From: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
To: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
andrew.jones@linux.dev
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, ricarkol@google.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 08/29] lib/acpi: Add support for the XSDT table
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 20:50:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3f7fd03-b5c3-41f3-149c-ac26a59ce9fe@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230428120405.3770496-9-nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
On 4/28/23 20:03, Nikos Nikoleris wrote:
> XSDT provides pointers to other ACPI tables much like RSDT. However,
> contrary to RSDT that provides 32-bit addresses, XSDT provides 64-bit
> pointers. ACPI requires that if XSDT is valid then it takes precedence
> over RSDT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
> [ Alex E: Use flexible array member for XSDT struct ]
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
> ---
> lib/acpi.h | 6 ++++++
> lib/acpi.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/acpi.h b/lib/acpi.h
> index 53e41c4b..74ba00ac 100644
> --- a/lib/acpi.h
> +++ b/lib/acpi.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>
> #define RSDP_SIGNATURE ACPI_SIGNATURE('R','S','D','P')
> #define RSDT_SIGNATURE ACPI_SIGNATURE('R','S','D','T')
> +#define XSDT_SIGNATURE ACPI_SIGNATURE('X','S','D','T')
> #define FACP_SIGNATURE ACPI_SIGNATURE('F','A','C','P')
> #define FACS_SIGNATURE ACPI_SIGNATURE('F','A','C','S')
>
> @@ -56,6 +57,11 @@ struct acpi_table_rsdt_rev1 {
> u32 table_offset_entry[];
> };
>
> +struct acpi_table_xsdt {
> + ACPI_TABLE_HEADER_DEF
> + u64 table_offset_entry[];
> +};
> +
> struct acpi_table_fadt_rev1 {
> ACPI_TABLE_HEADER_DEF /* ACPI common table header */
> u32 firmware_ctrl; /* Physical address of FACS */
> diff --git a/lib/acpi.c b/lib/acpi.c
> index 166ffd14..d35f09a6 100644
> --- a/lib/acpi.c
> +++ b/lib/acpi.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ static struct acpi_table_rsdp *get_rsdp(void)
>
> void *find_acpi_table_addr(u32 sig)
> {
> - struct acpi_table_rsdt_rev1 *rsdt;
> + struct acpi_table_rsdt_rev1 *rsdt = NULL;
> + struct acpi_table_xsdt *xsdt = NULL;
> struct acpi_table_rsdp *rsdp;
> void *end;
> int i;
> @@ -62,18 +63,41 @@ void *find_acpi_table_addr(u32 sig)
> return rsdp;
>
> rsdt = (void *)(ulong) rsdp->rsdt_physical_address;
> - if (!rsdt || rsdt->signature != RSDT_SIGNATURE)
> - return NULL;
> + if (rsdt && rsdt->signature != RSDT_SIGNATURE)
> + rsdt = NULL;
>
> if (sig == RSDT_SIGNATURE)
> return rsdt;
>
> - end = (void *)rsdt + rsdt->length;
> - for (i = 0; (void *)&rsdt->table_offset_entry[i] < end; i++) {
> - struct acpi_table *t = (void *)(ulong) rsdt->table_offset_entry[i];
> + if (rsdp->revision >= 2) {
> + xsdt = (void *)rsdp->xsdt_physical_address;
> + if (xsdt && xsdt->signature != XSDT_SIGNATURE)
> + xsdt = NULL;
> + }
>
> - if (t && t->signature == sig)
> - return t;
> + if (sig == XSDT_SIGNATURE)
> + return xsdt;
> +
> + /*
> + * When the system implements APCI 2.0 and above and XSDT is valid we
> + * have use XSDT to find other ACPI tables, otherwise, we use RSDT.
> + */
> + if (xsdt) {
> + end = (void *)xsdt + xsdt->length;
> + for (i = 0; (void *)&xsdt->table_offset_entry[i] < end; i++) {
> + struct acpi_table *t = (void *)(ulong) xsdt->table_offset_entry[i];
> +
> + if (t && t->signature == sig)
> + return t;
> + }
> + } else if (rsdt) {
> + end = (void *)rsdt + rsdt->length;
> + for (i = 0; (void *)&rsdt->table_offset_entry[i] < end; i++) {
> + struct acpi_table *t = (void *)(ulong) rsdt->table_offset_entry[i];
> +
> + if (t && t->signature == sig)
> + return t;
> + }
> }
>
> return NULL;
--
Shaoqin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-01 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-28 12:03 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 00/29] EFI and ACPI support for arm64 Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 01/29] lib: Move acpi header and implementation to lib Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:41 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 02/29] x86: Move x86_64-specific EFI CFLAGS to x86_64 Makefile Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:41 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 03/29] lib: Apply Lindent to acpi.{c,h} Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:44 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 04/29] lib: Fix style for acpi.{c,h} Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:50 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 05/29] lib/acpi: Convert table names to Linux style Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 06/29] x86: Avoid references to fields of ACPI tables Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 07/29] lib/acpi: Ensure all struct definition for ACPI tables are packed Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 08/29] lib/acpi: Add support for the XSDT table Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:50 ` Shaoqin Huang [this message]
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 09/29] lib/acpi: Extend the definition of the FADT table Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:51 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 10/29] devicetree: Check that fdt is not NULL in dt_available() Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 11/29] arm64: Add support for setting up the PSCI conduit through ACPI Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:54 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 12/29] arm64: Add support for discovering the UART " Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:55 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 13/29] arm64: Add support for timer initialization " Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 14/29] arm64: Add support for cpu " Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:56 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 15/29] arm64: Add support for gic " Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 16/29] lib/printf: Support for precision modifier in printf Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 17/29] lib/printf: Add support for printing wide strings Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 18/29] lib/efi: Add support for getting the cmdline Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 19/29] arm/arm64: Rename etext to _etext Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 20/29] lib: Avoid ms_abi for calls related to EFI on arm64 Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 21/29] arm64: Add a new type of memory type flag MR_F_RESERVED Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 22/29] arm64: Add a setup sequence for systems that boot through EFI Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:59 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 23/29] arm64: Copy code from GNU-EFI Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 24/29] arm64: Change GNU-EFI imported code to use defined types Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 25/29] arm64: Use code from the gnu-efi when booting with EFI Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 26/29] lib: Avoid external dependency in libelf Nikos Nikoleris
2023-04-28 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 27/29] arm64: Add support for efi in Makefile Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 13:00 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 28/29] lib: arm: Print test exit status Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 13:00 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-28 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 29/29] arm64: Add an efi/run script Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:48 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-29 16:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 00/29] EFI and ACPI support for arm64 Andrew Jones
2023-04-29 16:21 ` Andrew Jones
2023-04-30 0:02 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 11:21 ` Andrew Jones
2023-05-01 22:27 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-02 7:32 ` Andrew Jones
2023-05-05 14:55 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2023-05-01 12:09 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-05-03 21:18 ` Nikos Nikoleris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b3f7fd03-b5c3-41f3-149c-ac26a59ce9fe@redhat.com \
--to=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nikos.nikoleris@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox