From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/7] blk-mq: stop to handle IO before hctx's all CPUs become offline
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:47:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190712024726.1227-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712024726.1227-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Most of blk-mq drivers depend on managed IRQ's auto-affinity to setup
up queue mapping. Thomas mentioned the following point[1]:
"
That was the constraint of managed interrupts from the very beginning:
The driver/subsystem has to quiesce the interrupt line and the associated
queue _before_ it gets shutdown in CPU unplug and not fiddle with it
until it's restarted by the core when the CPU is plugged in again.
"
However, current blk-mq implementation doesn't quiesce hw queue before
the last CPU in the hctx is shutdown. Even worse, CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD is
one cpuhp state handled after the CPU is down, so there isn't any chance
to quiesce hctx for blk-mq wrt. CPU hotplug.
Add new cpuhp state of CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE for blk-mq to stop queues
and wait for completion of in-flight requests.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/alpine.DEB.2.21.1904051331270.1802@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-mq-tag.c | 2 +-
block/blk-mq-tag.h | 2 ++
block/blk-mq.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/blk-mq.h | 1 +
include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 +
5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index da19f0bc8876..bcefb213ad69 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void bt_tags_for_each(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, struct sbitmap_queue *bt,
* true to continue iterating tags, false to stop.
* @priv: Will be passed as second argument to @fn.
*/
-static void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
+void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv)
{
if (tags->nr_reserved_tags)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.h b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
index 61deab0b5a5a..321fd6f440e6 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ extern int blk_mq_tag_update_depth(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
extern void blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, bool);
void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_iter_fn *fn,
void *priv);
+void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
+ busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv);
static inline struct sbq_wait_state *bt_wait_ptr(struct sbitmap_queue *bt,
struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index e5ef40c603ca..028c5d78e409 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2205,6 +2205,64 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
return -ENOMEM;
}
+static bool blk_mq_count_inflight_rq(struct request *rq, void *data,
+ bool reserved)
+{
+ unsigned *count = data;
+
+ if ((blk_mq_rq_state(rq) == MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT))
+ (*count)++;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+unsigned blk_mq_tags_inflight_rqs(struct blk_mq_tags *tags)
+{
+ unsigned count = 0;
+
+ blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(tags, blk_mq_count_inflight_rq, &count);
+
+ return count;
+}
+
+static void blk_mq_drain_inflight_rqs(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+{
+ while (1) {
+ if (!blk_mq_tags_inflight_rqs(hctx->tags))
+ break;
+ msleep(5);
+ }
+}
+
+static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_online(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
+{
+ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = hlist_entry_safe(node,
+ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, cpuhp_online);
+ unsigned prev_cpu = -1;
+
+ if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_NO_MANAGED_IRQ)
+ return 0;
+
+ while (true) {
+ unsigned other_cpu = cpumask_next_and(prev_cpu, hctx->cpumask,
+ cpu_online_mask);
+
+ if (other_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ break;
+
+ /* return if there is other online CPU on this hctx */
+ if (other_cpu != cpu)
+ return 0;
+
+ prev_cpu = other_cpu;
+ }
+
+ set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_INTERNAL_STOPPED, &hctx->state);
+ blk_mq_drain_inflight_rqs(hctx);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* 'cpu' is going away. splice any existing rq_list entries from this
* software queue to the hw queue dispatch list, and ensure that it
@@ -2221,6 +2279,9 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
ctx = __blk_mq_get_ctx(hctx->queue, cpu);
type = hctx->type;
+ if (test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_INTERNAL_STOPPED, &hctx->state))
+ clear_bit(BLK_MQ_S_INTERNAL_STOPPED, &hctx->state);
+
spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
if (!list_empty(&ctx->rq_lists[type])) {
list_splice_init(&ctx->rq_lists[type], &tmp);
@@ -2243,6 +2304,8 @@ static void blk_mq_remove_cpuhp(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD,
&hctx->cpuhp_dead);
+ cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE,
+ &hctx->cpuhp_online);
}
/* hctx->ctxs will be freed in queue's release handler */
@@ -2301,6 +2364,8 @@ static int blk_mq_init_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
hctx->queue_num = hctx_idx;
cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD, &hctx->cpuhp_dead);
+ cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE,
+ &hctx->cpuhp_online);
hctx->tags = set->tags[hctx_idx];
@@ -3536,6 +3601,8 @@ static int __init blk_mq_init(void)
{
cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD, "block/mq:dead", NULL,
blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead);
+ cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE, "block/mq:online",
+ NULL, blk_mq_hctx_notify_online);
return 0;
}
subsys_initcall(blk_mq_init);
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index 911cdc6479dc..dc86bdac08f4 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
atomic_t nr_active;
struct hlist_node cpuhp_dead;
+ struct hlist_node cpuhp_online;
struct kobject kobj;
unsigned long poll_considered;
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
index 87c211adf49e..5177f7bbcb88 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state {
CPUHP_AP_SMPBOOT_THREADS,
CPUHP_AP_X86_VDSO_VMA_ONLINE,
CPUHP_AP_IRQ_AFFINITY_ONLINE,
+ CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE,
CPUHP_AP_ARM_MVEBU_SYNC_CLOCKS,
CPUHP_AP_X86_INTEL_EPB_ONLINE,
CPUHP_AP_PERF_ONLINE,
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-12 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-12 2:47 [RFC PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: improvement on handling IO during CPU hotplug Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] blk-mq: add new state of BLK_MQ_S_INTERNAL_STOPPED Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] blk-mq: add blk-mq flag of BLK_MQ_F_NO_MANAGED_IRQ Ming Lei
2019-07-16 2:53 ` John Garry
2019-07-16 6:08 ` Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-07-12 9:03 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] blk-mq: stop to handle IO before hctx's all CPUs become offline Minwoo Im
2019-07-16 3:03 ` John Garry
2019-07-16 6:12 ` Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] blk-mq: add callback of .free_request Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] SCSI: implement .free_request callback Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] blk-mq: re-submit IO in case that hctx is dead Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] blk-mq: handle requests dispatched from IO scheduler " Ming Lei
2019-07-16 6:54 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: improvement on handling IO during CPU hotplug John Garry
2019-07-16 7:18 ` Ming Lei
2019-07-16 8:13 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190712024726.1227-4-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox