From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Das Sandipan <Sandipan.Das@amd.com>,
Shukla Manali <Manali.Shukla@amd.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Support Intel fixed counter 3 on mediated vPMU
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:16:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5428c00-afa7-4bce-a256-7fc37b929649@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629231938.15129-3-zide.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
On 6/30/2026 7:19 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
> From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
>
> Starting with Ice Lake, Intel introduced fixed counter 3, which counts
> TOPDOWN.SLOTS - the number of available slots for an unhalted logical
> processor. It serves as the denominator for top-level metrics in the
> Top-down Microarchitecture Analysis method.
>
> Emulating this counter on legacy vPMU would require introducing a new
> generic perf encoding for the Intel-specific TOPDOWN.SLOTS event in
> order to call perf_get_hw_event_config(). This is undesirable as it
> would pollute the generic perf event encoding.
>
> Moreover, KVM does not intend to emulate IA32_PERF_METRICS in the
> legacy vPMU model, and without IA32_PERF_METRICS, emulating this
> counter has little practical value. Therefore, expose fixed counter
> 3 to guests only when mediated vPMU is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> v6:
> - Update comments to replace 2 with KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_FIXED_COUNTERS - 1.
> v3:
> - Move the non-contiguous counter filter code to pmu.c
> v2:
> - Don't advertise fixed counter 3 to userspace if the host doesn't
> support it.
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index d8700eb848b4..dc9e4e8bfc07 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ struct kvm_pmc {
> #define KVM_MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS KVM_MAX(KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_GP_COUNTERS, \
> KVM_MAX_NR_AMD_GP_COUNTERS)
>
> -#define KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_FIXED_COUNTERS 3
> +#define KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_FIXED_COUNTERS 4
> #define KVM_MAX_NR_AMD_FIXED_COUNTERS 0
> #define KVM_MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS KVM_MAX(KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_FIXED_COUNTERS, \
> KVM_MAX_NR_AMD_FIXED_COUNTERS)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c b/arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c
> index c230b18d87e3..3bf42d90ad14 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static const u32 msrs_to_save_base[] = {
>
> static const u32 msrs_to_save_pmu[] = {
> MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR0, MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR1,
> - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR0 + 2,
> + MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR2, MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR3,
> MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS,
> MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL,
> MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, MSR_IA32_DS_AREA, MSR_PEBS_DATA_CFG,
> @@ -2688,7 +2688,7 @@ void kvm_init_msr_lists(void)
> {
> unsigned i;
>
> - BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(KVM_MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS != 3,
> + BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(KVM_MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS != 4,
> "Please update the fixed PMCs in msrs_to_save_pmu[]");
>
> num_msrs_to_save = 0;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> index 62d0ed99ebe9..f82ba63767d0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id vmx_pebs_pdist_cpu[] = {
> * all perf counters (both gp and fixed). The mapping relationship
> * between pmc and perf counters is as the following:
> * * Intel: [0 .. KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_GP_COUNTERS-1] <=> gp counters
> - * [KVM_FIXED_PMC_BASE_IDX .. KVM_FIXED_PMC_BASE_IDX + 2] <=> fixed
> + * [KVM_FIXED_PMC_BASE_IDX .. KVM_FIXED_PMC_BASE_IDX +
> + * KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_FIXED_COUNTERS - 1] <=> fixed
> * * AMD: [0 .. AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS-1] and, for families 15H
> * and later, [0 .. AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS_CORE-1] <=> gp counters
> */
> @@ -134,6 +135,8 @@ void kvm_init_pmu_capability(struct kvm_pmu_ops *pmu_ops)
> {
> bool is_intel = boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL;
> int min_nr_gp_ctrs = pmu_ops->MIN_NR_GP_COUNTERS;
> + union cpuid10_edx edx;
> + u32 eax, ebx, ecx;
>
> /*
> * Hybrid PMUs don't play nice with virtualization without careful
> @@ -181,6 +184,19 @@ void kvm_init_pmu_capability(struct kvm_pmu_ops *pmu_ops)
> kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_fixed = min(kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_fixed,
> KVM_MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS);
>
> + /*
> + * Currently, KVM doesn't support non-contiguous fixed counters; make
> + * sure only contiguous ones are retained in kvm_pmu_cap.
> + */
> + if (kvm_host_pmu.version >= 5) {
> + cpuid(0xa, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx.full);
> + if (kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_fixed > edx.split.num_counters_fixed)
> + kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_fixed = edx.split.num_counters_fixed;
> + }
> +
> + if (!enable_mediated_pmu && kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_fixed > 3)
> + kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_fixed = 3;
> +
> kvm_pmu_eventsel.INSTRUCTIONS_RETIRED =
> perf_get_hw_event_config(PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS);
> kvm_pmu_eventsel.BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS_RETIRED =
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 23:19 [PATCH V6 0/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Add hardware Topdown metrics support Zide Chen
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Do not map fixed counters >= 3 to generic perf events Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:13 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Support Intel fixed counter 3 on mediated vPMU Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:16 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Rename and move vcpu_get_perf_capabilities() to pmu.h Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:18 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Snapshot host IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES in kvm_host Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:19 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Support PERF_METRICS MSR in mediated vPMU Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:20 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Move RDPMC emulation into per-vendor callbacks Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:23 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Emulate RDPMC on performance metrics Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:23 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] KVM: selftests: Add PERF_METRICS and fixed counter 3 tests Zide Chen
2026-06-29 23:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 2:36 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c5428c00-afa7-4bce-a256-7fc37b929649@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Manali.Shukla@amd.com \
--cc=Sandipan.Das@amd.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox