From: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Set dirty state at stage-2
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 18:14:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aujTGWJDPIsKBv3V@LeoBrasDK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023205610.1044532-8-oupton@kernel.org>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2026 at 01:55:49PM -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> Set the dirty state on descriptors at stage-2 for write accesses when
> DBM is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> index dea5c31f10df..1d581d3bd557 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ struct s2_walk_info {
> unsigned int t0sz;
> bool be;
> bool ha;
> + bool hd;
> };
>
> struct s2_walk_step {
> @@ -246,6 +247,20 @@ static int read_guest_s2_desc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s2_walk_step *ws,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool should_set_dirty_state(struct s2_walk_info *wi, struct s2_walk_step *ws,
> + struct kvm_s2_trans *out, struct kvm_walk_access *access)
> +{
> + switch (access->type) {
> + /* R_ZYGHJ */
> + case WALK_ACCESS_CMO:
> + case WALK_ACCESS_AT:
> + return false;
> + default:
> + /* R_NSXRD */
> + return access->write && wi->hd && out->writable;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int handle_desc_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s2_walk_info *wi,
> struct s2_walk_step *ws, struct kvm_s2_trans *out,
> struct kvm_walk_access *access)
> @@ -258,6 +273,9 @@ static int handle_desc_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s2_walk_info *wi,
> if (wi->ha)
> new |= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_AF;
>
> + if (should_set_dirty_state(wi, ws, out, access))
> + new |= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_W;
> +
> if (old == new)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -272,11 +290,15 @@ static int handle_desc_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s2_walk_info *wi,
> }
>
> ret = __kvm_at_swap_desc(vcpu->kvm, ws->desc_pa, old, new);
> - if (!ret || ret == -EAGAIN)
> + if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> return ret;
> + if (!ret) {
> + out->desc = ws->desc;
> + out->dirty = out->desc & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_W;
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> out->esr = ESR_ELx_FSC_SEA_TTW(ws->level);
> - out->desc = ws->desc;
> return 1;
> }
Before that out->desc would only be updated if __kvm_at_swap_desc()
returned != (0 or -EAGAIN). Now it only gets updated if ret == 0.
Is this intentional?
>
> @@ -422,16 +444,6 @@ static int walk_nested_s2_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_walk_access *acc
> return 1;
> }
>
> - ret = handle_desc_update(vcpu, wi, &ws, out, access);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - if (!(ws.desc & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_AF)) {
> - out->esr = compute_fsc(ws.level, ESR_ELx_FSC_ACCESS);
> - out->desc = ws.desc;
> - return 1;
> - }
> -
> addr_bottom += contiguous_bit_shift(ws.desc, wi, ws.level);
>
> /* Calculate and return the result */
> @@ -441,6 +453,20 @@ static int walk_nested_s2_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_walk_access *acc
> compute_s2_permissions(vcpu, wi, &ws, out);
> out->level = ws.level;
> out->desc = ws.desc;
> +
> + ret = handle_desc_update(vcpu, wi, &ws, out, access);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!(ws.desc & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_AF)) {
> + *out = (struct kvm_s2_trans) {
> + .esr = compute_fsc(ws.level, ESR_ELx_FSC_ACCESS),
> + .desc = ws.desc,
> + };
> +
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
The block got moved down in walk_nested_s2_pgd(), and IIUC if the
descriptor lacks the AF, we zero all other fields except esr and desc,
cleaning everything that just got set in the lines above (out->writable,
etc).
Any particular reason for doing it like this, instead of keeping where it
was, and avoid calculating the other out->* fields?
>
> @@ -537,6 +563,7 @@ static void setup_s2_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s2_walk_info *wi)
> ps_to_output_size(FIELD_GET(VTCR_EL2_PS_MASK, vtcr), false));
> wi->ha = vtcr & VTCR_EL2_HA;
> wi->be = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL2) & SCTLR_ELx_EE;
> + wi->hd = wi->ha && (vtcr & VTCR_EL2_HD);
> }
>
> int kvm_walk_nested_s2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_walk_access *access,
> --
> 2.47.3
>
Thanks!
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 20:55 [PATCH v2 00/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 01/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce struct for stage-2 walk step Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 02/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Consolidate computation of stage-2 permissions Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 03/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Get rid of kvm_s2_trans*() accessors Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 04/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Only shadow writable-dirty guest descs as writable Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 21:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-24 6:26 ` Oliver Upton
2026-11-02 17:27 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Pass an access descriptor for stage-2 walks Oliver Upton
2026-11-02 17:41 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 06/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Use a helper for stage-2 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-11-02 17:51 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 07/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Set dirty state at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-11-02 18:14 ` Leonardo Bras [this message]
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 08/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Treat DBM as writable " Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 09/28] KVM: arm64: Compute S1 permissions as part of s1_walk() Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 10/28] KVM: arm64: Plumb through access descriptor for stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 21:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 17:37 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 11/28] KVM: arm64: Use a struct for stage-1 walk context Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 12/28] KVM: arm64: Create helper for stage-1 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 13/28] KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 14/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect HA when computing translated TCR Oliver Upton
2026-11-03 17:58 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 15/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect HD " Oliver Upton
2026-11-03 18:08 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 16/28] KVM: arm64: Grant write permission when DBM is set at S1 Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 17/28] KVM: arm64: Don't update descriptors for "non-arch" access Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 18/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Emulate CMOs via writable-clean translations as NOPs Oliver Upton
2026-11-04 15:03 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-04 17:22 ` Oliver Upton
2026-11-04 17:28 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-04 18:04 ` Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 19/28] arm64: Add command line switch to disable FEAT_S2FWB Oliver Upton
2026-11-04 15:58 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 20/28] KVM: arm64: Reject non-coherent DMA when using forced writeback Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 21:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 16:19 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 21/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFDBS Oliver Upton
2026-11-04 16:56 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 22/28] KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 21:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-24 6:24 ` Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 23/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Set access flag on table descriptors at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 24/28] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 25/28] KVM: arm64: selftests: Only test AF behavior for emulated AT insns Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 26/28] KVM: arm64: selftests: Test AT emulation for FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 27/28] KVM: arm64: Add tracepoints for S1 page table walk Oliver Upton
2026-11-04 17:09 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-23 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 28/28] KVM: arm64: Add tracepoints for S2 " Oliver Upton
2026-11-04 17:10 ` Leonardo Bras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aujTGWJDPIsKBv3V@LeoBrasDK \
--to=leo.bras@arm.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=weilin.chang@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox