* [linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] clk: sunxi-ng: support R40 SoC [not found] <20170222231738.HXRSmi86@smtp1o.mail.yandex.net> @ 2017-02-24 0:20 ` Maxime Ripard 2017-02-28 15:50 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Maxime Ripard @ 2017-02-24 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:54:58PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > 2017?2?22? 07:03? Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>??? > > > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 01:37:17AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > > Allwinner R40 SoC have a clock controller module in the style of the > > > SoCs beyond sun6i, however, it's more rich and complex. > > > > > > Add support for it. > > > > > > As the user manual is still not available, this driver is made with > > > knowledge from clk-sun8iw11.c in the BSP kernel source. > > > > Missing SoB. > > > > Why are some patches tagged as RFC and some don't? > > There's still no open User Manual for R40, so I tagged CCU-related > drivers RFC. > > Pinctrl driver can be written with the datasheet draft, which is > available now. > > For USB we have never user manual so everything is educated guess -- > so it's not RFC. It's still kind of weird to mix and match patches with and without RFC tags. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20170223/c982a9c2/attachment.sig> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] clk: sunxi-ng: support R40 SoC 2017-02-24 0:20 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] clk: sunxi-ng: support R40 SoC Maxime Ripard @ 2017-02-28 15:50 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Chen-Yu Tsai @ 2017-02-28 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Icenowy, On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:54:58PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >> >> 2017?2?22? 07:03? Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>??? >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 01:37:17AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >> > > Allwinner R40 SoC have a clock controller module in the style of the >> > > SoCs beyond sun6i, however, it's more rich and complex. >> > > >> > > Add support for it. >> > > >> > > As the user manual is still not available, this driver is made with >> > > knowledge from clk-sun8iw11.c in the BSP kernel source. >> > >> > Missing SoB. >> > >> > Why are some patches tagged as RFC and some don't? >> >> There's still no open User Manual for R40, so I tagged CCU-related >> drivers RFC. >> >> Pinctrl driver can be written with the datasheet draft, which is >> available now. >> >> For USB we have never user manual so everything is educated guess -- >> so it's not RFC. > > It's still kind of weird to mix and match patches with and without RFC > tags. Allwinner just released the docs today. See https://github.com/tinalinux/docs/tree/r40-v1.y Could you check your patches against it, and maybe we don't need the RFC tags anymore? ChenYu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-28 15:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20170222231738.HXRSmi86@smtp1o.mail.yandex.net>
2017-02-24 0:20 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] clk: sunxi-ng: support R40 SoC Maxime Ripard
2017-02-28 15:50 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox