From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/7] blk-mq: stop to handle IO before hctx's all CPUs become offline
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:03:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91f2a5ce-614a-1e4d-6830-81750cf7f708@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712024726.1227-4-ming.lei@redhat.com>
在 12/07/2019 10:47, Ming Lei 写道:
> Most of blk-mq drivers depend on managed IRQ's auto-affinity to setup
> up queue mapping. Thomas mentioned the following point[1]:
>
> "
> That was the constraint of managed interrupts from the very beginning:
>
> The driver/subsystem has to quiesce the interrupt line and the associated
> queue _before_ it gets shutdown in CPU unplug and not fiddle with it
> until it's restarted by the core when the CPU is plugged in again.
> "
>
> However, current blk-mq implementation doesn't quiesce hw queue before
> the last CPU in the hctx is shutdown. Even worse, CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD is
> one cpuhp state handled after the CPU is down, so there isn't any chance
> to quiesce hctx for blk-mq wrt. CPU hotplug.
>
> Add new cpuhp state of CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE for blk-mq to stop queues
> and wait for completion of in-flight requests.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/alpine.DEB.2.21.1904051331270.1802@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
>
> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-tag.c | 2 +-
> block/blk-mq-tag.h | 2 ++
> block/blk-mq.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/blk-mq.h | 1 +
> include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index da19f0bc8876..bcefb213ad69 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void bt_tags_for_each(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, struct sbitmap_queue *bt,
> * true to continue iterating tags, false to stop.
> * @priv: Will be passed as second argument to @fn.
> */
> -static void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
> +void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
> busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv)
> {
> if (tags->nr_reserved_tags)
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.h b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
> index 61deab0b5a5a..321fd6f440e6 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.h
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ extern int blk_mq_tag_update_depth(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> extern void blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, bool);
> void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_iter_fn *fn,
> void *priv);
> +void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
> + busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv);
>
> static inline struct sbq_wait_state *bt_wait_ptr(struct sbitmap_queue *bt,
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index e5ef40c603ca..028c5d78e409 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2205,6 +2205,64 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> +static bool blk_mq_count_inflight_rq(struct request *rq, void *data,
> + bool reserved)
> +{
> + unsigned *count = data;
> +
> + if ((blk_mq_rq_state(rq) == MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT))
> + (*count)++;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +unsigned blk_mq_tags_inflight_rqs(struct blk_mq_tags *tags)
> +{
> + unsigned count = 0;
> +
> + blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(tags, blk_mq_count_inflight_rq, &count);
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> +static void blk_mq_drain_inflight_rqs(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> +{
> + while (1) {
> + if (!blk_mq_tags_inflight_rqs(hctx->tags))
> + break;
> + msleep(5);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_online(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
> +{
> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = hlist_entry_safe(node,
> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, cpuhp_online);
> + unsigned prev_cpu = -1;
> +
> + if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_NO_MANAGED_IRQ)
> + return 0;
is it possible to make this check at registration, such that we don't
even register for when (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_NO_MANAGED_IRQ)?
> +
> + while (true) {
> + unsigned other_cpu = cpumask_next_and(prev_cpu, hctx->cpumask,
nit: to me name next_cpu seems better
> + cpu_online_mask);
> +
> + if (other_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> + break;
> +
> + /* return if there is other online CPU on this hctx */
> + if (other_cpu != cpu)
> + return 0;
> +
> + prev_cpu = other_cpu;
> + }
> +
> + set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_INTERNAL_STOPPED, &hctx->state);
> + blk_mq_drain_inflight_rqs(hctx);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * 'cpu' is going away. splice any existing rq_list entries from this
> * software queue to the hw queue dispatch list, and ensure that it
> @@ -2221,6 +2279,9 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
> ctx = __blk_mq_get_ctx(hctx->queue, cpu);
> type = hctx->type;
>
> + if (test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_INTERNAL_STOPPED, &hctx->state))
> + clear_bit(BLK_MQ_S_INTERNAL_STOPPED, &hctx->state);
can you just always clear the bit without the test?
> +
> spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> if (!list_empty(&ctx->rq_lists[type])) {
> list_splice_init(&ctx->rq_lists[type], &tmp);
> @@ -2243,6 +2304,8 @@ static void blk_mq_remove_cpuhp(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> {
> cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD,
> &hctx->cpuhp_dead);
> + cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE,
> + &hctx->cpuhp_online);
> }
>
> /* hctx->ctxs will be freed in queue's release handler */
> @@ -2301,6 +2364,8 @@ static int blk_mq_init_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
> hctx->queue_num = hctx_idx;
>
> cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD, &hctx->cpuhp_dead);
> + cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE,
> + &hctx->cpuhp_online);
>
> hctx->tags = set->tags[hctx_idx];
>
> @@ -3536,6 +3601,8 @@ static int __init blk_mq_init(void)
> {
> cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD, "block/mq:dead", NULL,
> blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead);
> + cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE, "block/mq:online",
> + NULL, blk_mq_hctx_notify_online);
> return 0;
> }
> subsys_initcall(blk_mq_init);
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> index 911cdc6479dc..dc86bdac08f4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
> atomic_t nr_active;
>
> struct hlist_node cpuhp_dead;
> + struct hlist_node cpuhp_online;
I'd reorder with cpuhp_dead
> struct kobject kobj;
>
> unsigned long poll_considered;
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> index 87c211adf49e..5177f7bbcb88 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state {
> CPUHP_AP_SMPBOOT_THREADS,
> CPUHP_AP_X86_VDSO_VMA_ONLINE,
> CPUHP_AP_IRQ_AFFINITY_ONLINE,
> + CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE,
> CPUHP_AP_ARM_MVEBU_SYNC_CLOCKS,
> CPUHP_AP_X86_INTEL_EPB_ONLINE,
> CPUHP_AP_PERF_ONLINE,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-16 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-12 2:47 [RFC PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: improvement on handling IO during CPU hotplug Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] blk-mq: add new state of BLK_MQ_S_INTERNAL_STOPPED Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] blk-mq: add blk-mq flag of BLK_MQ_F_NO_MANAGED_IRQ Ming Lei
2019-07-16 2:53 ` John Garry
2019-07-16 6:08 ` Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] blk-mq: stop to handle IO before hctx's all CPUs become offline Ming Lei
2019-07-12 9:03 ` Minwoo Im
2019-07-16 3:03 ` John Garry [this message]
2019-07-16 6:12 ` Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] blk-mq: add callback of .free_request Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] SCSI: implement .free_request callback Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] blk-mq: re-submit IO in case that hctx is dead Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] blk-mq: handle requests dispatched from IO scheduler " Ming Lei
2019-07-16 6:54 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: improvement on handling IO during CPU hotplug John Garry
2019-07-16 7:18 ` Ming Lei
2019-07-16 8:13 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91f2a5ce-614a-1e4d-6830-81750cf7f708@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox