From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Das Sandipan <Sandipan.Das@amd.com>,
Shukla Manali <Manali.Shukla@amd.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Support PERF_METRICS MSR in mediated vPMU
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:20:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58368536-9b55-4e90-a3fa-010fcd8d312a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629231938.15129-6-zide.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
On 6/30/2026 7:19 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
> From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
>
> Bit 15 in IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES indicates that the CPU provides
> built-in support for Topdown Microarchitecture Analysis (TMA) L1
> metrics via the IA32_PERF_METRICS MSR.
>
> Expose this capability only when mediated vPMU is enabled, as emulating
> IA32_PERF_METRICS in the legacy vPMU model is impractical.
>
> Pass IA32_PERF_METRICS through to the guest only when mediated vPMU is
> enabled and bit 15 is set in guest IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES. Allow
> kvm_pmu_{get,set}_msr() to handle this MSR for host accesses.
>
> Save and restore this MSR on host/guest PMU context switches so that
> host PMU activity does not clobber the guest value, and guest state
> is not leaked into the host.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> v5:
> - Remove host_initiated check in set/get MSR handlers.
> v4:
> - Remove WARN_ON_ONCE() and simply reject the guest accesses by checking
> host_initiated. (Sashiko)
> - Passthru MSR_PERF_METRICS only if has_mediated_pmu is true. (Sashiko)
> - Remove the redundant !! in vcpu_has_perf_metrics().
> v3:
> - Replace WARN_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE(). (Dapeng)
> - Add comments to explain why we don't validate writes on PERF_METRICS.
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c | 6 +++++-
> arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h | 5 +++++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 7 +++++++
> 7 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 80f638588bf7..96376d8a5199 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -630,6 +630,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
> u64 global_status_rsvd;
> u64 reserved_bits;
> u64 raw_event_mask;
> + u64 perf_metrics;
> struct kvm_pmc gp_counters[KVM_MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS];
> struct kvm_pmc fixed_counters[KVM_MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS];
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 18c4be75e927..fdcaeb6c8352 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@
> #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT 0xf00
> #define PERF_CAP_FW_WRITES BIT_ULL(13)
> #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE BIT_ULL(14)
> +#define PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS BIT_ULL(15)
> #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_TIMING_INFO BIT_ULL(17)
> #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_MASK (PERF_CAP_PEBS_TRAP | PERF_CAP_ARCH_REG | \
> PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT | PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE | \
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> index 1eb13673e889..bc2e1cbcd9b9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> @@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ static inline bool is_topdown_idx(int idx)
> #define GLOBAL_STATUS_ARCH_PEBS_THRESHOLD_BIT 54
> #define GLOBAL_STATUS_ARCH_PEBS_THRESHOLD BIT_ULL(GLOBAL_STATUS_ARCH_PEBS_THRESHOLD_BIT)
> #define GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF_BIT 48
> +#define GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF BIT_ULL(GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF_BIT)
>
> #define GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS BIT_ULL(48)
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c b/arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c
> index 3bf42d90ad14..c751a8dbd45d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c
> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static const u32 msrs_to_save_pmu[] = {
> MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR0, MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR1,
> MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR2, MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR3,
> MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS,
> - MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL,
> + MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, MSR_PERF_METRICS,
> MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, MSR_IA32_DS_AREA, MSR_PEBS_DATA_CFG,
>
> /* This part of MSRs should match KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_GP_COUNTERS. */
> @@ -2625,6 +2625,10 @@ static void kvm_probe_msr_to_save(u32 msr_index)
> intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges) * 2))
> return;
> break;
> + case MSR_PERF_METRICS:
> + if (!(kvm_caps.supported_perf_cap & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS))
> + return;
> + break;
> case MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 ...
> MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 + KVM_MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS - 1:
> if (msr_index - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 >=
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
> index 1b2f66a2e915..3066cade5790 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
> @@ -279,6 +279,11 @@ static inline u64 kvm_vcpu_get_perf_caps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities;
> }
>
> +static inline bool kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return kvm_vcpu_get_perf_caps(vcpu) & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS;
> +}
> +
> void kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_pmu_rdpmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned pmc, u64 *data);
> int kvm_pmu_check_rdpmc_early(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> index e426ddc8add4..225afd3937c3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> @@ -188,6 +188,8 @@ static bool intel_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
> switch (msr) {
> case MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL:
> return kvm_pmu_has_perf_global_ctrl(pmu);
> + case MSR_PERF_METRICS:
> + return kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu);
> case MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE:
> ret = kvm_vcpu_get_perf_caps(vcpu) & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT;
> break;
> @@ -345,6 +347,9 @@ static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> case MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL:
> msr_info->data = pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl;
> break;
> + case MSR_PERF_METRICS:
> + msr_info->data = pmu->perf_metrics;
> + break;
> case MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE:
> msr_info->data = pmu->pebs_enable;
> break;
> @@ -394,6 +399,15 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> if (pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl != data)
> reprogram_fixed_counters(pmu, data);
> break;
> + case MSR_PERF_METRICS:
> + /*
> + * On platforms that support only hardware level-1, bits [63:32]
> + * are reserved and ignored by hardware. If hardware level-2 is also
> + * supported, they may contain valid metric data.
> + * Either way, guest writes are passed through verbatim.
> + */
> + pmu->perf_metrics = data;
> + break;
> case MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE:
> if (data & pmu->pebs_enable_rsvd)
> return 1;
> @@ -589,6 +603,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> pmu->global_status_rsvd &=
> ~MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL_TRACE_TOPA_PMI;
>
> + if (perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS) {
> + pmu->global_ctrl_rsvd &= ~GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS;
> + pmu->global_status_rsvd &= ~GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF;
> + }
> +
> if (perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT) {
> if (perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE) {
> pmu->pebs_enable_rsvd = counter_rsvd;
> @@ -632,6 +651,9 @@ static void intel_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> static void intel_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> +
> + pmu->perf_metrics = 0;
> intel_pmu_release_guest_lbr_event(vcpu);
> }
>
> @@ -803,6 +825,9 @@ static void intel_mediated_pmu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> u64 global_status, toggle;
>
> + if (kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu))
> + wrmsrq(MSR_PERF_METRICS, pmu->perf_metrics);
> +
> rdmsrq(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS, global_status);
> toggle = pmu->global_status ^ global_status;
> if (global_status & toggle)
> @@ -831,6 +856,12 @@ static void intel_mediated_pmu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> */
> if (pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl_hw)
> wrmsrq(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, 0);
> +
> + if (kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu)) {
> + pmu->perf_metrics = rdpmc(INTEL_PMC_FIXED_RDPMC_METRICS);
> + if (pmu->perf_metrics)
> + wrmsrq(MSR_PERF_METRICS, 0);
> + }
> }
>
> struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops __initdata = {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index b736b9ff965b..21eb4b339fa6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -4273,6 +4273,10 @@ static void vmx_recalc_pmu_msr_intercepts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> MSR_TYPE_RW, intercept);
> vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL,
> MSR_TYPE_RW, intercept);
> +
> + intercept = !has_mediated_pmu || !kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu);
> + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_PERF_METRICS,
> + MSR_TYPE_RW, intercept);
> }
>
> static void vmx_recalc_msr_intercepts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -8095,6 +8099,9 @@ static __init u64 vmx_get_perf_capabilities(void)
> perf_cap &= ~PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE;
> }
>
> + if (enable_mediated_pmu)
> + perf_cap |= kvm_host.perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS;
> +
> return perf_cap;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 23:19 [PATCH V6 0/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Add hardware Topdown metrics support Zide Chen
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Do not map fixed counters >= 3 to generic perf events Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:13 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Support Intel fixed counter 3 on mediated vPMU Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:16 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Rename and move vcpu_get_perf_capabilities() to pmu.h Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:18 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Snapshot host IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES in kvm_host Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:19 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Support PERF_METRICS MSR in mediated vPMU Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:20 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Move RDPMC emulation into per-vendor callbacks Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:23 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Emulate RDPMC on performance metrics Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:23 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] KVM: selftests: Add PERF_METRICS and fixed counter 3 tests Zide Chen
2026-06-29 23:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 2:36 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58368536-9b55-4e90-a3fa-010fcd8d312a@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Manali.Shukla@amd.com \
--cc=Sandipan.Das@amd.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox