From: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/17] KVM: arm64: Implement HVC handling for protected guests at EL2
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 17:34:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831163421.272420-9-fuad.tabba@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831163421.272420-1-fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Extend kvm_handle_pvm_hvc64() to handle SMCCC_VERSION,
SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES and the vendor hypervisor call UID at EL2, so
these queries do not reach the host. ARCH_FEATURES is mandatory from
SMCCC 1.1, the version EL2 reports: it returns SUCCESS for itself and
for SMCCC_VERSION, and NOT_SUPPORTED for anything else.
Add handle_pvm_entry_hvc64() and handle_pvm_exit_hvc64(), which
forward a protected guest's HVCs to the host and return the reply; a
later patch wires them into the per-EC dispatch tables.
Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
index d4b0f69ff130c..62864db1e099a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
* Author: Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>
*/
+#include <kvm/arm_hypercalls.h>
+
#include <hyp/adjust_pc.h>
#include <hyp/switch.h>
@@ -33,6 +35,32 @@ void __kvm_hyp_host_forward_smc(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt);
typedef void (*hyp_entry_exit_handler_fn)(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *);
+static void __maybe_unused handle_pvm_entry_hvc64(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+ u64 ret =
+ READ_ONCE(hyp_vcpu->host_vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.regs[i]);
+ vcpu_set_reg(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu, i, ret);
+ }
+}
+
+static void __maybe_unused handle_pvm_exit_hvc64(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu)
+{
+ struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu = hyp_vcpu->host_vcpu;
+ int i;
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2,
+ hyp_vcpu->vcpu.arch.fault.esr_el2);
+
+ /* Pass the HVC function id (r0) and its arguments. */
+ for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.regs[i],
+ vcpu_get_reg(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu, i));
+ }
+}
+
static void handle_vm_entry_generic(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu)
{
vcpu_copy_flag(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu, hyp_vcpu->host_vcpu, PC_UPDATE_REQ);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
index af334318d0a03..0fe11f95e2e26 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
@@ -1144,8 +1144,37 @@ bool kvm_handle_pvm_hvc64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
{
u64 val[4] = { SMCCC_RET_INVALID_PARAMETER };
bool handled = true;
+ u32 feature;
+ uuid_t uuid;
switch (smccc_get_function(vcpu)) {
+ case ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_FUNC_ID:
+ /* Nothing to be handled by the host. Go back to the guest. */
+ val[0] = ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_1_1;
+ val[1] = 0;
+ val[2] = 0;
+ val[3] = 0;
+ break;
+ case ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID:
+ /* SUCCESS only for the architecture calls EL2 implements. */
+ feature = smccc_get_arg1(vcpu);
+ switch (feature) {
+ case ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_FUNC_ID:
+ case ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID:
+ val[0] = SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS;
+ break;
+ default:
+ val[0] = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+ break;
+ }
+ break;
+ case ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_CALL_UID_FUNC_ID:
+ uuid = ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_KVM;
+ val[0] = smccc_uuid_to_reg(&uuid, 0);
+ val[1] = smccc_uuid_to_reg(&uuid, 1);
+ val[2] = smccc_uuid_to_reg(&uuid, 2);
+ val[3] = smccc_uuid_to_reg(&uuid, 3);
+ break;
case ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_FEATURES_FUNC_ID:
val[0] = BIT(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_FEATURES);
val[0] |= BIT(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_HYP_MEMINFO);
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 16:34 [PATCH 00/17] KVM: arm64: Confine protected VM vCPU state to EL2 Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 01/17] KVM: arm64: Sync HCR_EL2.VSE back to the host vCPU under pKVM Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 02/17] KVM: arm64: Advertise the capabilities that protected VMs support Fuad Tabba
2026-09-02 13:22 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-03 16:20 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 03/17] KVM: arm64: Reject the PVTIME vCPU attribute for protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2026-09-02 13:30 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-03 16:21 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 04/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce per-EC entry handlers for pKVM Fuad Tabba
2026-09-02 10:12 ` Joey Gouly
2026-09-02 11:35 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 05/17] KVM: arm64: Skip fixed-feature state flush for protected vCPUs Fuad Tabba
2026-09-02 15:05 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-02 15:26 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-03 16:22 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 06/17] KVM: arm64: Add {flush,sync}_hyp_timer_state() primitives Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 07/17] KVM: arm64: Add system register reset framework for protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2026-09-02 15:14 ` Joey Gouly
2026-09-03 16:24 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` Fuad Tabba [this message]
2026-09-03 15:12 ` [PATCH 08/17] KVM: arm64: Implement HVC handling for protected guests at EL2 Joey Gouly
2026-09-03 16:25 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 09/17] KVM: arm64: Handle PSCI calls for protected VMs " Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 10/17] KVM: arm64: Restrict KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT and PSCI version for protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 11/17] KVM: arm64: Prevent host PC adjustments for protected vCPUs Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 12/17] KVM: arm64: Inject an UNDEF at EL2 for unhandled protected guest exits Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 13/17] KVM: arm64: Add per-EC entry/exit state marshalling for protected guests Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 14/17] KVM: arm64: Pend a protected guest's SError with HCR_EL2.VSE only Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 15/17] KVM: arm64: Reject host access to protected VM private state Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 16/17] KVM: arm64: Reject host power-on of a vCPU that EL2 holds powered off Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 17/17] KVM: arm64: Document the protected VM userspace API Fuad Tabba
2026-08-31 19:27 ` [PATCH 00/17] KVM: arm64: Confine protected VM vCPU state to EL2 Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831163421.272420-9-fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--to=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox