From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 28/36] arm64: cpufeature: Detect PE support for FEAT_NMI
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:25:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77cd779b-9091-49f2-9a20-c0805c03e50e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709121333.23507-29-vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
On 7/9/2026 8:13 PM, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> From: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
>
> Use of FEAT_NMI requires that all the PEs in the system and the GIC
> have NMI support. This patch implements the PE part of that detection.
>
> In order to avoid problematic interactions between real and pseudo NMIs
> we disable the architected feature if the user has enabled pseudo NMIs
> on the command line. If this is done on a system where support for the
> architected feature is detected then a warning is printed during boot in
> order to help users spot what is likely to be a misconfiguration.
>
> As KVM does not care about the host kernel supporting FEAT_NMI or not
> to allow guests to use it, split the CPU cap in two : ARM64_HAS_NMI is
> the hardware support, ARM64_NMI is the kernel making use of it.
>
> Co-developed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 10 +++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 2 +
> 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> index 25c61cda901c..176a63f1cc1b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ cpucap_is_possible(const unsigned int cap)
> return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS);
> case ARM64_HAS_LSUI:
> return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_LSUI);
> + case ARM64_NMI:
> + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_NMI);
> }
>
> return true;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 95cd8d4acd26..84b817b29155 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -816,6 +816,16 @@ static __always_inline bool system_uses_irq_prio_masking(void)
> return alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING);
> }
>
> +static __always_inline bool system_supports_nmi(void)
> +{
> + return alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_HAS_NMI);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline bool system_uses_nmi(void)
> +{
> + return alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_NMI);
> +}
> +
> static inline bool system_supports_mte(void)
> {
> return alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_MTE);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 9a22df0c5120..bb22292ebabc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -83,13 +83,14 @@
> #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
> #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
> #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> +#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> #include <asm/insn.h>
> +#include <asm/interrupts/common_flags.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_host.h>
> #include <asm/mmu.h>
> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> #include <asm/mpam.h>
> #include <asm/mte.h>
> -#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/smp.h>
> #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> @@ -315,6 +316,7 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64pfr1[] = {
> ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE_IF_IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_GCS),
> FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_GCS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_frac_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_NMI_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE_IF_IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SME),
> FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_SME_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MPAM_frac_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> @@ -2320,6 +2322,51 @@ static bool has_gic_prio_relaxed_sync(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_NMI
> +static bool can_use_nmi(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int scope)
> +{
> + /*
> + * ARM64_HAS_NMI has a lower index, and is a boot CPU
> + * feature, so will be detected earlier.
> + */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARM64_NMI <= ARM64_HAS_NMI);
> + if (!cpus_have_cap(ARM64_HAS_NMI))
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * Having both real and pseudo NMIs enabled simultaneously is
> + * likely to cause confusion. Since pseudo NMIs must be
> + * enabled with an explicit command line option, if the user
> + * has set that option on a system with real NMIs for some
> + * reason assume they know what they're doing.
> + *
> + * ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING has a lower index, and is a boot CPU
> + * feature, so will be detected earlier.
> + */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI) &&
> + (ARM64_NMI <= ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING));
> + if (cpus_have_cap(ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING)) {
> + pr_info("Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI\n");
> + return false;
A small suggestion is to change it to pr_info_once. Otherwise, a large
number of print information will be displayed.
Otherwise, LGTM
Reviewed-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
# dmesg | grep NMI
[ 0.000000] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.000000] GICv3: Pseudo-NMIs enabled using relaxed ICC_PMR_EL1
synchronisation
[ 0.434430] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.461345] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.475924] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.491364] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.507948] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.523741] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.543870] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.561246] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.579303] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.597354] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.611880] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.630754] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.649572] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.666047] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.681356] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.707386] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.727123] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.744232] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.769575] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.788145] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.811170] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.831739] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.855084] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.876659] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.897121] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.923611] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.943820] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.967216] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 0.997958] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 1.027661] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 1.057660] CPU features: Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI
[ 8.532896] hw perfevents: enabled with armv8_pmuv3 PMU driver, 7
(0,8000003f) counters available, using NMIs
[ 8.536298] watchdog: NMI not fully supported
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void nmi_enable(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Enable use of NMIs controlled by ALLINT, SPINTMASK should
> + * be clear by default but make it explicit that we are using
> + * this mode. Ensure that ALLINT is clear first in order to
> + * avoid leaving things masked.
> + */
> + _allint_clear();
> + sysreg_clear_set(sctlr_el1, SCTLR_EL1_SPINTMASK, SCTLR_EL1_NMI);
> + isb();
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static bool can_trap_icv_dir_el1(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
> int scope)
> {
> @@ -3198,6 +3245,25 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
> .matches = has_cpuid_feature,
> ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64ISAR3_EL1, LSUI, IMP)
> },
> +#endif
> + {
> + .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE,
> + .capability = ARM64_HAS_NMI,
> + .matches = has_cpuid_feature,
> + ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, NMI, IMP)
> + },
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_NMI
> + /*
> + * Depends on ARM64_HAS_NMI
> + * Checks for conflict with pseudo-NMIs, giving them priority.
> + */
> + {
> + .desc = "Non-maskable Interrupts",
> + .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE,
> + .capability = ARM64_NMI,
> + .matches = can_use_nmi,
> + .cpu_enable = nmi_enable,
> + },
> #endif
> {},
> };
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> index 9b85a84f6fd4..2117b3ef0b82 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ HAS_LS64_V
> HAS_LSUI
> HAS_MOPS
> HAS_NESTED_VIRT
> +HAS_NMI
> HAS_BBML2_NOABORT
> HAS_PAN
> HAS_PMUV3
> @@ -80,6 +81,7 @@ MTE
> MTE_ASYMM
> MTE_FAR
> MTE_STORE_ONLY
> +NMI
> SME
> SME_FA64
> SME2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 12:12 [RFC PATCH 00/36] arm64: Add support for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:12 ` [RFC PATCH 01/36] arm64: ptrace: Remove INIT_PSTATE_EL2 Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:36 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:12 ` [RFC PATCH 02/36] arm64: debug: don't mask DAIF for mdscr_write() Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 13:06 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 03/36] arm64: hibernate: mask DAIF before restoring hibernated kernel Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 13:19 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 3:00 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 3:28 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 3:40 ` Liao, Chang
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 04/36] arm64: suspend: rely on daif helpers to handle PMR Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 3:41 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 4:06 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 05/36] arm64: suspend: Initialize PMR on resume Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 06/36] arm64: irq: introduce a helper for GIC priority initialization Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 4:16 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 7:29 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 7:44 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 07/36] arm64: entry: mask DAIF before returning from C EL1 handlers Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 7:57 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 08/36] irqchip/gic-v3: make the unmasking of pseudo-NMIs explicit when handling IRQs Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 8:04 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 09/36] arm64: irqflags: introduce arm64-specific irqflags type Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 8:40 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 10/36] arm64: irqflags: save and use both DAIF and PMR Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 3:53 ` Liao, Chang
2026-07-10 8:11 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 8:47 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 9:02 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 11/36] arm64: interrupts: introduce interrupt masking helpers for entry code Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 9:19 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 9:39 ` Liao, Chang
2026-07-10 9:39 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 9:44 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 12/36] arm64: entry: replace DAIF helpers with entry helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 9:36 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 10:01 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 13/36] arm64: process: Use helper to check exception state Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 10:00 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 14/36] arm64: interrupts: introduce generic interrupt masking helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 15/36] arm64: replace local_daif helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 16/36] arm64: cpuidle: use new helpers to bypass interrupt priority masking Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 17/36] arm64: remove daifflags.h Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 18/36] arm64: gicv3: remove GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 19/36] arm64: cpufeature: Remove system_has_prio_mask_debugging() Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 20/36] arm64: irqflags: Switch to CONFIG_DEBUG_IRQFLAGS Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 21/36] arm64: Kconfig: Remove CONFIG_ARM64_DEBUG_PRIORITY_MASKING Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 22/36] efi/runtime-wrappers: Permit architectures to override IRQ flags checks Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 23/36] arm64/efi: Implement override for " Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 24/36] arm64: booting: Document boot requirements for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 2:39 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 25/36] arm64: sysreg: Add definitions for immediate versions of MSR ALLINT Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 26/36] arm64: ptrace: Add PSR_ALLINT_BIT Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 2:16 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 27/36] arm64: idreg: Add an override for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 2:17 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 28/36] arm64: cpufeature: Detect PE support " Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 2:25 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 29/36] arm64: nmi: Manage masking for superpriority interrupts Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 10:04 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-10 10:08 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 30/36] arm64: irq: Report FEAT_NMI masking local IRQs Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 31/36] arm64: nmi: Add handling of superpriority interrupts as NMIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 10:13 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 32/36] arm64: suspend: Always initialise PSTATE.ALLINT Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 33/36] arm64/efi: Add ALLINT to IRQ flags checks Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 34/36] arm64: kprobes: Disable NMIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 35/36] arm64: nmi: Add Kconfig for NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-10 2:41 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH 36/36] irqchip/gic-v3: Implement FEAT_GICv3_NMI support Vladimir Murzin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=77cd779b-9091-49f2-9a20-c0805c03e50e@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox