Re: [PATCH net v2] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Fix 1 PPS sync

[Meghana Malladi <m-malladi@ti.com>]

On 25/10/24 18:52, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 11:17:44AM +0530, Meghana Malladi wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 25/10/24 01:25, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>> +static inline u64 icssg_readq(const void __iomem *addr)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	return readl(addr) + ((u64)readl(addr + 4) << 32);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline void icssg_writeq(u64 val, void __iomem *addr)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	writel(lower_32_bits(val), addr);
>>>> +	writel(upper_32_bits(val), addr + 4);
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> Could readq() and writeq() be used, rather than your own helpers?
>>>
>>> 	Andrew
>>>
>> The addresses we are trying to read here are not 64-bit aligned, hence using
>> our own helpers to read the 64-bit value.
> 
> Ah, you should document this, because somebody might do a drive by
> patch converting this to readq()/write(q).
> 
> Alternatively, i think hi_lo_writeq() would work.
> 
> 	Andrew
I tried hi_lo_readq() and hi_lo_writeq(), and it is fitting my 
requirement. Thanks, I will update it.

Regards,
Meghana