From: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
To: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, pbonzini@redhat.com,
alexandru.elisei@arm.com, ricarkol@google.com, seanjc@google.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 00/29] EFI and ACPI support for arm64
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 23:27:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <658590ba-1c73-87cd-b1b1-bcbf3e556f29@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230501-85b5dca6ed2d86d8bb0e55b6@orel>
On 01/05/2023 12:21, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 01:02:42AM +0100, Nikos Nikoleris wrote:
>> On 29/04/2023 17:21, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 06:18:25PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 01:03:36PM +0100, Nikos Nikoleris wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> This series adds initial support for building arm64 tests as EFI
>>>>> apps and running them under QEMU. Much like x86_64, we import external
>>>>> dependencies from gnu-efi and adapt them to work with types and other
>>>>> assumptions from kvm-unit-tests. In addition, this series adds support
>>>>> for enumerating parts of the system using ACPI.
>>>>>
>>>>> The first set of patches, moves the existing ACPI code to the common
>>>>> lib path. Then, it extends definitions and functions to allow for more
>>>>> robust discovery of ACPI tables. We add support for setting up the PSCI
>>>>> conduit, discovering the UART, timers, GIC and cpus via ACPI. The code
>>>>> retains existing behavior and gives priority to discovery through DT
>>>>> when one has been provided.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the second set of patches, we add support for getting the command
>>>>> line from the EFI shell. This is a requirement for many of the
>>>>> existing arm64 tests.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the third set of patches, we import code from gnu-efi, make minor
>>>>> changes and add an alternative setup sequence from arm64 systems that
>>>>> boot through EFI. Finally, we add support in the build system and a
>>>>> run script which is used to run an EFI app.
>>>>>
>>>>> After this set of patches one can build arm64 EFI tests:
>>>>>
>>>>> $> ./configure --enable-efi
>>>>> $> make
>>>>>
>>>>> And use the run script to run an EFI tests:
>>>>>
>>>>> $> ./arm/efi/run ./arm/selftest.efi -smp 2 -m 256 -append "setup smp=2 mem=256"
>>>>>
>>>>> Or all tests:
>>>>>
>>>>> $> ./run_tests.sh
>>>>>
>>>>> There are a few items that this series does not address but they would
>>>>> be useful to have:
>>>>> - Support for booting the system from EL2. Currently, we assume that a
>>>>> test starts EL1. This will be required to run EFI tests on sytems
>>>>> that implement EL2.
>>>>> - Support for reading environment variables and populating __envp.
>>>>> - Support for discovering the PCI subsystem using ACPI.
>>>>> - Get rid of other assumptions (e.g., vmalloc area) that don't hold on
>>>>> real HW.
>>>>> - Various fixes related to cache maintaince to better support turn the
>>>>> MMU off.
>>>>> - Switch to a new stack and avoid relying on the one provided by EFI.
>>>>>
>>>>> git branch: https://github.com/relokin/kvm-unit-tests/pull/new/target-efi-upstream-v5
>>>>>
>>>>> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20230213101759.2577077-1-nikos.nikoleris@arm.com/
>>>>> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220630100324.3153655-1-nikos.nikoleris@arm.com/
>>>>> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220506205605.359830-1-nikos.nikoleris@arm.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v5:
>>>>> - Minor style changes (thanks Shaoqin).
>>>>> - Avoid including lib/acpi.o to cflatobjs twice (thanks Drew).
>>>>> - Increase NR_INITIAL_MEM_REGIONS to avoid overflows and add check when
>>>>> we run out of space (thanks Shaoqin).
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>>> - Removed patch that reworks cache maintenance when turning the MMU
>>>>> off. This is not strictly required for EFI tests running with tcg and
>>>>> will be addressed in a separate series by Alex.
>>>>> - Fix compilation for arm (Alex).
>>>>> - Convert ACPI tables to Linux style (Alex).
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>>> - Addressed feedback from Drew, Alex and Ricardo. Many thanks for the reviews!
>>>>> - Added support for discovering the GIC through ACPI
>>>>> - Added a missing header file (<elf.h>)
>>>>> - Added support for correctly parsing the outcome of tests (./run_tests)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Nikos!
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to get an ack from either Paolo or Sean on the changes to ACPI,
>>>> as they're shared with x86, and there are also some x86 code changes.
>>>
>>> Actually, there are two build pipeline failures with the new ACPI code.
>>> Please take a look at
>>>
>>> https://gitlab.com/jones-drew/kvm-unit-tests/-/pipelines/852864569
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing the series!
>>
>> I think this fixes the compilation issues:
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/acpi.h b/lib/acpi.h
>> index 202d832e..c330c877 100644
>> --- a/lib/acpi.h
>> +++ b/lib/acpi.h
>> @@ -292,7 +292,8 @@ struct acpi_table_gtdt {
>> u32 platform_timer_offset;
>> };
>>
>> -#pragma pack(0)
>> +/* Reset to default packing */
>> +#pragma pack()
>>
>> void set_efi_rsdp(struct acpi_table_rsdp *rsdp);
>> void *find_acpi_table_addr(u32 sig);
>> diff --git a/lib/acpi.c b/lib/acpi.c
>> index 760cd8b2..0440cddb 100644
>> --- a/lib/acpi.c
>> +++ b/lib/acpi.c
>> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ void *find_acpi_table_addr(u32 sig)
>> return rsdt;
>>
>> if (rsdp->revision >= 2) {
>> - xsdt = (void *)rsdp->xsdt_physical_address;
>> + xsdt = (void *)(ulong) rsdp->xsdt_physical_address;
>> if (xsdt && xsdt->signature != XSDT_SIGNATURE)
>> xsdt = NULL;
>> }
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> drew
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also,
>>>>
>>>> 1) It'd be nice if this worked with DT, too. We can use UEFI with DT
>>>> when adding '-no-acpi' to the QEMU command line. setup_efi() needs
>>>> to learn how to find the dtb and most the '#ifdef CONFIG_EFI's
>>>> would need to change to a new CONFIG_ACPI guard.
>>>>
>>
>> I had a quick look at it at some point and it didn't look straightforward
>> but I'll check again.
>>
>>>> 2) The debug bp and ss tests fail with EFI, but not without, for me.
>>>>
>>
>> I think, I've found the problem, the patch below fixes it for me.
>>
>> diff --git a/arm/debug.c b/arm/debug.c
>> index b3e9749c..126fa267 100644
>> --- a/arm/debug.c
>> +++ b/arm/debug.c
>> @@ -292,11 +292,14 @@ static noinline void test_hw_bp(bool migrate)
>> hw_bp_idx = 0;
>>
>> /* Trap on up to 16 debug exception unmask instructions. */
>> - asm volatile("hw_bp0:\n"
>> - "msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8; msr
>> daifclr, #8\n"
>> - "msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8; msr
>> daifclr, #8\n"
>> - "msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8; msr
>> daifclr, #8\n"
>> - "msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8; msr
>> daifclr, #8\n");
>> + asm volatile(
>> + ".globl hw_bp0\n"
>> + "hw_bp0:\n"
>> + "msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8;
>> msr daifclr, #8\n"
>> + "msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8;
>> msr daifclr, #8\n"
>> + "msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8;
>> msr daifclr, #8\n"
>> + "msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8; msr daifclr, #8;
>> msr daifclr, #8\n"
>> + );
>>
>> for (i = 0, addr = (uint64_t)&hw_bp0; i < num_bp; i++, addr += 4)
>> report(hw_bp_addr[i] == addr, "hw breakpoint: %d", i);
>> @@ -367,11 +370,14 @@ static noinline void test_ss(bool migrate)
>>
>> asm volatile("msr daifclr, #8");
>>
>> - asm volatile("ss_start:\n"
>> + asm volatile(
>> + ".globl ss_start\n"
>> + "ss_start:\n"
>> "mrs x0, esr_el1\n"
>> "add x0, x0, #1\n"
>> "msr daifset, #8\n"
>> - : : : "x0");
>> + : : : "x0"
>> + );
>>
>> report(ss_addr[0] == (uint64_t)&ss_start, "single step");
>> }
>>
>>>> 3) The timer test runs (and succeeds) when run with
>>>> './arm/efi/run ./arm/timer.efi', but not when run with
>>>> './run_tests.sh -g timer'. This is because UEFI takes
>>>> up all the given timeout time (10s), and then the test times out.
>>>> The hackyish fix below resolves it for me. I'll consider posting it
>>>> as a real patch
>>>>
>>
>> I see. I didn't hit the timeout on my test machine but I tried on a slower
>> machine and I did.
>>
>> New branch with the fixups here:
>>
>> https://github.com/relokin/kvm-unit-tests/pull/new/target-efi-upstream-v5
>
> Thanks for the quick fixes. Can you update your tree and make an MR? I
> no longer use github.com/rhdrjones/kvm-unit-tests. I use
>
> https://gitlab.com/jones-drew/kvm-unit-tests.git
>
You mean a MR into your repo and to the branch arm/queue, don't you?
I've tried doing that but I get an error: "Target branch "arm/queue"
does not exist", but it allows me to create a MR into other repos. Am I
doing something wrong?
My branch on gitlab:
https://gitlab.com/nnikoleris/kvm-unit-tests/-/tree/target-efi-upstream-v6-pre
Has the new fixups squashed and I've added Shaoqin's Reviewed-by tags.
And the branch with the fixups separately lives here:
https://gitlab.com/nnikoleris/kvm-unit-tests/-/tree/target-efi-upstream-v5-fixups
Do you want me to add your patch as well? Or are you going to add it
afterwards? Meanwhile, I've tried adding support for booting using a
fdt. I think it's not too hard, but I wouldn't mind merging this series
first and looking at the patches for the fdt support later.
Thanks,
Nikos
> Thanks,
> drew
>
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Nikos
>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> drew
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/scripts/arch-run.bash b/scripts/arch-run.bash
>>>> index 51e4b97b27d1..72ce718b1170 100644
>>>> --- a/scripts/arch-run.bash
>>>> +++ b/scripts/arch-run.bash
>>>> @@ -94,7 +94,17 @@ run_qemu_status ()
>>>> timeout_cmd ()
>>>> {
>>>> + local s
>>>> +
>>>> if [ "$TIMEOUT" ] && [ "$TIMEOUT" != "0" ]; then
>>>> + if [ "$CONFIG_EFI" = 'y' ]; then
>>>> + s=${TIMEOUT: -1}
>>>> + if [ "$s" = 's' ]; then
>>>> + TIMEOUT=${TIMEOUT:0:-1}
>>>> + ((TIMEOUT += 10)) # Add 10 seconds for booting UEFI
>>>> + TIMEOUT="${TIMEOUT}s"
>>>> + fi
>>>> + fi
>>>> echo "timeout -k 1s --foreground $TIMEOUT"
>>>> fi
>>>> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-01 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-28 12:03 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 00/29] EFI and ACPI support for arm64 Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 01/29] lib: Move acpi header and implementation to lib Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:41 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 02/29] x86: Move x86_64-specific EFI CFLAGS to x86_64 Makefile Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:41 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 03/29] lib: Apply Lindent to acpi.{c,h} Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:44 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 04/29] lib: Fix style for acpi.{c,h} Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:50 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 05/29] lib/acpi: Convert table names to Linux style Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 06/29] x86: Avoid references to fields of ACPI tables Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 07/29] lib/acpi: Ensure all struct definition for ACPI tables are packed Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 08/29] lib/acpi: Add support for the XSDT table Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:50 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 09/29] lib/acpi: Extend the definition of the FADT table Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:51 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 10/29] devicetree: Check that fdt is not NULL in dt_available() Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 11/29] arm64: Add support for setting up the PSCI conduit through ACPI Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:54 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 12/29] arm64: Add support for discovering the UART " Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:55 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 13/29] arm64: Add support for timer initialization " Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 14/29] arm64: Add support for cpu " Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:56 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 15/29] arm64: Add support for gic " Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 16/29] lib/printf: Support for precision modifier in printf Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 17/29] lib/printf: Add support for printing wide strings Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 18/29] lib/efi: Add support for getting the cmdline Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 19/29] arm/arm64: Rename etext to _etext Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 20/29] lib: Avoid ms_abi for calls related to EFI on arm64 Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 21/29] arm64: Add a new type of memory type flag MR_F_RESERVED Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 22/29] arm64: Add a setup sequence for systems that boot through EFI Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:59 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 23/29] arm64: Copy code from GNU-EFI Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 24/29] arm64: Change GNU-EFI imported code to use defined types Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 25/29] arm64: Use code from the gnu-efi when booting with EFI Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 26/29] lib: Avoid external dependency in libelf Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 27/29] arm64: Add support for efi in Makefile Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 13:00 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 28/29] lib: arm: Print test exit status Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 13:00 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 29/29] arm64: Add an efi/run script Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:48 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-29 16:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 00/29] EFI and ACPI support for arm64 Andrew Jones
2023-04-29 16:21 ` Andrew Jones
2023-04-30 0:02 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 11:21 ` Andrew Jones
2023-05-01 22:27 ` Nikos Nikoleris [this message]
2023-05-02 7:32 ` Andrew Jones
2023-05-05 14:55 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:09 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-05-03 21:18 ` Nikos Nikoleris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=658590ba-1c73-87cd-b1b1-bcbf3e556f29@arm.com \
--to=nikos.nikoleris@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox