From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@nabladev.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@foss.st.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@foss.st.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Yannick Fertre <yannick.fertre@foss.st.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@dh-electronics.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: stm32: Document st,stm32mp23/25-syscfg subnodes and cells
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:13:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831-craftily-operative-ac855bdbe897@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b09012a-3cae-4589-b42d-f61d33f2f876@nabladev.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2828 bytes --]
On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 06:27:21PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 8/31/26 5:05 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>
> Hello Conor,
>
> > > > Sashiko comment here I believe is valid, the syntax here only works if
> > > > there's only the listed compatible present. It doesn't work with
> > > > fallbacks.
> > >
> > > This syntax is used all over the place ?
> > >
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml-allOf:
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml- - $ref:
> > > ahci-common.yaml#
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml-
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml- - if:
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml- properties:
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml- compatible:
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml: contains:
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^
> > This is the key difference, you need "contains" for partial matches.
>
> Uh ... right ... fixed in V5. Thank you.
>
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml- enum:
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml- -
> > > qcom,apq8064-ahci
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml- -
> > > qcom,ipq806x-ahci
> > >
> > > > pw-bot: changes-requested
> > > >
> > > > > then:
> > > > > required:
> > > > > - "#clock-cells"
> > > > > + - "#address-cells"
> > > > > + - "#size-cells"
> > > >
> > > > else, false? But I'm also not sure what the benefit is of requiring
> > > > addr/size cells when the child node is not?
> > > The subnodes of this syscfg node have reg property , see [PATCH v4 0/4]
> > > arm64: dts: st: Add STM32MP2 USB support .
> >
> > Right, but I was questioning why the properties describing the reg
> > property in children is required when the children (and thus the reg
> > property in them) were not made required.
>
> Do you mean this patternProperties should be made required in here ?
>
> "
> +patternProperties:
> + "^phy@[0-9a-f]+$":
> "
>
> Could you please give me a hint how to do that ? git grep gives me nothing.
I mean, if the phys aren't going to be required I would not make the
cells properties required. I seem to recall a warning that dtbs_check
can emit when there are size/addr cells properties in a node where there
are no children, which is why I questioned this in the first place.
Otherwise, if the phys are to be made required (no idea if they should
be), I can only recall this being done with the non-pattern variant. IOW
required:
- phy@0
- phy@1
Cheers,
Conor.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 15:11 [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: stm32: Document st,stm32mp23/25-syscfg subnodes and cells Marek Vasut
2026-08-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] soc: st: Add STM32MP2 SYSCFG driver Marek Vasut
2026-08-28 15:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: stm32: Document st,stm32mp23/25-syscfg subnodes and cells Conor Dooley
2026-08-28 16:05 ` Marek Vasut
2026-08-31 15:05 ` Conor Dooley
2026-08-31 16:27 ` Marek Vasut
2026-08-31 17:13 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-08-31 17:38 ` Marek Vasut
2026-08-31 19:56 ` Conor Dooley
2026-09-01 11:53 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831-craftily-operative-ac855bdbe897@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=christophe.roullier@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@dh-electronics.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=marex@nabladev.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=raphael.gallais-pou@foss.st.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=yannick.fertre@foss.st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox