From: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
To: Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>,
Christopher Corsi <cjmovie@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: discard synchronous on most SSDs?
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:26:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140314192605.GD6143@merlins.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJvTjgh4+SW6qx_v2eaXYwOrNo8xK5L3gkS45yhXzvtJp954zw@mail.gmail.com> <pan$667da$c4955705$c59674a0$a844850c@cox.net> <5289248.oqpgSKG6td@quad>
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:07:54PM +0000, Duncan wrote:
> Marc MERLIN posted on Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:17:50 -0700 as excerpted:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 09:39:02PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mar 13, 2014, at 8:11 PM, Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:33:50AM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote:
> >> >> discard is, except on the very latest hardware, a synchronous
> >> >> command (it's a limitation of the SATA standard), and therefore
> >> >> results in very very poor performance.
> >> >
> >> > Interesting. How do I know if a given SSD will hang on discard?
> >> > Is a Samsung EVO 840 1TB SSD latest hardware enough, or not? :)
> >>
> >> smartctl -a or -x will tell you what SATA revision is in place. The
> >> queued trim support is in SATA Rev 3.1. I'm not certain if this
> >> requires only the drive to support that revision level, or both
> >> controller and drive.
> >
> > I'm not sure I'm seeing this, which field is that?
>
> > ATA Version is: 8
> > ATA Standard is: ATA-8-ACS revision 4c
>
> Your drive didn't report it, but here, I have SATA fields as well, in
> addition to the ATA fields:
>
> Here's the fields from my Corsair Neutron SSDs:
>
> ATA Version is: ATA8-ACS (minor revision not indicated)
> SATA Version is: SATA 2.5, 6.0 Gb/s
>
> Here's the fields from my Seagate 500-gig 2.5-inch spinning rust:
>
> ATA Version is: ATA8-ACS T13/1699-D revision 4
> SATA Version is: SATA 2.6, 3.0 Gb/s
Ok, my smartmontools was too old. I got a newer one and now have proper
output:
Device Model: Samsung SSD 840 EVO 1TB
Serial Number: S1D9NEAD934600N
LU WWN Device Id: 5 002538 85009a8ff
Firmware Version: EXT0BB0Q
User Capacity: 1,000,204,886,016 bytes [1.00 TB]
Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical
Rotation Rate: Solid State Device
Device is: Not in smartctl database [for details use: -P showall]
ATA Version is: ACS-2, ATA8-ACS T13/1699-D revision 4c
SATA Version is: SATA 3.1, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 6.0 Gb/s)
Local Time is: Fri Mar 14 10:49:39 2014 PDT
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
So I have Sata 3.1, that's great news, it means I can keep using discard
without worrying about performance and hangs
Thanks,
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-14 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-09 7:48 Massive BTRFS performance degradation KC
2014-03-09 8:17 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2014-03-09 10:01 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-03-09 10:23 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2014-03-09 11:33 ` Hugo Mills
2014-03-09 11:54 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-03-09 12:10 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2014-03-09 17:14 ` boris
2014-03-14 2:11 ` discard synchronous on most SSDs? Marc MERLIN
2014-03-14 3:39 ` Chris Murphy
2014-03-14 5:17 ` Marc MERLIN
2014-03-14 7:33 ` Chris Samuel
2014-03-14 19:26 ` Marc MERLIN [this message]
2014-03-14 19:57 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-03-14 20:46 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2014-03-15 4:21 ` Marc MERLIN
2014-03-15 9:38 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2014-03-15 5:25 ` Chris Samuel
2014-03-15 6:48 ` Chris Samuel
2014-03-15 11:26 ` Duncan
2014-03-15 22:48 ` Chris Samuel
2014-03-16 6:06 ` Marc MERLIN
2014-03-16 17:09 ` Chris Murphy
2014-03-16 16:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-03-16 17:50 ` Marc MERLIN
2014-03-15 4:06 ` Chris Samuel
2014-03-16 16:07 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-03-14 12:07 ` Duncan
2014-03-14 21:44 ` Chris Murphy
2014-03-14 7:27 ` Chris Samuel
2014-03-09 17:36 ` Massive BTRFS performance degradation Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-03-09 18:55 ` Tobias Holst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140314192605.GD6143@merlins.org \
--to=marc@merlins.org \
--cc=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=chris@csamuel.org \
--cc=cjmovie@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox