From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/36] arm64: entry: mask DAIF before returning from C EL1 handlers
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:57:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <495a9d3f-ad12-4927-84c0-6f8f89cf9a06@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709121333.23507-8-vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
On 7/9/2026 8:13 PM, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> From: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
>
> Most EL1 exceptions already call `local_daif_mask()` before returning,
> with the exception of debug exception handlers which do not change
> DAIF, and the IRQ/FIQ/Error handlers.
>
> However, DAIF get masked in `kernel_exit()` in all cases when
> returning from EL1 C handlers anyway.
>
> Move this masking from assembly to C by adding `local_daif_mask()`
> before `irqentry_nmi_exit()` when it is called by EL1 handlers.
>
> Remove the `disable_daif` assembly macro, as this was its only use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h | 4 ----
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 4 ----
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> index effae53e9739..0b58b550e8dc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -34,10 +34,6 @@
> wx\n .req w\n
> .endr
>
> - .macro disable_daif
> - msr daifset, #0xf
> - .endm
> -
> /*
> * Save/restore interrupts.
> */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> index ceb4eb11232a..2be42d7f4eaa 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> @@ -495,6 +495,7 @@ static __always_inline void __el1_pnmi(struct pt_regs *regs,
>
> state = irqentry_nmi_enter(regs);
> do_interrupt_handler(regs, handler);
> + local_daif_mask();
> irqentry_nmi_exit(regs, state);
> }
>
> @@ -540,6 +541,7 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr el1h_64_error_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> local_daif_restore(DAIF_ERRCTX);
> state = irqentry_nmi_enter(regs);
> do_serror(regs, esr);
> + local_daif_mask();
> irqentry_nmi_exit(regs, state);
This is similar to my patch below:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260703100135.2512312-4-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/
I think there are at least three problems:
1、disable_daif is missing for el1h_64_sync_handler() and __el1_irq()
2、The order after moving to the C code is incorrect. disable_daif should
be the exit point for C, that is, after irqentry_nmi_exit(), it is
unclear why this order change occurred ?
3、local_daif_mask () has added some pseudo NMI operations and
trace_hardirqs_off ().
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index e0db14e9c843..f63049ac32dc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -333,10 +333,6 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
> .endm
>
> .macro kernel_exit, el
> - .if \el != 0
> - disable_daif
> - .endif
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
> alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING
> b .Lskip_pmr_restore\@
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 12:12 [RFC PATCH 00/36] arm64: Add support for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:12 ` [RFC PATCH 01/36] arm64: ptrace: Remove INIT_PSTATE_EL2 Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:36 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:12 ` [RFC PATCH 02/36] arm64: debug: don't mask DAIF for mdscr_write() Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 13:06 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 03/36] arm64: hibernate: mask DAIF before restoring hibernated kernel Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 13:19 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 3:00 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 3:28 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 3:40 ` Liao, Chang
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 04/36] arm64: suspend: rely on daif helpers to handle PMR Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 3:41 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 4:06 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 05/36] arm64: suspend: Initialize PMR on resume Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 06/36] arm64: irq: introduce a helper for GIC priority initialization Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 4:16 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 7:29 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 7:44 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 07/36] arm64: entry: mask DAIF before returning from C EL1 handlers Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 7:57 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 08/36] irqchip/gic-v3: make the unmasking of pseudo-NMIs explicit when handling IRQs Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 8:04 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 09/36] arm64: irqflags: introduce arm64-specific irqflags type Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 8:40 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 10/36] arm64: irqflags: save and use both DAIF and PMR Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 3:53 ` Liao, Chang
2026-07-10 8:11 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 8:47 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 9:02 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 11/36] arm64: interrupts: introduce interrupt masking helpers for entry code Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 9:19 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 9:39 ` Liao, Chang
2026-07-10 9:39 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 9:44 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 12/36] arm64: entry: replace DAIF helpers with entry helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 9:36 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 10:01 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 13/36] arm64: process: Use helper to check exception state Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 10:00 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 14/36] arm64: interrupts: introduce generic interrupt masking helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 15/36] arm64: replace local_daif helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 16/36] arm64: cpuidle: use new helpers to bypass interrupt priority masking Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 17/36] arm64: remove daifflags.h Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 18/36] arm64: gicv3: remove GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 19/36] arm64: cpufeature: Remove system_has_prio_mask_debugging() Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 20/36] arm64: irqflags: Switch to CONFIG_DEBUG_IRQFLAGS Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 21/36] arm64: Kconfig: Remove CONFIG_ARM64_DEBUG_PRIORITY_MASKING Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 22/36] efi/runtime-wrappers: Permit architectures to override IRQ flags checks Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 23/36] arm64/efi: Implement override for " Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 24/36] arm64: booting: Document boot requirements for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 2:39 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 25/36] arm64: sysreg: Add definitions for immediate versions of MSR ALLINT Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 26/36] arm64: ptrace: Add PSR_ALLINT_BIT Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 2:16 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 27/36] arm64: idreg: Add an override for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 2:17 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 28/36] arm64: cpufeature: Detect PE support " Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 2:25 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 29/36] arm64: nmi: Manage masking for superpriority interrupts Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 10:04 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 10:08 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 30/36] arm64: irq: Report FEAT_NMI masking local IRQs Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 31/36] arm64: nmi: Add handling of superpriority interrupts as NMIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 10:13 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 32/36] arm64: suspend: Always initialise PSTATE.ALLINT Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 33/36] arm64/efi: Add ALLINT to IRQ flags checks Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 34/36] arm64: kprobes: Disable NMIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 35/36] arm64: nmi: Add Kconfig for NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 2:41 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 36/36] irqchip/gic-v3: Implement FEAT_GICv3_NMI support Vladimir Murzin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=495a9d3f-ad12-4927-84c0-6f8f89cf9a06@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox