Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>,
	Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Set dirty state at stage-2
Date: Mon,  2 Nov 2026 18:14:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aujTGWJDPIsKBv3V@LeoBrasDK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023205610.1044532-8-oupton@kernel.org>

On Fri, Oct 23, 2026 at 01:55:49PM -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> Set the dirty state on descriptors at stage-2 for write accesses when
> DBM is set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> index dea5c31f10df..1d581d3bd557 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ struct s2_walk_info {
>  	unsigned int	t0sz;
>  	bool		be;
>  	bool		ha;
> +	bool		hd;
>  };
>  
>  struct s2_walk_step {
> @@ -246,6 +247,20 @@ static int read_guest_s2_desc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s2_walk_step *ws,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static bool should_set_dirty_state(struct s2_walk_info *wi, struct s2_walk_step *ws,
> +				   struct kvm_s2_trans *out, struct kvm_walk_access *access)
> +{
> +	switch (access->type) {
> +	/* R_ZYGHJ */
> +	case WALK_ACCESS_CMO:
> +	case WALK_ACCESS_AT:
> +		return false;
> +	default:
> +		/* R_NSXRD */
> +		return access->write && wi->hd && out->writable;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int handle_desc_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s2_walk_info *wi,
>  			      struct s2_walk_step *ws, struct kvm_s2_trans *out,
>  			      struct kvm_walk_access *access)
> @@ -258,6 +273,9 @@ static int handle_desc_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s2_walk_info *wi,
>  	if (wi->ha)
>  		new |= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_AF;
>  
> +	if (should_set_dirty_state(wi, ws, out, access))
> +		new |= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_W;
> +
>  	if (old == new)
>  		return 0;
>  
> @@ -272,11 +290,15 @@ static int handle_desc_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s2_walk_info *wi,
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = __kvm_at_swap_desc(vcpu->kvm, ws->desc_pa, old, new);
> -	if (!ret || ret == -EAGAIN)
> +	if (ret == -EAGAIN)
>  		return ret;
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		out->desc = ws->desc;
> +		out->dirty = out->desc & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_W;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>  
>  	out->esr = ESR_ELx_FSC_SEA_TTW(ws->level);
> -	out->desc = ws->desc;
>  	return 1;
>  }


Before that out->desc would only be updated if __kvm_at_swap_desc() 
returned != (0 or -EAGAIN). Now it only gets updated if ret == 0.
Is this intentional?

>  
> @@ -422,16 +444,6 @@ static int walk_nested_s2_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_walk_access *acc
>  		return 1;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = handle_desc_update(vcpu, wi, &ws, out, access);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	if (!(ws.desc & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_AF)) {
> -		out->esr = compute_fsc(ws.level, ESR_ELx_FSC_ACCESS);
> -		out->desc = ws.desc;
> -		return 1;
> -	}
> -
>  	addr_bottom += contiguous_bit_shift(ws.desc, wi, ws.level);
>  
>  	/* Calculate and return the result */
> @@ -441,6 +453,20 @@ static int walk_nested_s2_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_walk_access *acc
>  	compute_s2_permissions(vcpu, wi, &ws, out);
>  	out->level = ws.level;
>  	out->desc = ws.desc;
> +
> +	ret = handle_desc_update(vcpu, wi, &ws, out, access);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (!(ws.desc & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_AF)) {
> +		*out = (struct kvm_s2_trans) {
> +			.esr	= compute_fsc(ws.level, ESR_ELx_FSC_ACCESS),
> +			.desc	= ws.desc,
> +		};
> +
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }

The block got moved down in walk_nested_s2_pgd(), and IIUC if the 
descriptor lacks the AF, we zero all other fields except esr and desc, 
cleaning everything that just got set in the lines above (out->writable, 
etc).

Any particular reason for doing it like this, instead of keeping where it 
was, and avoid calculating the other out->* fields?


>  
> @@ -537,6 +563,7 @@ static void setup_s2_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s2_walk_info *wi)
>  			      ps_to_output_size(FIELD_GET(VTCR_EL2_PS_MASK, vtcr), false));
>  	wi->ha = vtcr & VTCR_EL2_HA;
>  	wi->be = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL2) & SCTLR_ELx_EE;
> +	wi->hd = wi->ha && (vtcr & VTCR_EL2_HD);
>  }
>  
>  int kvm_walk_nested_s2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_walk_access *access,
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 

Thanks!
Leo

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-02 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-23 20:55 [PATCH v2 00/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 01/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce struct for stage-2 walk step Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 02/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Consolidate computation of stage-2 permissions Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 03/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Get rid of kvm_s2_trans*() accessors Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 04/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Only shadow writable-dirty guest descs as writable Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 21:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-24  6:26     ` Oliver Upton
2026-11-02 17:27   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Pass an access descriptor for stage-2 walks Oliver Upton
2026-11-02 17:41   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 06/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Use a helper for stage-2 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-11-02 17:51   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 07/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Set dirty state at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-11-02 18:14   ` Leonardo Bras [this message]
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 08/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Treat DBM as writable " Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 09/28] KVM: arm64: Compute S1 permissions as part of s1_walk() Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 10/28] KVM: arm64: Plumb through access descriptor for stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 21:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 17:37   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 11/28] KVM: arm64: Use a struct for stage-1 walk context Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 12/28] KVM: arm64: Create helper for stage-1 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 13/28] KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 14/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect HA when computing translated TCR Oliver Upton
2026-11-03 17:58   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 15/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect HD " Oliver Upton
2026-11-03 18:08   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 16/28] KVM: arm64: Grant write permission when DBM is set at S1 Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 17/28] KVM: arm64: Don't update descriptors for "non-arch" access Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 18/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Emulate CMOs via writable-clean translations as NOPs Oliver Upton
2026-11-04 15:03   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-04 17:22     ` Oliver Upton
2026-11-04 17:28       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-04 18:04         ` Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 19/28] arm64: Add command line switch to disable FEAT_S2FWB Oliver Upton
2026-11-04 15:58   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 20/28] KVM: arm64: Reject non-coherent DMA when using forced writeback Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 21:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 16:19   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 21/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFDBS Oliver Upton
2026-11-04 16:56   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 22/28] KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 21:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-24  6:24     ` Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 23/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Set access flag on table descriptors at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 24/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 25/28] KVM: arm64: selftests: Only test AF behavior for emulated AT insns Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 26/28] KVM: arm64: selftests: Test AT emulation for FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 27/28] KVM: arm64: Add tracepoints for S1 page table walk Oliver Upton
2026-11-04 17:09   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 28/28] KVM: arm64: Add tracepoints for S2 " Oliver Upton
2026-11-04 17:10   ` Leonardo Bras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aujTGWJDPIsKBv3V@LeoBrasDK \
    --to=leo.bras@arm.com \
    --cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=weilin.chang@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox