From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
cohuck@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
nrb@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 0/4] S390x: CPU Topology Information
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 14:27:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220208132709.48291-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi,
new version of the series with corrections.
When facility 11 is available inside the S390x architecture, 2 new
instructions are available: PTF and STSI with function code 15.
Let's check their availability in QEMU/KVM and their coherence
with the CPU topology provided to the QEMU -smp parameter and as
argument for the test.
To run these tests successfully you will need both the Linux and the
QEMU patches, at least the following or newer patches:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/8/3/201
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-s390x/2021-07/msg00165.html
Then if you have the text you can run directly the unit test or directly
start QEMU with:
# ./s390x-run s390x/topology.elf \
-smp 5,drawers=2,books=3,sockets=4,cores=4,maxcpus=96 \
-append "-d 2 -b 3 -s 4 -c 4 -m 96"
If you do not have the patches you can still use the test but only with
the first two topology levels like in:
# ./s390x-run s390x/topology.elf \
-smp 5,sockets=24,cores=4,maxcpus=96 \
-append "-s 24 -c 4 -m 96"
Of course the declaration of the number of socket and core must be
coherent.
Regards,
Pierre
Pierre Morel (4):
s390x: lib: Add SCLP toplogy nested level
s390x: stsi: Define vm_is_kvm to be used in different tests
s390x: topology: Check the Perform Topology Function
s390x: topology: Checking Configuration Topology Information
lib/s390x/sclp.c | 6 +
lib/s390x/sclp.h | 4 +-
lib/s390x/stsi.h | 76 ++++++++++
lib/s390x/vm.c | 56 ++++++-
lib/s390x/vm.h | 3 +
s390x/Makefile | 1 +
s390x/stsi.c | 23 +--
s390x/topology.c | 346 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
s390x/unittests.cfg | 4 +
9 files changed, 495 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 lib/s390x/stsi.h
create mode 100644 s390x/topology.c
--
2.27.0
Changelog:
From V2:
- Copyrights modifications, assert for allocation failures
(Claudio)
- adding a vm_is_lpar and modification of vm_is_kvm
(Janosh)
- Check if the test in running in KVM
(Janosch)
- patch on "Simplify stsi_get_fc and move it to library"
pushed separatly
- replace named level with abstracted topology levels
to get rid of a possible naming controversy
(Pierre)
- Better checks and new checks for STSI(15,1,x)
(Pierre)
From V1:
- Simplify the stsi_get_fc function when pushing it into lib
(Janosch)
- Simplify PTF inline assembly as PTF instruction does not use RRE
second argument
(Claudio)
- Rename Test global name
(Claudio, Janosch)
- readibility, naming for PTF_REQ_* and removed unused globals
(Janosch)
- skipping tests which could fail when run on LPAR
(Janosh)
- Missing prefix_pop
(Janosch)
next reply other threads:[~2022-02-08 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-08 13:27 Pierre Morel [this message]
2022-02-08 13:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 1/4] s390x: lib: Add SCLP toplogy nested level Pierre Morel
2022-02-08 13:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/4] s390x: stsi: Define vm_is_kvm to be used in different tests Pierre Morel
2022-02-08 15:31 ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-08 15:43 ` Nico Boehr
2022-02-14 8:01 ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-14 9:18 ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-08 15:35 ` Nico Boehr
2022-02-14 7:55 ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-15 11:18 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-08 13:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 3/4] s390x: topology: Check the Perform Topology Function Pierre Morel
2022-02-09 11:37 ` Nico Boehr
2022-02-14 9:21 ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-15 8:29 ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-15 8:50 ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-15 9:21 ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-15 9:44 ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-15 10:28 ` Nico Boehr
2022-02-08 13:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 4/4] s390x: topology: Checking Configuration Topology Information Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220208132709.48291-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox