public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Ramsey <MikeJRamsey@comcast.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Phoronix article slaming BTRFS
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:20:10 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20090624T021752-858@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090623181935.2b01c17d.skraw@ithnet.com

Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw <at> ithnet.com> writes:

[snip]
> 
> Can someone explain to a quite naive person like me why one should be
> interested in SSDs that perform worse than Intel? Why shouldn't I just buy the
> best-performing product? This is a moving market, and it is obvious that the
> bad performers will be left behind...
> If you really care to fiddle with ssd options then use a real bad hw for
> testing the performance - take an ide interface and connect a CF card.
> This is a common setup for embedded usage and frequently used. Everything in
> between CF and Intel will just be dead before your fs options will become
> really stable. So why loose time with it?
> 

Depends on who you talk to.

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/ocz-ssd-vertex-intel-solid-state,7127.html

"OCZ Says Its New Vertex SSD Beats Intel's X25-E"

I am not taking sides.  I am just saying that the SSD market is fluid.

--Mike Ramsey




  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-24  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-23  2:51 Phoronix article slaming BTRFS Mike Ramsey
2009-06-23 10:13 ` Miguel F Mascarenhas Sousa Filipe
     [not found]   ` <2d23818a0906231026g6e4567fdv8eda3d6c4828ef4d@mail.gmail.com>
2009-06-23 17:28     ` Jaime sanchez
2009-06-24  1:27       ` Mike Ramsey
2009-06-24  2:20         ` Wil Reichert
2009-06-24  2:47           ` Mike Ramsey
2009-06-24  9:31             ` Bron Gondwana
2009-06-24 12:57               ` Mike Ramsey
2009-06-25  1:32                 ` Bron Gondwana
2009-06-23 14:41 ` Chris Mason
2009-06-23 14:53   ` Sander
2009-06-23 15:17     ` Chris Mason
2009-06-23 16:19   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-06-23 16:30     ` Chris Mason
2009-06-24  2:20     ` Mike Ramsey [this message]
2009-06-24  8:20       ` Sander
2009-06-24  8:31       ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-24 13:11         ` Mike Ramsey
2009-06-24 17:38           ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-25  8:43             ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-06-23 17:30 ` Jaime sanchez
2009-06-23 17:44   ` nightrow
2009-06-23 18:27     ` Jaime sanchez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=loom.20090624T021752-858@post.gmane.org \
    --to=mikejramsey@comcast.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox