From: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@gmail.com>,
Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/11] ASoC: fsl_rpmsg: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 20:26:37 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612132639.78086-10-phucduc.bui@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612132639.78086-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
From: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Clean up the code using guard() for mutex & spin locks.
Merely code refactoring, and no behavior change.
Signed-off-by: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
---
sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c | 69 +++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c b/sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c
index 031e5272215d..7210393dfa5d 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c
@@ -39,10 +39,9 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_send_message(struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = info->rpdev;
int ret = 0;
- mutex_lock(&info->msg_lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&info->msg_lock);
if (!rpdev) {
dev_err(info->dev, "rpmsg channel not ready\n");
- mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -55,15 +54,12 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_send_message(struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
if (ret) {
dev_err(&rpdev->dev, "rpmsg_send failed: %d\n", ret);
- mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
return ret;
}
/* No receive msg for TYPE_C command */
- if (msg->s_msg.header.type == MSG_TYPE_C) {
- mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
+ if (msg->s_msg.header.type == MSG_TYPE_C)
return 0;
- }
/* wait response from rpmsg */
ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&info->cmd_complete,
@@ -71,7 +67,6 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_send_message(struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
if (!ret) {
dev_err(&rpdev->dev, "rpmsg_send cmd %d timeout!\n",
msg->s_msg.header.cmd);
- mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
@@ -100,8 +95,6 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_send_message(struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
dev_dbg(&rpdev->dev, "cmd:%d, resp %d\n", msg->s_msg.header.cmd,
info->r_msg.param.resp);
- mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
-
return 0;
}
@@ -109,14 +102,13 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_insert_workqueue(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
struct rpmsg_info *info)
{
- unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
/*
* Queue the work to workqueue.
* If the queue is full, drop the message.
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&info->wq_lock, flags);
+ guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&info->wq_lock);
if (info->work_write_index != info->work_read_index) {
int index = info->work_write_index;
@@ -130,7 +122,6 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_insert_workqueue(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
info->msg_drop_count[substream->stream]++;
ret = -EPIPE;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->wq_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -523,7 +514,6 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_ack(struct snd_soc_component *component,
snd_pcm_sframes_t avail;
struct timer_list *timer;
struct rpmsg_msg *msg;
- unsigned long flags;
int buffer_tail = 0;
int written_num;
@@ -553,11 +543,11 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_ack(struct snd_soc_component *component,
msg->s_msg.param.buffer_tail = buffer_tail;
/* The notification message is updated to latest */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&info->lock[substream->stream], flags);
- memcpy(&info->notify[substream->stream], msg,
- sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
- info->notify_updated[substream->stream] = true;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[substream->stream], flags);
+ scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &info->lock[substream->stream]) {
+ memcpy(&info->notify[substream->stream], msg,
+ sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
+ info->notify_updated[substream->stream] = true;
+ }
if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
avail = snd_pcm_playback_hw_avail(runtime);
@@ -640,7 +630,7 @@ static void imx_rpmsg_pcm_work(struct work_struct *work)
bool is_notification = false;
struct rpmsg_info *info;
struct rpmsg_msg msg;
- unsigned long flags;
+ bool updated;
work_of_rpmsg = container_of(work, struct work_of_rpmsg, work);
info = work_of_rpmsg->info;
@@ -651,25 +641,26 @@ static void imx_rpmsg_pcm_work(struct work_struct *work)
* enough data in M core side, need to let M core know
* data is updated immediately.
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&info->lock[TX], flags);
- if (info->notify_updated[TX]) {
- memcpy(&msg, &info->notify[TX], sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
- info->notify_updated[TX] = false;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[TX], flags);
- info->send_message(&msg, info);
- } else {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[TX], flags);
+ scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &info->lock[TX]) {
+ updated = info->notify_updated[TX];
+ if (updated) {
+ memcpy(&msg, &info->notify[TX], sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
+ info->notify_updated[TX] = false;
+ }
}
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&info->lock[RX], flags);
- if (info->notify_updated[RX]) {
- memcpy(&msg, &info->notify[RX], sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
- info->notify_updated[RX] = false;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[RX], flags);
+ if (updated)
info->send_message(&msg, info);
- } else {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[RX], flags);
+
+ scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &info->lock[RX]) {
+ updated = info->notify_updated[RX];
+ if (updated) {
+ memcpy(&msg, &info->notify[RX], sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
+ info->notify_updated[RX] = false;
+ }
}
+ if (updated)
+ info->send_message(&msg, info);
+
/* Skip the notification message for it has been processed above */
if (work_of_rpmsg->msg.s_msg.header.type == MSG_TYPE_C &&
@@ -681,10 +672,10 @@ static void imx_rpmsg_pcm_work(struct work_struct *work)
info->send_message(&work_of_rpmsg->msg, info);
/* update read index */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&info->wq_lock, flags);
- info->work_read_index++;
- info->work_read_index %= WORK_MAX_NUM;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->wq_lock, flags);
+ scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &info->wq_lock) {
+ info->work_read_index++;
+ info->work_read_index %= WORK_MAX_NUM;
+ }
}
static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 13:26 [PATCH 00/11] ASoC: fsl: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 01/11] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 02/11] ASoC: fsl_audmix: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 03/11] ASoC: fsl_easrc: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 04/11] ASoC: fsl_esai: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 05/11] ASoC: fsl_spdif: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 06/11] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 07/11] ASoC: fsl_xcvr: Use guard() for spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 08/11] ASoC: imx-audio-rpmsg: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` phucduc.bui [this message]
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 10/11] ASoC: fsl: mpc5200_dma: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 11/11] ASoC: fsl: mpc5200_psc_ac97: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 15:05 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260612132639.78086-10-phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--to=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox