From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] programmatic IDS routing
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:55:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803191355.38855.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803191340.22092.sgrubb@redhat.com>
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 13:40:21 Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 13:12:22 Linda Knippers wrote:
> > Rather than using the key for two purposes and introducing special key
> > words, couldn't an admin just tell the IDS which he's are of interest?
> > And what the priority of each one is?
>
> The problem is that you can tell the IDS that you want any reads
> of /opt/my-secrets, but unless you have a matching audit rule you will not
> get any records. This allows you to make sure you have a watch paired with
> its meaning.
And I should add, the IDS could run on each remote system, or off an
aggregator. This means expressing rules gets more complicated when you have
to express rules as on this particular host, I am looking for files in this
location. To me, its just simpler and hopefully less error prone to use the
key field like this.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-19 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-19 17:02 [RFC] programmatic IDS routing Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 17:12 ` Linda Knippers
2008-03-19 17:40 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 17:55 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2008-03-19 18:18 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-19 18:54 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 20:09 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-19 18:05 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-19 18:40 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 19:04 ` Linda Knippers
2008-03-19 19:28 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 19:48 ` Eric Paris
2008-03-19 20:48 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 19:55 ` Linda Knippers
2008-03-19 21:01 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 21:31 ` Linda Knippers
2008-03-19 21:41 ` Eric Paris
2008-03-19 22:42 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-19 23:00 ` Linda Knippers
2008-03-19 23:44 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-20 13:32 ` Linda Knippers
2008-03-20 13:53 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-21 10:28 ` Klaus Heinrich Kiwi
2008-03-21 12:50 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-21 14:14 ` LC Bruzenak
2008-03-21 15:01 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-21 16:32 ` LC Bruzenak
2008-03-24 13:13 ` Klaus Heinrich Kiwi
2008-03-20 12:19 ` Steve Grubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200803191355.38855.sgrubb@redhat.com \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox