Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@gmail.com>,
	Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/11] ASoC: fsl_rpmsg: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 20:26:37 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612132639.78086-10-phucduc.bui@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612132639.78086-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

From: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

Clean up the code using guard() for mutex & spin locks.
Merely code refactoring, and no behavior change.

Signed-off-by: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
---
 sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c | 69 +++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c b/sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c
index 031e5272215d..7210393dfa5d 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c
@@ -39,10 +39,9 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_send_message(struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
 	struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = info->rpdev;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&info->msg_lock);
+	guard(mutex)(&info->msg_lock);
 	if (!rpdev) {
 		dev_err(info->dev, "rpmsg channel not ready\n");
-		mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -55,15 +54,12 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_send_message(struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
 			 sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&rpdev->dev, "rpmsg_send failed: %d\n", ret);
-		mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
 	/* No receive msg for TYPE_C command */
-	if (msg->s_msg.header.type == MSG_TYPE_C) {
-		mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
+	if (msg->s_msg.header.type == MSG_TYPE_C)
 		return 0;
-	}
 
 	/* wait response from rpmsg */
 	ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&info->cmd_complete,
@@ -71,7 +67,6 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_send_message(struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
 	if (!ret) {
 		dev_err(&rpdev->dev, "rpmsg_send cmd %d timeout!\n",
 			msg->s_msg.header.cmd);
-		mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
 		return -ETIMEDOUT;
 	}
 
@@ -100,8 +95,6 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_send_message(struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
 	dev_dbg(&rpdev->dev, "cmd:%d, resp %d\n", msg->s_msg.header.cmd,
 		info->r_msg.param.resp);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -109,14 +102,13 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_insert_workqueue(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
 				      struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
 				      struct rpmsg_info *info)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Queue the work to workqueue.
 	 * If the queue is full, drop the message.
 	 */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&info->wq_lock, flags);
+	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&info->wq_lock);
 	if (info->work_write_index != info->work_read_index) {
 		int index = info->work_write_index;
 
@@ -130,7 +122,6 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_insert_workqueue(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
 		info->msg_drop_count[substream->stream]++;
 		ret = -EPIPE;
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->wq_lock, flags);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -523,7 +514,6 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_ack(struct snd_soc_component *component,
 	snd_pcm_sframes_t avail;
 	struct timer_list *timer;
 	struct rpmsg_msg *msg;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	int buffer_tail = 0;
 	int written_num;
 
@@ -553,11 +543,11 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_ack(struct snd_soc_component *component,
 		msg->s_msg.param.buffer_tail = buffer_tail;
 
 		/* The notification message is updated to latest */
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&info->lock[substream->stream], flags);
-		memcpy(&info->notify[substream->stream], msg,
-		       sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
-		info->notify_updated[substream->stream] = true;
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[substream->stream], flags);
+		scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &info->lock[substream->stream]) {
+			memcpy(&info->notify[substream->stream], msg,
+			       sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
+			info->notify_updated[substream->stream] = true;
+		}
 
 		if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
 			avail = snd_pcm_playback_hw_avail(runtime);
@@ -640,7 +630,7 @@ static void imx_rpmsg_pcm_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	bool is_notification = false;
 	struct rpmsg_info *info;
 	struct rpmsg_msg msg;
-	unsigned long flags;
+	bool updated;
 
 	work_of_rpmsg = container_of(work, struct work_of_rpmsg, work);
 	info = work_of_rpmsg->info;
@@ -651,25 +641,26 @@ static void imx_rpmsg_pcm_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	 * enough data in M core side, need to let M core know
 	 * data is updated immediately.
 	 */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&info->lock[TX], flags);
-	if (info->notify_updated[TX]) {
-		memcpy(&msg, &info->notify[TX], sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
-		info->notify_updated[TX] = false;
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[TX], flags);
-		info->send_message(&msg, info);
-	} else {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[TX], flags);
+	scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &info->lock[TX]) {
+		updated = info->notify_updated[TX];
+		if (updated) {
+			memcpy(&msg, &info->notify[TX], sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
+			info->notify_updated[TX] = false;
+		}
 	}
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&info->lock[RX], flags);
-	if (info->notify_updated[RX]) {
-		memcpy(&msg, &info->notify[RX], sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
-		info->notify_updated[RX] = false;
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[RX], flags);
+	if (updated)
 		info->send_message(&msg, info);
-	} else {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[RX], flags);
+
+	scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &info->lock[RX]) {
+		updated = info->notify_updated[RX];
+		if (updated) {
+			memcpy(&msg, &info->notify[RX], sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
+			info->notify_updated[RX] = false;
+		}
 	}
+	if (updated)
+		info->send_message(&msg, info);
+
 
 	/* Skip the notification message for it has been processed above */
 	if (work_of_rpmsg->msg.s_msg.header.type == MSG_TYPE_C &&
@@ -681,10 +672,10 @@ static void imx_rpmsg_pcm_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		info->send_message(&work_of_rpmsg->msg, info);
 
 	/* update read index */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&info->wq_lock, flags);
-	info->work_read_index++;
-	info->work_read_index %= WORK_MAX_NUM;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->wq_lock, flags);
+	scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &info->wq_lock) {
+		info->work_read_index++;
+		info->work_read_index %= WORK_MAX_NUM;
+	}
 }
 
 static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
-- 
2.43.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-12 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-12 13:26 [PATCH 00/11] ASoC: fsl: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 01/11] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 02/11] ASoC: fsl_audmix: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 03/11] ASoC: fsl_easrc: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 04/11] ASoC: fsl_esai: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 05/11] ASoC: fsl_spdif: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 06/11] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 07/11] ASoC: fsl_xcvr: Use guard() for spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 08/11] ASoC: imx-audio-rpmsg: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` phucduc.bui [this message]
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 10/11] ASoC: fsl: mpc5200_dma: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 11/11] ASoC: fsl: mpc5200_psc_ac97: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 15:05   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260612132639.78086-10-phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
    --to=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shengjiu.wang@gmail.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox