[LARTC] htb

[LARTC] htb

[George Tsuladze]

How can i do the following: i have 100 kb leased line. I have 2 ips in 
my network 1) 1.2.3.1 2) 1.2.3.2 , i gave all of them 100 kbps, but if 
1.2.3.1 needs 80 kb, and 1.2.3.2 downlloads with 90, 1.2.3.1 must get 80 
kb, and 1.2.3.2 continue download with 10 kbps.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb

[Soulfly]

If 1.2.3.1 is absolute priority you should use the prio qdisc and put in a
filter that brings 1.2.3.1's traffic to a band with higher priority (read
the LARTC HOWTO in http://lartc.org/ ).  If you want to give 1.2.3.2 minimum
bandwidth to use (like 10 kbps) then I recommend HTB (
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ ) but you must patch both kernel and tc.

In either case or if you decide to use anything else you should understand
the problem domain. Start with readning LARTC-HOWTO.

----- Original Message -----
From: "George Tsuladze" <gio@ultracom.ge>
To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:43 AM
Subject: [LARTC] htb


> How can i do the following: i have 100 kb leased line. I have 2 ips in
> my network 1) 1.2.3.1 2) 1.2.3.2 , i gave all of them 100 kbps, but if
> 1.2.3.1 needs 80 kb, and 1.2.3.2 downlloads with 90, 1.2.3.1 must get 80
> kb, and 1.2.3.2 continue download with 10 kbps.
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] htb

[Anjaneya Pal]

hi,
i'm hearing a lot abt htb. can ne'one plz tell me wht is htb? and wht does 
it do?

thanx in advance,

-- 
Anjaneya Pal
Electronics & Comm. Engg.
Final Year.
REC-Jaipur

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb

[Martin Devera]

http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/

On Sat, 4 May 2002, [iso-8859-1] Anjaneya Pal wrote:

> hi,
> i'm hearing a lot abt htb. can ne'one plz tell me wht is htb? and wht does
> it do?
>
> thanx in advance,
>
> --
> Anjaneya Pal
> Electronics & Comm. Engg.
> Final Year.
> REC-Jaipur
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb

[Stef Coene]

On Saturday 04 May 2002 11:03, Anjaneya Pal wrote:
> hi,
> i'm hearing a lot abt htb. can ne'one plz tell me wht is htb? and wht does
> it do?
You can use it in stead of CBQ to manage the available bandwidth.  You can 
create a setup where hosts/services/traffic-flows can borrow bandwidth from 
each other and where you can specify minimum bandwidths

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] HTB

[Rimas]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 78 bytes --]

Hi guys,

How to put HTB in to 2.4 kernel?


Thanks in advance

Rimas

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 757 bytes --]

[LARTC] HTB

[Rimas]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 78 bytes --]

Hi guys,

How to put HTB in to 2.4 kernel?


Thanks in advance

Rimas

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 757 bytes --]

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[Marc-Christian Petersen]

On Tuesday 24 September 2002 16:12, Rimas wrote:

Hi Rimas,

> How to put HTB in to 2.4 kernel?
patching? :)

If you wanna try 3.6 code, download the tgz, untargzip it (tar xzpf) and 
you'll see a diff/patch. Just "patch -p1 --dry-run < patchname" and see if it 
succeed, if, leave out --dry-run, if not, fix the errors. If you have 
questions when errors occur, don't hesitate to ask.

for HTB2 code, just download the patch and follow the same as above (patch -p1 
...)

http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/

-- 
Kind regards
        Marc-Christian Petersen

http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk

PGP/GnuPG Key: 1024D/569DE2E3DB441A16
Fingerprint: 3469 0CF8 CA7E 0042 7824 080A 569D E2E3 DB44 1A16
Key available at www.keyserver.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[Esteban Maringolo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 359 bytes --]

On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 11:12, Rimas wrote:
> Hi guys,
>  
> How to put HTB in to 2.4 kernel?

Compile kernel 2.4.20 with HTB support.


Or else get kernel patches for 2.4.x (or 2.2.x) from devik's homepage.



-- 
Esteban A. Maringolo
Secont, Comunicaciones Digitales
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Tel: +54 (11) 4551-2455
http://www.secont.com.ar/

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[Rimas]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 265 bytes --]

Thank you guys

Rimas

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Rimas 
  To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:12 PM
  Subject: [LARTC] HTB


  Hi guys,

  How to put HTB in to 2.4 kernel?


  Thanks in advance

  Rimas

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1682 bytes --]

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[Rimas]

I tried the "patch -p1 --dry-run ./htb3.6_2.4.17.diff" but nothing happened,
no error message, nothing.

Rimas


----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc-Christian Petersen" <m.c.p@gmx.net>
To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Cc: "Rimas" <rmocius@auste.elnet.lt>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB


> On Tuesday 24 September 2002 16:12, Rimas wrote:
>
> Hi Rimas,
>
> > How to put HTB in to 2.4 kernel?
> patching? :)
>
> If you wanna try 3.6 code, download the tgz, untargzip it (tar xzpf) and
> you'll see a diff/patch. Just "patch -p1 --dry-run < patchname" and see if
it
> succeed, if, leave out --dry-run, if not, fix the errors. If you have
> questions when errors occur, don't hesitate to ask.
>
> for HTB2 code, just download the patch and follow the same as above
(patch -p1
> ...)
>
> http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/
>
> --
> Kind regards
>         Marc-Christian Petersen
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk
>
> PGP/GnuPG Key: 1024D/569DE2E3DB441A16
> Fingerprint: 3469 0CF8 CA7E 0042 7824 080A 569D E2E3 DB44 1A16
> Key available at www.keyserver.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
>
>


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[Marc-Christian Petersen]

On Tuesday 24 September 2002 16:55, Rimas wrote:

Hi Rimas,

> I tried the "patch -p1 --dry-run ./htb3.6_2.4.17.diff" but nothing
> happened, no error message, nothing.
err, you forget < !

Look carefully to what I've posted :)

root@codeman:[/usr/src/linux-2.4.18-vanilla] # patch -p1 --dry-run < 
htb2_2.4.17.diff 
patching file net/sched/Config.in
patching file net/sched/Makefile
patching file net/sched/sch_htb.c
patching file include/linux/pkt_sched.h
patching file net/sched/sch_api.c

-- 
Kind regards
        Marc-Christian Petersen

http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk

PGP/GnuPG Key: 1024D/569DE2E3DB441A16
Fingerprint: 3469 0CF8 CA7E 0042 7824 080A 569D E2E3 DB44 1A16
Key available at www.keyserver.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[Rimas]

Hi again,

Sorry it was my mistake, I have mised <.
And I got a few error messages :

patching file net/sched/Config.in
patching file net/sched/Makefile
patching file net/sched/sch_htb.c
patching file include/linux/pkt_sched.h
patching file net/sched/sch_api.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1117.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/sched/sch_api.c.rej
patching file lib/Makefile
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
patching file lib/rbtree.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
patching file include/net/pkt_sched.h
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
Hunk #1 succeeded at 222 (offset 1 line).

Is it OK or no?

I use RedHat 7.3 and kernel 2.4.19 and do I have to update iproute2 too ?

Thank you

Rimas


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marc-Christian Petersen" <m.c.p@gmx.net>
To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Cc: "Rimas" <rmocius@auste.elnet.lt>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB


> On Tuesday 24 September 2002 16:55, Rimas wrote:
> 
> Hi Rimas,
> 
> > I tried the "patch -p1 --dry-run ./htb3.6_2.4.17.diff" but nothing
> > happened, no error message, nothing.
> err, you forget < !
> 
> Look carefully to what I've posted :)
> 
> root@codeman:[/usr/src/linux-2.4.18-vanilla] # patch -p1 --dry-run < 
> htb2_2.4.17.diff 
> patching file net/sched/Config.in
> patching file net/sched/Makefile
> patching file net/sched/sch_htb.c
> patching file include/linux/pkt_sched.h
> patching file net/sched/sch_api.c
> 
> -- 
> Kind regards
>         Marc-Christian Petersen
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk
> 
> PGP/GnuPG Key: 1024D/569DE2E3DB441A16
> Fingerprint: 3469 0CF8 CA7E 0042 7824 080A 569D E2E3 DB44 1A16
> Key available at www.keyserver.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> 

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[Rimas]

Hi again,

Sorry it was my mistake, I have mised <.
And I got a few error messages :

patching file net/sched/Config.in
patching file net/sched/Makefile
patching file net/sched/sch_htb.c
patching file include/linux/pkt_sched.h
patching file net/sched/sch_api.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1117.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/sched/sch_api.c.rej
patching file lib/Makefile
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
patching file lib/rbtree.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
patching file include/net/pkt_sched.h
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
Hunk #1 succeeded at 222 (offset 1 line).

Is it OK or no?

I use RedHat 7.3 and kernel 2.4.19 and do I have to update iproute2 too ?

Thank you

Rimas


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marc-Christian Petersen" <m.c.p@gmx.net>
To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Cc: "Rimas" <rmocius@auste.elnet.lt>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB


> On Tuesday 24 September 2002 16:55, Rimas wrote:
> 
> Hi Rimas,
> 
> > I tried the "patch -p1 --dry-run ./htb3.6_2.4.17.diff" but nothing
> > happened, no error message, nothing.
> err, you forget < !
> 
> Look carefully to what I've posted :)
> 
> root@codeman:[/usr/src/linux-2.4.18-vanilla] # patch -p1 --dry-run < 
> htb2_2.4.17.diff 
> patching file net/sched/Config.in
> patching file net/sched/Makefile
> patching file net/sched/sch_htb.c
> patching file include/linux/pkt_sched.h
> patching file net/sched/sch_api.c
> 
> -- 
> Kind regards
>         Marc-Christian Petersen
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk
> 
> PGP/GnuPG Key: 1024D/569DE2E3DB441A16
> Fingerprint: 3469 0CF8 CA7E 0042 7824 080A 569D E2E3 DB44 1A16
> Key available at www.keyserver.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> 

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[Esteban Maringolo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 479 bytes --]

On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 12:38, Stef Coene wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 September 2002 16:23, Esteban Maringolo wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 11:12, Rimas wrote:

> > > How to put HTB in to 2.4 kernel?

> > Compile kernel 2.4.20 with HTB support.
> Kernel 2.4.20 has htb builtin.

That's why I've said "compile" and not "patch". :-)


-- 
Esteban A. Maringolo
Secont, Comunicaciones Digitales
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Tel: +54 (11) 4551-2455
http://www.secont.com.ar/

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[Stef Coene]

On Tuesday 24 September 2002 17:51, Esteban Maringolo wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 12:38, Stef Coene wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 September 2002 16:23, Esteban Maringolo wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 11:12, Rimas wrote:
> > > > How to put HTB in to 2.4 kernel?
> > >
> > > Compile kernel 2.4.20 with HTB support.
> >
> > Kernel 2.4.20 has htb builtin.
>
> That's why I've said "compile" and not "patch". :-)
:)

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[mdew]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1043 bytes --]

On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 03:14, Rimas wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> Sorry it was my mistake, I have mised <.
> And I got a few error messages :
> 
> patching file net/sched/Config.in
> patching file net/sched/Makefile
> patching file net/sched/sch_htb.c
> patching file include/linux/pkt_sched.h
> patching file net/sched/sch_api.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1117.
> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/sched/sch_api.c.rej
> patching file lib/Makefile
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
                                                                 ^^^^
> patching file lib/rbtree.c
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
                                                                 ^^^^
> patching file include/net/pkt_sched.h
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
                                                                 ^^^^
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 222 (offset 1 line).

why did you reverse the patch?


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[Stef Coene]

On Tuesday 24 September 2002 17:14, Rimas wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Sorry it was my mistake, I have mised <.
> And I got a few error messages :
>
> patching file net/sched/Config.in
> patching file net/sched/Makefile
> patching file net/sched/sch_htb.c
> patching file include/linux/pkt_sched.h
> patching file net/sched/sch_api.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1117.
> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/sched/sch_api.c.rej
> patching file lib/Makefile
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
> patching file lib/rbtree.c
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
> patching file include/net/pkt_sched.h
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 222 (offset 1 line).
>
> Is it OK or no?
Nop.  You have to choose "n".  Some general clean-up patches that are in the 
htb patch are already applied to the defaul tkernel.

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[raptor]

Mandrake 2.4.19mdk has HTB in, probably RedHat have done the same ...

"Rimas" <rmocius@auste.elnet.lt> wrote:

|Hi again,
|
|Sorry it was my mistake, I have mised <.
|And I got a few error messages :
|
|patching file net/sched/Config.in
|patching file net/sched/Makefile
|patching file net/sched/sch_htb.c
|patching file include/linux/pkt_sched.h
|patching file net/sched/sch_api.c
|Hunk #1 FAILED at 1117.
|1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/sched/sch_api.c.rej
|patching file lib/Makefile
|Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
|patching file lib/rbtree.c
|Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
|patching file include/net/pkt_sched.h
|Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
|Hunk #1 succeeded at 222 (offset 1 line).
|
|Is it OK or no?
|
|I use RedHat 7.3 and kernel 2.4.19 and do I have to update iproute2 too ?
|
|Thank you
|
|Rimas
|
|
|----- Original Message ----- 
|From: "Marc-Christian Petersen" <m.c.p@gmx.net>
|To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
|Cc: "Rimas" <rmocius@auste.elnet.lt>
|Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 4:00 PM
|Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB
|
|
|> On Tuesday 24 September 2002 16:55, Rimas wrote:
|> 
|> Hi Rimas,
|> 
|> > I tried the "patch -p1 --dry-run ./htb3.6_2.4.17.diff" but nothing
|> > happened, no error message, nothing.
|> err, you forget < !
|> 
|> Look carefully to what I've posted :)
|> 
|> root@codeman:[/usr/src/linux-2.4.18-vanilla] # patch -p1 --dry-run < 
|> htb2_2.4.17.diff 
|> patching file net/sched/Config.in
|> patching file net/sched/Makefile
|> patching file net/sched/sch_htb.c
|> patching file include/linux/pkt_sched.h
|> patching file net/sched/sch_api.c
|> 
|> -- 
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[Chandrashekhar Rane]

Dear Rimas,

I think you trying to remove any qdisc already present on your egress
queue.

If you have not created any qdisc before trying to remove it, then
defn't it will give such error.  

You need to redirect it to /dev/null. if you trying to do the same
before creating the root qdisc.

shekhar
On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 18:38, Rimas wrote:
> shekhar,
> 
> >Make sure you had enable the HTB support in Kernel for Fair Queuing.
> I did it.
> 
> When I look to htb-start (debug file) I seethe error message only in one
> place:
> 
> # Fri Nov  8 10:56:35 GMT 2002
> 
> # ip link show
> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
>     link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
> 2: shaper0: <> mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 10
>     link/ether
> 3: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
>     link/ether 00:50:04:6c:3c:5b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 4: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
>     link/ether 00:50:da:3c:d9:8b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 5: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
>     link/ether 00:04:e2:26:3d:80 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 
> # tc qdisc del dev eth0 root
> RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 30 r2q 100
> 
> # ip link show
> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
>     link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
> 2: shaper0: <> mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 10
>     link/ether
> 3: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc htb qlen 100
>     link/ether 00:50:04:6c:3c:5b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 4: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
>     link/ether 00:50:da:3c:d9:8b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 5: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
>     link/ether 00:04:e2:26:3d:80 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 
> # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 5Mbit burst 15k
> 
> # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 5Mbit burst 15k
> 
> # tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 10 sfq perturb 10
> 
> # tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip sport
> 80 0xffff classid 1:10
> 
> # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:20 htb rate 3Mbit ceil 5Mbit
> burst 15k
> 
> # tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:20 handle 20 sfq perturb 10
> 
> # tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dport
> 25 0xffff classid 1:20
> 
> # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:30 htb rate 1Kbit ceil 5Mbit
> burst 15k
> 
> # tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:30 handle 30 sfq perturb 10
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Thnak you
> 
> Rimas
> 


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] HTB

[Reginald R. Richardson]

Hi guys..

Running HTB on leaf bearing 1.0-stable with kernel 2.4.20

For some reason, I'm getting these messages in my SYSLOG
Dec 27 18:21:12 gw-homenet kernel: htb*r3 m=0 
Dec 27 18:21:12 gw-homenet kernel: htb*r2 m=0 
Dec 27 18:21:12 gw-homenet kernel: htb*r1 m=0 
Dec 27 18:21:12 gw-homenet kernel: htb*r0 m=0 
Dec 27 18:21:12 gw-homenet kernel: htb*c10011 m=2 t=391999 c=100352 pq=0
df=0 ql=0 pa=0 f: 
Dec 27 18:21:12 gw-homenet kernel: htb*c10001 m=2 t=83725 c=83725 pq=0
df=0 ql=0 pa=0 f: 
Dec 27 18:21:12 gw-homenet kernel: htb*c10010 m=2 t=130400 c=88341 pq=0
df=229376 ql=0 pa=0 f: 
Dec 27 18:21:12 gw-homenet kernel: htb*c10012 m=2 t=577066 c=168099 pq=0
df=60000000 ql=0 pa=0 f: 
Dec 27 18:21:12 gw-homenet kernel: htb*g j=145034 
Dec 27 18:21:12 gw-homenet kernel: htb*r7 m=0 
Dec 27 18:21:12 gw-homenet kernel: htb*r6 m=0 
Dec 27 18:21:12 gw-homenet kernel: htb*r5 m=0 
Dec 27 18:21:12 gw-homenet kernel: htb*r4 m=0 
Dec 27 18:21:12 gw-homenet kernel: htb*r3 m=0 
Dec 27 18:21:13 gw-homenet kernel: htb*r2 m=0 
Dec 27 18:21:13 gw-homenet kernel: htb*r1 m=0 
Dec 27 18:21:13 gw-homenet kernel: htb*r0 m=0 
Dec 27 18:21:13 gw-homenet kernel: htb*c10011 m=2 t=391999 c=100352 pq=0
df=0 ql=0 pa=0 f: 
Dec 27 18:21:13 gw-homenet kernel: htb*c10001 m=2 t=83725 c=83725 pq=0
df=0 ql=0 pa=0 f: 
Dec 27 18:21:13 gw-homenet kernel: htb*c10010 m=2 t=130400 c=88341 pq=0
df=229376 ql=0 pa=0 f: 
Dec 27 18:21:13 gw-homenet kernel: htb*c10012 m=2 t=577066 c=168099 pq=0
df=60000000 ql=0 pa=0 f: 
Dec 27 18:21:13 gw-homenet kernel: htb*g j=145037 


This is my start file -- this is being started from Shorewall Firewall
run_tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 10
run_tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 122kbit ceil
122kbit

echo "   Added Top Level Class -- rate 122kbit"

run_tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 80kbit ceil
122kbit prio 0
run_tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 24kbit ceil
100kbit prio 1
run_tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 18kbit ceil
64kbit prio 2

echo "   Added Second Level Classes -- rates 80kbit, 24kbit, 18kbit"

run_tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:10 handle 120: sfq perturb 10
run_tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:11 handle 130: sfq perturb 10
run_tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:12 handle 140: sfq perturb 10

echo "   Enabled SFQ on Second Level Classes"

run_tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 0 handle 1 fw
classid 1:10
run_tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 handle 2 fw
classid 1:11
run_tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 2 handle 3 fw
classid 1:12

echo "   Defined fwmark filters"


During the startup of my Linux box, I see this message in the Syslog,
which I assume, is generated, when the sch_htb module is being load

Dec 27 18:02:10 gw-homenet kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10011 is small.
Consider r2q change.<4>HTB: quantum of class 10012 is small. Consider
r2q change

Any suggestions will be appreciated, thnks



__________________________________________________________________
Reginald Richardson
ICQ#: 365841
Current ICQ status:   
+  More ways to contact me 
__________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[Stef Coene]

> Dec 27 18:02:10 gw-homenet kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10011 is small.
> Consider r2q change.<4>HTB: quantum of class 10012 is small. Consider
> r2q change
>
> Any suggestions will be appreciated, thnks
The famous quantum question :)
I have more info on the faq page on www.docum.org

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] htb

[Evgeni Gechev]

class htb 1000:10 root leaf 1010: prio 0 quantum 1600 rate 48Mbit ceil
48Mbit burst 3Kb/8 mpu 0b cburst 63Kb/8 mpu 0b level 0
 Sent 17553816503 bytes 13078592 pkts (dropped 63733, overlimits 0)
 rate 730783bps 570pps backlog 112p
 lended: 13078480 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
 tokens: -589 ctokens: 7412

Hi!
  Can somebody explain what is wrong from the above?
I can't understand following relation:
"rate 48Mbit ceil 48Mbit" and "rate 730783bps 570pps backlog 112p"
Why the current rate is limited to 730KByte/s (and there is backlog
112p) when the rate and ceil are 48Mbit/s (6Mbyte/s)?
I sent similar question some months ago, but there was no answer.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb

[Stef Coene]

On Tuesday 13 May 2003 20:00, Evgeni Gechev wrote:
> class htb 1000:10 root leaf 1010: prio 0 quantum 1600 rate 48Mbit ceil
> 48Mbit burst 3Kb/8 mpu 0b cburst 63Kb/8 mpu 0b level 0
>  Sent 17553816503 bytes 13078592 pkts (dropped 63733, overlimits 0)
>  rate 730783bps 570pps backlog 112p
>  lended: 13078480 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
>  tokens: -589 ctokens: 7412
>
> Hi!
>   Can somebody explain what is wrong from the above?
> I can't understand following relation:
> "rate 48Mbit ceil 48Mbit" and "rate 730783bps 570pps backlog 112p"
> Why the current rate is limited to 730KByte/s (and there is backlog
> 112p) when the rate and ceil are 48Mbit/s (6Mbyte/s)?
rate 730783bps means that the average rate is 730783bps for that class.  And 
570pps means that class sends 570 packets per seconds.  So it's just some 
statistics for that class.
I'm not sure for the backlog, but I think it means that there are 112 packets 
in the queue ready to be send.

> I sent similar question some months ago, but there was no answer.
Satisfied ?  :)

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb

[Evgeni Gechev]

Stef Coene wrote:

> On Tuesday 13 May 2003 20:00, Evgeni Gechev wrote:
> > class htb 1000:10 root leaf 1010: prio 0 quantum 1600 rate 48Mbit ceil
> > 48Mbit burst 3Kb/8 mpu 0b cburst 63Kb/8 mpu 0b level 0
> >  Sent 17553816503 bytes 13078592 pkts (dropped 63733, overlimits 0)
> >  rate 730783bps 570pps backlog 112p
> >  lended: 13078480 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
> >  tokens: -589 ctokens: 7412
> >
> > Hi!
> >   Can somebody explain what is wrong from the above?
> > I can't understand following relation:
> > "rate 48Mbit ceil 48Mbit" and "rate 730783bps 570pps backlog 112p"
> > Why the current rate is limited to 730KByte/s (and there is backlog
> > 112p) when the rate and ceil are 48Mbit/s (6Mbyte/s)?
> rate 730783bps means that the average rate is 730783bps for that class.  And
> 570pps means that class sends 570 packets per seconds.  So it's just some
> statistics for that class.
> I'm not sure for the backlog, but I think it means that there are 112 packets
> in the queue ready to be send.
>
> > I sent similar question some months ago, but there was no answer.
> Satisfied ?  :)
>
> Stef
>
> --
>
> stef.coene@docum.org
>  "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
>      http://www.docum.org/
>      #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Satisfied :)
But partially :(
The problem is that the bandwidth is REALLY limited to about 730kbps.
And isn't the backlog the number of packets, delayed due to bandwidth reached
the shaper limit?

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb

[Stef Coene]

> Satisfied :)
> But partially :(
> The problem is that the bandwidth is REALLY limited to about 730kbps.
Then your class reaches it's limit.  But why do you have a ceil of 48Mbps and 
730kbps?

> And isn't the backlog the number of packets, delayed due to bandwidth
> reached the shaper limit?
Or like I said, there are packets in the queue ready to be send but they can't 
due to limited link bandwidth.

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb

[Evgeni Gechev]

Stef Coene wrote:

> > Satisfied :)
> > But partially :(
> > The problem is that the bandwidth is REALLY limited to about 730kbps.
> Then your class reaches it's limit.  But why do you have a ceil of 48Mbps and
> 730kbps?
>

Exactly. Why?
I can't find out.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb

[Stef Coene]

On Tuesday 13 May 2003 21:47, Evgeni Gechev wrote:
> Stef Coene wrote:
> > > Satisfied :)
> > > But partially :(
> > > The problem is that the bandwidth is REALLY limited to about 730kbps.
> >
> > Then your class reaches it's limit.  But why do you have a ceil of 48Mbps
> > and 730kbps?
>
> Exactly. Why?
> I can't find out.
What's the command you used to create that class?

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb

[Evgeni Gechev]

Stef Coene wrote:

> On Tuesday 13 May 2003 21:47, Evgeni Gechev wrote:
> > Stef Coene wrote:
> > > > Satisfied :)
> > > > But partially :(
> > > > The problem is that the bandwidth is REALLY limited to about 730kbps.
> > >
> > > Then your class reaches it's limit.  But why do you have a ceil of 48Mbps
> > > and 730kbps?
> >
> > Exactly. Why?
> > I can't find out.
> What's the command you used to create that class?
>
> Stef
>
> --
>
> stef.coene@docum.org
>  "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
>      http://www.docum.org/
>      #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

Simple configuration:


test1:
root@mail:~# tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1000: htb
root@mail:~# tc class add dev eth1 parent 1000: classid 1000:10 htb rate 5Mbit
ceil 5Mbit burst 3k quantum 1600
root@mail:~# tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst
0.0.0.0/0 flowid 1000:10
root@mail:~# ifstat -i eth1
       eth1
 KB/s in  KB/s out
   43.84    631.32
   43.46    627.32
   43.71    627.99
   43.27    626.35
   43.72    627.36
   43.59    628.03
   43.62    627.17
   43.96    627.22
   43.43    627.81
   43.83    627.54

test2:
root@mail:~# tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1000: htb
root@mail:~# tc class add dev eth1 parent 1000: classid 1000:10 htb rate 6Mbit
ceil 6Mbit burst 3k quantum 1600
root@mail:~# tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst
0.0.0.0/0 flowid 1000:10
root@mail:~# ifstat -i eth1
       eth1
 KB/s in  KB/s out
   45.46    651.63
   45.06    651.58
   45.02    651.49
   45.22    647.36
   45.14    652.95
   45.31    651.22
   45.29    650.39
   44.96    650.34
   45.13    651.30
   45.16    651.42

test3:
root@mail:~# tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1000: htb
root@mail:~# tc class add dev eth1 parent 1000: classid 1000:10 htb rate 50Mbit
ceil 50Mbit burst 3k quantum 1600
root@mail:~# tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst
0.0.0.0/0 flowid 1000:10
root@mail:~# ifstat -i eth1
       eth1
 KB/s in  KB/s out
   45.04    655.73
   44.75    644.21
   45.16    651.51
   45.36    652.94
   44.28    650.62
   45.15    651.90
   44.91    651.28
   45.21    651.69
   44.66    651.25
   45.16    650.84

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb

[Stef Coene]

> Simple configuration:
>
>
> test1:
> root@mail:~# tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1000: htb
> root@mail:~# tc class add dev eth1 parent 1000: classid 1000:10 htb rate
> 5Mbit ceil 5Mbit burst 3k quantum 1600
> root@mail:~# tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst
> 0.0.0.0/0 flowid 1000:10
Your burst is too low.  If you don't specify it, htb will calculate the 
minimum burst for you.

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] HTB

[Cristea Virgil Ionut]

Hi, I have the following questions:

I only have one htb computer (2 nics) to shape the international traffic 
as well as the metropolitan traffic (i have a list of metropolitan ip's to 
use). Can this be achived using iptables with packet marking (on that htb 
computer the 2 nics are bridged)?
If it can will there be delays introduced by the shaping operation (the 
metropolitan link is a 100M fiber - full almost all the time)???
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[Andre Correa]

Cristea, you are too vague in your question. I can tell you that you can 
shape MAN and WAN traffic separately using diferent classes and filters.

100Mbits for a single machine looks like too much traffic. Maybe you 
should divide load between more machines and have redundancy in your setup.

If this is not what you meant, please let us know...

Andre



Cristea Virgil Ionut wrote:
> Hi, I have the following questions:
> 
> I only have one htb computer (2 nics) to shape the international traffic 
> as well as the metropolitan traffic (i have a list of metropolitan ip's 
> to use). Can this be achived using iptables with packet marking (on that 
> htb computer the 2 nics are bridged)?
> If it can will there be delays introduced by the shaping operation (the 
> metropolitan link is a 100M fiber - full almost all the time)???
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] HTB

[Arturas Lapiene]

Hello,

I have problems with htb. The problem is that when I download
any file via shaper with htb, the traffic is very dinamic, 
it jumps, for example:
if i have set ceil = 128kbit the results that it jumps from 112kbps
to 144kbps or smth like that maybe its not very bad, but when the
traffic drops down to 40kbps or less and then after 1 or 2 seconds
jumps to 144kbps, its bad :-( and it is often.

Root class is 20Mbit
There are about 7000 classes (on two interfaces)

an example script: 

===============================================#!/bin/sh

TC="/sbin/tc"

INT_IF="eth1"
EXT_IF="eth0"

$TC qdisc del dev $INT_IF root
$TC qdisc del dev $EXT_IF root
$TC qdisc add dev $INT_IF root handle 1: htb r2q 1 default 2000 # tried default r2q
$TC qdisc add dev $EXT_IF root handle 1: htb r2q 1 default 2000

$TC class add dev $INT_IF parent 1: classid 1:1 htb quantum 60000 rate 20Mbit ceil 20Mbit
$TC class add dev $EXT_IF parent 1: classid 1:1 htb quantum 40000 rate 20Mbit ceil 20Mbit
$TC class add dev $INT_IF parent 1:1 classid 1:2000 htb quantum 1500 rate 1kbit ceil 5kbit
$TC class add dev $EXT_IF parent 1:1 classid 1:2000 htb quantum 1500 rate 1kbit ceil 5kbit
$TC qdisc add dev $INT_IF parent 1:2000 handle 2000: sfq perturb 10
$TC qdisc add dev $EXT_IF parent 1:2000 handle 2000: sfq perturb 10
$TC class add dev $INT_IF parent 1:1 classid 1:2001 htb quantum 60000 rate 682kbit ceil 2048kbit # tried to let htb itself calculate quantum, the same 
$TC class add dev $EXT_IF parent 1:1 classid 1:2001 htb quantum 60000 rate 682kbit ceil 2048kbit
$TC qdisc add dev $INT_IF parent 1:2001 handle 2001: sfq perturb 10
$TC qdisc add dev $EXT_IF parent 1:2001 handle 2001: sfq perturb 10
$TC filter add dev $INT_IF protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip dst x.x.x.x flowid 1:2001
$TC filter add dev $EXT_IF protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src x.x.x.x flowid 1:2001
$TC class add dev $INT_IF parent 1:1 classid 1:2002 htb quantum 1500 rate 42kbit ceil 128kbit
$TC class add dev $EXT_IF parent 1:1 classid 1:2002 htb quantum 1500 rate 42kbit ceil 128kbit
$TC qdisc add dev $INT_IF parent 1:2002 handle 2002: sfq perturb 10
$TC qdisc add dev $EXT_IF parent 1:2002 handle 2002: sfq perturb 10
$TC filter add dev $INT_IF protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip dst x.x.x.x flowid 1:2002
$TC filter add dev $EXT_IF protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src x.x.x.x flowid 1:2002

================================================

linux 2.4.25
network cards: eepro100
HTB 3

Xeon 2.4GHz

Maybe I need to tune kernel, HZ or smth?

sorry for bad english 

--
Arturas
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] HTB

[sistemas]

Hi all

I'm new in this list and i hope to lear and to help if possible.

But firt i need help :-(

I have this messege in my syslog when my classes and qdiscs goes down.

Can any one know what does it mean?

Thnx in advance.

Yannick Arrimadas Bot

Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: HTB init, kernel part version 3.17
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00100100
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  printing eip:
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: c0267fb4
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: *pde = 00000000
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: Oops: 0000 [#1]
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: Modules linked in: cls_fw sch_sfq sch_htb ipt_MARK iptable_mangle ide_floppy ide_tape sg sr_mod ide_cd cd
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: CPU:    0
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: EIP:    0060:[<c0267fb4>]    Not tainted
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: EFLAGS: 00010206   (2.6.8.1) 
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: EIP is at qdisc_lookup+0x34/0x50
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: eax: 001000d4   ebx: 001000d4   ecx: dd3f7914   edx: 00100100
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: esi: 00010000   edi: 00010000   ebp: c204dc38   esp: c204dc30
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: Process tc (pid: 22899, threadinfoÂ04c000 taskÈ0219d0)
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: Stack: ddeca290 dd3f7800 c204dc80 c0268a62 dd3f7800 00010000 d1a8873c 00000000
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:        000005c8 ddb15800 0000000a 00000000 00000000 ffffffff dd3f7800 ddb15800
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:        00000010 dce34a40 00000048 c204dcb0 c204dcfc c0262297 dce34a40 ddeca280
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: Call Trace:
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  [<c010707b>] show_stack+0x9b/0xb0
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  [<c01071cb>] show_registers+0x11b/0x180
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  [<c0107310>] die+0x50/0xb0
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  [<c0117280>] do_page_fault+0x330/0x5b8
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  [<c0106cbd>] error_code+0x2d/0x40
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  [<c0268a62>] tc_modify_qdisc+0x102/0x450
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  [<c0262297>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x347/0x3b0  
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  [<c026c3c4>] netlink_data_ready+0x54/0x60
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  [<c026baca>] netlink_sendskb+0x6a/0x90   
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  [<c026c0a9>] netlink_sendmsg+0x1f9/0x2c0 
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  [<c0253078>] sock_sendmsg+0x88/0xb0
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  [<c0254696>] sys_sendmsg+0x196/0x210
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  [<c0254960>] sys_socketcall+0x80/0x1a0
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel:  [<c0105c79>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x79
Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: Code: 8b 40 2c 0f 18 00 90 39 ca 75 e6 31 c0 5b 5e 5d c3 8d 74 26


Oct 14 17:23:30 pototogorri kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10481 is small. Consider r2q change.
Oct 14 17:23:30 pototogorri kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10482 is small. Consider r2q change.
Oct 14 17:23:30 pototogorri kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10483 is small. Consider r2q change.
Oct 14 17:23:30 pototogorri kernel: HTB: quantum of class 11041 is small. Consider r2q change.
Oct 14 17:23:30 pototogorri kernel: HTB: quantum of class 11042 is small. Consider r2q change.


Servicio ofrecido por www.systemwifi.com

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[Jason Boxman]

On Thursday 14 October 2004 14:23, sistemas wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm new in this list and i hope to lear and to help if possible.
>
> But firt i need help :-(
>
> I have this messege in my syslog when my classes and qdiscs goes down.
>
> Can any one know what does it mean?
>

I used to have an Oops an awful lot like that.  I upgraded to 2.6.9-rc3 and it 
resolved the problem.  Yours could be something else, though.

What `tc` configuration are you using?  What's the simplest possible 
configuration you can create that consistently reproduces the problem?

What specifically did you do to trigger this problem, if you know?

Thanks.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] htb

[James Lista]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1030 bytes --]

buddies,

i am newbie to band control..  i have a linux box (as a router, NATing,) sharing internet

----internet----------eth0-[linux.box]-eth1----------my.lan
              
wan = adsl 600
lan  = about 20 users

my problem is that due the contract i cannot block users from my lan from downloading anything, so they can use kazaa (argghh), edonkey(argghhhhh), emule(arghhhhhh), soulseek(arghjhhhh) etc etc etc,     

so,

I want to know if using htb i can make that users that uses browsers (port 80) have priority then users that uses port (110 and 25) , then rest of the ports.....    as if i could have such thing:


600kbit --------   50% for port 80
                       30% for port 25 and 110
                       20% for the rest 

this way no user can complain that cannot access his internet banking, checking his emails  and other thing that are essentials...

if it is possible (with htb) or any other method, please tell me a direction for me to go..

really thanks

james 






[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3219 bytes --]

Re: [LARTC] htb

[James Lista]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1983 bytes --]

hey ja,

do you have a small script example to show me ? ...  i am new to those thing.. wanna study examples to understand how things works...   tried reading some docs but my english is poor so, i could understand very few..

thanks

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: ja 
  To: James Lista ; lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl 
  Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 10:53 AM
  Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb


  This is no good cause for example bittorent can download on port 80 :D. So the best way is create classes with ceil parameter for example 128kbit to ensure relability for every user and limit number of connections to 50-80 per user. This the best (i can get a word grr....- you know) if you dont want to block p2p.
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: James Lista 
    To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl 
    Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 2:42 PM
    Subject: [LARTC] htb


    buddies,

    i am newbie to band control..  i have a linux box (as a router, NATing,) sharing internet

    ----internet----------eth0-[linux.box]-eth1----------my.lan
                  
    wan = adsl 600
    lan  = about 20 users

    my problem is that due the contract i cannot block users from my lan from downloading anything, so they can use kazaa (argghh), edonkey(argghhhhh), emule(arghhhhhh), soulseek(arghjhhhh) etc etc etc,     

    so,

    I want to know if using htb i can make that users that uses browsers (port 80) have priority then users that uses port (110 and 25) , then rest of the ports.....    as if i could have such thing:


    600kbit --------   50% for port 80
                           30% for port 25 and 110
                           20% for the rest 

    this way no user can complain that cannot access his internet banking, checking his emails  and other thing that are essentials...

    if it is possible (with htb) or any other method, please tell me a direction for me to go..

    really thanks

    james 






[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5915 bytes --]

Re: [LARTC] htb

[Andreas Klauer]

Am Sunday 17 October 2004 14:42 schrieb James Lista:
> 600kbit ------------   50% for port 80
>                        30% for port 25 and 110
>                        20% for the rest

Sure, that's possible. That's one 600kbit class with three child classes.

However, there may be many other ports besides 25, 80, and 110 that deserve 
prioritizing. Throwing them in the same class as all filesharing traffic 
could make things even worse than before.

Then there's the problem that many filesharing protocols can work on any 
port, so your users could just move to one of the prioritized ports and 
take all the bandwidth again.

That's some of the reasons why I never bothered with prioritizing ports on 
a global basis. Consider using ipp2p or l7-filter for a more reliable way 
for detecting P2P traffic.

No matter how you look at it, 600kbit for 20 users is a bit slow. Even 
without P2P traffic, if all of them surf the web at the same time, they 
won't be very happy with the speed. 

Besides traffic shaping, you should do anything possible to reduce load. 
Cache DNS queries, provide a HTTP proxy, probably squid. Make sure that 
you can't be flooded from the outside. Stuff like that.

HTH
Andreas
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb

[James Lista]

andreas,

having one class per user seems cool... please buddy, have a sample script
of that ?
so, if i have 600kbit / 7 = 86kbit for each, is it that ???  if so, is it
too few for a single user ?
about something that i read that say "borrowing",  when a user borrow his
spare band to a "vampire", when will he gets it back when he needs it...?

thanks again

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Klauer" <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb


> Am Sunday 17 October 2004 15:02 schrieb James Lista:
> > and about that you say take a look at ipp2p or l7-filter:  errr,  can
> > they identify when a user changed edonkey or any other p2p default port
> > and limit such packet even so ????
>
> They try to. I'm using IPP2P and it works okay for me.
>
> Although my shaping setup is a little different from what you want to do.
> I've got one class per user, so everyone gets the same share of bandwidth.
> This way it doesn't matter what kind of traffic a user generates, as it
> doesn't influence the others.
>
> Prioritization is then done within the user classes, the only effect of
> that is that a user can still have a lag free SSH connection while he's
> downloading stuff at the same time.
>
> So in my setup, if the user finds a way to trick the prioritization
> settings, he's only tricking himself, because he can't escape his user
> class :)
>
> Andreas
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb

[ja]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1533 bytes --]

This is no good cause for example bittorent can download on port 80 :D. So the best way is create classes with ceil parameter for example 128kbit to ensure relability for every user and limit number of connections to 50-80 per user. This the best (i can get a word grr....- you know) if you dont want to block p2p.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: James Lista 
  To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl 
  Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 2:42 PM
  Subject: [LARTC] htb


  buddies,

  i am newbie to band control..  i have a linux box (as a router, NATing,) sharing internet

  ----internet----------eth0-[linux.box]-eth1----------my.lan
                
  wan = adsl 600
  lan  = about 20 users

  my problem is that due the contract i cannot block users from my lan from downloading anything, so they can use kazaa (argghh), edonkey(argghhhhh), emule(arghhhhhh), soulseek(arghjhhhh) etc etc etc,     

  so,

  I want to know if using htb i can make that users that uses browsers (port 80) have priority then users that uses port (110 and 25) , then rest of the ports.....    as if i could have such thing:


  600kbit --------   50% for port 80
                         30% for port 25 and 110
                         20% for the rest 

  this way no user can complain that cannot access his internet banking, checking his emails  and other thing that are essentials...

  if it is possible (with htb) or any other method, please tell me a direction for me to go..

  really thanks

  james 






[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4413 bytes --]

Re: [LARTC] htb

[James Lista]

andreas

first thanks for the answer and the advices.

well. let me say some things: inspite of saying that i have 600kbit for 20
users, it is really rare to have more than 7 at the same time

and about that you say take a look at ipp2p or l7-filter:  errr,  can they
identify when a user changed edonkey or any other p2p default port and limit
such packet even so ????



----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Klauer" <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb


> Am Sunday 17 October 2004 14:42 schrieb James Lista:
> > 600kbit ------------   50% for port 80
> >                        30% for port 25 and 110
> >                        20% for the rest
>
> Sure, that's possible. That's one 600kbit class with three child classes.
>
> However, there may be many other ports besides 25, 80, and 110 that
deserve
> prioritizing. Throwing them in the same class as all filesharing traffic
> could make things even worse than before.
>
> Then there's the problem that many filesharing protocols can work on any
> port, so your users could just move to one of the prioritized ports and
> take all the bandwidth again.
>
> That's some of the reasons why I never bothered with prioritizing ports on
> a global basis. Consider using ipp2p or l7-filter for a more reliable way
> for detecting P2P traffic.
>
> No matter how you look at it, 600kbit for 20 users is a bit slow. Even
> without P2P traffic, if all of them surf the web at the same time, they
> won't be very happy with the speed.
>
> Besides traffic shaping, you should do anything possible to reduce load.
> Cache DNS queries, provide a HTTP proxy, probably squid. Make sure that
> you can't be flooded from the outside. Stuff like that.
>
> HTH
> Andreas
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb

[Andreas Klauer]

Am Sunday 17 October 2004 15:02 schrieb James Lista:
> and about that you say take a look at ipp2p or l7-filter:  errr,  can
> they identify when a user changed edonkey or any other p2p default port
> and limit such packet even so ????

They try to. I'm using IPP2P and it works okay for me.

Although my shaping setup is a little different from what you want to do. 
I've got one class per user, so everyone gets the same share of bandwidth. 
This way it doesn't matter what kind of traffic a user generates, as it 
doesn't influence the others.

Prioritization is then done within the user classes, the only effect of 
that is that a user can still have a lag free SSH connection while he's 
downloading stuff at the same time.

So in my setup, if the user finds a way to trick the prioritization 
settings, he's only tricking himself, because he can't escape his user 
class :)

Andreas
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb

[Andreas Klauer]

Am Sunday 17 October 2004 14:08 schrieb James Lista:
> do you have a small script example to show me ? ...

I don't know about the "small" part...
My own script: http://www.metamorpher.de/fairnat/

HTH
Andreas
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] HTB

["Marcus Schäfer"]

 Hello folks, 
 
 I´m a fully Beginner in Linux and Traffic Control. 
 I have a lot of Problems to realize the following Scenario(I need it for my

 scholastics): 
  
 2 customers share one 2Mbit link. The packets of the customers are coming
on 
 the interface with a NAT Adress each. Each of the customers should use only

 1Mbit of the Line. 
  
          192.168.0.1        - - -  
          customer1    eth0 |     | eth1        customer1 
                 -----------|     |-------------- 
          customer2    2Mbit|     | 2Mbit       customer2 
          192.168.1.99       - - - 
  
 I think I have to use 2 Scripts, one for each interface (on every side). 
  
 I have written a small skript, but i´m unsteady if it works. It would be 
 very nice, if you can take a look at it and give me some hints. 
  
 Greetings  
 Marcus Schäfer 
  
  

############################################################################Traffic

 Control 
 ###########################################################################

  
  
 #! /bin/sh 
 #variables 
 ext_dev_1=eth0 
 bw=1Mbps 
  
 #####root qdisc for eth0 
 tc qdisc add dev $ext_dev_1 root handle 1: htb  
 #####root class for customer 1 on eth0 
 tc class add dev $ext_dev_1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate $bw ceil $bw
prio 
 0 
  
 ##### 3 classes for customer 1 on eth0 
 tc class add dev $ext_dev_1 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 450kbps ceil
$bw 
 prio 0 
 tc class add dev $ext_dev_1 parent 1:1 classid 1:3 htb rate 450kbps ceil
$bw 
 prio 1 
 tc class add dev $ext_dev_1 parent 1:1 classid 1:4 htb rate 100kbps ceil
$bw 
 prio 2 
  
  
 #####root class for customer 2 on eth0 
 tc class add dev $ext_dev_1 parent 1: classid 2:1 htb rate $bw ceil $bw
prio 
 0 
  
 #####3 classes for customer 2 on eth0 
 tc class add dev $ext_dev_1 parent 1:1 classid 2:2 htb rate 450kbps ceil
$bw 
 prio 0 
 tc class add dev $ext_dev_1 parent 1:1 classid 2:3 htb rate 450kbps ceil
$bw 
 prio 1 
 tc class add dev $ext_dev_1 parent 1:1 classid 2:4 htb rate 100kbps ceil
$bw 
 prio 2 
  
  
  
 #####Filters which directs packets marked with iptables in the right
classes 
  
  
 #####Filters for customer 1 on eth0 
 tc filter add dev ext_dev_1 parent 1: prio 0 protocol ip handle 1 fw flowid

 1:2 
 tc filter add dev ext_dev_1 parent 1: prio 1 protocol ip handle 2 fw flowid

 1:3 
 tc filter add dev ext_dev_1 parent 1: prio 2 protocol ip handle 3 fw flowid

 1:4  
  
 #####Filters for customer 2 on eth0 
 tc filter add dev ext_dev_1 parent 1: prio 0 protocol ip handle 4 fw flowid

 2:2 
 tc filter add dev ext_dev_1 parent 1: prio 1 protocol ip handle 5 fw flowid

 2:3  
 tc filter add dev ext_dev_1 parent 1: prio 1 protocol ip handle 6 fw flowid

 2:4  
  
  
  
  

############################################################################

 iptables 
 ###########################################################################

  
 $ipt=/sbin/iptables 
  
 ########### mark packets for customer 1 on eth0 ###########################

  
 # mark packets with 1 which come from 192.168.0.1 and have a source port
#of 
 80 
  
 $ipt -t mangle -A FORWARD -s 192.168.0.1 -p tcp --sport 80 -j MARK 
 --set-mark 1 
  
 # mark packets with 2 which come from 192.168.0.1 and have a source port
#of 
 22 
  
 $ipt -t mangle -A FORWARD -s 192.168.0.1 -p tcp --sport 22 -j MARK 
 --set-mark 2 
  
 ######## mark packets for customer 2 on eth0 ##############################

  
 # mark packets with 4 which come from 192.168.1.99 and have a source port 
 #of 80 
  
 $ipt -t mangle -A FORWARD -s 192.168.1.99 -p tcp --sport 80 -j MARK 
 --set-mark 4 
  
  
 # mark packets with 5 which come from 192.168.1.99 and have a source port 
 #of 22 
  
 $ipt -t mangle -A FORWARD -s 192.168.1.99 -p tcp --sport 22 -j MARK 
 --set-mark 5 
  
  
 ######## mark unmatched packets ###########################################

  
 #mark packets with 3 which come from 192.168.0.1 
  
 $ipt -t mangle -A FORWARD -s 192.168.0.1 -j MARK --set-mark 3 
  
 #mark packets with 6 which come from 192.168.1.99 
  
 $ipt -t mangle -A FORWARD -s 192.168.1.99 -j MARK --set-mark 6 

-- 
NEU +++ DSL Komplett von GMX +++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
GMX DSL-Netzanschluss + Tarif zum supergünstigen Komplett-Preis!
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] HTB

[Marco Aurelio]

What exactly happens if the sum of the children classes rate is bigger
than the parent's?

What if the majority of these classes are using less than the minimum
rate established (eg. 0kbps)?

-- 
Marco Casaroli
SapucaiNet Telecom
+55 35 34712377 ext 5
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] HTB

[m.innocenti]

Marco Aurelio ha scritto:
> What exactly happens if the sum of the children classes rate is bigger
> than the parent's?

HTB will assign to the leaf the rate regardeless of the value of the 
parent's rate.
The parent's rate is used only to compute how much bandwith must be 
allocated to the leaf's ceil.

> What if the majority of these classes are using less than the minimum
> rate established (eg. 0kbps)?



-- 
**********************************************************************
Marco Innocenti              Gruppo Infrastruttura e Sicurezza
CINECA                       phone:+39 0516171553 / fax:+39 0516132198
Via Magnanelli 6/3           e-mail: innocenti@cineca.it
40033 Casalecchio di Reno    Bologna (Italia)
**********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc