From: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/7] blk-mq: stop to handle IO before hctx's all CPUs become offline
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:03:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190712090350.GB31048@minwoo-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712024726.1227-4-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On 19-07-12 10:47:22, Ming Lei wrote:
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index e5ef40c603ca..028c5d78e409 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2205,6 +2205,64 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> +static bool blk_mq_count_inflight_rq(struct request *rq, void *data,
> + bool reserved)
> +{
> + unsigned *count = data;
> +
> + if ((blk_mq_rq_state(rq) == MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT))
> + (*count)++;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +unsigned blk_mq_tags_inflight_rqs(struct blk_mq_tags *tags)
> +{
> + unsigned count = 0;
> +
> + blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(tags, blk_mq_count_inflight_rq, &count);
> +
> + return count;
> +}
Ming,
Maybe it can be static?
> +
> +static void blk_mq_drain_inflight_rqs(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> +{
> + while (1) {
> + if (!blk_mq_tags_inflight_rqs(hctx->tags))
> + break;
> + msleep(5);
> + }
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-12 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-12 2:47 [RFC PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: improvement on handling IO during CPU hotplug Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] blk-mq: add new state of BLK_MQ_S_INTERNAL_STOPPED Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] blk-mq: add blk-mq flag of BLK_MQ_F_NO_MANAGED_IRQ Ming Lei
2019-07-16 2:53 ` John Garry
2019-07-16 6:08 ` Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] blk-mq: stop to handle IO before hctx's all CPUs become offline Ming Lei
2019-07-12 9:03 ` Minwoo Im [this message]
2019-07-16 3:03 ` John Garry
2019-07-16 6:12 ` Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] blk-mq: add callback of .free_request Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] SCSI: implement .free_request callback Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] blk-mq: re-submit IO in case that hctx is dead Ming Lei
2019-07-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] blk-mq: handle requests dispatched from IO scheduler " Ming Lei
2019-07-16 6:54 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: improvement on handling IO during CPU hotplug John Garry
2019-07-16 7:18 ` Ming Lei
2019-07-16 8:13 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190712090350.GB31048@minwoo-desktop \
--to=minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox