From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
david@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, scgl@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 9/9] s390x: snippets: Define all things that are needed to link the lib
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 10:13:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d3a91e8-657a-0912-4380-36ba00a1b112@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf94d76c-ee23-465e-1c2a-8c4ee1b006f7@redhat.com>
On 10/8/21 09:20, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 07/10/2021 12.44, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> On 10/7/21 11:44, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 07/10/2021 10.50, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>>> Let's just define all of the needed things so we can link libcflat.
>>>>
>>>> A significant portion of the lib won't work, like printing and
>>>> allocation but we can still use things like memset() which already
>>>> improves our lives significantly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S b/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S
>>>> index 031a6b83..2d397669 100644
>>>> --- a/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S
>>>> +++ b/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S
>>>> @@ -20,6 +20,20 @@ start:
>>>> lghi %r15, stackptr
>>>> sam64
>>>> brasl %r14, main
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Defining things that the linker needs to link in libcflat and make
>>>> + * them result in sigp stop if called.
>>>> + */
>>>> +.globl sie_exit
>>>> +.globl sie_entry
>>>> +.globl smp_cpu_setup_state
>>>> +.globl ipl_args
>>>> +.globl auxinfo
>>>> +sie_exit:
>>>> +sie_entry:
>>>> +smp_cpu_setup_state:
>>>> +ipl_args:
>>>> +auxinfo:
>>>
>>> I think this likely could be done in a somewhat nicer way, e.g. by moving
>>
>> Definitely, as I said, it's a simple fix
>
> Alternatively, something like this might work, too:
Seems like it works for the two tests that I checked.
Would you mind sending a proper patch?
I'd like to send out a pull today or on Monday.
>
> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> --- a/s390x/Makefile
> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ asmlib = $(TEST_DIR)/cstart64.o $(TEST_DIR)/cpu.o
> FLATLIBS = $(libcflat)
>
> SNIPPET_DIR = $(TEST_DIR)/snippets
> -snippet_asmlib = $(SNIPPET_DIR)/c/cstart.o
> +snippet_asmlib = $(SNIPPET_DIR)/c/cstart.o lib/auxinfo.o
>
> # perquisites (=guests) for the snippet hosts.
> # $(TEST_DIR)/<snippet-host>.elf: snippets = $(SNIPPET_DIR)/<c/asm>/<snippet>.gbin
> diff --git a/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S b/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S
> --- a/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S
> +++ b/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S
> @@ -21,5 +21,9 @@ start:
> sam64
> brasl %r14, main
> /* For now let's only use cpu 0 in snippets so this will always work. */
> +.global puts
> +.global exit
> +puts:
> +exit:
> xgr %r0, %r0
> sigp %r2, %r0, SIGP_STOP
>
> I think that's more clear this way, since we're fencing the
> functions that caused the dependencies to the other functions
> from your patch. What do you think?
>
> Thomas
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-08 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-07 8:50 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/9] s390x: Cleanup and maintenance 2 Janosch Frank
2021-10-07 8:50 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/9] s390x: uv: Tolerate 0x100 query return code Janosch Frank
2021-10-07 8:58 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-07 8:50 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/9] s390x: uv-host: Fence a destroy cpu test on z15 Janosch Frank
2021-10-07 8:50 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/9] lib: s390x: uv: Fix share return value and print Janosch Frank
2021-10-07 8:50 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/9] lib: s390x: uv: Add UVC_ERR_DEBUG switch Janosch Frank
2021-10-07 9:01 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-13 14:14 ` Janosch Frank
2021-10-07 8:50 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/9] lib: s390x: Add access key argument to tprot Janosch Frank
2021-10-07 9:05 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-07 8:50 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/9] lib: s390x: Print PGM code as hex Janosch Frank
2021-10-07 8:50 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 7/9] s390x: Add sthyi cc==0 r2+1 verification Janosch Frank
2021-10-07 9:11 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-07 10:51 ` Janosch Frank
2021-10-07 8:50 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 8/9] s390x: snippets: Set stackptr and stacktop in cstart.S Janosch Frank
2021-10-07 9:13 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-07 9:22 ` Janosch Frank
2021-10-07 8:50 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 9/9] s390x: snippets: Define all things that are needed to link the lib Janosch Frank
2021-10-07 9:44 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-07 10:44 ` Janosch Frank
2021-10-08 7:20 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-08 8:13 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d3a91e8-657a-0912-4380-36ba00a1b112@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox