From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"jthumshirn@suse.de" <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"stern@rowland.harvard.edu" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"adrian.hunter@intel.com" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/3] scsi_mq: enable runtime PM
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:43:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <63b1f80c-00bf-3244-3ba0-337aba1b1c82@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVNpyOENs=F1pkiwTVfD6H9essfbcc8_-zQOrG56Fs1w=Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/18/2018 02:06 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>> On 7/17/18 9:38 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 03:34:35PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 23:30 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 03:24:11PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 04:06:02PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>>>>> Usually SCSI supports runtime PM, so pass BLK_MQ_F_SUPPORT_RPM to blk-mq
>>>>>>> core for enabling block runtime PM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I still think enabling this unconditionally for any SCSI device was
>>>>>> a mistake, and it is even more so for blk-mq.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please only opt in for ufs, ATA first, adding others if wanted by
>>>>>> maintainers.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, this way will cause regression because runtime PM works for
>>>>> all sd/sr device actually, and it isn't related with scsi host.
>>>>
>>>> For which SCSI devices other than ufs and ATA do we need PM support?
>>>
>>> As I said, it is any sd/sr device, which can be put down by runtime PM
>>> via START_STOP command if it isn't used for a while.
>>
>> Christoph is basically echoing my concerns. Why don't we just enable
>> it on slower devices, similarly to what we do for adding
>> randomness? Nobody wants to pay this overhead for faster devices,
>> since most people won't care.
>
> IMO the problem isn't related with slow or quick device, it is related with
> the system, especially when it cares about power consumption, such as
> mobile phone, or laptop or servers with lots of disks attached. And we know
> it is often to see some fast disks shipped in laptop, such as NVMe, or other
> SSD.
>
But those typically have dedicated (transport/driver) mechanism to put
the device to sleep, _and_ START STOP UNIT will be emulated for those
devices anyway.
I'd rather advocate to move runtime PM into the individual
subsystems/drivers, and _not_ abuse START STOP UNIT here.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-18 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-13 8:05 [PATCH RFC V2 0/3] blk-mq: support runtime PM Ming Lei
2018-07-13 8:06 ` [PATCH RFC V2 1/3] block: put runtime PM code into common helpers Ming Lei
2018-07-17 13:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-13 8:06 ` [PATCH RFC V2 2/3] blk-mq: prepare for supporting runtime PM Ming Lei
2018-07-13 20:16 ` Alan Stern
2018-07-17 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-13 8:06 ` [PATCH RFC V2 3/3] scsi_mq: enable " Ming Lei
2018-07-17 13:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-17 15:30 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-17 15:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-17 15:38 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-17 19:50 ` hch
2018-07-17 20:54 ` Alan Stern
2018-07-17 21:49 ` Jens Axboe
2018-07-18 12:06 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-18 12:28 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-18 12:37 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-18 14:12 ` Alan Stern
2018-07-18 14:18 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-18 15:01 ` Alan Stern
2018-07-19 6:41 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-19 14:35 ` Alan Stern
2018-07-19 14:43 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-18 14:50 ` Jens Axboe
2018-07-18 18:46 ` Alan Stern
2018-07-18 23:08 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-18 12:43 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2018-07-18 13:05 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-13 14:21 ` [PATCH RFC V2 0/3] blk-mq: support " Jens Axboe
2018-07-14 2:37 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-14 2:54 ` Jens Axboe
2018-07-16 16:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-16 16:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-17 1:12 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=63b1f80c-00bf-3244-3ba0-337aba1b1c82@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox