Re: Phoronix article slaming BTRFS

[nightrow <nightrow@gmail.com>]

If you look here : http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page in=20
the benchmarking section, you will notice that the test was made more=20
than one month ago.
I also mentionned, as said by chris on phoronix phorums, that kernel=20
starting from 2.6.30 should be faster.

I think we should expect them to run it periodicaly against newer versi=
on.

I made the link to the phoronix test. They may not be the best, but thi=
s=20
is all I found. If you find any better test, don't hesitate to add them=
=2E

disclaimer: I'm not a btrfs developer, just a entusiast that follows
the developement.

Jb benoit.

Jaime sanchez wrote :
> They are using 2.6.29.4 kernel, it isn't a bit old??
>
> I think that kernel doesn't have the last btrfs updates, and that it
> is a very bad work and benchmarks results from phoronix part. If u ar=
e
> benchmarking an experimental filesystem benchmark it with the lastest
> updaets =BF? it doesn't have sense.
>
>  =20



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html