Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC][PATCH] Sector Size check during Mount
@ 2011-11-30  1:44 Keith Mannthey
  2011-11-30 15:06 ` Chris Mason
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Keith Mannthey @ 2011-11-30  1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs

Gracefully fail when trying to mount a BTRFS file system that has a
sectorsize smaller than PAGE_SIZE.  

On PPC it is possible to build a FS while using a 4k PAGE_SIZE kernel
then boot into a 64K PAGE_SIZE kernel.  Presently open_ctree fails in an
endless loop and hangs the machine in this situation. 

My debugging has show this Sector size < Page size to be a non trivial
situation and a graceful exit from the situation would be nice for the
time being. 


Signed-off-by:  Keith Mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>

---

diff -urN a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c	2011-10-09 21:53:11.000000000 -0500
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c	2011-11-29 17:33:15.000000000 -0600
@@ -1916,6 +1916,12 @@
 		goto fail_sb_buffer;
 	}
 
+	if (sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "btrfs: Incompatible sector size "
+		       "found on %s\n", sb->s_id);
+		goto fail_sb_buffer;
+	}
+
 	mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
 	ret = btrfs_read_sys_array(tree_root);
 	mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC][PATCH] Sector Size check during Mount
  2011-11-30  1:44 [RFC][PATCH] Sector Size check during Mount Keith Mannthey
@ 2011-11-30 15:06 ` Chris Mason
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2011-11-30 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Keith Mannthey; +Cc: linux-btrfs

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 05:44:12PM -0800, Keith Mannthey wrote:
> Gracefully fail when trying to mount a BTRFS file system that has a
> sectorsize smaller than PAGE_SIZE.  
> 
> On PPC it is possible to build a FS while using a 4k PAGE_SIZE kernel
> then boot into a 64K PAGE_SIZE kernel.  Presently open_ctree fails in an
> endless loop and hangs the machine in this situation. 
> 
> My debugging has show this Sector size < Page size to be a non trivial
> situation and a graceful exit from the situation would be nice for the
> time being. 

Thanks.  The large block size patches should finally go into 3.3, which
will make a big difference.

-chris

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-30 15:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-30  1:44 [RFC][PATCH] Sector Size check during Mount Keith Mannthey
2011-11-30 15:06 ` Chris Mason

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox