From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Das Sandipan <Sandipan.Das@amd.com>,
Shukla Manali <Manali.Shukla@amd.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Emulate RDPMC on performance metrics
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:23:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7cce9e44-3cc6-4265-8e83-0a49f1e7c2f5@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629231938.15129-8-zide.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
On 6/30/2026 7:19 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
> If the host has the PERF_METRICS capability but it's not present on
> the guest, RDPMC interception must be enabled and KVM should inject
> an #GP when the guest attempts a PERF_METRICS RDPMC.
>
> If the guest has PERF_METRICS but RDPMC interception is enabled for
> other reasons, KVM needs to emulate RDPMC with type 2000H.
>
> For simplicity, Metrics Clear Mode is not supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> v6:
> - Merge kvm_pmu_rdpmc_metrics() into intel_emulate_rdpmc().
> - Reject non-zero index.
> v5:
> - new patch.
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 7 +++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> index 8ef2d4761790..04b9c840f218 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> @@ -806,6 +806,12 @@ bool kvm_need_perf_global_ctrl_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM_INTERNAL(kvm_need_perf_global_ctrl_intercept);
>
> +static bool kvm_need_perf_metrics_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return (kvm_host.perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS) &&
> + !kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu);
> +}
> +
> bool kvm_need_rdpmc_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> @@ -818,6 +824,7 @@ bool kvm_need_rdpmc_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return true;
>
> return kvm_need_any_pmc_intercept(vcpu) ||
> + kvm_need_perf_metrics_intercept(vcpu) ||
> pmu->counter_bitmask[KVM_PMC_GP] != (BIT_ULL(kvm_host_pmu.bit_width_gp) - 1) ||
> pmu->counter_bitmask[KVM_PMC_FIXED] != (BIT_ULL(kvm_host_pmu.bit_width_fixed) - 1);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> index 080677372c9b..93b5a8360377 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> */
> #define INTEL_RDPMC_GP 0
> #define INTEL_RDPMC_FIXED INTEL_PMC_FIXED_RDPMC_BASE
> +#define INTEL_RDPMC_METRICS INTEL_PMC_FIXED_RDPMC_METRICS
>
> #define INTEL_RDPMC_TYPE_MASK GENMASK(31, 16)
> #define INTEL_RDPMC_INDEX_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
> @@ -124,6 +125,19 @@ static int intel_emulate_rdpmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx,
> counters = pmu->gp_counters;
> num_counters = pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters;
> break;
> + case INTEL_RDPMC_METRICS:
> + if (!kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu))
> + return 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * The index in ECX[15:0] is implementation specific, but no
> + * platform currently supports a non-zero index.
> + */
> + if (idx)
> + return 1;
> +
> + *data = pmu->perf_metrics;
> + return 0;
> default:
> return 1;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 23:19 [PATCH V6 0/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Add hardware Topdown metrics support Zide Chen
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Do not map fixed counters >= 3 to generic perf events Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:13 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Support Intel fixed counter 3 on mediated vPMU Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:16 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Rename and move vcpu_get_perf_capabilities() to pmu.h Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:18 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Snapshot host IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES in kvm_host Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:19 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Support PERF_METRICS MSR in mediated vPMU Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:20 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Move RDPMC emulation into per-vendor callbacks Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:23 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Emulate RDPMC on performance metrics Zide Chen
2026-06-30 2:23 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-06-29 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] KVM: selftests: Add PERF_METRICS and fixed counter 3 tests Zide Chen
2026-06-29 23:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 2:36 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7cce9e44-3cc6-4265-8e83-0a49f1e7c2f5@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Manali.Shukla@amd.com \
--cc=Sandipan.Das@amd.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox