public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sander <sander@humilis.net>
To: Mike Ramsey <MikeJRamsey@comcast.net>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Phoronix article slaming BTRFS
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:20:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090624082009.GA16357@cumulus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20090624T021752-858@post.gmane.org>

Mike Ramsey wrote (ao):
> Depends on who you talk to.
> 
> http://www.tomshardware.com/news/ocz-ssd-vertex-intel-solid-state,7127.html
> 
> "OCZ Says Its New Vertex SSD Beats Intel's X25-E"
> 
> I am not taking sides.  I am just saying that the SSD market is fluid.

Read and write speeds specs mean (almost) nothing when it comes to SSD.

The true performance is shown in heavy long-running benchmarks. OCZ has
a long history of very bad performing SSD products.

The Intel SSD did set the standard since it came on the market (hence
the reason OCZ mentions the X25-E).

Btw, not only benchmarks show paper specs mean (almost) nothing: check
the OCZ forums and google on real life usage performance problems
(stutters mostly) under normal to low load.

Especially small writes kill OCZ SSD performance, although their
products have improved with the last releases.

	With kind regards, Sander

-- 
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-24  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-23  2:51 Phoronix article slaming BTRFS Mike Ramsey
2009-06-23 10:13 ` Miguel F Mascarenhas Sousa Filipe
     [not found]   ` <2d23818a0906231026g6e4567fdv8eda3d6c4828ef4d@mail.gmail.com>
2009-06-23 17:28     ` Jaime sanchez
2009-06-24  1:27       ` Mike Ramsey
2009-06-24  2:20         ` Wil Reichert
2009-06-24  2:47           ` Mike Ramsey
2009-06-24  9:31             ` Bron Gondwana
2009-06-24 12:57               ` Mike Ramsey
2009-06-25  1:32                 ` Bron Gondwana
2009-06-23 14:41 ` Chris Mason
2009-06-23 14:53   ` Sander
2009-06-23 15:17     ` Chris Mason
2009-06-23 16:19   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-06-23 16:30     ` Chris Mason
2009-06-24  2:20     ` Mike Ramsey
2009-06-24  8:20       ` Sander [this message]
2009-06-24  8:31       ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-24 13:11         ` Mike Ramsey
2009-06-24 17:38           ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-25  8:43             ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-06-23 17:30 ` Jaime sanchez
2009-06-23 17:44   ` nightrow
2009-06-23 18:27     ` Jaime sanchez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090624082009.GA16357@cumulus \
    --to=sander@humilis.net \
    --cc=MikeJRamsey@comcast.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox