[linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] clk: sunxi-ng: support R40 SoC

[linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] clk: sunxi-ng: support R40 SoC

[Maxime Ripard]

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:54:58PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 
> 2017?2?22? 07:03? Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>???
> >
> > Hi, 
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 01:37:17AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: 
> > > Allwinner R40 SoC have a clock controller module in the style of the 
> > > SoCs beyond sun6i, however, it's more rich and complex. 
> > > 
> > > Add support for it. 
> > > 
> > > As the user manual is still not available, this driver is made with 
> > > knowledge from clk-sun8iw11.c in the BSP kernel source. 
> >
> > Missing SoB. 
> >
> > Why are some patches tagged as RFC and some don't? 
> 
> There's still no open User Manual for R40, so I tagged CCU-related
> drivers RFC.
> 
> Pinctrl driver can be written with the datasheet draft, which is
> available now.
> 
> For USB we have never user manual so everything is educated guess --
> so it's not RFC.

It's still kind of weird to mix and match patches with and without RFC
tags.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20170223/c982a9c2/attachment.sig>

[linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] clk: sunxi-ng: support R40 SoC

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

Hi Icenowy,

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:54:58PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>>
>> 2017?2?22? 07:03? Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>???
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 01:37:17AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> > > Allwinner R40 SoC have a clock controller module in the style of the
>> > > SoCs beyond sun6i, however, it's more rich and complex.
>> > >
>> > > Add support for it.
>> > >
>> > > As the user manual is still not available, this driver is made with
>> > > knowledge from clk-sun8iw11.c in the BSP kernel source.
>> >
>> > Missing SoB.
>> >
>> > Why are some patches tagged as RFC and some don't?
>>
>> There's still no open User Manual for R40, so I tagged CCU-related
>> drivers RFC.
>>
>> Pinctrl driver can be written with the datasheet draft, which is
>> available now.
>>
>> For USB we have never user manual so everything is educated guess --
>> so it's not RFC.
>
> It's still kind of weird to mix and match patches with and without RFC
> tags.

Allwinner just released the docs today. See

    https://github.com/tinalinux/docs/tree/r40-v1.y

Could you check your patches against it, and maybe we don't need the
RFC tags anymore?

ChenYu