From: Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: discard synchronous on most SSDs?
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:48:56 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1566234.HjNzCBAKa5@quad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4448214.x9oPWjPhdL@quad>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 965 bytes --]
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 04:25:05 PM Chris Samuel wrote:
> I wonder if it would be possible to use that knowledge to extend the
> smartctl's --identify functionality to report this?
After reading the SATA 3.1 spec I believe that smartctl *can* indicate if a
drive claims to support SATA 3.1 NCQ TRIM, thus:
$ sudo smartctl --identify /dev/sdb | fgrep 'Trim bit in DATA SET MANAGEMENT'
169 0 1 Trim bit in DATA SET MANAGEMENT command supported
$
If that command returns nothing then it's not reported as supported (and I've
tested that). You can get the same info with hdparm -I.
Of course, as Martin said, that doesn't necessarily mean the kernel is using
that reported ability.
My puzzle now is that I have two SSD drives that report supporting NCQ TRIM
(one confirmed via product info) but report only supporting SATA 3.0 not 3.1.
cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 482 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-15 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-09 7:48 Massive BTRFS performance degradation KC
2014-03-09 8:17 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2014-03-09 10:01 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-03-09 10:23 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2014-03-09 11:33 ` Hugo Mills
2014-03-09 11:54 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-03-09 12:10 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2014-03-09 17:14 ` boris
2014-03-14 2:11 ` discard synchronous on most SSDs? Marc MERLIN
2014-03-14 3:39 ` Chris Murphy
2014-03-14 5:17 ` Marc MERLIN
2014-03-14 7:33 ` Chris Samuel
2014-03-14 19:26 ` Marc MERLIN
2014-03-14 19:57 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-03-14 20:46 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2014-03-15 4:21 ` Marc MERLIN
2014-03-15 9:38 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2014-03-15 5:25 ` Chris Samuel
2014-03-15 6:48 ` Chris Samuel [this message]
2014-03-15 11:26 ` Duncan
2014-03-15 22:48 ` Chris Samuel
2014-03-16 6:06 ` Marc MERLIN
2014-03-16 17:09 ` Chris Murphy
2014-03-16 16:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-03-16 17:50 ` Marc MERLIN
2014-03-15 4:06 ` Chris Samuel
2014-03-16 16:07 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-03-14 12:07 ` Duncan
2014-03-14 21:44 ` Chris Murphy
2014-03-14 7:27 ` Chris Samuel
2014-03-09 17:36 ` Massive BTRFS performance degradation Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-03-09 18:55 ` Tobias Holst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1566234.HjNzCBAKa5@quad \
--to=chris@csamuel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox