* Re: [PATCH 1/1] RFC: dt bindings: Add property "brcm,gen3-eq-presets" [not found] ` <20241021190334.GA953710-robh@kernel.org> @ 2024-10-25 1:08 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru 2024-10-28 18:51 ` James Quinlan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru @ 2024-10-25 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rob Herring, Jim Quinlan Cc: linux-pci, Nicolas Saenz Julienne, Bjorn Helgaas, Lorenzo Pieralisi, bcm-kernel-feedback-list, jim2101024, Florian Fainelli, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Krzysztof Wilczyński, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, open list On 10/22/2024 12:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 02:22:45PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: >> Support configuration of the GEN3 preset equalization settings, aka the >> Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI Express >> Extended Capability. These registers are of type HwInit/RsvdP and >> typically set by FW. In our case they are set by our RC host bridge >> driver using internal registers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >> index 0925c520195a..f965ad57f32f 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >> @@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ properties: >> minItems: 1 >> maxItems: 3 >> >> + brcm,gen3-eq-presets: >> + description: | >> + A u16 array giving the GEN3 equilization presets, one for each lane. >> + These values are destined for the 16bit registers known as the >> + Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI Express >> + Extended Capability. In the array, lane 0 is first term, lane 1 next, >> + etc. The contents of the entries reflect what is necessary for >> + the current board and SoC, and the details of each preset are >> + described in Section 7.27.4 of the PCI base spec, Revision 3.0. > > If these are defined by the PCIe spec, then why is it Broadcom specific > property? > Hi Rob, qcom pcie driver also needs to program these presets as you suggested this can go to common pci bridge binding. from PCIe spec 6.0.1 revision section 8.3.3.3 & 4.2.4.2 for data rates of 8.0 GT/s, 16.0 GT/s, and 32.0 GT/s uses one class of preset (P0 through P10) and where as data rates of 64.0 GT/s use different class of presets (Q0 through Q10) (Table 4-23). And data rates of 8.0 GT/s also have optional preset hints (Table 4-24). And there is possibility that for each data rate we may require different preset configuration. Can we have a dt binding for each data rate of 16 byte array. like gen3-eq-preset array, gen4-eq-preset array etc. - Krishna Chaitanya >> + >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint16-array > > minItems: 1 > maxItems: 16 > > Last I saw, you can only have up to 16 lanes. > > Rob > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] RFC: dt bindings: Add property "brcm,gen3-eq-presets" 2024-10-25 1:08 ` [PATCH 1/1] RFC: dt bindings: Add property "brcm,gen3-eq-presets" Krishna Chaitanya Chundru @ 2024-10-28 18:51 ` James Quinlan 2024-10-29 5:17 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: James Quinlan @ 2024-10-28 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru, Rob Herring Cc: linux-pci, Nicolas Saenz Julienne, Bjorn Helgaas, Lorenzo Pieralisi, bcm-kernel-feedback-list, jim2101024, Florian Fainelli, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Krzysztof Wilczyński, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, open list On 10/24/24 21:08, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: > > > On 10/22/2024 12:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 02:22:45PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: >>> Support configuration of the GEN3 preset equalization settings, aka the >>> Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI Express >>> Extended Capability. These registers are of type HwInit/RsvdP and >>> typically set by FW. In our case they are set by our RC host bridge >>> driver using internal registers. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 12 >>> ++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git >>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>> index 0925c520195a..f965ad57f32f 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>> @@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ properties: >>> minItems: 1 >>> maxItems: 3 >>> + brcm,gen3-eq-presets: >>> + description: | >>> + A u16 array giving the GEN3 equilization presets, one for >>> each lane. >>> + These values are destined for the 16bit registers known as the >>> + Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI >>> Express >>> + Extended Capability. In the array, lane 0 is first term, >>> lane 1 next, >>> + etc. The contents of the entries reflect what is necessary for >>> + the current board and SoC, and the details of each preset are >>> + described in Section 7.27.4 of the PCI base spec, Revision 3.0. >> >> If these are defined by the PCIe spec, then why is it Broadcom specific >> property? Yes, I will remove the "brcm," prefix. >> > Hi Rob, > > qcom pcie driver also needs to program these presets as you suggested > this can go to common pci bridge binding. > > from PCIe spec 6.0.1 revision section 8.3.3.3 & 4.2.4.2 for data rates > of 8.0 GT/s, 16.0 GT/s, and 32.0 GT/s uses one class of preset (P0 > through P10) and where as data rates of 64.0 GT/s use different class of > presets (Q0 through Q10) (Table 4-23). And data rates of 8.0 GT/s also > have optional preset hints (Table 4-24). > > And there is possibility that for each data rate we may require > different preset configuration. > > Can we have a dt binding for each data rate of 16 byte array. > like gen3-eq-preset array, gen4-eq-preset array etc. Yes, that was the idea when using "genX-eq-preset", for X in {3,4...}. Keep in mind that this is an RFC; I have a backlog of commit submissions before I can submit the code that uses this DT property. If you (Krishna) want to submit something now I'd be quite happy to go with that. I don't believe it is acceptable to submit a bindings commit w/o code that uses it (if I'm incorrect I'll be glad to do a V2). Regards, Jim Quinlan Broadcom STB/CM > > - Krishna Chaitanya >>> + >>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint16-array >> >> minItems: 1 >> maxItems: 16 >> >> Last I saw, you can only have up to 16 lanes. >> >> Rob >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] RFC: dt bindings: Add property "brcm,gen3-eq-presets" 2024-10-28 18:51 ` James Quinlan @ 2024-10-29 5:17 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru 2024-10-29 14:22 ` Jim Quinlan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru @ 2024-10-29 5:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: James Quinlan, Rob Herring Cc: linux-pci, Nicolas Saenz Julienne, Bjorn Helgaas, Lorenzo Pieralisi, bcm-kernel-feedback-list, jim2101024, Florian Fainelli, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Krzysztof Wilczyński, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, open list On 10/29/2024 12:21 AM, James Quinlan wrote: > On 10/24/24 21:08, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: >> >> >> On 10/22/2024 12:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 02:22:45PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: >>>> Support configuration of the GEN3 preset equalization settings, aka the >>>> Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI Express >>>> Extended Capability. These registers are of type HwInit/RsvdP and >>>> typically set by FW. In our case they are set by our RC host bridge >>>> driver using internal registers. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> >>>> --- >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 12 >>>> ++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git >>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>>> index 0925c520195a..f965ad57f32f 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>>> @@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ properties: >>>> minItems: 1 >>>> maxItems: 3 >>>> + brcm,gen3-eq-presets: >>>> + description: | >>>> + A u16 array giving the GEN3 equilization presets, one for >>>> each lane. >>>> + These values are destined for the 16bit registers known as the >>>> + Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI >>>> Express >>>> + Extended Capability. In the array, lane 0 is first term, >>>> lane 1 next, >>>> + etc. The contents of the entries reflect what is necessary for >>>> + the current board and SoC, and the details of each preset are >>>> + described in Section 7.27.4 of the PCI base spec, Revision 3.0. >>> >>> If these are defined by the PCIe spec, then why is it Broadcom specific >>> property? > Yes, I will remove the "brcm," prefix. >>> >> Hi Rob, >> >> qcom pcie driver also needs to program these presets as you suggested >> this can go to common pci bridge binding. >> >> from PCIe spec 6.0.1 revision section 8.3.3.3 & 4.2.4.2 for data rates >> of 8.0 GT/s, 16.0 GT/s, and 32.0 GT/s uses one class of preset (P0 >> through P10) and where as data rates of 64.0 GT/s use different class of >> presets (Q0 through Q10) (Table 4-23). And data rates of 8.0 GT/s also >> have optional preset hints (Table 4-24). >> >> And there is possibility that for each data rate we may require >> different preset configuration. >> >> Can we have a dt binding for each data rate of 16 byte array. >> like gen3-eq-preset array, gen4-eq-preset array etc. > > Yes, that was the idea when using "genX-eq-preset", for X in {3,4...}. > > Keep in mind that this is an RFC; I have a backlog of commit submissions > before I can submit the code that uses this DT property. If you > (Krishna) want to submit something now I'd be quite happy to go with > that. I don't believe it is acceptable to submit a bindings commit w/o > code that uses it (if I'm incorrect I'll be glad to do a V2). > Hi Jim, I submitted a pull request for this. if you have any other suggestions or if we need to have any other details we can update this pull request. https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/146 - Krishna Chaitanya. > Regards, > > Jim Quinlan > Broadcom STB/CM > >> >> - Krishna Chaitanya >>>> + >>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint16-array >>> >>> minItems: 1 >>> maxItems: 16 >>> >>> Last I saw, you can only have up to 16 lanes. >>> >>> Rob >>> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] RFC: dt bindings: Add property "brcm,gen3-eq-presets" 2024-10-29 5:17 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru @ 2024-10-29 14:22 ` Jim Quinlan 2024-10-29 14:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jim Quinlan @ 2024-10-29 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru Cc: Rob Herring, linux-pci, Nicolas Saenz Julienne, Bjorn Helgaas, Lorenzo Pieralisi, bcm-kernel-feedback-list, jim2101024, Florian Fainelli, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Krzysztof Wilczyński, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, open list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4352 bytes --] On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 1:17 AM Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <quic_krichai@quicinc.com> wrote: > > > > On 10/29/2024 12:21 AM, James Quinlan wrote: > > On 10/24/24 21:08, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 10/22/2024 12:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > >>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 02:22:45PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > >>>> Support configuration of the GEN3 preset equalization settings, aka the > >>>> Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI Express > >>>> Extended Capability. These registers are of type HwInit/RsvdP and > >>>> typically set by FW. In our case they are set by our RC host bridge > >>>> driver using internal registers. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > >>>> --- > >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 12 > >>>> ++++++++++++ > >>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git > >>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > >>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > >>>> index 0925c520195a..f965ad57f32f 100644 > >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > >>>> @@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ properties: > >>>> minItems: 1 > >>>> maxItems: 3 > >>>> + brcm,gen3-eq-presets: > >>>> + description: | > >>>> + A u16 array giving the GEN3 equilization presets, one for > >>>> each lane. > >>>> + These values are destined for the 16bit registers known as the > >>>> + Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI > >>>> Express > >>>> + Extended Capability. In the array, lane 0 is first term, > >>>> lane 1 next, > >>>> + etc. The contents of the entries reflect what is necessary for > >>>> + the current board and SoC, and the details of each preset are > >>>> + described in Section 7.27.4 of the PCI base spec, Revision 3.0. > >>> > >>> If these are defined by the PCIe spec, then why is it Broadcom specific > >>> property? > > Yes, I will remove the "brcm," prefix. > >>> > >> Hi Rob, > >> > >> qcom pcie driver also needs to program these presets as you suggested > >> this can go to common pci bridge binding. > >> > >> from PCIe spec 6.0.1 revision section 8.3.3.3 & 4.2.4.2 for data rates > >> of 8.0 GT/s, 16.0 GT/s, and 32.0 GT/s uses one class of preset (P0 > >> through P10) and where as data rates of 64.0 GT/s use different class of > >> presets (Q0 through Q10) (Table 4-23). And data rates of 8.0 GT/s also > >> have optional preset hints (Table 4-24). > >> > >> And there is possibility that for each data rate we may require > >> different preset configuration. > >> > >> Can we have a dt binding for each data rate of 16 byte array. > >> like gen3-eq-preset array, gen4-eq-preset array etc. > > > > Yes, that was the idea when using "genX-eq-preset", for X in {3,4...}. > > > > Keep in mind that this is an RFC; I have a backlog of commit submissions > > before I can submit the code that uses this DT property. If you > > (Krishna) want to submit something now I'd be quite happy to go with > > that. I don't believe it is acceptable to submit a bindings commit w/o > > code that uses it (if I'm incorrect I'll be glad to do a V2). > > > Hi Jim, > > I submitted a pull request for this. if you have any other suggestions > or if we need to have any other details we can update this pull request. > https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/146 Hi Krishna, Thanks for doing this. However, why a u8 array? The registers are defined as u16 so it would be more natural to use a u16 array, each entry giving all of the data for a single lane. In our implementation we read a u16 and we write it to the register -- what advantage is there by using a u8 array? Also if there are 16 lanes, you will need 32 maxItems, correct? Regards, Jim Quinlan Broadcom STB/CM > > > > - Krishna Chaitanya. > > Regards, > > > > Jim Quinlan > > Broadcom STB/CM > > > >> > >> - Krishna Chaitanya > >>>> + > >>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint16-array > >>> > >>> minItems: 1 > >>> maxItems: 16 > >>> > >>> Last I saw, you can only have up to 16 lanes. > >>> > >>> Rob > >>> > > [-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --] [-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4210 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] RFC: dt bindings: Add property "brcm,gen3-eq-presets" 2024-10-29 14:22 ` Jim Quinlan @ 2024-10-29 14:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2024-10-29 15:22 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2024-10-29 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Quinlan Cc: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru, Rob Herring, linux-pci, Nicolas Saenz Julienne, Bjorn Helgaas, Lorenzo Pieralisi, bcm-kernel-feedback-list, jim2101024, Florian Fainelli, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Krzysztof Wilczyński, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, open list On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:22:36AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 1:17 AM Krishna Chaitanya Chundru > <quic_krichai@quicinc.com> wrote: > > On 10/29/2024 12:21 AM, James Quinlan wrote: > > > On 10/24/24 21:08, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: > > >> On 10/22/2024 12:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > >>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 02:22:45PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > >>>> Support configuration of the GEN3 preset equalization settings, aka the > > >>>> Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI Express > > >>>> Extended Capability. These registers are of type HwInit/RsvdP and > > >>>> typically set by FW. In our case they are set by our RC host bridge > > >>>> driver using internal registers. > > >>>> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > > >>>> --- > > >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 12 > > >>>> ++++++++++++ > > >>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > >>>> > > >>>> diff --git > > >>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > >>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > >>>> index 0925c520195a..f965ad57f32f 100644 > > >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > >>>> @@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ properties: > > >>>> minItems: 1 > > >>>> maxItems: 3 > > >>>> + brcm,gen3-eq-presets: > > >>>> + description: | > > >>>> + A u16 array giving the GEN3 equilization presets, one for > > >>>> each lane. > > >>>> + These values are destined for the 16bit registers known as the > > >>>> + Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI > > >>>> Express > > >>>> + Extended Capability. In the array, lane 0 is first term, > > >>>> lane 1 next, > > >>>> + etc. The contents of the entries reflect what is necessary for > > >>>> + the current board and SoC, and the details of each preset are > > >>>> + described in Section 7.27.4 of the PCI base spec, Revision 3.0. > > >>> > > >>> If these are defined by the PCIe spec, then why is it Broadcom specific > > >>> property? > > > Yes, I will remove the "brcm," prefix. > > >>> > > >> Hi Rob, > > >> > > >> qcom pcie driver also needs to program these presets as you suggested > > >> this can go to common pci bridge binding. > > >> > > >> from PCIe spec 6.0.1 revision section 8.3.3.3 & 4.2.4.2 for data rates > > >> of 8.0 GT/s, 16.0 GT/s, and 32.0 GT/s uses one class of preset (P0 > > >> through P10) and where as data rates of 64.0 GT/s use different class of > > >> presets (Q0 through Q10) (Table 4-23). And data rates of 8.0 GT/s also > > >> have optional preset hints (Table 4-24). > > >> > > >> And there is possibility that for each data rate we may require > > >> different preset configuration. > > >> > > >> Can we have a dt binding for each data rate of 16 byte array. > > >> like gen3-eq-preset array, gen4-eq-preset array etc. > > > > > > Yes, that was the idea when using "genX-eq-preset", for X in {3,4...}. > > > > > > Keep in mind that this is an RFC; I have a backlog of commit submissions > > > before I can submit the code that uses this DT property. If you > > > (Krishna) want to submit something now I'd be quite happy to go with > > > that. I don't believe it is acceptable to submit a bindings commit w/o > > > code that uses it (if I'm incorrect I'll be glad to do a V2). > > > > > I submitted a pull request for this. if you have any other suggestions > > or if we need to have any other details we can update this pull request. > > https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/146 > > Thanks for doing this. However, why a u8 array? The registers are > defined as u16 so it would be more natural to use a u16 array, each > entry giving > all of the data for a single lane. In our implementation we read a > u16 and we write it to the register -- what advantage is there by > using a u8 array? > > Also if there are 16 lanes, you will need 32 maxItems, correct? I added these questions to the github PR. Also, why does it define gen3-eq-presets, gen4-eq-presets, gen5-eq-presets, and gen6-eq-presets? I think there's only a single place to write these values (the Lane Equalization Control registers, PCIe r6.0, sec 7.7.3.4), isn't here? How would software choose the correct values to use? > > >> - Krishna Chaitanya > > >>>> + > > >>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint16-array > > >>> > > >>> minItems: 1 > > >>> maxItems: 16 > > >>> > > >>> Last I saw, you can only have up to 16 lanes. > > >>> > > >>> Rob > > >>> > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] RFC: dt bindings: Add property "brcm,gen3-eq-presets" 2024-10-29 14:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas @ 2024-10-29 15:22 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru 2024-10-29 15:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru @ 2024-10-29 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Helgaas, Jim Quinlan Cc: Rob Herring, linux-pci, Nicolas Saenz Julienne, Bjorn Helgaas, Lorenzo Pieralisi, bcm-kernel-feedback-list, jim2101024, Florian Fainelli, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Krzysztof Wilczyński, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, open list, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti, Mayank Rana On 10/29/2024 8:18 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:22:36AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 1:17 AM Krishna Chaitanya Chundru >> <quic_krichai@quicinc.com> wrote: >>> On 10/29/2024 12:21 AM, James Quinlan wrote: >>>> On 10/24/24 21:08, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: >>>>> On 10/22/2024 12:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 02:22:45PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: >>>>>>> Support configuration of the GEN3 preset equalization settings, aka the >>>>>>> Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI Express >>>>>>> Extended Capability. These registers are of type HwInit/RsvdP and >>>>>>> typically set by FW. In our case they are set by our RC host bridge >>>>>>> driver using internal registers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 12 >>>>>>> ++++++++++++ >>>>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git >>>>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>>>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>>>>>> index 0925c520195a..f965ad57f32f 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>>>>>> @@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ properties: >>>>>>> minItems: 1 >>>>>>> maxItems: 3 >>>>>>> + brcm,gen3-eq-presets: >>>>>>> + description: | >>>>>>> + A u16 array giving the GEN3 equilization presets, one for >>>>>>> each lane. >>>>>>> + These values are destined for the 16bit registers known as the >>>>>>> + Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI >>>>>>> Express >>>>>>> + Extended Capability. In the array, lane 0 is first term, >>>>>>> lane 1 next, >>>>>>> + etc. The contents of the entries reflect what is necessary for >>>>>>> + the current board and SoC, and the details of each preset are >>>>>>> + described in Section 7.27.4 of the PCI base spec, Revision 3.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> If these are defined by the PCIe spec, then why is it Broadcom specific >>>>>> property? >>>> Yes, I will remove the "brcm," prefix. >>>>>> >>>>> Hi Rob, >>>>> >>>>> qcom pcie driver also needs to program these presets as you suggested >>>>> this can go to common pci bridge binding. >>>>> >>>>> from PCIe spec 6.0.1 revision section 8.3.3.3 & 4.2.4.2 for data rates >>>>> of 8.0 GT/s, 16.0 GT/s, and 32.0 GT/s uses one class of preset (P0 >>>>> through P10) and where as data rates of 64.0 GT/s use different class of >>>>> presets (Q0 through Q10) (Table 4-23). And data rates of 8.0 GT/s also >>>>> have optional preset hints (Table 4-24). >>>>> >>>>> And there is possibility that for each data rate we may require >>>>> different preset configuration. >>>>> >>>>> Can we have a dt binding for each data rate of 16 byte array. >>>>> like gen3-eq-preset array, gen4-eq-preset array etc. >>>> >>>> Yes, that was the idea when using "genX-eq-preset", for X in {3,4...}. >>>> >>>> Keep in mind that this is an RFC; I have a backlog of commit submissions >>>> before I can submit the code that uses this DT property. If you >>>> (Krishna) want to submit something now I'd be quite happy to go with >>>> that. I don't believe it is acceptable to submit a bindings commit w/o >>>> code that uses it (if I'm incorrect I'll be glad to do a V2). >>>> >>> I submitted a pull request for this. if you have any other suggestions >>> or if we need to have any other details we can update this pull request. >>> https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/146 >> >> Thanks for doing this. However, why a u8 array? The registers are >> defined as u16 so it would be more natural to use a u16 array, each >> entry giving >> all of the data for a single lane. In our implementation we read a >> u16 and we write it to the register -- what advantage is there by >> using a u8 array? >> >> Also if there are 16 lanes, you will need 32 maxItems, correct? > > I added these questions to the github PR. > > Also, why does it define gen3-eq-presets, gen4-eq-presets, > gen5-eq-presets, and gen6-eq-presets? I think there's only a single > place to write these values (the Lane Equalization Control registers, > PCIe r6.0, sec 7.7.3.4), isn't here? How would software choose the > correct values to use? > Hi Jim & Bjorn, 7.7.3.4 Lane Equalization Control Register is for gen3 speed, for gen4 we had a new capability register 7.7.5.9 16.0 GT/s Lane Equalization Control Register for gen5 we have 7.7.6.9 32.0 GT/s Lane Equalization Control Register. for gen3 we should not use uint8 as gen3 as transmitter preset and receiver preset hint thus for each lane we need to have uint16 instead of uint8 as we are defining per lane property in driver where we use each uint16 value of array needs to be mapped correctly in the register. If we have only support for single lane then last 16 bits becomes invalid. so for 16 lanes we need to uint16 array each of uint16 instead of uint8. ( I will modify it to uint16 instead of uint16) for remaining gen speeds we don't have receiver preset hint, and it requires only 8 bits to represent a lane only. so i will use only uint8 for remaining gen speeds. Bjorn, from PCIe spec 8.3.3.3 Tx Equalization Presets for 8.0, 16.0, 32.0, and 64.0 GT/ tells which preset value we neeed to use based upon different parameters. Based upon the type of the board hardware one has to calculate the preset value and provide them using these properties. - Krishna Chaitanya. >>>>> - Krishna Chaitanya >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint16-array >>>>>> >>>>>> minItems: 1 >>>>>> maxItems: 16 >>>>>> >>>>>> Last I saw, you can only have up to 16 lanes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rob >>>>>> >>>> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] RFC: dt bindings: Add property "brcm,gen3-eq-presets" 2024-10-29 15:22 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru @ 2024-10-29 15:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2024-10-29 15:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2024-10-29 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru Cc: Jim Quinlan, Rob Herring, linux-pci, Nicolas Saenz Julienne, Bjorn Helgaas, Lorenzo Pieralisi, bcm-kernel-feedback-list, jim2101024, Florian Fainelli, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Krzysztof Wilczyński, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, open list, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti, Mayank Rana On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 08:52:15PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: > On 10/29/2024 8:18 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:22:36AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 1:17 AM Krishna Chaitanya Chundru > > > <quic_krichai@quicinc.com> wrote: > > > > On 10/29/2024 12:21 AM, James Quinlan wrote: > > > > > On 10/24/24 21:08, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: > > > > > > On 10/22/2024 12:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 02:22:45PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > > > > > > > Support configuration of the GEN3 preset equalization settings, aka the > > > > > > > > Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI Express > > > > > > > > Extended Capability. These registers are of type HwInit/RsvdP and > > > > > > > > typically set by FW. In our case they are set by our RC host bridge > > > > > > > > driver using internal registers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 12 > > > > > > > > ++++++++++++ > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git > > > > > > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > > > > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > > > > > > > index 0925c520195a..f965ad57f32f 100644 > > > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > > > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > > > > > > > @@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ properties: > > > > > > > > minItems: 1 > > > > > > > > maxItems: 3 > > > > > > > > + brcm,gen3-eq-presets: > > > > > > > > + description: | > > > > > > > > + A u16 array giving the GEN3 equilization presets, one for > > > > > > > > each lane. > > > > > > > > + These values are destined for the 16bit registers known as the > > > > > > > > + Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI > > > > > > > > Express > > > > > > > > + Extended Capability. In the array, lane 0 is first term, > > > > > > > > lane 1 next, > > > > > > > > + etc. The contents of the entries reflect what is necessary for > > > > > > > > + the current board and SoC, and the details of each preset are > > > > > > > > + described in Section 7.27.4 of the PCI base spec, Revision 3.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these are defined by the PCIe spec, then why is it Broadcom specific > > > > > > > property? > > > > > Yes, I will remove the "brcm," prefix. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Rob, > > > > > > > > > > > > qcom pcie driver also needs to program these presets as you suggested > > > > > > this can go to common pci bridge binding. > > > > > > > > > > > > from PCIe spec 6.0.1 revision section 8.3.3.3 & 4.2.4.2 for data rates > > > > > > of 8.0 GT/s, 16.0 GT/s, and 32.0 GT/s uses one class of preset (P0 > > > > > > through P10) and where as data rates of 64.0 GT/s use different class of > > > > > > presets (Q0 through Q10) (Table 4-23). And data rates of 8.0 GT/s also > > > > > > have optional preset hints (Table 4-24). > > > > > > > > > > > > And there is possibility that for each data rate we may require > > > > > > different preset configuration. > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we have a dt binding for each data rate of 16 byte array. > > > > > > like gen3-eq-preset array, gen4-eq-preset array etc. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that was the idea when using "genX-eq-preset", for X in {3,4...}. > > > > > > > > > > Keep in mind that this is an RFC; I have a backlog of commit submissions > > > > > before I can submit the code that uses this DT property. If you > > > > > (Krishna) want to submit something now I'd be quite happy to go with > > > > > that. I don't believe it is acceptable to submit a bindings commit w/o > > > > > code that uses it (if I'm incorrect I'll be glad to do a V2). > > > > > > > > > I submitted a pull request for this. if you have any other suggestions > > > > or if we need to have any other details we can update this pull request. > > > > https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/146 > > > > > > Thanks for doing this. However, why a u8 array? The registers are > > > defined as u16 so it would be more natural to use a u16 array, each > > > entry giving > > > all of the data for a single lane. In our implementation we read a > > > u16 and we write it to the register -- what advantage is there by > > > using a u8 array? > > > > > > Also if there are 16 lanes, you will need 32 maxItems, correct? > > > > I added these questions to the github PR. > > > > Also, why does it define gen3-eq-presets, gen4-eq-presets, > > gen5-eq-presets, and gen6-eq-presets? I think there's only a single > > place to write these values (the Lane Equalization Control registers, > > PCIe r6.0, sec 7.7.3.4), isn't here? How would software choose the > > correct values to use? > > 7.7.3.4 Lane Equalization Control Register is for gen3 speed, for gen4 > we had a new capability register 7.7.5.9 16.0 GT/s Lane Equalization Control > Register for gen5 we have 7.7.6.9 32.0 GT/s Lane Equalization Control > Register. Oh, thank you! I completely missed those new registers. > for gen3 we should not use uint8 as gen3 as transmitter preset and > receiver preset hint thus for each lane we need to have uint16 instead > of uint8 as we are defining per lane property in driver where we use > each uint16 value of array needs to be mapped correctly in the register. > If we have only support for single lane then last 16 bits becomes > invalid. so for 16 lanes we need to uint16 array each of uint16 instead > of uint8. ( I will modify it to uint16 instead of uint16) > > for remaining gen speeds we don't have receiver preset hint, and it > requires only 8 bits to represent a lane only. so i will use only uint8 > for remaining gen speeds. > > Bjorn, > > from PCIe spec 8.3.3.3 Tx Equalization Presets for 8.0, 16.0, 32.0, and > 64.0 GT/ tells which preset value we neeed to use based upon different > parameters. Based upon the type of the board hardware one has to > calculate the preset value and provide them using these properties. Thanks, I had looked at 8.3.3.3, but missed the extra 16, 32, and 64 GT/s registers because 8.3.3.3 looks more like guidance for hardware design and firmware to calculate the values, and it doesn't mention the registers the OS would program. Sorry for confusing things! Bjorn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] RFC: dt bindings: Add property "brcm,gen3-eq-presets" 2024-10-29 15:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas @ 2024-10-29 15:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2024-10-29 16:54 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2024-10-29 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru Cc: Jim Quinlan, Rob Herring, linux-pci, Nicolas Saenz Julienne, Bjorn Helgaas, Lorenzo Pieralisi, bcm-kernel-feedback-list, jim2101024, Florian Fainelli, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Krzysztof Wilczyński, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, open list, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti, Mayank Rana On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:40:32AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 08:52:15PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: > > On 10/29/2024 8:18 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:22:36AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 1:17 AM Krishna Chaitanya Chundru > > > > <quic_krichai@quicinc.com> wrote: > > > > > On 10/29/2024 12:21 AM, James Quinlan wrote: > > > > > > On 10/24/24 21:08, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: > > > > > > > On 10/22/2024 12:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 02:22:45PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > > > > > > > > Support configuration of the GEN3 preset equalization settings, aka the > > > > > > > > > Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI Express > > > > > > > > > Extended Capability. These registers are of type HwInit/RsvdP and > > > > > > > > > typically set by FW. In our case they are set by our RC host bridge > > > > > > > > > driver using internal registers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 12 > > > > > > > > > ++++++++++++ > > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git > > > > > > > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > > > > > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > > > > > > > > index 0925c520195a..f965ad57f32f 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > > > > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > > > > > > > > @@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ properties: > > > > > > > > > minItems: 1 > > > > > > > > > maxItems: 3 > > > > > > > > > + brcm,gen3-eq-presets: > > > > > > > > > + description: | > > > > > > > > > + A u16 array giving the GEN3 equilization presets, one for > > > > > > > > > each lane. > > > > > > > > > + These values are destined for the 16bit registers known as the > > > > > > > > > + Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI > > > > > > > > > Express > > > > > > > > > + Extended Capability. In the array, lane 0 is first term, > > > > > > > > > lane 1 next, > > > > > > > > > + etc. The contents of the entries reflect what is necessary for > > > > > > > > > + the current board and SoC, and the details of each preset are > > > > > > > > > + described in Section 7.27.4 of the PCI base spec, Revision 3.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these are defined by the PCIe spec, then why is it Broadcom specific > > > > > > > > property? > > > > > > Yes, I will remove the "brcm," prefix. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Rob, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > qcom pcie driver also needs to program these presets as you suggested > > > > > > > this can go to common pci bridge binding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from PCIe spec 6.0.1 revision section 8.3.3.3 & 4.2.4.2 for data rates > > > > > > > of 8.0 GT/s, 16.0 GT/s, and 32.0 GT/s uses one class of preset (P0 > > > > > > > through P10) and where as data rates of 64.0 GT/s use different class of > > > > > > > presets (Q0 through Q10) (Table 4-23). And data rates of 8.0 GT/s also > > > > > > > have optional preset hints (Table 4-24). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And there is possibility that for each data rate we may require > > > > > > > different preset configuration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we have a dt binding for each data rate of 16 byte array. > > > > > > > like gen3-eq-preset array, gen4-eq-preset array etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that was the idea when using "genX-eq-preset", for X in {3,4...}. > > > > > > > > > > > > Keep in mind that this is an RFC; I have a backlog of commit submissions > > > > > > before I can submit the code that uses this DT property. If you > > > > > > (Krishna) want to submit something now I'd be quite happy to go with > > > > > > that. I don't believe it is acceptable to submit a bindings commit w/o > > > > > > code that uses it (if I'm incorrect I'll be glad to do a V2). > > > > > > > > > > > I submitted a pull request for this. if you have any other suggestions > > > > > or if we need to have any other details we can update this pull request. > > > > > https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/146 > > > > > > > > Thanks for doing this. However, why a u8 array? The registers are > > > > defined as u16 so it would be more natural to use a u16 array, each > > > > entry giving > > > > all of the data for a single lane. In our implementation we read a > > > > u16 and we write it to the register -- what advantage is there by > > > > using a u8 array? > > > > > > > > Also if there are 16 lanes, you will need 32 maxItems, correct? > > > > > > I added these questions to the github PR. > > > > > > Also, why does it define gen3-eq-presets, gen4-eq-presets, > > > gen5-eq-presets, and gen6-eq-presets? I think there's only a single > > > place to write these values (the Lane Equalization Control registers, > > > PCIe r6.0, sec 7.7.3.4), isn't here? How would software choose the > > > correct values to use? > ... Oh, one more thing: I guess "gen3", "gen4", etc. are well-entrenched terms in the industry, and they're probably fine in marketing materials. But I really don't like them in device trees or drivers because the spec doesn't use those terms. In fact, the spec specifically advises *avoiding* them (PCIe r6.0, sec 1.2 footnote): Terms like “PCIe Gen3” are ambiguous and should be avoided. For example, “gen3” could mean (1) compliant with Base 3.0, (2) compliant with Base 3.1 (last revision of 3.x), (3) compliant with Base 3.0 and supporting 8.0 GT/s, (4) compliant with Base 3.0 or later and supporting 8.0 GT/s, .... As a practical matter, those terms make it hard to use the spec: where do I go to learn how to use "gen4-eq-presets"? There's no instance of "gen4" in the PCIe spec. AFAICT, all I can do is look up the PCIe r4.0 spec and try to figure out what was added in that revision, which is a real hassle. Bjorn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] RFC: dt bindings: Add property "brcm,gen3-eq-presets" 2024-10-29 15:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas @ 2024-10-29 16:54 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru 2024-10-29 17:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru @ 2024-10-29 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Jim Quinlan, Rob Herring, linux-pci, Nicolas Saenz Julienne, Bjorn Helgaas, Lorenzo Pieralisi, bcm-kernel-feedback-list, jim2101024, Florian Fainelli, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Krzysztof Wilczyński, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, open list, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti, Mayank Rana On 10/29/2024 9:25 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:40:32AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 08:52:15PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: >>> On 10/29/2024 8:18 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:22:36AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 1:17 AM Krishna Chaitanya Chundru >>>>> <quic_krichai@quicinc.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 10/29/2024 12:21 AM, James Quinlan wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/24/24 21:08, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: >>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 12:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 02:22:45PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Support configuration of the GEN3 preset equalization settings, aka the >>>>>>>>>> Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI Express >>>>>>>>>> Extended Capability. These registers are of type HwInit/RsvdP and >>>>>>>>>> typically set by FW. In our case they are set by our RC host bridge >>>>>>>>>> driver using internal registers. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 12 >>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++ >>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> diff --git >>>>>>>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>>>>>>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>>>>>>>>> index 0925c520195a..f965ad57f32f 100644 >>>>>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>>>>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>>>>>>>>> @@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ properties: >>>>>>>>>> minItems: 1 >>>>>>>>>> maxItems: 3 >>>>>>>>>> + brcm,gen3-eq-presets: >>>>>>>>>> + description: | >>>>>>>>>> + A u16 array giving the GEN3 equilization presets, one for >>>>>>>>>> each lane. >>>>>>>>>> + These values are destined for the 16bit registers known as the >>>>>>>>>> + Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI >>>>>>>>>> Express >>>>>>>>>> + Extended Capability. In the array, lane 0 is first term, >>>>>>>>>> lane 1 next, >>>>>>>>>> + etc. The contents of the entries reflect what is necessary for >>>>>>>>>> + the current board and SoC, and the details of each preset are >>>>>>>>>> + described in Section 7.27.4 of the PCI base spec, Revision 3.0. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If these are defined by the PCIe spec, then why is it Broadcom specific >>>>>>>>> property? >>>>>>> Yes, I will remove the "brcm," prefix. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Rob, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> qcom pcie driver also needs to program these presets as you suggested >>>>>>>> this can go to common pci bridge binding. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> from PCIe spec 6.0.1 revision section 8.3.3.3 & 4.2.4.2 for data rates >>>>>>>> of 8.0 GT/s, 16.0 GT/s, and 32.0 GT/s uses one class of preset (P0 >>>>>>>> through P10) and where as data rates of 64.0 GT/s use different class of >>>>>>>> presets (Q0 through Q10) (Table 4-23). And data rates of 8.0 GT/s also >>>>>>>> have optional preset hints (Table 4-24). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And there is possibility that for each data rate we may require >>>>>>>> different preset configuration. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can we have a dt binding for each data rate of 16 byte array. >>>>>>>> like gen3-eq-preset array, gen4-eq-preset array etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, that was the idea when using "genX-eq-preset", for X in {3,4...}. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Keep in mind that this is an RFC; I have a backlog of commit submissions >>>>>>> before I can submit the code that uses this DT property. If you >>>>>>> (Krishna) want to submit something now I'd be quite happy to go with >>>>>>> that. I don't believe it is acceptable to submit a bindings commit w/o >>>>>>> code that uses it (if I'm incorrect I'll be glad to do a V2). >>>>>>> >>>>>> I submitted a pull request for this. if you have any other suggestions >>>>>> or if we need to have any other details we can update this pull request. >>>>>> https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/146 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for doing this. However, why a u8 array? The registers are >>>>> defined as u16 so it would be more natural to use a u16 array, each >>>>> entry giving >>>>> all of the data for a single lane. In our implementation we read a >>>>> u16 and we write it to the register -- what advantage is there by >>>>> using a u8 array? >>>>> >>>>> Also if there are 16 lanes, you will need 32 maxItems, correct? >>>> >>>> I added these questions to the github PR. >>>> >>>> Also, why does it define gen3-eq-presets, gen4-eq-presets, >>>> gen5-eq-presets, and gen6-eq-presets? I think there's only a single >>>> place to write these values (the Lane Equalization Control registers, >>>> PCIe r6.0, sec 7.7.3.4), isn't here? How would software choose the >>>> correct values to use? >> ... > > Oh, one more thing: I guess "gen3", "gen4", etc. are well-entrenched > terms in the industry, and they're probably fine in marketing > materials. > > But I really don't like them in device trees or drivers because the > spec doesn't use those terms. In fact, the spec specifically advises > *avoiding* them (PCIe r6.0, sec 1.2 footnote): > > Terms like “PCIe Gen3” are ambiguous and should be avoided. For > example, “gen3” could mean (1) compliant with Base 3.0, (2) > compliant with Base 3.1 (last revision of 3.x), (3) compliant with > Base 3.0 and supporting 8.0 GT/s, (4) compliant with Base 3.0 or > later and supporting 8.0 GT/s, .... > > As a practical matter, those terms make it hard to use the spec: where > do I go to learn how to use "gen4-eq-presets"? There's no instance of > "gen4" in the PCIe spec. AFAICT, all I can do is look up the PCIe > r4.0 spec and try to figure out what was added in that revision, which > is a real hassle. > is it fine if I change names from gen3-eq-presets, gen4-eq-presets etc to 8gts-eq-presets, 16gts-eq-presets etc. If above names are fine I will update the patch. - Krishna Chaitanya. > Bjorn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] RFC: dt bindings: Add property "brcm,gen3-eq-presets" 2024-10-29 16:54 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru @ 2024-10-29 17:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2024-10-29 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru Cc: Jim Quinlan, Rob Herring, linux-pci, Nicolas Saenz Julienne, Bjorn Helgaas, Lorenzo Pieralisi, bcm-kernel-feedback-list, jim2101024, Florian Fainelli, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Krzysztof Wilczyński, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE, moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, open list, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti, Mayank Rana On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:24:48PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: > On 10/29/2024 9:25 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:40:32AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 08:52:15PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: > > > > On 10/29/2024 8:18 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:22:36AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 1:17 AM Krishna Chaitanya Chundru > > > > > > <quic_krichai@quicinc.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 10/29/2024 12:21 AM, James Quinlan wrote: > > > > > > > > On 10/24/24 21:08, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 10/22/2024 12:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 02:22:45PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Support configuration of the GEN3 preset equalization settings, aka the > > > > > > > > > > > Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI Express > > > > > > > > > > > Extended Capability. These registers are of type HwInit/RsvdP and > > > > > > > > > > > typically set by FW. In our case they are set by our RC host bridge > > > > > > > > > > > driver using internal registers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 12 > > > > > > > > > > > ++++++++++++ > > > > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git > > > > > > > > > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > > > > > > > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > > > > > > > > > > index 0925c520195a..f965ad57f32f 100644 > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ properties: > > > > > > > > > > > minItems: 1 > > > > > > > > > > > maxItems: 3 > > > > > > > > > > > + brcm,gen3-eq-presets: > > > > > > > > > > > + description: | > > > > > > > > > > > + A u16 array giving the GEN3 equilization presets, one for > > > > > > > > > > > each lane. > > > > > > > > > > > + These values are destined for the 16bit registers known as the > > > > > > > > > > > + Lane Equalization Control Register(s) of the Secondary PCI > > > > > > > > > > > Express > > > > > > > > > > > + Extended Capability. In the array, lane 0 is first term, > > > > > > > > > > > lane 1 next, > > > > > > > > > > > + etc. The contents of the entries reflect what is necessary for > > > > > > > > > > > + the current board and SoC, and the details of each preset are > > > > > > > > > > > + described in Section 7.27.4 of the PCI base spec, Revision 3.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these are defined by the PCIe spec, then why is it Broadcom specific > > > > > > > > > > property? > > > > > > > > Yes, I will remove the "brcm," prefix. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Rob, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > qcom pcie driver also needs to program these presets as you suggested > > > > > > > > > this can go to common pci bridge binding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from PCIe spec 6.0.1 revision section 8.3.3.3 & 4.2.4.2 for data rates > > > > > > > > > of 8.0 GT/s, 16.0 GT/s, and 32.0 GT/s uses one class of preset (P0 > > > > > > > > > through P10) and where as data rates of 64.0 GT/s use different class of > > > > > > > > > presets (Q0 through Q10) (Table 4-23). And data rates of 8.0 GT/s also > > > > > > > > > have optional preset hints (Table 4-24). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And there is possibility that for each data rate we may require > > > > > > > > > different preset configuration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we have a dt binding for each data rate of 16 byte array. > > > > > > > > > like gen3-eq-preset array, gen4-eq-preset array etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that was the idea when using "genX-eq-preset", for X in {3,4...}. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Keep in mind that this is an RFC; I have a backlog of commit submissions > > > > > > > > before I can submit the code that uses this DT property. If you > > > > > > > > (Krishna) want to submit something now I'd be quite happy to go with > > > > > > > > that. I don't believe it is acceptable to submit a bindings commit w/o > > > > > > > > code that uses it (if I'm incorrect I'll be glad to do a V2). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I submitted a pull request for this. if you have any other suggestions > > > > > > > or if we need to have any other details we can update this pull request. > > > > > > > https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/146 > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for doing this. However, why a u8 array? The registers are > > > > > > defined as u16 so it would be more natural to use a u16 array, each > > > > > > entry giving > > > > > > all of the data for a single lane. In our implementation we read a > > > > > > u16 and we write it to the register -- what advantage is there by > > > > > > using a u8 array? > > > > > > > > > > > > Also if there are 16 lanes, you will need 32 maxItems, correct? > > > > > > > > > > I added these questions to the github PR. > > > > > > > > > > Also, why does it define gen3-eq-presets, gen4-eq-presets, > > > > > gen5-eq-presets, and gen6-eq-presets? I think there's only a single > > > > > place to write these values (the Lane Equalization Control registers, > > > > > PCIe r6.0, sec 7.7.3.4), isn't here? How would software choose the > > > > > correct values to use? > > > ... > > > > Oh, one more thing: I guess "gen3", "gen4", etc. are well-entrenched > > terms in the industry, and they're probably fine in marketing > > materials. > > > > But I really don't like them in device trees or drivers because the > > spec doesn't use those terms. In fact, the spec specifically advises > > *avoiding* them (PCIe r6.0, sec 1.2 footnote): > > > > Terms like “PCIe Gen3” are ambiguous and should be avoided. For > > example, “gen3” could mean (1) compliant with Base 3.0, (2) > > compliant with Base 3.1 (last revision of 3.x), (3) compliant with > > Base 3.0 and supporting 8.0 GT/s, (4) compliant with Base 3.0 or > > later and supporting 8.0 GT/s, .... > > > > As a practical matter, those terms make it hard to use the spec: where > > do I go to learn how to use "gen4-eq-presets"? There's no instance of > > "gen4" in the PCIe spec. AFAICT, all I can do is look up the PCIe > > r4.0 spec and try to figure out what was added in that revision, which > > is a real hassle. > > > is it fine if I change names from gen3-eq-presets, gen4-eq-presets etc > to 8gts-eq-presets, 16gts-eq-presets etc. Those would be fine with me. If names starting with digits don't work, things like "eq-presets-8gts" would also be fine. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-29 18:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20241018182247.41130-1-james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
[not found] ` <20241018182247.41130-2-james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
[not found] ` <20241021190334.GA953710-robh@kernel.org>
2024-10-25 1:08 ` [PATCH 1/1] RFC: dt bindings: Add property "brcm,gen3-eq-presets" Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2024-10-28 18:51 ` James Quinlan
2024-10-29 5:17 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2024-10-29 14:22 ` Jim Quinlan
2024-10-29 14:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-29 15:22 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2024-10-29 15:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-29 15:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-29 16:54 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2024-10-29 17:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox