From: Klaus Heinrich Kiwi <klausk@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Subject: Re: [RFC] programmatic IDS routing
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:28:42 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1206095322.9069.40.camel@klausk.br.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803200953.33566.sgrubb@redhat.com>
> > So the admin would create the rule he wants, create a unique key and tell
> > the IDS what the key is and how it should react when it sees a record with
> > that key.
>
> Yes. What I want to do is also say that if you create your unique key a
> certain way, you get this additional benefit of realtime alerting or
> correlation. if you choose not to, then its treated as any other event
I agree with Steve's compromise with speed, but maybe there's no way out
of using hashes or linked lists in the general case.
What if a message is important not only for the IDS plugin but also to a
fictional 'real-time compliance reporting' plugin - both wanting to use
the key field to carry special things, and in the same event:
type=USER_ACCT msg=... key=ids-file-high,sox-fault-med,actual_key
The plug-ins would need to check if their specific identifier is present
not only in the first 4 bytes, but after every comma.
If it's desirable to support the general case, instead of putting
everything in one single 'key' field, maybe having an index just like
execve arguments:
type=USER_ACCT msg=... key[0]=ids-file-high key[1]=sox-fault-med
key[2]=actual_key
Still need to iterate through all keys in the worst case, but the
plugins could individually chose between having the rules hardcoded (for
speed) or configurable.
-Klaus
--
Klaus Heinrich Kiwi
Security Development - IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-21 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-19 17:02 [RFC] programmatic IDS routing Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 17:12 ` Linda Knippers
2008-03-19 17:40 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 17:55 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 18:18 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-19 18:54 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 20:09 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-19 18:05 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-19 18:40 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 19:04 ` Linda Knippers
2008-03-19 19:28 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 19:48 ` Eric Paris
2008-03-19 20:48 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 19:55 ` Linda Knippers
2008-03-19 21:01 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 21:31 ` Linda Knippers
2008-03-19 21:41 ` Eric Paris
2008-03-19 22:42 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 23:00 ` Linda Knippers
2008-03-19 23:44 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-20 13:32 ` Linda Knippers
2008-03-20 13:53 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-21 10:28 ` Klaus Heinrich Kiwi [this message]
2008-03-21 12:50 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-21 14:14 ` LC Bruzenak
2008-03-21 15:01 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-21 16:32 ` LC Bruzenak
2008-03-24 13:13 ` Klaus Heinrich Kiwi
2008-03-20 12:19 ` Steve Grubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1206095322.9069.40.camel@klausk.br.ibm.com \
--to=klausk@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox