arch question in rules

public inbox for linux-audit@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* arch question in rules
@ 2009-04-07 16:01 LC Bruzenak
  2009-04-07 18:34 ` Steve Grubb
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: LC Bruzenak @ 2009-04-07 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Audit

Q: Should I remove the arch=b32 audit rules if all machines are 64-bit?
Previously we had both; loaded same ruleset everywhere.

Thx,
LCB.

-- 
LC (Lenny) Bruzenak
lenny@magitekltd.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: arch question in rules
  2009-04-07 16:01 arch question in rules LC Bruzenak
@ 2009-04-07 18:34 ` Steve Grubb
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steve Grubb @ 2009-04-07 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-audit

On Tuesday 07 April 2009 12:01:04 pm LC Bruzenak wrote:
> Q: Should I remove the arch=b32 audit rules if all machines are 64-bit?
> Previously we had both; loaded same ruleset everywhere.

If you had a i386, you could drop the b64 rules. However, x86_64 has both 32 
and 64 bit syscalls. So you need both for full coverage.

-Steve

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-07 18:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-07 16:01 arch question in rules LC Bruzenak
2009-04-07 18:34 ` Steve Grubb

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox