprocnet.pp $ /usr/sbin/semodule -i fixprocnet.pp Requires selinux-policy-devel to be installed. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux [not found] ` <1221483926.30816.18.camel-/ugcdrsPCSfIm9DtXLC9OUVfdvkotuLY+aIohriVLy8@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-15 13:42 ` Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-17 19:50 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-17 21:24 ` Paul Moore [not found] ` <20080917125053.1f9ecf37.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 2 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-17 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Smalley Cc: jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Eric W. Biederman, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:05:26 -0400 Stephen Smalley <sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 12:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:15:43 +1000 (EST) James Morris <jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > > > > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > > > > > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> > > > > > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > > > > > > > > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we > > > > > > By which I mean, this was caused by a non-SELinux change to the upstream > > > kernel many, many eons ago. > > > > hm, seems that 2.6.24 is OK but 2.6.25 is not. I must have missed the > > bug when testing 2.6.25-based kernels. > > > > I started a git bisection search but after half an hour I hit bad > > bisection breakage: a complete machine hang in fib_rules_init(). > > > > > > > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > > > > > this seen with? > > > > > > > > > > > > > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. > > > > > > As mentioned in the bugzilla, any related avc messages would be useful. > > > > 2.6.25 dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-sony.txt > > /var/log/messages: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/messages-sony.txt > > > > The latter includes this: > > > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class key not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class dccp_socket not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class memprotect not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class peer not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class capability2 not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class dir not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class chr_file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class blk_file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class fifo_file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setkeycreate in class process not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setsockcreate in class process not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setfcap in class capability not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission polmatch in class association not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_in in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_out in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_in in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_out in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be denied > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1403 audit(1221309118.644:3): policy loaded auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1400 audit(1221334321.726:4): avc: denied { audit_write } for pid=400 comm="hwclock" capability=29 scontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tclass=capability > > > > > > Why am I seeing this on two machines and two vanilla-installed distros > > but nobody else is reporting it? Running `ls -l /proc/net' on the FC6 machine produces: [ 132.591215] type=1400 audit(1221679672.590:10): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=4389 comm="ls" path="/proc/net" dev=proc ino=4026531867 scontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:proc_net_t:s0 tclass=lnk_file > What we actually need to see is the output of: > /sbin/ausearch -i -m AVC -sv no akpm2:/home/akpm# /sbin/ausearch -i -m AVC -sv no <no matches> > However, the most likely explanation is simply that when /proc/net was > changed from being a directory to being a symlink to /proc/self/net, > that introduced an additional permission check on accesses > of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read check on the symlink itself. > And since that check wasn't happening on /proc/net accesses with older > kernels, older policies didn't allow it. > > As to why others haven't reported it, I expect that they have updated > their policies to newer ones that allow the necessary access. The fact > that legacy distros wouldn't have such updated policies isn't surprising > - they don't push updates to those distros for new kernels. FC5 and FC6 > are both EOL'd, right? > > In any event, we didn't change anything in SELinux - the change was > elsewhere (in the proc/net implementation). Don't blame the messenger > please. > Vanilla FC5 broke and vanilla FC6 broke. Did vanilla FC7, 8 or 9 break? http://smolt.fedoraproject.org/static/stats/stats.html shows 11,000-odd people running FC5 and FC6. It would be incautious to assume that all those people have updated their selinux rules. And _requiring_ people to update their selinux rules to fix a kernel-caused regression is a pretty big deal for some people, I expect. Then again, given that this regression has been out there since 2.6.25, I guess not too many people are hurting from it. But we suck. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 19:50 ` Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-17 21:24 ` Paul Moore 2008-09-17 21:39 ` Eric W. Biederman ` (2 more replies) [not found] ` <20080917125053.1f9ecf37.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 3 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Paul Moore @ 2008-09-17 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: Stephen Smalley, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, Eric W. Biederman, netdev On Wednesday 17 September 2008 3:50:53 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:05:26 -0400 > Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote: > > However, the most likely explanation is simply that when /proc/net > > was changed from being a directory to being a symlink to > > /proc/self/net, that introduced an additional permission check on > > accesses of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read check on the > > symlink itself. And since that check wasn't happening on /proc/net > > accesses with older kernels, older policies didn't allow it. > > > > As to why others haven't reported it, I expect that they have > > updated their policies to newer ones that allow the necessary > > access. The fact that legacy distros wouldn't have such updated > > policies isn't surprising - they don't push updates to those > > distros for new kernels. FC5 and FC6 are both EOL'd, right? > > > > In any event, we didn't change anything in SELinux - the change was > > elsewhere (in the proc/net implementation). Don't blame the > > messenger please. > > Vanilla FC5 broke and vanilla FC6 broke. Did vanilla FC7, 8 or 9 > break? > > http://smolt.fedoraproject.org/static/stats/stats.html shows > 11,000-odd people running FC5 and FC6. It would be incautious to > assume that all those people have updated their selinux rules. > > And _requiring_ people to update their selinux rules to fix a > kernel-caused regression is a pretty big deal for some people, I > expect. Just so I'm clear on the context of the problem, it sounds like if a FC5 (I'm limiting myself to FC5 for the moment) user upgraded to a recent (2.6.25+) kernel (non-distro supplied in the case of FC5) then they will run into problems unless they also upgrade their SELinux policy, yes? If that is the case I'm not sure it is really that big of a deal. Maybe I'm in the minority here, but in my mind once you step away from the distro supplied kernel (also applies to other packages, although those are arguably less critical) you should also bear the responsibility to make sure you upgrade/tweak/install whatever other bits need to be fixed. > Then again, given that this regression has been out there since > 2.6.25, I guess not too many people are hurting from it. But we > suck. We suck? Maybe, but some explanation about why we suck in this particular case would be helpful as far as I'm concerned. I don't really care about identifying the guilty suckees, I'm more interested in finding out what happened to cause us to suck because of this. -- paul moore linux @ hp ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 21:24 ` Paul Moore @ 2008-09-17 21:39 ` Eric W. Biederman [not found] ` <m1vdwu4fku.fsf-B27657KtZYmhTnVgQlOflh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-17 21:48 ` Andrew Morton [not found] ` <200809171724.36269.paul.moore-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> 2 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-17 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Moore Cc: Andrew Morton, Stephen Smalley, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com> writes: > We suck? Maybe, but some explanation about why we suck in this > particular case would be helpful as far as I'm concerned. I don't > really care about identifying the guilty suckees, I'm more interested > in finding out what happened to cause us to suck because of this. Agreed. I believe we carefully gave selinux the same paths for /proc/net that it had before so I don't know why this affects user space. I know we had some selinux review when we made the change. Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <m1vdwu4fku.fsf-B27657KtZYmhTnVgQlOflh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux [not found] ` <m1vdwu4fku.fsf-B27657KtZYmhTnVgQlOflh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-17 22:11 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-17 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric W. Biederman Cc: paul.moore-VXdhtT5mjnY, sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA, jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:39:45 -0700 ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > Paul Moore <paul.moore-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> writes: > > > We suck? Maybe, but some explanation about why we suck in this > > particular case would be helpful as far as I'm concerned. I don't > > really care about identifying the guilty suckees, I'm more interested > > in finding out what happened to cause us to suck because of this. > > Agreed. I believe we carefully gave selinux the same paths for /proc/net > that it had before so I don't know why this affects user space. > > I know we had some selinux review when we made the change. > > Eric It's back up-thread somewhere. umm... On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:05:26 -0400 Stephen Smalley <sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > However, the most likely explanation is simply that when /proc/net was > changed from being a directory to being a symlink to /proc/self/net, > that introduced an additional permission check on accesses > of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read check on the symlink itself. > And since that check wasn't happening on /proc/net accesses with older > kernels, older policies didn't allow it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 21:24 ` Paul Moore 2008-09-17 21:39 ` Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-17 21:48 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-17 22:12 ` Paul Moore [not found] ` <20080917144842.7df59f9e.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> [not found] ` <200809171724.36269.paul.moore-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> 2 siblings, 2 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-17 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Moore Cc: sds, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, ebiederm, netdev On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:24:36 -0400 Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 17 September 2008 3:50:53 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:05:26 -0400 > > Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote: > > > However, the most likely explanation is simply that when /proc/net > > > was changed from being a directory to being a symlink to > > > /proc/self/net, that introduced an additional permission check on > > > accesses of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read check on the > > > symlink itself. And since that check wasn't happening on /proc/net > > > accesses with older kernels, older policies didn't allow it. > > > > > > As to why others haven't reported it, I expect that they have > > > updated their policies to newer ones that allow the necessary > > > access. The fact that legacy distros wouldn't have such updated > > > policies isn't surprising - they don't push updates to those > > > distros for new kernels. FC5 and FC6 are both EOL'd, right? > > > > > > In any event, we didn't change anything in SELinux - the change was > > > elsewhere (in the proc/net implementation). Don't blame the > > > messenger please. > > > > Vanilla FC5 broke and vanilla FC6 broke. Did vanilla FC7, 8 or 9 > > break? > > > > http://smolt.fedoraproject.org/static/stats/stats.html shows > > 11,000-odd people running FC5 and FC6. It would be incautious to > > assume that all those people have updated their selinux rules. > > > > And _requiring_ people to update their selinux rules to fix a > > kernel-caused regression is a pretty big deal for some people, I > > expect. > > Just so I'm clear on the context of the problem, it sounds like if a FC5 > (I'm limiting myself to FC5 for the moment) user upgraded to a recent > (2.6.25+) kernel (non-distro supplied in the case of FC5) then they > will run into problems unless they also upgrade their SELinux policy, > yes? That only true if the 2.6.25+ kernel.org kernel is backward-incompatible with the distro kernel. > If that is the case I'm not sure it is really that big of a deal. Maybe > I'm in the minority here, but in my mind once you step away from the > distro supplied kernel (also applies to other packages, although those > are arguably less critical) you should also bear the responsibility to > make sure you upgrade/tweak/install whatever other bits need to be > fixed. Nope. Releasing a non-backward-compatible kernel.org kernel is a big deal. We'll do it sometimes, with long notice, much care and much deliberation. We did it this time by sheer accident. That's known in the trade as a "bug". > > Then again, given that this regression has been out there since > > 2.6.25, I guess not too many people are hurting from it. But we > > suck. > > We suck? Maybe, but some explanation about why we suck in this > particular case would be helpful as far as I'm concerned. I don't > really care about identifying the guilty suckees, I'm more interested > in finding out what happened to cause us to suck because of this. Because we unintentionally and unknowingly released a kernel which is not compatible with previous kernels without notifying any of our users and without any consideration or planning. Yes, often the consequences of the screwup are fairly small, but it's a screwup nonetheless. We don't even know the extent of the damage yet. Which distros were affected? With which versions of which userspace packages? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 21:48 ` Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-17 22:12 ` Paul Moore 2008-09-17 22:24 ` Andrew Morton [not found] ` <20080917144842.7df59f9e.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Paul Moore @ 2008-09-17 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: sds, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, ebiederm, netdev On Wednesday 17 September 2008 5:48:42 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:24:36 -0400 > > Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 September 2008 3:50:53 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:05:26 -0400 > > > > > > Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote: > > > > However, the most likely explanation is simply that when > > > > /proc/net was changed from being a directory to being a symlink > > > > to /proc/self/net, that introduced an additional permission > > > > check on accesses of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read > > > > check on the symlink itself. And since that check wasn't > > > > happening on /proc/net accesses with older kernels, older > > > > policies didn't allow it. > > > > > > > > As to why others haven't reported it, I expect that they have > > > > updated their policies to newer ones that allow the necessary > > > > access. The fact that legacy distros wouldn't have such > > > > updated policies isn't surprising - they don't push updates to > > > > those distros for new kernels. FC5 and FC6 are both EOL'd, > > > > right? > > > > > > > > In any event, we didn't change anything in SELinux - the change > > > > was elsewhere (in the proc/net implementation). Don't blame > > > > the messenger please. > > > > > > Vanilla FC5 broke and vanilla FC6 broke. Did vanilla FC7, 8 or 9 > > > break? > > > > > > http://smolt.fedoraproject.org/static/stats/stats.html shows > > > 11,000-odd people running FC5 and FC6. It would be incautious to > > > assume that all those people have updated their selinux rules. > > > > > > And _requiring_ people to update their selinux rules to fix a > > > kernel-caused regression is a pretty big deal for some people, I > > > expect. > > > > Just so I'm clear on the context of the problem, it sounds like if > > a FC5 (I'm limiting myself to FC5 for the moment) user upgraded to > > a recent (2.6.25+) kernel (non-distro supplied in the case of FC5) > > then they will run into problems unless they also upgrade their > > SELinux policy, yes? > > That only true if the 2.6.25+ kernel.org kernel is > backward-incompatible with the distro kernel. Yep, just wanted to make sure I was understanding the problem correctly. > > If that is the case I'm not sure it is really that big of a deal. > > Maybe I'm in the minority here, but in my mind once you step away > > from the distro supplied kernel (also applies to other packages, > > although those are arguably less critical) you should also bear the > > responsibility to make sure you upgrade/tweak/install whatever > > other bits need to be fixed. > > Nope. Releasing a non-backward-compatible kernel.org kernel is a big > deal. Well, there is also the issue of distro specific "special sauce" patches which might cause different behavior from the kernel.org kernel, but now we are starting to do down a rat hole ... > We'll do it sometimes, with long notice, much care and much > deliberation. > > We did it this time by sheer accident. That's known in the trade as > a "bug". It is somewhat comforting to know that we can call what we do a "trade", further commentary on my part is best left to the imagination :) > > > Then again, given that this regression has been out there since > > > 2.6.25, I guess not too many people are hurting from it. But we > > > suck. > > > > We suck? Maybe, but some explanation about why we suck in this > > particular case would be helpful as far as I'm concerned. I don't > > really care about identifying the guilty suckees, I'm more > > interested in finding out what happened to cause us to suck because > > of this. > > Because we unintentionally and unknowingly released a kernel which is > not compatible with previous kernels without notifying any of our > users and without any consideration or planning. > > Yes, often the consequences of the screwup are fairly small, but it's > a screwup nonetheless. Okay, so we suck because broke something in 2.6.25 that went undetected because current SELinux policies happen to be compatible with the breakage. Gotcha. > We don't even know the extent of the damage yet. Which distros were > affected? With which versions of which userspace packages? Can I assume that the "right" thing to do would be to find the problem and revert whatever change caused the issue, yes? Or are we happy to wait and see since the fallout so far has been minimal? -- paul moore linux @ hp ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 22:12 ` Paul Moore @ 2008-09-17 22:24 ` Andrew Morton [not found] ` <20080917152407.76230f0c.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-17 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Moore Cc: sds, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, ebiederm, netdev On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:12:59 -0400 Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com> wrote: > > We don't even know the extent of the damage yet. Which distros were > > affected? With which versions of which userspace packages? > > Can I assume that the "right" thing to do would be to find the problem > and revert whatever change caused the issue, yes? Or are we happy to > wait and see since the fallout so far has been minimal? I don't think a revert is justified after all this time. afaik I'm the first person to notice the problem, and it's been out there for multiple months. However it would be good if we could find some not-completely-stinky way of making the old userspace work. otoh, people who are shipping 2.6.25- and 2.6.26-based distros probably wouldn't want such a patch in their kernels anyway. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080917152407.76230f0c.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux [not found] ` <20080917152407.76230f0c.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-17 22:53 ` Eric W. Biederman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-17 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: Paul Moore, sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA, jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> writes: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:12:59 -0400 > Paul Moore <paul.moore-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> > We don't even know the extent of the damage yet. Which distros were >> > affected? With which versions of which userspace packages? >> >> Can I assume that the "right" thing to do would be to find the problem >> and revert whatever change caused the issue, yes? Or are we happy to >> wait and see since the fallout so far has been minimal? > > I don't think a revert is justified after all this time. afaik I'm the > first person to notice the problem, and it's been out there for > multiple months. > > However it would be good if we could find some not-completely-stinky > way of making the old userspace work. > > otoh, people who are shipping 2.6.25- and 2.6.26-based distros probably > wouldn't want such a patch in their kernels anyway. Disable selinux? Get a selinux mystic to update that selinux policy. I bet it is a one line change to each the policy about /proc/net as a symlink. Although I am puzzled why we don't get the same label as /proc/net as a directory had. Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080917144842.7df59f9e.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux [not found] ` <20080917144842.7df59f9e.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-17 22:32 ` Eric W. Biederman 2008-09-18 12:38 ` Stephen Smalley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-17 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: Paul Moore, sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA, jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> writes: > We don't even know the extent of the damage yet. Which distros were > affected? With which versions of which userspace packages? This seems to me to be an extremely fragile selinux user space policy. In their code that derives security labels from path names. Why don't we have AppArmor in the kernel again? Further I don't see how we could have possibly have supported that user space policy. How can we apply a user space defined label required by the selinux policy to a symlink that did not exist? I expect cd /proc/self/net would work. In your situation and you can see /proc/self/net/dev. Everything here sounds to me like that selinux policy is impossibly brittle. And anything that is that brittle I have no intention in claiming is a bug in proc. Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 22:32 ` Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-18 12:38 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-18 13:03 ` Stephen Smalley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-18 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric W. Biederman Cc: Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 15:32 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes: > > > We don't even know the extent of the damage yet. Which distros were > > affected? With which versions of which userspace packages? > > This seems to me to be an extremely fragile selinux user space policy. > In their code that derives security labels from path names. > Why don't we have AppArmor in the kernel again? I think I explained that one before - in the case of /proc, the only stable basis we have for deducing the security properties / protection requirements for a given entry is its name, and its name can be reliably constructed from the kernel's internal proc_dir_entry tree w/o any ambiguity or potential for userspace manipulation (unlike the pathname returned by d_path for a normal file). I'd agree that it isn't optimal, but it is what we have. > Further I don't see how we could have possibly have supported that user space > policy. How can we apply a user space defined label required by the selinux > policy to a symlink that did not exist? I'm not blaming anyone here, or trying to argue that the /proc/net changes should be reverted. What happened here is that a kernel interface (/proc/net) changed in a subtle way that had a side effect on permission checking, and we tried to hide that change at the time (in terms of ensuring that the new /proc/self/net tree would still be labeled correctly), and we missed the fact that there would still be a new check on the symlink read that wouldn't be covered by existing policy. > Everything here sounds to me like that selinux policy is impossibly brittle. > And anything that is that brittle I have no intention in claiming is a bug > in proc. I'm not arguing that this is a bug in proc or in selinux for that matter. I do however think that the mantra that we can't require users to update policy for kernel changes is unsupportable in general. The precise set of permission checks on a given operation is not set in stone and it is not part of the kernel/userland interface/contract. Policy isn't "userspace"; it governs what userspace can do, and it has to adapt to kernel changes. Users who are willing/able to run the latest kernel on their own w/o waiting for a coordinated update of kernel and policy from their distribution ought to be able to create a local policy module - it isn't rocket science, and they can always fall back on audit2allow if they need to do so. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-18 12:38 ` Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-18 13:03 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-18 18:09 ` Eric W. Biederman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-18 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric W. Biederman Cc: Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:38 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 15:32 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes: > > > > > We don't even know the extent of the damage yet. Which distros were > > > affected? With which versions of which userspace packages? > > > > This seems to me to be an extremely fragile selinux user space policy. > > In their code that derives security labels from path names. > > Why don't we have AppArmor in the kernel again? > > I think I explained that one before - in the case of /proc, the only > stable basis we have for deducing the security properties / protection > requirements for a given entry is its name, and its name can be reliably > constructed from the kernel's internal proc_dir_entry tree w/o any > ambiguity or potential for userspace manipulation (unlike the pathname > returned by d_path for a normal file). I'd agree that it isn't optimal, > but it is what we have. > > > Further I don't see how we could have possibly have supported that user space > > policy. How can we apply a user space defined label required by the selinux > > policy to a symlink that did not exist? > > I'm not blaming anyone here, or trying to argue that the /proc/net > changes should be reverted. What happened here is that a kernel > interface (/proc/net) changed in a subtle way that had a side effect on > permission checking, and we tried to hide that change at the time (in > terms of ensuring that the new /proc/self/net tree would still be > labeled correctly), and we missed the fact that there would still be a > new check on the symlink read that wouldn't be covered by existing > policy. > > > Everything here sounds to me like that selinux policy is impossibly brittle. > > And anything that is that brittle I have no intention in claiming is a bug > > in proc. > > I'm not arguing that this is a bug in proc or in selinux for that > matter. > > I do however think that the mantra that we can't require users to update > policy for kernel changes is unsupportable in general. The precise set > of permission checks on a given operation is not set in stone and it is > not part of the kernel/userland interface/contract. Policy isn't > "userspace"; it governs what userspace can do, and it has to adapt to > kernel changes. I should note here that for changes to SELinux, we have gone out of our way to avoid such breakage to date through the introduction of compatibility switches, policy flags to enable any new checks, etc (albeit at a cost in complexity and ever creeping compatibility code). But changes to the rest of the kernel can just as easily alter the set of permission checks that get applied on a given operation, and I don't think we are always going to be able to guarantee that new kernel + old policy will Just Work. > Users who are willing/able to run the latest kernel on their own w/o > waiting for a coordinated update of kernel and policy from their > distribution ought to be able to create a local policy module - it isn't > rocket science, and they can always fall back on audit2allow if they > need to do so. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-18 13:03 ` Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-18 18:09 ` Eric W. Biederman 2008-09-18 18:34 ` Stephen Smalley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-18 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Smalley Cc: Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> writes: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:38 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: >> I do however think that the mantra that we can't require users to update >> policy for kernel changes is unsupportable in general. The precise set >> of permission checks on a given operation is not set in stone and it is >> not part of the kernel/userland interface/contract. Policy isn't >> "userspace"; it governs what userspace can do, and it has to adapt to >> kernel changes. > > I should note here that for changes to SELinux, we have gone out of our > way to avoid such breakage to date through the introduction of > compatibility switches, policy flags to enable any new checks, etc > (albeit at a cost in complexity and ever creeping compatibility code). > But changes to the rest of the kernel can just as easily alter the set > of permission checks that get applied on a given operation, and I don't > think we are always going to be able to guarantee that new kernel + old > policy will Just Work. I know of at least 2 more directories that I intend to turn into symlinks into somewhere under /proc/self. How do we keep from breaking selinux policies when I do that? For comparison how do we handle sysfs? How do we handle device nodes in tmpfs? Ultimately do we want to implement xattrs and inotify on /proc? Or is there another way that would simplify maintenance? Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-18 18:09 ` Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-18 18:34 ` Stephen Smalley [not found] ` <1221762850.24048.107.camel-/ugcdrsPCSfIm9DtXLC9OUVfdvkotuLY+aIohriVLy8@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-18 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric W. Biederman Cc: Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev, Eric Paris On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 11:09 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> writes: > > > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:38 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > >> I do however think that the mantra that we can't require users to update > >> policy for kernel changes is unsupportable in general. The precise set > >> of permission checks on a given operation is not set in stone and it is > >> not part of the kernel/userland interface/contract. Policy isn't > >> "userspace"; it governs what userspace can do, and it has to adapt to > >> kernel changes. > > > > I should note here that for changes to SELinux, we have gone out of our > > way to avoid such breakage to date through the introduction of > > compatibility switches, policy flags to enable any new checks, etc > > (albeit at a cost in complexity and ever creeping compatibility code). > > But changes to the rest of the kernel can just as easily alter the set > > of permission checks that get applied on a given operation, and I don't > > think we are always going to be able to guarantee that new kernel + old > > policy will Just Work. > > I know of at least 2 more directories that I intend to turn into > symlinks into somewhere under /proc/self. How do we keep from > breaking selinux policies when I do that? I suspect we could tweak the logic in selinux_proc_get_sid() to always label all symlinks under /proc with the base proc_t type already used for e.g. /proc/self, at which point existing policies would be ok. > For comparison how do we handle sysfs? Unresolved; presently has a single label for all nodes. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228902 for prior discussion of fine-grained labeling support for sysfs. > How do we handle device nodes in tmpfs? udev has selinux support - looks up the appropriate context in a userland config file (file_contexts) via libselinux matchpathcon(3) and sets it upon creation. tmpfs has long supported getting/setting security.* attributes. > Ultimately do we want to implement xattrs and inotify on /proc? > Or is there another way that would simplify maintenance? If proc supported setxattr, then I suppose early userspace could label it instead of the kernel needing to determine a label internally. But not sure how we'd cleanly migrate to avoid breakage with old userspace. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1221762850.24048.107.camel-/ugcdrsPCSfIm9DtXLC9OUVfdvkotuLY+aIohriVLy8@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux [not found] ` <1221762850.24048.107.camel-/ugcdrsPCSfIm9DtXLC9OUVfdvkotuLY+aIohriVLy8@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-19 16:58 ` david-gFPdbfVZQbY 2008-09-19 17:07 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-29 16:49 ` Stephen Smalley 1 sibling, 1 reply; 78+ messages in thread From: david-gFPdbfVZQbY @ 2008-09-19 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Smalley Cc: Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Eric Paris On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 11:09 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Stephen Smalley <sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA@public.gmane.org> writes: >> >>> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:38 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: >>>> I do however think that the mantra that we can't require users to update >>>> policy for kernel changes is unsupportable in general. The precise set >>>> of permission checks on a given operation is not set in stone and it is >>>> not part of the kernel/userland interface/contract. Policy isn't >>>> "userspace"; it governs what userspace can do, and it has to adapt to >>>> kernel changes. >>> >>> I should note here that for changes to SELinux, we have gone out of our >>> way to avoid such breakage to date through the introduction of >>> compatibility switches, policy flags to enable any new checks, etc >>> (albeit at a cost in complexity and ever creeping compatibility code). >>> But changes to the rest of the kernel can just as easily alter the set >>> of permission checks that get applied on a given operation, and I don't >>> think we are always going to be able to guarantee that new kernel + old >>> policy will Just Work. >> >> I know of at least 2 more directories that I intend to turn into >> symlinks into somewhere under /proc/self. How do we keep from >> breaking selinux policies when I do that? > > I suspect we could tweak the logic in selinux_proc_get_sid() to always > label all symlinks under /proc with the base proc_t type already used > for e.g. /proc/self, at which point existing policies would be ok. so if proc is mounted anywhere other then /proc the selinux policy would do odd things? David Lang >> For comparison how do we handle sysfs? > > Unresolved; presently has a single label for all nodes. > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228902 > for prior discussion of fine-grained labeling support for sysfs. > >> How do we handle device nodes in tmpfs? > > udev has selinux support - looks up the appropriate context in a > userland config file (file_contexts) via libselinux matchpathcon(3) and > sets it upon creation. tmpfs has long supported getting/setting > security.* attributes. > >> Ultimately do we want to implement xattrs and inotify on /proc? >> Or is there another way that would simplify maintenance? > > If proc supported setxattr, then I suppose early userspace could label > it instead of the kernel needing to determine a label internally. But > not sure how we'd cleanly migrate to avoid breakage with old userspace. > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-19 16:58 ` david-gFPdbfVZQbY @ 2008-09-19 17:07 ` Stephen Smalley 0 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-19 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: david Cc: Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev, Eric Paris On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 09:58 -0700, david@lang.hm wrote: > On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 11:09 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> writes: > >> > >>> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:38 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > >>>> I do however think that the mantra that we can't require users to update > >>>> policy for kernel changes is unsupportable in general. The precise set > >>>> of permission checks on a given operation is not set in stone and it is > >>>> not part of the kernel/userland interface/contract. Policy isn't > >>>> "userspace"; it governs what userspace can do, and it has to adapt to > >>>> kernel changes. > >>> > >>> I should note here that for changes to SELinux, we have gone out of our > >>> way to avoid such breakage to date through the introduction of > >>> compatibility switches, policy flags to enable any new checks, etc > >>> (albeit at a cost in complexity and ever creeping compatibility code). > >>> But changes to the rest of the kernel can just as easily alter the set > >>> of permission checks that get applied on a given operation, and I don't > >>> think we are always going to be able to guarantee that new kernel + old > >>> policy will Just Work. > >> > >> I know of at least 2 more directories that I intend to turn into > >> symlinks into somewhere under /proc/self. How do we keep from > >> breaking selinux policies when I do that? > > > > I suspect we could tweak the logic in selinux_proc_get_sid() to always > > label all symlinks under /proc with the base proc_t type already used > > for e.g. /proc/self, at which point existing policies would be ok. > > so if proc is mounted anywhere other then /proc the selinux policy would > do odd things? No, the logic doesn't care where proc is mounted. Only the name relative to the root of proc is used. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux [not found] ` <1221762850.24048.107.camel-/ugcdrsPCSfIm9DtXLC9OUVfdvkotuLY+aIohriVLy8@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-19 16:58 ` david-gFPdbfVZQbY @ 2008-09-29 16:49 ` Stephen Smalley 1 sibling, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-29 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric W. Biederman Cc: Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Eric Paris On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 14:34 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 11:09 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Stephen Smalley <sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA@public.gmane.org> writes: > > > > > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:38 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > >> I do however think that the mantra that we can't require users to update > > >> policy for kernel changes is unsupportable in general. The precise set > > >> of permission checks on a given operation is not set in stone and it is > > >> not part of the kernel/userland interface/contract. Policy isn't > > >> "userspace"; it governs what userspace can do, and it has to adapt to > > >> kernel changes. > > > > > > I should note here that for changes to SELinux, we have gone out of our > > > way to avoid such breakage to date through the introduction of > > > compatibility switches, policy flags to enable any new checks, etc > > > (albeit at a cost in complexity and ever creeping compatibility code). > > > But changes to the rest of the kernel can just as easily alter the set > > > of permission checks that get applied on a given operation, and I don't > > > think we are always going to be able to guarantee that new kernel + old > > > policy will Just Work. > > > > I know of at least 2 more directories that I intend to turn into > > symlinks into somewhere under /proc/self. How do we keep from > > breaking selinux policies when I do that? > > I suspect we could tweak the logic in selinux_proc_get_sid() to always > label all symlinks under /proc with the base proc_t type already used > for e.g. /proc/self, at which point existing policies would be ok. FWIW, a fix for this issue has been applied to: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next The particular commit can be viewed at: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6.git;a=commit;h=ea6b184f7d521a503ecab71feca6e4057562252b This should address not only the /proc/net breakage but also any future changes to turn existing directories into symlinks. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200809171724.36269.paul.moore-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux [not found] ` <200809171724.36269.paul.moore-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-17 22:23 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-17 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: paul.moore-VXdhtT5mjnY Cc: akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b, sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA, jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA From: Paul Moore <paul.moore-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:24:36 -0400 > If that is the case I'm not sure it is really that big of a deal. Maybe > I'm in the minority here, but in my mind once you step away from the > distro supplied kernel (also applies to other packages, although those > are arguably less critical) you should also bear the responsibility to > make sure you upgrade/tweak/install whatever other bits need to be > fixed. No, we tend to call this breaking things instead. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080917125053.1f9ecf37.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux [not found] ` <20080917125053.1f9ecf37.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-17 21:56 ` Eric W. Biederman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 78+ messages in thread From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-17 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: Stephen Smalley, jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> writes: > On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:05:26 -0400 > Stephen Smalley <sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 12:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> However, the most likely explanation is simply that when /proc/net was >> changed from being a directory to being a symlink to /proc/self/net, >> that introduced an additional permission check on accesses >> of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read check on the symlink itself. >> And since that check wasn't happening on /proc/net accesses with older >> kernels, older policies didn't allow it. >> As to why others haven't reported it, I expect that they have updated >> their policies to newer ones that allow the necessary access. The fact >> that legacy distros wouldn't have such updated policies isn't surprising >> - they don't push updates to those distros for new kernels. FC5 and FC6 >> are both EOL'd, right? >> >> In any event, we didn't change anything in SELinux - the change was >> elsewhere (in the proc/net implementation). Don't blame the messenger >> please. >> > > Vanilla FC5 broke and vanilla FC6 broke. Did vanilla FC7, 8 or 9 break? > > http://smolt.fedoraproject.org/static/stats/stats.html shows 11,000-odd > people running FC5 and FC6. It would be incautious to assume that all > those people have updated their selinux rules. > > And _requiring_ people to update their selinux rules to fix a > kernel-caused regression is a pretty big deal for some people, I > expect. > Then again, given that this regression has been out there since 2.6.25, > I guess not too many people are hurting from it. But we suck. Looking at this discussion closely from what I see selinux is designed to work on the principle of least privilege. If you make a user space visible but compatible change, selinux will keep the system until you update selinux. Is selinux exposing too much to user space? selinux was taken into consideration when the change was made. The patch was even updated with feedback from Stephen Smiley. > commit e9720acd728a46cb40daa52c99a979f7c4ff195c > Author: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> > Date: Fri Mar 7 11:08:40 2008 -0800 > > [NET]: Make /proc/net a symlink on /proc/self/net (v3) > > Current /proc/net is done with so called "shadows", but current > implementation is broken and has little chances to get fixed. > > The problem is that dentries subtree of /proc/net directory has > fancy revalidation rules to make processes living in different > net namespaces see different entries in /proc/net subtree, but > currently, tasks see in the /proc/net subdir the contents of any > other namespace, depending on who opened the file first. > > The proposed fix is to turn /proc/net into a symlink, which points > to /proc/self/net, which in turn shows what previously was in > /proc/net - the network-related info, from the net namespace the > appropriate task lives in. > > # ls -l /proc/net > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Mar 5 15:17 /proc/net -> self/net > > In other words - this behaves like /proc/mounts, but unlike > "mounts", "net" is not a file, but a directory. > > Changes from v2: > * Fixed discrepancy of /proc/net nlink count and selinux labeling > screwup pointed out by Stephen. > > To get the correct nlink count the ->getattr callback for /proc/net > is overridden to read one from the net->proc_net entry. > > To make selinux still work the net->proc_net entry is initialized > properly, i.e. with the "net" name and the proc_net parent. > > Selinux fixes are > Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA@public.gmane.org> > > Changes from v1: > * Fixed a task_struct leak in get_proc_task_net, pointed out by Paul. > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> > Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 78+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-29 16:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-09-06 21:24 2.6.27-rc5-git8: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:25 ` [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11210] libata badness Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11209] 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-07 9:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <1220778273.8687.20.camel-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-07 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200809080002.09381.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-08 6:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11237] corrupt PMD after resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11230] Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11276] build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11334] myri10ge: use ioremap_wc: compilation failure on ARM Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-07 15:59 ` Lennert Buytenhek
[not found] ` <20080907155952.GA24110-mfnYTeDhw6uOVk/H6u/4e9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-08 8:52 ` Martin Michlmayr
2008-09-10 12:09 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11335] 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11336] 2.6.27-rc2:stall while mounting root fs Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11343] SATA Cold Boot Problems with 2.6.27-rc[23] on nVidia 680i Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11357] Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11358] net: forcedeth call restore mac addr in nv_shutdown path Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11403] 2.6.27-rc2 USB suspend regression Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11418] Many soft lockups Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-08 4:44 ` Greg KH
2008-09-09 5:01 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11459] kernel crash after wifi connection established Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11465] Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11463] sshd hangs on close Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11485] 2.6.27-rc xen pvops regression? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11471] GPE storm detected, kernel freezes Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11501] Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11506] oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11507] usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-12 10:09 ` Frans Pop
2008-09-06 21:30 ` [Bug #11511] HPT374 detection crash with 74811f355f4f69a187fa74892dcf2a684b84ce99 Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-12 22:14 ` James Morris
[not found] ` <alpine.LRH.1.10.0809130812460.12313-CK9fWmtY32x9JUWOpEiw7w@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-12 22:24 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20080912152443.c4e59f42.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-13 0:15 ` James Morris
[not found] ` <alpine.LRH.1.10.0809131012310.13073-CK9fWmtY32x9JUWOpEiw7w@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-13 19:37 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20080913123722.e238ae2a.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-15 0:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-15 13:05 ` Stephen Smalley
[not found] ` <1221483926.30816.18.camel-/ugcdrsPCSfIm9DtXLC9OUVfdvkotuLY+aIohriVLy8@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-15 13:42 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-09-17 19:50 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-17 21:24 ` Paul Moore
2008-09-17 21:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <m1vdwu4fku.fsf-B27657KtZYmhTnVgQlOflh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-17 22:11 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-17 21:48 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-17 22:12 ` Paul Moore
2008-09-17 22:24 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20080917152407.76230f0c.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-17 22:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <20080917144842.7df59f9e.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-17 22:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-18 12:38 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-09-18 13:03 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-09-18 18:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-18 18:34 ` Stephen Smalley
[not found] ` <1221762850.24048.107.camel-/ugcdrsPCSfIm9DtXLC9OUVfdvkotuLY+aIohriVLy8@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-19 16:58 ` david-gFPdbfVZQbY
2008-09-19 17:07 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-09-29 16:49 ` Stephen Smalley
[not found] ` <200809171724.36269.paul.moore-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-17 22:23 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20080917125053.1f9ecf37.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-17 21:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox