public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	cohuck@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/4] s390x: stsi: Define vm_is_kvm to be used in different tests
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 16:35:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea550ac540d29fdf76eb104d05a7016a95f8373b.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220208132709.48291-3-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 14:27 +0100, Pierre Morel wrote:
> We need in several tests to check if the VM we are running in
> is KVM.
> Let's add the test.
> 
> To check the VM type we use the STSI 3.2.2 instruction, let's
> define it's response structure in a central header.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  lib/s390x/stsi.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/s390x/vm.c   | 56
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  lib/s390x/vm.h   |  3 +++
>  s390x/stsi.c     | 23 ++------------------
>  4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 lib/s390x/stsi.h
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/stsi.h b/lib/s390x/stsi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..9b40664f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/s390x/stsi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */

This was taken from stsi.c which is GPL 2 only, so this probably should
be as well.

> diff --git a/lib/s390x/vm.c b/lib/s390x/vm.c
> index a5b92863..38886b76 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/vm.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/vm.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include <alloc_page.h>
>  #include <asm/arch_def.h>
>  #include "vm.h"
> +#include "stsi.h"
>  
>  /**
>   * Detect whether we are running with TCG (instead of KVM)
> @@ -26,9 +27,13 @@ bool vm_is_tcg(void)
>         if (initialized)
>                 return is_tcg;
>  
> -       buf = alloc_page();
> -       if (!buf)
> +       if (!vm_is_vm()) {
> +               initialized = true;
>                 return false;
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/vm.c b/lib/s390x/vm.c
> index a5b92863..38886b76 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/vm.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/vm.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include <alloc_page.h>
>  #include <asm/arch_def.h>
>  #include "vm.h"
> +#include "stsi.h"
>  
>  /**
>   * Detect whether we are running with TCG (instead of KVM)
> @@ -26,9 +27,13 @@ bool vm_is_tcg(void)
>         if (initialized)
>                 return is_tcg;
>  
> -       buf = alloc_page();
> -       if (!buf)
> +       if (!vm_is_vm()) {
> +               initialized = true;
>                 return false;

I would personally prefer return is_tcg here to make it obvious we're
relying on the previous initalization to false for subsequent calls.

> +       }
> +
> +       buf = alloc_page();
> +       assert(buf);
>  
>         if (stsi(buf, 1, 1, 1))
>                 goto out;
> @@ -43,3 +48,50 @@ out:
>         free_page(buf);
>         return is_tcg;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * Detect whether we are running with KVM
> + */
> +

No newline here.

> +bool vm_is_kvm(void)
> +{
> +       /* EBCDIC for "KVM/" */
> +       const uint8_t kvm_ebcdic[] = { 0xd2, 0xe5, 0xd4, 0x61 };
> +       static bool initialized;
> +       static bool is_kvm;

Might make sense to initizalize these to false to make it consistent
with vm_is_tcg().

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-08 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-08 13:27 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 0/4] S390x: CPU Topology Information Pierre Morel
2022-02-08 13:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 1/4] s390x: lib: Add SCLP toplogy nested level Pierre Morel
2022-02-08 13:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/4] s390x: stsi: Define vm_is_kvm to be used in different tests Pierre Morel
2022-02-08 15:31   ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-08 15:43     ` Nico Boehr
2022-02-14  8:01       ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-14  9:18     ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-08 15:35   ` Nico Boehr [this message]
2022-02-14  7:55     ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-15 11:18   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-08 13:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 3/4] s390x: topology: Check the Perform Topology Function Pierre Morel
2022-02-09 11:37   ` Nico Boehr
2022-02-14  9:21     ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-15  8:29     ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-15  8:50     ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-15  9:21       ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-15  9:44         ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-15 10:28           ` Nico Boehr
2022-02-08 13:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 4/4] s390x: topology: Checking Configuration Topology Information Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ea550ac540d29fdf76eb104d05a7016a95f8373b.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox